Youtube comments of L.W. Paradis (@l.w.paradis2108).
-
950
-
848
-
527
-
437
-
431
-
425
-
395
-
388
-
385
-
383
-
376
-
372
-
362
-
360
-
355
-
350
-
335
-
313
-
312
-
305
-
299
-
293
-
264
-
256
-
252
-
248
-
243
-
231
-
219
-
212
-
205
-
202
-
202
-
199
-
190
-
189
-
187
-
185
-
182
-
182
-
181
-
179
-
174
-
173
-
172
-
170
-
166
-
164
-
162
-
157
-
156
-
155
-
147
-
145
-
144
-
142
-
142
-
141
-
140
-
140
-
139
-
136
-
132
-
132
-
131
-
131
-
129
-
129
-
128
-
128
-
128
-
125
-
125
-
125
-
124
-
124
-
124
-
123
-
122
-
118
-
115
-
114
-
113
-
113
-
113
-
113
-
112
-
111
-
111
-
110
-
109
-
109
-
109
-
109
-
108
-
106
-
105
-
104
-
104
-
104
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
102
-
102
-
102
-
101
-
100
-
100
-
99
-
97
-
96
-
96
-
94
-
93
-
93
-
92
-
92
-
92
-
90
-
89
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
88
-
87
-
84
-
84
-
84
-
83
-
82
-
81
-
81
-
81
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
78
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
73
-
73
-
73
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
72
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
71
-
69
-
68
-
68
-
68
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
52
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
Once you are full grown, always remember: if you apply for a job and are rejected, you don't know why. You don't know why the person hired was hired. If you apply to a prestigious school, or for a loan, or an internship, same story. Don't read the articles on how to interview, etc., as though they were written in good faith. Don't be immobilized by self-reproach. Watch this video and think. Sex, drugs, money, . . . who knows what changed hands?
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
No, I'm sorry -- ignoring the larger picture in this instance is unacceptable. Greece was pushed to the brink, and essentially did collapse in 2015, and for years, 25 to 30% of those under 25 had no job and no hope of finding a job. It is an EU neo-colony. When Greece elected a decent government, it was not allowed to govern. The banks decided policy instead. And then, the very same forces who did this also determined that Greece should be the stopping place for all refugees. Can you be serious? At the very end, Helen Benedict gives a nod to "a few nice Greek people -- they aren't all racists." Benedict, who has had her choice of living in London or New York her entire life, is going to pontificate to a people who still see no solution for their own predicament. She is the embodiment of petite bonne femme bien pensante. I'm not sure whether the Greeks are racist, but I have no doubt the English are. After all, they don't have to live there.
26
-
26
-
You are being lied to, and it is a vastly simpler than you think. People label certain postures as signs of weakness, and react mindlessly to them, not mindfully. Blaming a victim is convenient -- you even see abused children blamed, even preschool children. This is convenient because it lets bystanders off the hook. If the victim is responsible, then they can conveniently turn their backs and be on their way. How nice.
Consider this: you are a passenger in a solid car with a great driver at 10 am on a dry, sunny day. You get broadsided by a drunk driver, hit and run. You have zero responsibility for the accident, yet full responsibility for participating in your rehab and doing all the exercises, eating well, and making your psychological needs known in an appropriate way. That's already a lot. And zero of it is your fault. Not a tiny bit. Literally zero. Think this through.
I recommend a real book: Peter Levine, In an Unspoken Voice. Please get that, and take your time with it.
There's also The Body Keeps the Score, and In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts. These are real books by real people.
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
@josec1538 Dore agrees with you that joking was wrong. That is why he delivered a formal apology, in writing, promised never to make crass jokes like that again, also in writing, and gave Ana a small gift -- SEVEN YEARS AGO. And now, because Ana does not like the criticism she so richly deserves, she brings it up. To make Dore stop "running his mouth." And she reminds him of the note wrote. And takes a SWIPE at his WIFE.
It really doesn't matter what anyone thinks of Jimmy. You don't abuse people the way Ana did, to make them bend to her will. She achieved a lot of what she was after. She misjudged Aaron Mate's power in journalism, but she knew that Jimmy's blue collar cultural background and his personal trauma would make him an easy target. Greenwald did the best, drama-free take on what's important about this incident, and related it to many others, to show why it matters.
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
@@jassasingh9880 I used to think that. Then the meth labs invaded the lovely small towns all over the US. I shudder to think what opioids have done, to the once wonderful places. As for Canada, I could never get in, and it's too cold anyway, and with strange politics now, that I cannot comprehend. Anyway, thank you so much!
Where my family lives has the same weather as Rome! :) I lived in Paris, and the quality of life was lower there, than where I plan to go. The world has become very strange. I would never have predicted the last three years, not by any stretch, not ever.
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
@gaiangalaxy3198 Spoiled? I'm not an American, I'm non-Western, and I avoid speaking English whenever possible. Very bad guessing, but in line with the false flag narrative you are apparently pushing.
You seem to want people to refuse to be vaccinated for extraneous reasons, having nothing to do with a rational cost-benefit analysis, and certainly nothing to do with their health. You insult them, repeatedly, hoping that will make them mad enough not to be vaccinated.
Or maybe it's simpler. You had the vaccine, you didn't really want it, now you have second thoughts, so of course you want everyone else to be in the same position as you are. That's common, too. The simplest explanation is usually the best.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
THIS is what's disturbing.
We've been lied to so much, and systematically, and by now, everyone must know it. If your friend had actually watched the video or read a complete transcript, and come away feeling uneasy, thinking it could be antisemitic, all on their very own, without hearing someone else say it first, then there is a simple disagreement about interpreting facts we have in common.
This, on the other hand, is sinister.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric concerning "Judeo-Christian" values, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions in what Bannon is on record as having said. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that were implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the economic destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan word in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables in this picture. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of Trump's and the Republicans' election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere. See a pattern here?
So, who was so disappointing? I thought it was illuminating. Bannon is interesting to watch. Nothing ever comes of the good policies he endorses -- especially on taxes! Ha.
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
@patriciacampbell6443 Really? One of my closest friends who always votes Republican and who practices marksmanship tried to get me to take the vaccine.
Now she is sorry she got vaccinated. She did it for her elderly dad, thinking she was protecting him. If my dad had been alive, it probably would have tipped the balance for me as well.
I am far left, by the way. In other countries, the left opposed the mandates. In France the left made it illegal to so much as ask a minor if they were vaccinated, much less to try to force them to take it. After that, no one was asked anymore.
Never follow just American health advice. If Switzerland, Norway, Denmark, Germany, France, etc., aren't doing it -- don't do it. Whatever "it" is!
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@robmoore8393 Did you notice where, in the Q & A, she said she was opposed to criminalizing all treatments for the youth? That is because she does acknowledge that transgender people exist, and that they feel that something is fundamentally wrong from their very earliest memories. She explained how it is never something that just pops up during puberty, nor is it something that is common, especially among biological girls. In fact, it is very rare, and almost always affects boys when it does happen.
The Frontline documentary on the subject was fascinating. Not one transgender child was ever in harmony with their biological sex. Some even looked to be the opposite sex as toddlers, and people spontaneously thought they were. Dysphoria is a key symptom, but something else is definitely going on. Having this disorder suddenly become "trendy" is deeply sinister, and harms actual trans youth, without a doubt.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@gdiwolverinemale2745 I didn't say it was a linear relationship, and it is obvious that it couldn't be. But nice try.
I thought everyone knew about things like marginal value, diminishing returns, etc., which characterize economics. You know, optimization problems; Economics 101.
Re: "national balance sheets" We've had about 40 years of reducing taxes on capital, which has then purchased government bonds and become the government's creditor -- instead of paying taxes, they collect interest on the national debt. In the meantime, industry, farming, and fishing are gutted while the service sector grows. Laws which prohibited banks backed by the government from taking certain risks in highly volatile securities markets have been repealed. Gee. What could go wrong? Oh, I don't know. It should be a blast to find out.
In the meantime, go after seniors. BTW, do you have any familiarity with France? When people get their pension, which secures their basic needs, come what may, they don't usually retire. They very often open their own shop. Sometimes they even paint, or write.
Did you ever wonder why you have to say "bonjour madame, bonjour monsieur" when you walk into a boutique? It's not owned by some conglomerate, it's that older person's joint.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
How are so many people missing the point?
It's simple. Let's say you get a minimum wage job. Great! No problem: you work X hours, you must be paid for X hours, under the Fair Labor Standards Act. You are protected by law. You WILL get what you deserve for sure, based on your work.
But you have higher aspirations. You work very, very hard, and become truly outstanding at what you do. But does that mean you'll be admitted to school, or that you'll get the job? No. There are 100 applicants like you, for fewer than ten seats, and at least 20 or 30 of these applicants are as outstanding as you are, and possibly a little more.
No one is suggesting hard work is not essential. It is all the more essential. But it is "no guarantee." That was the point. More than that: a society where larger and larger numbers of deserving people get less and less is not going to work out, yo.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
I can relate to these sorts or reversals. I've had a cascade of "impossible" events happen, one after another, many times. Please listen to this advice:
First, take the long view. Whatever career you may embark upon before age 40 you will be doing for three decades. So, you have got plenty of time. A lot of people do not really know what they want to do early on, and may not be ready to make a real commitment before age 30. So let go of the past, it matters far, far less than you may think. In fact, being older when you graduate could be an advantage. Just ignore the people who got lucky and went straight through. They are not common in any case, they do not matter -- and they are not you.
Now with that out of the way: Take care of your health. Good food, sleep, exercise -- no shortcuts. You have to. Remember, here, too, being a little older is advantageous. It will make it easier for you to focus and follow through. People are often still a little fragile in early adulthood and don't hit their stride or their prime before their late twenties, or even later.
Third, every major urban area has some pubic university that is essentially open enrollment, and offers night classes. Find the best teachers at that university and study with them -- remember, the teacher is even more important than the subject. Find the right teachers and get the most you can out of it. Don't worry too much about your major right now, or getting a degree -- focus on rebuilding, and being excellent in your work. AND did I mention, studying with the right teachers?
Once you do these things, you'll be in a position to come up with new ideas. You'll see. What happened to you is really unfortunate, and it has disrupted your life, but it does NOT have to determine your future. A lot of people have disrupted lives at the moment. Sometimes disruption is the prelude to new opportunities. This is a good time to take a pause. Your health is your foundation. Put your focus there.
Having some art in your life is also important. What was your favorite thing to do when you were a child? This is an important question to return to from time to time.
One other thing: if you have bad grades on any college transcripts, consider petitioning to have them removed. State your case, make sure they know what happened, and stress that your goal is a true fresh start. Ask someone who is good at this, find out exactly where to address your request and how to write it up, and get it taken care of.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that were implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, obviously in opposition to the noisy crowd outside, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere.
So, who was so disappointing?
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@jimpollard113 The jury agreed. It was, however, within the law to convict, and a different jury might have thought otherwise. The facts were totally misrepresented by MSM, and Rittenhouse, a minor facing adult charges (which I do not agree with doing to any kid), was smeared. And now, the law with respect to self-defense is being misrepresented.
I see nothing good here. Less bad than a conviction for any intentional homicide, which had zero support in the evidence. No one standing up to question the practice of trying juveniles as adults in the first place. Rittenhouse, a lost and traumatized kid, being lionized(!!!) And still being smeared, for that matter. MSM doubles down on smearing him. Nope, nothing good.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
The US was never as bad as it has been since 9/11, either, and is falling fast. Today's US is not a good picture of what it once was like. It was much freer, and people born right after WWII had huge opportunities. A 1970 college grad could go to any city and find a job, and afford an apartment. Minimum wage and a couple of roommates could make Manhattan rent.
But the Five Eyes are very worried about the non-Western world, that is clear, especially Russia, Serbia, etc. NATO isn't as solid as it was. The elites in NATO countries are tight with US/UK, maybe more than ever, but many people in France, Spain, Greece, and even Germany see through US/UK and want to cooperate with Russia.
There is literally no anti-Slavic prejudice in France. It was a breath of fresh air living there.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@christheghostwriter Re: your last paragraph
I thought of that myself. I shouldn't be doing this for free. All the aftereffects of the pandemic haven't been shed yet, which is why I'm still commenting.
(Needless to say, I never joined Facebook, Twitter, etc., under any name -- or this platform, before the shutdowns.)
My license is in California, not Florida.
Look, it's plain that you don't know the law. What does distress me is that First and Fourth Amendment rights are being undermined drastically, from all corners. Maybe you should stop and think about whether you want to be a part of that. Forget about me, lol. This is bigger than the both of us.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
P-J Proudhom As a cover, so that when, for example, he suddenly emerges as the owner of more American farmland than any other person (and uses it for things like GMO expansion and carbon "offsets"), or it turns out that he went to Epstein's apartment more than one time, he can point to one of his vaccine programs and say "but philanthropy!!! Are you against philanthropy???"
I can think of an analogy that might impress you: when the Clintons' dealings with Russian uranium schemes, or crucial role in ill-advised bombing campaigns, or . . . um, Epstein, are revealed, they can say, "but misogyny!!! But vast right-wing conspiracy! But, but Trump something something RUSSIA!!!"
In the meantime, let's all empower women and girls.
You really don't get it? How sweet.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@JanetSmith900 I think it is very unlikely that anyone actually repels other people, and in any event, dwelling on it cannot possibly lead to any desirable outcome.
I've been around, and I have never seen it. Envy, resentment, or fear of being labeled a "certain kind" of person are the usual reasons for shunning someone or abusing them, coupled with what I said before: fear of being called upon to stand up for another person or help them in some other, tangible way.
You'd be surprised how common envy is. You may think you have nothing to envy . . . Guess again. It is more random than you might think. When something (like envy) is common, it sometimes lands on a person because they happen to be present. If someone else had been there, they would have been targeted instead.
Try observing people who seem to be popular and who seem to be unpopular, as dispassionately as possible, and then try to identify patterns. Then see whether you have a tendency to talk yourself out of your impressions ("that can't be," "that must be," etc.). There is little "can't be" and less "must be" in this world.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@cozytown5540 The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric concerning "Judeo-Christian" values, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions in what Bannon is on record as having said. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that were implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the economic destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan word in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables in this picture. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, clearly indicating disapproval of the din outside, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of Trump's and the Republicans' election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, when he said "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas. All dead in the water. Mysteriously.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere. See a pattern here?
So, who was so disappointing? I thought it was illuminating. Bannon is interesting to watch. Nothing ever comes of the few good policies he endorses -- especially on taxes!
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
Just checked the statistics --- the largest number of workers in the manufacturing sector, in terms of total workers and not as a percentage of the total labor force, occurred during the Carter administration: roughly 20 million people. So, later than we thought. Pre-Reagan, not coincidentally.
The purchasing power of the minimum wage peaked about ten years earlier, around 1968 or 1969. Back then, a couple starting out, both working full time for the minimum wage, could afford an apartment anywhere: San Francisco, Denver, Seattle, Chicago, New York, Boston, . . . literally anywhere.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@jamesmorrow1646 What vaccines are EUA, developed in a year, contain nanoparticles, and required four shots in under 18 months? None before these.
If Medication A has sufficient characteristics of a vaccine to be called a vaccine, it does not mean that it shares all the other, positive characteristics of other vaccines. Hence it makes no sense to say "vaccines save lives," AND ascribe that characteristic to this new medication. Whether, on balance, IT saves lives, AND has an acceptable risk profile for all age groups for which is has been prescribed, is precisely what is at issue. This is to be proved, not assumed. Precautionary Principle 101.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@jordan2170 I didn't intend for it to come across that way, but you're right.
In this video, Dore concedes that he is NOT as knowledgeable as Seder. (Well, no kidding.) In other videos, Seder falls all over himself looking for ways to disrespect Dore as a person. The fact is, Dore has been uncanny at times in showing exactly the right political instincts. And at other times not. He was traumatized by having to declare bankruptcy when he developed a very rare bone disorder, and he still feels ashamed about it, because he wasn't raised to view bankruptcy as just some paperwork to fill out. It still shows. Of course it clouds his views. And sometimes it gives him insights that people who will always have enough money to pay a doctor will never grasp, because they don't know what it feels like not to have means for real necessities. They have no idea. So, I value his perspective, even though it will not always be right.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that were implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere.
So, who was so disappointing?
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric concerning "Judeo-Christian" values, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions in what Bannon is on record as having said. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that were implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the economic destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan word in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables in this picture. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of Trump's and the Republicans' election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere. See a pattern here?
So, who was so bad? I thought it was illuminating. Bannon is interesting to watch. Nothing ever comes of the good policies he endorses -- especially on taxes! Ha.
Envy of the young is always such a sad stance to adopt. That is one war you cannot win. Thank goodness.
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
A hyper-individualistic, money-driven, and yet socially conformist society is very hard to live in. At least one of those three must have a safety valve.
Most societies are less individualistic. Some are individualistic and money-driven, but allow for more eccentricity, and celebrate quirkiness (think Britain). Money is important, but in most places it isn't everything, and people completely obsessed with it are shunned, not admired. Nor do most people expect to be liked by everyone, or seek that out. The tyranny of "popularity" is imposed on us, to the point where it can affect our very ability to make a living -- or, it can make someone rich for no obvious reason.
We have a hard row to hoe.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@otomicans6580 The DNC is now an elitist, corporatist neoliberal party. It does a lot of window dressing, but never stands against Wall Street deregulation, an ever-growing surveillance state, a huge military presence all over the world, or any system of health care or higher education that Wall Street cannot draw advantage from in some way (health insurance schemes designed in the interests of capital formation, student debt that cannot be discharged, etc.) Gay rights, marijuana legalization, etc., are now good for business and can also be used as wedge issues and distractions.
Whether unfettered immigration drives down wages and causes dislocation, and whether NAFTA harmed some parts of Mexico so much that the people are driven to go north for work, is almost never discussed. If you try to broach the subject, you'll be accused of racism immediately, when the people who set up this system clearly had no concern for the immigrants. Worse yet, so many immigrants are refugees WE created. Now, we refuse them shelter and a fair hearing. How far right is that?
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@nevillegoddard4966 So . . . The new list of Bad Foods includes . . . Red onions, fresh garlic, ginger, parsley, olive oil, avocados, black olives, capers, kimchi, goat kefir, broccoli, zucchini, red kale, spinach, tangerines, blueberries, raspberries, cherries . . . Sure, buddy. LOL
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@Rokaize Did you READ the complaint? Your understanding is wrong.
Your statement that guns drawn was "reasonable" under the circumstances of this case is purely conclusory, with no basis in the facts. The Graham v. Connor case stands for exactly the opposite principle: reasonableness is an objective standard. It is analogous to the "reasonable person" standard. It is not based on what these officers thought was reasonable, but on what a reasonable officer, properly trained (and not, say, prone to brutality or hysteria) would consider appropriate under all the facts and circumstances of the encounter. By your logic, that would allow almost anything. In fact, it does not. What in Graham v. Connor sounds to you like highly general language is in fact quite technical.
Naming something a felony stop, or devlaring it to be high risk does not make it so. Probable cause to believe a felony is in progress or is imminent is required. Why would a driver that does not speed up in response to sirens be considered a felon or high risk?
I used to advise judges on the law in the cases before them. So I wrote bench memoranda on the briefs and records of both sides, criminal and defense, federal level. Give it up. You thought insults would land?
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@SuMMeRFLi5 First of all, you do not have the correct timeline, which her own attorney presented during the press conference she called to announce her lawsuit. The search of the child's backpack was not initiated by her report. Second, you have no evidence that Ohio law requires her to immediately call the police due to the suspicion she had and articulated, which is the only thing that counts with respect to her suit. Third, even if it were true that calling police was required, it does not block her law suit. A mistake, even of that nature, is not full assumption of risk.
(Where did YOU go to law school? Don't worry, attorneys know how to keep people like you, who think you know the law better than the judge does, off of juries.)
6
-
@m3ke68 Take a look at where the most powerful people in each branch of government went to school. Then see where CEOs of major companies studied, including the ones where the founders did not finish a Bachelor's. Higher ed is more stratified than ever.
When I was a kid, a full-time summer job covered a full year's of in-state tuition everywhere: Texas, Michigan, Virginia, Wisconsin, Illinois, California. No exceptions. And a degree from any one of those schools wasn't quite at the level of the advantages Harvard/Yale/Princeton, etc., would give you, but it provided great opportunities. That's long over.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@somebody700 WHAT welfare? Literally EVERY developed country has a generous social safety net compared with America. We have food stamps for families whose breadwinners work full time and make minimum wage. We have an educational system the funding of which is based on the market price of the real property surrounding a school. We have no universal health care. We have real wages declining for two full generations now, not one. We have gig jobs with no benefits, no disability insurance, and no unemployment compensation until the current national emergency.
This is so dire that the recent Stockton experiment, giving people $500 a month, no strings, worked spectacularly well -- those who got the cushion were MORE likely to get a new job, by far. Of COURSE. They could buy a new laptop and a new set of clothes! A few of them could think about taking a community college class, I'm sure. Might have been the first time in a long time they felt less stressed.
Do you have any black friends? I don't mean in your community, I mean who live in a poorer one. Do you have any idea how hard they work for very little money? You really don't know this? You think they're underpaid because they don't work? Wow.
While you're at it, tell us what to do to get Jeff Bezos to work, instead of taking pictures of his . . . for his girlfriend.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@BrotherAlpha First of all, what is your source? Was a multivariate analysis performed? Second, why would such a miracle drug require mandating? That doesn't even make sense. Everyone would want it, wouldn't they? You simply have to persuade them. That shouldn't be difficult. Third, why would European countries known for exceptional infant, childhood and teenage health, such as Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, and others of the same caliber in health care, not be recommending the vaccine for young people, and holding off on boosters for those under 50? Why would they do that? (My source is their ministries of health, all of which have pages in English in addition to their languages.) Why would France outlaw mandates for minors? Not rescind, but make it illegal to ask a minor about vaccine status or proof of vaccination? Fourth, why would a recently published German study show that at least 20% of unexpected deaths at home may be associated with heart damage not from illness but from the vaccine? How could that happen? Fifth, why were my relatives in Europe advised not to get boosters? What new information prompted that advice from their (highly qualified) doctors? One of them is 72.
A reason for mandates is always to protect others. We assume that normal, competent adults will want to protect themselves. The vaccines do NOT protect others. We know that now. We also know we were actively misled into believing they did.
The statistic you cited -- are you sure it doesn't pertain to the childhood measles vaccine? The measles vaccine is known to reduce all-cause mortality. Live attenuated vaccines are the ones that are most likely to show that effect.
Look at all these inhuman people, who "don't matter." A human person such as yourself must be lonely by now. How do you stand it?
WOW am I glad I can get out of the West. Thank gawd for the language barrier, too.
P. S. Does Novak Djokovic count?🤣
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@planettoybox Once he spoke with you and agreed to represent you, he cannot do that. He would have to prove the timeline: he already had IBM as a client, then failed to do the proper conflicts check. If he took money from IBM after speaking with you and agreeing to represent you, you could have him disbarred.
Also, this is unusual. This is why firms specialize: you have tort firms and insurance firms, employee firms and management firms. Take a peek to see whether this guy still has his license. In any case, he should have been reported. If it was only an honest error, the bar often issues a reprimand. If it was worse, he could have been in big trouble.
If this could fly, the billionaires could bribe all the lawyers. Lay people don't know and think they have to take it. Depending on when this happened, you could report it now.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
There is a sweet spot for UBI, shown in several compelling studies. Just enough but not too much UBI raises employment: people are more relaxed and give better interviews, they come across as easier to work with, they dress better, get new shoes, get their teeth cleaned, and their nails done. Their health care costs go down.
This has been proven. Is there such a thing as too much UBI? Yes, the data supports that, too, but nowhere near as strongly. Just enough yields greater productivity, not less.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@migarsormrapophis2755 It is fundamentally a part of the concept of LIBERTY.
P. S. OF COURSE I oppose mandatory vaccination against COVID. Law almost always involves balancing interests, very much like in abortion. The vaccines are not nearly safe enough, nearly effective enough, nor necessary to stem an illness that is both highly contagious and highly lethal, to justify encroaching on LIBERTY.
The Fourteenth Amendment also protects the right to marry whomever you choose, the right to have children and to parent them, to use birth control if you choose, or refuse it. So, which do you want to give up?
More to the point, how do you propose to police pregnancy? You'll have to. Have bounty hunters, like Texas? An inquiry in cases of miscarriage? Manslaughter charges against a bar that unknowingly serves a pregnant woman, who then miscarries? And what do you do with the embryos created at fertility clinics?
What happens if a pregnant woman attempts suicide? Incarcerate her? Capital punishment if she survives but the baby doesn't? What happens if someone carries RU 486 across state lines?
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Two things about the wife's mental health and the drugs found in her system: first, if she was experiencing panic disorder, this could have been due to some intuitive sense of not being safe with her husband. That doesn't mean he killed her, because there were certainly other things he did wrong that she may have known or sensed, but her disorder by itself certainly does not make it more likely she committed the crime, either, and her panic could have been exacerbated by feeling unsafe with him.
Second, the medications in her system: never underestimate the fact that major corporate interests are aligned against recognizing that some widely-prescribed drugs are very dangerous to a tiny group of people. So, there were interests involved in suppressing that possibility. That would make it harder for the defense to get a qualified expert to testify for their side.
This is a tough case. Apparently, a lot of people who analyzed his entire statement to police agree it would be hard to fake believing his family was alive without slipping, and hard to fake interest in seeing the video of what happened. But that doesn't point to guilt or innocence, necessarily. It just means he really did have a traumatic memory lapse, making it impossible to assist in his defense.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@ablebaker8664 You understand that a defendant can't say, "we didn't follow procedures that were part of plaintiff's contract because the plaintiff is Really, Really Bad." The correct stance would be, "we followed procedures, and got rid of plaintiff because we determined that she is indeed Really, Really Bad." That's fine, then. They win. I mean, that's the template, right?
A male need not be as bad as Gino. He just has to be someone whose tenure was challenged for a cognizable reason, and who nevertheless got all the procedures to which he was legally entitled. Harvard can't be mesmerized by Badness, no matter how understandable that may be.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@ralsharp6013 Exactly. At college, varsity cheerleading is entirely different, involves certain acrobatics that can be done safely, and includes men and women. But in high school, you often see minor girls sexualized. It depends on the school, but usually the uniforms are in poor taste or skimpy, no boys are involved, and very little gymnastics, acrobatics, or modern dance is taught. So what is it for? To teach girls to cheer boys -- who themselves are playing a school sport where they risk a head injury? I thought school was supposed to be for improving your brain.
I wonder if most people know how odd this is, globally speaking. No one else has sports of this nature for young adolescents.
5
-
5
-
The only people impressed by him are those who really have read nothing. Then he sounds good. And you tend believe him, that this is really what school is, and what kind of propaganda is being pushed at universities, and so forth.
Newsflash: the most common major in America BY FAR is Business, and has been for decades and decades. As for the real "left," which exists in France, Spain, and so forth, it strongly supports teaching Latin and Greek and calculus in public high schools.
Murray has a good job denouncing Gender Studies and so forth. What would he do, that is as easy and lucrative, without the gender warriors? Symbiotic relationship.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Roller_Ghoster Of course my statement makes sense. Look at what OTHER countries are doing. I heard an interview with Dr. Eric Topol, one of the most pro-vaccine, activist doctors around, and HE called the US approach overly "vaccine-centric." I learned from him that Germans and Dutch just go to their pharmacies and pick up home COVID testing kits, for free, and that they have tracing protocols. I like Dr. Topol, he's clearly really smart and an honest guy. He might be right, he might be wrong, but he sure isn't lying.
Look, a lot of other countries are doing better -- or lying. Don't you want to know what's going on with this? Look at the numbers in other parts of the world. Many places with lower vaccination rates have less disease, and many places with high vaccination rates have a lot of breakthrough infections. This is no time for more dumb politics.
5
-
5
-
5
-
@bperez8656 I appreciate your discussion, and willingness to consider different possibilities. The only point I would want to underline is that, unlike being LGB, being trans requires supportive treatments that can be quite extensive and even carry some risk. A person who is gay, etc., may benefit from psychotherapy due in large part to how our society is configured, to marginalize all but the neurotypical heterosexual, but gayness is in no way a disorder. You will not find it in any legitimate DSM, and no surgery or hormones are ever necessary simply because a person is gay, lesbian, or bisexual. This is a reason to ask questions about transgender conditions. No, it isn't clear that it's only the fact that people can now declare who they are that accounts for the numbers. Sure, that could turn out to be true. It may not be. It is not super common sense at all.
A lot of things are happening to the environment, not just global warming, and entire species are dying off at record rates. Every condition causing emotional suffering and increasing in frequency needs to be looked at closely, without preconceived notions. I only fear that we aren't going to see that happening. I don't think gender dysphoria is the only one, and it may not even fall into the category of being due to environmental disruption. I think lots of other things may turn out to be environmentally triggered. I don't trust the current NIH to find out the truth, either.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@annak29 The number of people who participate in ELECTIONS was the issue. Do you believe the extraordinarily high participation rate in the last election, 2020, is a result of, or evidence of, the "vibrancy" of American democracy? When most people voted against the other candidate, rather than for anyone, that is a hard case to make -- regardless of whether or not you believe there were gross irregularities that affected the outcome.
The dismal Democratic primary season, and the lack of any meaningful challenge from the moderate Republicans to Trump in the Republican primaries, and the incessant culture wars nonsense ("impeach Trump!!" "Russia!!!" "Joe is a socialist!" "Antifa is taking over!!") at a time when most people want and need real leadership and actual policies that benefit regular working people, is more evidence of just how "vibrant" the democracy is.
Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, the Davos crowd, etc., and of course MSM have more to say about what's in store for you than anyone you might vote for. Their needs will be met all right. Yours, only by accident.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@billchessell8213 War, of course. But first it creates unstable excess and environmental degradation, which is psychologically very harmful to people. For example, becoming used to luxury that you could suddenly lose creates a lack of resourcefulness and a dependency on that luxury, as well as moments of extreme anxiety. If something happens and the luxury doesn't continue, you are much worse off than if you never had it in the first place. OTOH, having what you need, and having it be largely stable, so that you can count on having it, but being a little bit "hungry" from time to time, is a better balance. It's also the formula for creativity. I'm describing the material conditions of many creative geniuses.
Boom and bust, especially big, big boom and total bust, is horrible. Mental illness, physical illness, violence, suicide, war, extremism, everything. Dangling great wealth in front of us as though it were desirable is such a scam.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@jasonstroon There is very, very limited evidence that vaccines limit spread of the virus. This is because vaccinated people have contracted COVID, but only mild cases. Presumably, they can transmit it, and they may fail to get tested, thinking they cannot get COVID because they were vaccinated, or simply because their COVID feels like a little cold. Hence they may spread it more than those who are careful, get regular tests, wear masks, etc.
We also don't know how long immunity lasts. I've read 6 months. I think they are giving a low estimate as a precaution, but what if it is only 6 months? Booster shots, twice a year? You're sure that's prudent, and safe?
In principle, new virus + new technology, never used en masse, is a greater risk than new virus + traditional vaccine, or known virus + new technology. That's a basic fact of risk assessment. mRNA could turn out to be a real breakthrough, though. I just think caution is in order. So far, this vaccine causes more side effects, especially in women, than just about any other vaccine in general use. Odd, given that men are more likely to develop serious COVID. (Suddenly, we can't be feminists again. Next hashtag, we'll have to be.)
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I did as well, because I read a description on the MIT website of how these mRNA vaccines work.
First of all, I had symptoms of COVID in March 2020, and no test was available to me because I had not been outside the country or in close contact with anyone who had been outside the country -- though I had been very close to a known hotspot, and in lots of crowds shopping for groceries in advance of the shutdowns, in one case standing close to a woman who worked in a major hospital. So, I never found out for sure whether I had COVID.
Second, after reading the MIT description, I decide to use the J & J vaccine instead. I could not find anyone who was offering it, and then it was pulled for a short time, because it had caused blood clots to the brain. That did it. I started asking questions. Those questions were met with the greatest derision and flat-out hatred that I have ever experienced, and that is saying a lot.
Thats when I knew something was very wrong with this picture.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
There are a number of reasons to try this strategy to gain M4A. First, a loss, now, is NOT predictable. What usually happens may not happen this time, because we are not living in normal times. Second, politicians having to go on the record against M4A during a pandemic, in a country shedding jobs like crazy, where health insurance is tied to a job, is a tough calculation for them now. That's what they need to do -- represent us. And if they don't represent us, no more lurking in the shadows. We want the truth in full view. Third, no one ever got anywhere by playing nice -- well, except for career advancement. But real progress? Never.
Other than that, Krystal Ball and Briahna Joy Gray gave more technical reasons why to demand a vote now, and Cornel West is for it on principle. Krystal is an accountant and knows about forensic accounting in addition to journalism, BJG is Harvard Law and Bernie's former press secretary, and Dr. West is plain brilliant. So they are worth the time to read or watch.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric concerning "Judeo-Christian" values, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions in what Bannon is on record as having said. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the economic destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan word in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign. In general, his style of speaking is above that.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables in this picture. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of Trump's and the Republicans' election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere. See a pattern here?
So, who was so disappointing? I thought it was illuminating. Bannon is interesting to watch. Nothing ever comes of the good policies he endorses -- especially on taxes! Ha.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Not only that, but when I was in high-school and college, with people in their late teens and twenties, a serious viral illness -- mononucleosis, food-borne hepatitis, pneumonia, meningitis -- took from 6 months to a full year for the patient to be back to 100% normal, as though they had never been sick. These were people in their prime, not middle-aged people with chronic conditions. The WHO doesn't even consider diagnosing "long COVID" before twelve weeks.
This is very common. When I was a kid, my father called it "post-influenza weakness" and told me to exercise or walk a little bit more each day. He was right.
If you want to make someone really sick, tell them you don't believe "it's a thing." They'll feel worse in a matter of minutes. You might get a fever spike out of them, too.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@hazmat5118 1. "It's not about perfection" is too broad and vague: that could justify a lot of things that no one should accept. That sort of blather proves too much. 2. We were not informed about the risks and benefits, and stories of injuries were systematically suppressed; a vaccine that cannot protect others but only protects the one who takes it, and only for a matter of months, should not be mandatory. 3. I thought of that early on: if this is indeed the product of an accidental lab leak, we may need a vaccine to overcome it. It seems that recent variants are more transmissible and less lethal, which is exactly how natural viruses evolve, so that seems not to be a risk anymore, but we cannot be sure. The next variant could be much more lethal, just as we sometimes have an unusually lethal strain of flu. People have to admit they do not know what they do not know, and quit pretending they do.
Interesting that Fauci suppressed the lab leak theory while insisting that everyone be vaccinated, when the lab leak theory could have furnished another reason to be vaccinated. All I can say is that thank goodness that corona viruses are something we have all encountered, or this would have a far more lethal pandemic.
Too much of what happened over the past three years smacks too much of being a dress rehearsal for something worse.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@utah_koidragon7117 I actually agree with most of this. Almost all, in fact.
Based on the title of the video, I was afraid I would cringe -- but now I see RFK Jr is basically right again. JFK had a national fitness program, the President's Council on Physical Fitness. It's no joke, it is essential. Kids are on SSRIs, ADHD medication, puberty blockers(!) . . . And were forced to take a COVID vaccine almost none of them needed, that was never tested on kids, and had a horrible safety profile for young men. Kids need to be on fresh air and push ups, not these dangerous drugs.
If you ever get a chance, look at Robert Whitaker, Anatomy of an Epidemic -- about how mental illness became an "epidemic" in the US, and how drugs that only a minority of sufferers actually need were pushed on millions, including kids. He explains how companies like Pfizer captured the medical establishment, and he mentions Pfizer by name as the slickest in their marketing.
Looking at those older sources now is eye opening, and truly saddening as well. We don't have many people to defend us. :/
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@bradleyriles3889 There are lots of reasons why the dollar may be fragile, and none of them trace back to democratic government. All of them have to do, in one way or another, with Wall Street's capture of the reins of power. A fragile dollar's ultimate backstop is a huge military. By democratic government, I mean one that strives to embody the will of the people. As for me, I got a degree in a country where I am not a citizen tuition-free; fees were under $1000 per year. This is what college is in most of the rest of the world.
If a person works full-time for $12 an hour for 14 weeks over the summer, they'll have close to $6000, roughly. That's what a year's tuition at a state school should cost, maximum, and not a cent more. (I think it's still too much, personally, but I'm a realist. Of course community college should be tuition-free, fees only, at least for freshmen. Chances are they are there, instead of at university, because of some calamity, a true family tragedy, or because K-12 failed them.)
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@VandeRij-d3k LOL What do people imagine is a good preparation for law school or an MBA/MPA? Take any humanities major, literally any, add a year of introductory calculus, a year of accounting, a few courses in economics, a semester of finance, and a semester of computer science: THAT is what the top programs want, plus two years of work experience. (In college, humanities majors, unlike engineers, are expected to complete a lot of electives outside of their field.)
The most common college major is Business, and has been since Reagan. Without a CPA or advanced finance, that is a joke.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@nicktoofar3514 So, because of monopoly power, small vendors have little choice but to sell on Amazon, and Amazon has the means to analyze the market, which the small vendor was able to stake out at significant risk, then make an imitation of the same product at NO risk, and promote it ahead of the original -- and on top of it, undercut the price. This spells the end of that small vendor. Do you really not appreciate the marginal value of a dollar to a behemoth (basically nil), and the power of concentrated wealth? Of course, Amazon won't do that to everyone, because then the jig would be up. But they can do it to a LOT of people, and keep doing it, because of their dominance. How do you think someone ends up with a net worth the equivalent of 50 million+ bucks a year for every year since Year 1? (How do you think Amazon got to create billionaires without turning a profit for years and years? But that's another story.) Gosh people have no clue how vast fortunes are acquired.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric concerning "Judeo-Christian" values, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions in what Bannon is on record as having said. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that were implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the economic destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan word in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables in this picture. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of Trump's and the Republicans' election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere. See a pattern here?
So, who was so disappointing? I thought it was illuminating. Bannon is interesting to watch. Nothing ever comes of the good policies he endorses -- especially on taxes! Ha.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@MagnoliaZZZZ The early Slavic tribes lived in close proximity to the Continental Celts in central Europe, and got along well. The Continental Celts moved west, and mostly populated France, which was the single most common ethnic group of Europe for several hundred years. The Slavs moved east, and became the largest linguistic group of the major Indo-European languages in Europe (yes, up until recently, there were slightly more Slavic speakers than Germanic language speakers or Romance language speakers; not sure if that is still true and tend to doubt it. Could be.) In short, most Europeans are part French and part Eastern European, once you go back far enough. Also, lots of Italians have ancestry from Ancient Greece. We think of all of those groups as "exotic," only because North America was populated by northwestern Europeans. They weren't typical. They were unusual. Very adventurous, too.
4
-
@iksnaz553 Very interesting. I had not seen these reports. This is excruciating for Gabby's family, being their first holiday without her, but I hope more answers are forthcoming. It seems as though there were a lot of chances to save her life. Not an ordinary case at all.
Did you see her mother on 60 Minutes Australia? I was shocked by how astute, intelligent, and level-headed she was, and she admitted she did not have bad feelings about Brian. She is not changing her story now, either. She comes across great. Sometimes you will see a mom who pushes a daughter to date and so forth, unwisely but with good intentions. Not this mom. I got the feeling nothing escaped her, and that Gabby was very much loved and appreciated, and not pushed to get engaged at a young age.
I've never seen anything like it, frankly. I wouldn't have thought this could happen.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
So sorry! For whatever it may be worth, back when we were in our teens and twenties, everyone I know who developed any serious viral disease -- mononucleosis, hepatitis A, meningitis, pneumonia -- took a full year to feel like themselves, meaning, as if they had never been sick at all. We were young people, and we weren't suffering from a novel virus. Then remember all the people who developed chronic fatigue after a viral illness? I was one, and we were in such despair -- even though it had happened to several of us at the same time. Well, it resolved, for nearly everyone, within a year. I realize we were lucky and that there is no guarantee that will be the case for everyone, but remember, we were told we'd never feel like ourselves again. Within in year, nearly everyone did; within two, everyone was clearly much better. Take good care of yourself! Walk in parks and forests.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@marvelmusic4566 After reading this thread, I hunted down a few videos of Wolf. I don't pretend they were a representative sample -- in fact, in light of the recent censorship, they are likely to be the ones that survived. In any event, from the few I saw, what struck me were all the times she was careful to state that she was not a medical doctor, that she was not a statistician, and that she did not have the necessary expertise to take a hard look at the data. Then she called upon people who have that expertise to get involved.
She had no trouble saying three little truthful words that would have made all the difference over these past three years: "I don't know." I don't hear that from Klein. I don't hear that from any administration mouthpiece.
On the other hand, I also noticed that Wolf sometimes exaggerated the risk of certain side effects that we now know to be common, but that were systematically denied or minimized by the CDC, FDA, NIH, and other bad actors. I don't like or approve of either one, or regard exaggeration to be an antidote to minimization. It isn't. We WERE lied to, by those with an obligation to tell us the truth and keep us safe. The only corrective to lies is scrupulous truth-telling.
On balance, I find Wolf much more likable and believe she is sincere. I also find it much easier to check her claims and forgive her errors, but only because she is more humble and concedes her limitations. But as I said, I don't like or endorse exaggeration any more than the poisonous gaslighting we have been subjected to. Exaggeration makes it too easy to dismiss the truth that the problems with the vaccines are serious and are not being given the attention they deserve --- and to write people off with pressing concerns as "conspiracy theorists." That that move still works (still!!) is disappointing.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Well, when you sue someone for $50,000,000, you have to prove they really harmed you to the tune of $50,000,000, before the court will order the sheriff to seize your bank accounts, assets, pull you out of your house and auction it off, grab your car, etc. You think it should go some other way? The Justin Trudeau approach, maybe? 🤣
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
This is an outstanding video, with complete references. We need to keep an open mind, with no holds barred whatsoever. It will not do to assume that the vaccines are to blame; it has to be examined honestly. There could be a lot of factors; my first concern after the vaccines were introduced was whether people who had had COVID needed these vaccines, or should have them. No answers.
Then, the bullying came. Well, I don't want to make assumptions in response to assumptions. I want to see real gravitas for a change, I want complete honesty. The sheer stress caused by our politicians and public health officials certainly was harmful. Staying indoors for so long was harmful. Those "mitigation" measures may have been worse than the disease for anyone under 40, and a lot of people over 40, 50, 60, . . .
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
The Supreme Court always publishes the briefs, so I can tell you what they are arguing about: there is a long line of precedent that permits consideration of race in addition to a number of other factors, and previous Courts have ruled that a limited use of race in that way was legal as long as things like legacy admissions weighed so strongly against all non-Europeans. Seth Waxman, who was Solicitor General and is in front of the Court all the time, is arguing that the criteria for using race in a limited way was clearly met by Harvard's admissions policy. Well, now you can guess what the other side is arguing: they believe the line of precedent that allows using race should be overturned. The lead attorney for the other side is a U of Chicago and Cambridge (UK -- that Cambridge) grad who once considered becoming an astrophysicist. This gives you an idea of the brainpower applied to this case.
What is at stake also is that Harvard can forgo federal funding. It's a private school, and can continue its admissions policies exactly as they are, as long as it accepts no federal funds. Its policies are not the type that would easily trigger scrutiny under other federal laws. So, in the end, it's about the money.
The big question is why Harvard grads are so heavily advantaged for the rest of their lives. Chief Justice Roberts was a Harvard undergrad and Harvard Law graduate. He really did do well in school his whole life, however, and he wasn't admitted as a legacy. He actually worked in a steel mill one summer.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@justinmyres3487 Total agreement. The term "gender affirming care" itself is much too vague. If a boy wants to wear a dress and nail polish, let him. If a girl wants to wear a crewcut and play hockey, let her. If they get bullied, protect them. If they need counseling, get them counseling. Where does anyone see an imperative for dangerous drugs or body-altering surgery, or a reason to risk life-long infertility? What for? They are much too young to consent.
People at 16 swear they will never get married, at 20 they are sure they don't want children --- and at 34, they meet someone, fall in love, get married, and have their first child. It happens all the time. (Or have we stopped being the land of opportunity?) I say preserve the choice.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@DadSavesAmerica "The labor theory of value is false." Only if you believe value and market price are identical. If they were, then of course that would be true. But we know they are not: both in theory (see, for example, the recent work of Yanis Varoufakis), and from experience (e.g., the way the price of certain mortgage-backed securities collapsed in 2009; the way no organic farmer and no rancher can make what McDonald's makes; the way videos like this one will make much more money than the math videos from Kenya; the way an inferior immunization product just made record profits for investors, and so forth).
Note that I've just given examples from housing, food, education, and health care. That was an accident. It's not like you have to plan that. The examples are everywhere, staring us in the face. Not a pretty picture.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@shaykayback I'll tell you what. When essential workers cannot make ends meet but everywhere you look, you see grifters of every stripe becoming fabulously wealthy, something is very wrong. Who needs to look a hundred years ago (though that brings us to the decade that saw the rise of Hitler and the 1929 stock market crash, incidentally)? Take a look at more recent history, when many people alive today were already born. In 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980 you certainly did not see this many assets in the hands of so very few. What happened? (Can you say "financialization?") Do you think the quality of life is better now? Do you think everyone was "equally poor" in 1970? No. A minimum wage summer job paid for in-state tuition for a full year at the premier state universities throughout the country. Two people making minimum wage could live in any major city -- frugally, but they could. It paid the rent in San Francisco or New York. That's called freedom.
Take a look at all the corporations that have no profits but their founders are billionaires. Hm. How did that happen? Take a look at all the corporations that either pay no taxes, or pay more to lobbyists than they do in taxes. Hm. Odd, isn't it?
When Uber went public, it stated in its IPO documents that its business model may never lead to profitability. Gee. What happened to market discipline?
IOW, don't give me that crap. Don't imagine everyone is stupid.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@RebornLegacy How ironic that in criticizing the post for overstating the issue, you call it "hysterical rambling." I read it again carefully. Not hysterical, and certainly not rambling.
Ideological intolerance is a huge problem, but I think most people do not see how or why it arose. A phenomenally tight labor market, a wildly competitive and expensive system of higher education, with far too few scholarships or opportunities for tuition waivers on the basis of need or merit, an anti-intellectual bent to American society, and . . . the drive to make school "more like a business." Well, there's no First Amendment freedom of speech or expression in most businesses. Most business instead seek to instill "corporate culture," and get rid of whoever doesn't fit in. Once you make university the same, there will be a big fight to see who gets to define the university's corporate culture.
See the documentary "Inside Job" for a clearer picture of the result of these trends. Or consider that Business has been the most popular major for 30 years, and that something called "Financial Engineering" is a hot field.
What is true is that the new neoliberals of government and academe, and their IP cousins, got nothin' on Joe McCarthy.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@makeamericagreatagain3401 Well, in previous generations, this is what minimum wage could do:
1. A full summer of full-time work at the minimum wage equalled a full year of tuition at a state university. Now, only living expenses were left, and people had ways to meet them (part-time jobs, small loans, help from parents, scholarships, work-study).
2. Two roommates working full-time, minimum wage, could afford a small apartment anywhere -- Manhattan, San Francisco, Denver, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston. Then, they had a base from which to find BETTER OPPORTUNITIES.
3. A married couple working minimum wage could afford their own health insurance and save up for a baby. For real. They did not live in Mom's basement. Nope, Mom was now a doting grandma who babysat for their bundle of joy. People had a future. Life moved forward.
Does any of this sound possible any more? Well, what happened?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@elizabethsmusicandarts1590 I know. I taught community college for nearly 17 years part time, not as my main job. The last few years were a nightmare. I often took night classes at a local state college that used to be the teachers' college, and I had many fellow students who were in public education, usually in an affluent district. Their workload was unbelievable. Overwrought parents were using them as free therapists. Emails several pages long, twice a week, that sort of thing -- and those were the good jobs. No real regard for the teachers, or respect; pressure to give unearned grades; impossible for a teacher to say "no" to anything, because "think of the children." I'm not describing bad schools, I'm describing the "nicer" ones where my classmates taught while studying for their Master's degrees.
Of course, we had the shooter drills as well at community college, where I taught. I was expected to put myself at some measure of risk to protect the class, and I accepted the need, and the ethics as well. The day I knew I could no longer do that was the day I left. Students routinely harassed teachers and the teachers were assumed to be to blame. I have to say that when Trump came on the scene, that really blew the lid off. Everyone became entitled to their very own facts. Quite a few also wanted to bring their guns to school. I had more students crying in front of me, for various reasons, during those couple of years than during all the fifteen previous ones combined.
I wish I were making this up.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@brockreynolds870 "If you have to be persuaded, reminded pressured, lied to, incentivized, coerced, bullied, socially shamed, guilt-tripped, threatened, punished and criminalized... if all of this is considered necessary to gain your compliance, you can be absolutely certain that what is being promoted is not in your best interest." - Ian Watson
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
rs_ Yes. I accept that VAERS reports are unaudited. Incidents may also be underreported, as they have been in the past. Not only doctors report, and in any case, what is the basis for a doctor's "clarification" (in this politically-charged) climate (see, e.g., Mattias Desmet for more information)? And the head of the CDC does not have the numbers. Therefore we do not know, either.
What you said about person years makes no sense. Vaccine-induced myocarditis generally appears quickly, infection-induced can take weeks. We know this. If you don't make the distinction, you don't capture the facts. Moreover, the vaccine is very incomplete. Obviously this requires multivariate analysis. That's not speculation. My source is logic. (And the fact that I'm an attorney who worked extensively on the Daubert rule in the federal system. I know about taking a hard look at time lines.)
I find it funny that you ask me for my "source," as if you've caught me flat-footed or something, when the head of the CDC just admitted before the Senate that she does not have the numbers. That was under oath.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@rodrigosimoes9284 No, Stacey is correct. Listen to Mate, Greenwald, Hedges, Blumenthal, Scahill, Norton, Taibbi, Halper, even Wolff, etc., etc., for a while. Of course the current DNC is now right of center, compared with these types of parties in other developed countries, including the English-speaking world -- and compared to where the DNC itself was before Reagan/Thatcher.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
We had near-free education: in-state tuition for a full academic year at Michigan, California, Virginia, Texas, Illinois, Indiana, Wisconsin, everywhere, was something a student could earn by working full time in the summer. The kids who were able to do this were a different people. They were very often grownups, ready for college and for personal responsibility, at 18, and they graduated without significant debt as well.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@mellem4653 Exactly. Bullying is so bizarre. In a lot of other countries, it's seen for what it is, and is not tolerated at all. It's not an excuse for bullying anyone in return, much less hitting anyone, much less murder. But that's not the point.
Frankly, you find the most bullying in English-speaking societies, and you also find people looking down on the victims rather than the perpetrators. Most of the rest of the world sees through this nonsense and thinks it's disordered. They don't let children and adolescents behave in that way, because it's immature, uncivilized, and does no one any good, ever.
4
-
4
-
@zawyehtike3089 Hmm . . . Not sure where to start. I base my comment on reading, and meeting and talking with Finish college students studying in the US. The Atlantic ran probably the most extensive series of articles on the Finnish educational system about five years ago, and some of what they said was slightly exaggerated. The series is not a bad place to start, and then you could look for more nuance elsewhere. I guess I would say that a lot of what they do strikes us as counterintuitive, yet there is no doubt they spend the least per pupil of any European Union country and consistently score at the top in the PISA tests. They used to be first in the world; now they are "only" first in Europe.
Entrance into the teaching profession is about as competitive as law or medicine (below the top 10% means you probably won't make it), all teachers must have at least a Master's degree, but once attained, the teachers are regarded as professionals and given tons of autonomy -- and then the schools themselves are highly egalitarian. It is ironic. They simply don't encourage competition, but cooperation, and do no standardized testing as we know it until about 6th or 7th grade. Everyone gets meals in school. Everyone gets 15 minute breaks every hour. School days start later and finish earlier, school itself starts at age 7 and is no longer mandatory after age 16 -- but most kids choose to continue, and a large proportion go on to college. They do not do a lot of homework, but are expected to study quietly during several time slots in class every day, so in a sense they have homework sessions in class, with immediate feedback.
There is a lot of variety in the curriculum, but also uniformity, in that it is simply expected that everyone should and will attain a certain solid foundation in every academic subject, and be given an opportunity to practice various arts. They don't do tracking in the way we know it, or hear about it in Germany. Kids at different levels who are in the same grade study together in one classroom. Kids may even have the same teacher throughout most of elementary school, until their first serious standardized test at around age 13. They don't have private academic preschools or cram schools. All the kids become bilingual Finnish-Swedish, and most also learn English, so they graduate trilingual, but are not tested in English for their final high school exam ("matriculation"), only Finnish and Swedish.
They do not allow corporate influence or control, or business-speak, to influence their profession. There is no notion of the student (or parent) being a "client" or "customer" in any sense; educators do not "deliver" the curriculum to students. Their system assumes corporation heads are no more knowledgeable about education than they would be about medicine. Teachers are really put on a pedestal, at least in that sense.
I don't think any other high achieving country runs their schools that way. Most people -- even the egalitarian Finns -- believe that the single most important factor in their success is the thorough professionalizaton of the teaching corps. It is a really hard profession to enter.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@thehumanity0 Okay, no pandemic, no recession . . . "Unicorns and fairy dust." Got it.
My plan, personally, is to leave the US again. So, this matters much less to me than you think. Vastly less. You're the one who will need to be doing some serious thinking, if the option of leaving is closed to you.
It's not a Big Deal to pressure a politician like Nancy Pelosi to serve the people in a crisis. She just gave a chairmanship to Kathleen Rice, who not only withheld her vote for Speaker last time, but started out in politics as a REPUBLICAN. This is Realpolitik. I'm not a big AOC fan, but this gets under my skin. (*This* was divisive. Pelosi, however, is apparently not worried about being divisive.)
Also, don't swear at me. Or on second thought, do. It has the opposite effect you intended, for anyone with a brain.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
This didn't make sense. Here is the timeline, available in many places including CNN:
August 12 -- the videotaped police encounter we saw
August 17 -- Brian flies back to Florida to clean out a storage locker and get some supplies, and possibly money
August 23 -- Brian returns to Salt Lake City, rejoins Gabby; they were apart for about 5 or 6 days
August 27 -- incident in restaurant, last text from Gabby to parents that was clearly from her
By August 30, Gabby was dead.
This timeline shows interruptions to the buildup of rage described here. It also shows that Gabby had a real opportunity to get away, or at least to talk to someone she trusted, August 17 through 22, a solid five days.
So, what happened? If you want to prevent stuff, you need to know what happened.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@user-xg3uy6hq9g Let's make it a wrap. I am NOT saying she did not/could not have a perfectly innocent for not calling. I am saying it was not normal not to call. The normal thing, the expected thing, would have been to call. That does not make failing to call into something immoral, sinister, suspect, etc. (Are fine distinctions, like, over now? Do we just line up and take sides? As fast as possible, then dig in? Brilliant.)
Second, DO NOT say someone is drunk unless you know for fact that they are. DO NOT presume they are drunk. People with unusual medical conditions have died that way. Plus, it is rude. ("College kids drink, that 'must be' what she did." Stereotype much?? We'll be sure to return the favor, see how you like it.)
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@itsyourenotyour9101 The point is, the next generation cannot afford apartments, nevermind to start saving for a house, because of the debt burden. They stay on their parents' health insurance until age 26, provided they don't get married, which they can't do anyway because of having debt at the start of life.
Do you really not see where this is going? No generation in my lifetime was infantilized like this one. When I was a kid, the college students paid for their full year of tuition with a summer job, and their dorm with part-time work study. Then they could move to ANY city, with an ordinary job and one or two roommates. Yes, even San Francisco, even New York. That was opportunity. This isn't.
It was over by the time I graduated.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@boatguy3800 It is not unfounded speculation, and records were classified, sealed, or destroyed. In 1977, the Harvard Crimson reported as follows:
"The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) informed University officials this week that Harvard "was involved in one way or another" in two research projects conducted under the agency's MK-ULTRA human behavior control project, Daniel Steiner '54, general counsel to the University, said yesterday.
Steiner said the University received substantial financial records from the CIA outlining Harvard's involvement in the controversial mind-control program. He refused to release any details about the documents yesterday, but said the two research projects in question did not include any drug experimentation.
The CIA secretly operated the MK-ULTRA research project for 12 years beginning in the 1950s to study the effects of alcohol and various narcotics on witting and unwitting human subjects at a number of American universities and colleges.
The New York Times reported last month that the CIA had sponsored a separate series of hallucinogenic drug experiments conducted during the 1950s at a Harvard-affiliated teaching hospital. The tests studied the effects of LSD on students from Harvard and other Boston area universities."
It was easy to find, bro. I omit links, as YT usually shadows them (they make monitoring for TOS compliance too hard).
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Do you have something about you that's different, and that people might think of as a talent, or skill, or just great luck? Something considered good that is viewed as being lucky and "unearned?" Social media has trained resentment into people, and jealousy like I've never seen. These are the times we live in -- but there is nothing new under the sun. Times like these have happened before. See it clearly but never use it as a crutch. It's not an excuse, it's the opposite: it's a call to do more. YOU have to have more insight, be more private, tend your own garden, find better people, . . . That's harder than just finding a job and doing it, or taking a class and following the teacher's instructions. 🙁
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@gdiwolverinemale2745 Ha, are you ever funny. So, they want to start businesses without going into debt? They are looking to remain productive, and increase their productivity, based on interest, talent and prudence, without debt? Note: No banks need to be involved. "Oh, the horror! The horror!" You are the one trying to make an emotional appeal. That isn't receiving an "early pension," that is maintenance of the status quo. Note: no debt, and that means no control over them by creditors. "Oh, oh, the horror!" 🤣
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Nursery school in France has required a Master's degree for ages now. "The youngest should have the best" is a basic principle anywhere where you see kids excel in reading, mathematics, piano, gymnastics, theatre, ballet. Private schools in New York are the same, but they cost a fortune. Granted, that is school, not childcare.
As for the speech, Meloni resurrected slogans last used during WWII. That's what people in Italy and those who speak Italian are focusing on. It's not proof that she is fascist but it certainly raises the question. In France, the collaborators used to say "work, family, fatherland." Kind-of ironic, since they were betraying France.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
THIS! Absolutely. In the 1980s, France had the best elective abortion law, limited at 12 weeks, so during the embryonic phase. Counseling was mandatory. They always asked a woman why she wanted to abort. If she so much as mentioned money, she had to go to a second office that gave her information on all the public aid she would be entitled to. The paperwork she got said up front, the French Republic supports natality. She also had to sign an affidavit declaring she was a "mother in distress" in order to proceed.
Government paid 70% for elective abortion, 100% for births, including a clothing allowance. After 12 weeks, medically necessary abortions could be approved by a three-doctor panel, and severe psychiatric distress could be a reason, depending.
No idea what they do now. It was the best abortion law in the world, by my lights. France had really low infant and maternal mortality.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I had a very unusually severe cold in October 2019, followed by two weeks of extreme fatigue. I have not had fever with a cold since before puberty. Then, I had apparent COVID symptoms in March 2020, which were only mild at that time. I have not been sick since, and have not been vaccinated. I have been in very large crowds, in numerous international airports, many times since the summer of 2022. I have been exposed to COVID in other places as well.
Never have tested positive for COVID; my white blood cell count almost 4 months after the apparent COVID in 2020 was normal, but unusually high for me -- it deviated significantly from the prior ten years of white blood counts, which are all about the same.
I think I must have had COVID, and a coronavirus cold as well, before that.
That would explain why I seem to have had such good resistance since then. Too bad public health authorities had so little curiosity about this illness. At a minimum, of course. Maybe something more nefarious was going on?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I basically agree, and never knew the detail about passing close to a commercial plane. If that does not scream, "land that thing now," I don't know what does. However, absolutely no one who cannot follow a checklist or think logically could pass law school exams or any bar exam. Today the ultrawealthy get away with everything, but it wasn't the case for his generation, as was obvious by the fact that he did fail the NY Bar twice (which isn't rare, by the way). The Bar told him "no" twice.
BTW, I'm not a fan at all, as I hope is clear. Someone with his means, and for this flight, could have easily engaged a co-pilot. He killed two people through gross negligence. There's no excuse. Also, I would never frequent a Kennedy. Their rate of accidental deaths involving unacceptable risks is well documented. But this video is chock full of nonsense, too. I don't see what people get out of it, frankly.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@mariaangelicabrunellsolar7086 It is. Capitalism is a religion, money is a sacrament. We not only shun but heap scorn and virtually stone anyone who doesn't have it, and worship anyone who does, regardless of the circumstances. We treat Musk and Gates like oracles. Gates can propose to try to blot out the sun to end global warming. We have fanciful ideas about where profit comes from and how, and above all we pretend the armed forces have nothing to do with it. There are no forms of slavery or servitude in the world any more. Planned collapses of industry and finance that force families from their homes are natural disasters. The most perverse behavior by those who seek profit is natural. If a dating app makes money, then that's how you should meet people. If your parents or spouse hold you back from "success" then get rid of them, they're the devil. If you don't, it's your own fault. Any lack of "success" is your own fault.
Of all the "elite" people who consorted with Epstein, did a single one approach him and suggest that he was doing something wrong and needed to stop? When Gates tried to push Allen out of Microsoft while Allen was being treated for lymphoma, did Ballmer refuse to do the dirty work or did he jump right in? Anyone who points this out is very jealous and negative. If they could do these things, they would. But they can't, they're inferior.
Take it on faith. No normal thinking process could pervert a person to this point.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Not even comparable.
Have you ever known anyone from Oklahoma? That "Indian princess" family lore is silly, not sinister, and of course she has some Cherokee ancestry. Like I said, Oklahoma.
Having said that, I would never vote for her, for more substantial reasons. And she got where she is by first, studying hard, becoming an expert in bankruptcy law, and then making sure she got the credit for it -- by marrying well, among other things. She has a lot in common with the Clintons and Tony Blair, and with Biden, for that matter.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@fortusvictus8297 Adam Smith supported the maintenance of "the commons," and warned against allowing the rentier class to create monopolies and extract wealth without earning it, which Smith considered a concerted subversion of the mechanism of the Invisible Hand, and the only real threat to free markets. IOW, we aren't even up to the standards of Adam Smith, much less . . . Modern day "commons" are clean air, clean water, universal public education and universal health care. Once you have that, and reach the age of adulthood, all the rest is up to you. Like I said, we aren't even up to that level. Pfft.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@gratefulila9980 Exactly. Literally try everything else first. Diet, walking, massage, being outdoors and looking up at wide vistas, clouds and so forth, the horizon line of a large body of water, any form of art therapy (music, painting, dance), keeping a journal and writing poetry, yoga. Try several at once, it's synergistic. If you're not opposed to eating an animal, vegan plus occasional fish is worth a try. If you do eat meat, try giving up mammals, and giving up all but fermented dairy (yogurt, kefir, camembert), and eating that only in moderation.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Treat this as a real emergency. Get her off of any drug safely. Consult a new doctor. Make a comprehensive plan: someone has got to take time off and do this. Family Medical Leave Act. She should take a shower every morning. Then take her for a long walk in nature (park, beach, forest preserve) every day. Then go shopping together for fresh, unprocessed food, and cook with her. Cut her screen time, turn off screens at 9 pm. Get a reading program and a cinema program together. Reading real books results in thoughts and even eye movements that are good for your brain. Take her to art galleries, plays. Have a new outing per week, or so; two per month as a minimum. Never mention her tatoos and piercings. Encourage any art or music she wants to pursue. Buy her a journal. Don't let anyone else touch it.
I'm serious. You can fix this by July if you do it. Or, let it drag on for years, get in shouting matches periodically, not know where she is for a weekend or two, only to get a call from a hospital or the cops. You know. What most people do.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@edwardcoit9748 But when you remove discrimination from blacks, they succeed as well: which is why blacks from UK, France, Ethiopia, Somalia, Sudan, Kenya, Nigeria, etc., do just fine. Maybe you are unfamiliar with the global black intelligentsia? A lot of prolific writers who happened to be black were finally given a podium since the death of George Floyd. Have you, er, noticed?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
If this is a "powerful" message, it shows how far we've fallen. Meloni resurrected some slogans last used during WWII. That's what people in Italy and those who speak Italian are focusing on. It's not proof that she is fascist by any stretch, but it certainly raises the question. In France, the collaborators used to say "work, family, fatherland." Kind-of ironic, since they were betraying France.
I thought it was even more ironic that commentators here cite her support of Ukraine as evidence of liberalism. Considering how strong the neo-Nazis are there, and how much they influence the military and government, well beyond their numbers, I would hold off on interpreting that as a positive. There are no good guys waging that 8-year-long war, however much Putin is the worst actor in the picture at the moment.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@owainkanaway8345 One other thing: when I was a kid, do you know what was still possible? Working full time for minimum wage for an entire summer was enough to earn a full year's worth of tuition and fees at the best state universities in the country, and might even cover books and supplies. This is because tuition was heavily tax subsidized, and minimum wage had a relationship to actual costs of living. Being able to earn your tuition did WONDERS for a teenager's sense of autonomy. Debt may allow greater luxury in the moment, but it sure doesn't make you feel capable. Just the opposite.
You know what else young people could do? Take a road trip with a best friend, end up in New York City, San Francisco, Seattle, Denver, Los Angeles, Austin -- ANYWHERE -- and get a job and an apartment. Minimum wage could cover that, too. You had to be resourceful, sure (and you needed good roommates). But no one back then called it "frugal." By the time I was in my 20s, this world was already gone.
This was the world that gave us an explosion of real creativity. Now kids are in front of a screen instead of a piano, or a mirror in a dance studio, or playing in their older brother's garage band, and they are hoping against hope that Wall Street or Silicon Valley will find some use for them and let them live. Someone calls this having it good? Oh wow.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@xitlallicommentstoday2169 To me, that makes the overreaction of the principal all the more unwise. Send him home to wash his face and call it a day. The less attention placed on him, the better. Doing nothing would have been far preferable to making him famous.
And you're right, those who listened to the end know that Jessica said it made no sense to slap a racist label on him. He's too young to be a "racist." He's a kid.
Also, I thought principals were supposed to know something about school law. Although courts give school administrators huge deference in their decisions concerning discipline, a suspension can be a violation of his rights, because he does have a right to a public education and he does have a measure of free speech in school, though obviously not what adults in a traditional free speech forum have. The point is, though, to avoid lawsuits. This is dumber than it looks -- it will probably cost the school district money, and to what end? This was really senseless.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@royjacobs1204 Happens every time. Back in the '60s and '70s, the major state universities -- Michigan, Virginia, Berkeley, etc. -- were essentially free. A summer job paid for a year of tuition, fees, and required texts. Well, some of those working class kids actually worked hard and excelled in engineering, mathematics, physics, chemistry, pre-med, squeezing out the kids of the rich, who came to college to join the right fraternity and make connections. You know that had to end.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@user-hg2tk3xj9y False. If you put ten quarters into the Social Security system, you do qualify for a pension, with offset, even with a teacher's pension. If you are married for ten years, but never paid into Social Security yourself, you do receive your deceased spouse's Social Security, but with a major offset, larger than if you yourself had paid into the system.
The woman featured was not a teacher, and did not strike me as terribly cerebral. If she filled out the forms truthfully, the math is the government's problem, not hers. If she lied, then that's different. There is no reason to think she engineered a fraud. Prove it.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Ludlow889 Let me see if I understand. According to you, the virus has not been identified, there are many false positives, BUT we can use seropositivity to estimate mortality rates.
You know, you can find biologists, real ones, who tout Creation Science. And a member of the Manson family married a Harvard Law grad while she was in prison.
As for the policy debates on how best to deal with COVID, the left in most places has insisted we open a conversation. This is true of France Insoumise, this is true of Jimmy Dore. The reason it is getting so little traction in the US is because nothing the political leaders have done so far has been rational. It is not evident where to start. Citing false, misleading, or discredited studies is not the place.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@gdwnet "Intervention by Russia's central bank . . . " that's how this report starts out! No . . . people need energy to manufacture things, grow crops, transport foodstuffs and other goods, and heat their homes. They do not need Mastercard, iPhones, McDonald's, Google, or Twitter to manufacture things, grow crops, transport foodstuffs and other goods, and heat their homes.
I know. It's counterintuitive. /s
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Yeah, I can. He pays a lot of attention to people who have lost out over the last several decades, and who no one pays attention to except to make fun of or denounce. He says some true things that everyone should acknowledge but very few people do. And he employs some well-tested techniques of demagoguery only at times -- often, but not too often. He creates scapegoats for the fragile who need some such thing to rid themselves of rage and move on.
A 20-year-old kid who is quite average, has certainly done nothing wrong, who would have had a decent union trade 40 years ago, like his father did, and who is literally sleeping on a couch in his parents' basement, is very angry. He needs someone to acknowledge it, lift the blame from his shoulders, and then show him a way OUT. You can be sure he gets zero decent advice, lots of bad advice, and gets yelled at ALL the time. If he sold drugs and got away with it, he'd get more respect. Not good. Enter Jordan Peterson.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Baratheon. What do you think constitutes "perjury?" I mean, under the law, not on social media. Have you ever read any cases that were prosecuted?
No one is ever convicted on the basis of statements that are vague, or lacking in comprehensiveness, or open to more than one reasonable interpretation, or where faulty memory could be a factor -- for example, if she tweeted all the time, and the vast majority of her tweets were about pets or recipes, and she forgot about the handful of offensive ones, or didn't appreciate that they were offensive.
Stuff like that isn't a crime, it's a disqualification from having a serious job -- or at least it used to be.
What "projection" are you talking about? Where did you pick that up from? Freud was the gaslighter extraordinaire.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@alexanderflood1462 Ask for help? Treacherous. I know people who, at their lowest point, were mistreated when they did.
I was just thinking of a student I had, Iraq combat veteran, anti-war but rationally so, who had a grave problem at a job where everyone had high-level security clearance and the rules were not being enforced in ways that really matter. When he asked me for advice, obviously I gave it a lot of thought, from several different perspectives, and acknowledged that only he would know what was best. I wasn't competent to tell him. I did write out my thoughts in a long email.
You know what other people told him? Absolutely thoughtless, accusatory slogans: "If you quit, the bad guys win." "If you stay, you could end up in trouble with them." Complete rot. No respect, and of course, they came up with these slogans without listening to what he had to say, much less thinking before speaking.
If that were the only story . . . I know people who were emotionally abused after a cancer diagnosis. Seven, to be precise -- in two cases, the mothers of pediatric cancer patients suffered emotional abuse.
People are at the end of their rope for a reason.
On a positive note, Harvard professor of psychiatry Christopher Palmer was once homeless, was once harmed by a poor therapist, and had a mother who suffered from schizophrenia. Well, you can tell by what he is today that he worked his way up. He is so dedicated, and has helped people with intractable mental illness.
Finding the RIGHT people is hard, but possible, and worth the struggle. Finding the right book helps. It's a connection to a kindred spirit. It's a start.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
It is illegal to use deadly force in defense of mere property, everywhere. Lethal force is justified if you put any person at risk of imminent physical harm. It is never legal for defense of mere property. Social ills, etc., are irrelevant. The age of the perpetrator is irrelevant. Whether he put a person in danger of physical harm is the only question that matters.
It is a bright line. We have a lot of gun owners in America, and this isn't common knowledge? Wow, just wow.
Also, this is exactly why a carjacking, or a home invasion while there are people in the house, can be met with lethal force. It doesn't matter if the assailant turns out to be unarmed, or was just looking to burgle and thought the house was empty, or was only a juvenile. There is no question about this. It's called self-defense for a reason.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@dloesch Well, because, unfortunately, what we need now is a multivariate analysis, and those are very hard to do. I'm serious. I do NOT trust the drug companies to do them, because too many judgment calls must be made, and I expect them all to be made in one direction.
Too many things have changed: the virus, the lockdowns, the stress, and then the vaccines. It could be that having the virus, then a vaccine is the most dangerous -- and young people were the most likely to be asymptomatic, and there were not enough tests available in early 2020, and the young were forced to be vaccinated to come back to SCHOOL or participate in normal life. So it's obvious more than one factor is involved.
This should never have been done in the first place, even for a drug with no known side effects. It was an EUA drug, and most young people had no reason to chose to take it. It should have always been a choice, for everyone. Vaccinating those who had recovered from COVID when it was never tested on that group was particularly unethical.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@dimomarkov8937 I see. Well, I taught community college, as a sort of public service, for 17 years, and never once encountered radicalized youth. In the US, the races are separate; you will almost never see an integrated wedding, for example, unless the people are all very rich. Classes are separate, and people at different income levels don't know how those above them or below them actually live. In fact, most think more is just more --- and they all want more, so why wouldn't a billionaire? Romanticizing Soviets? Good luck meeting anyone who knows the Red Army defeated Hitler, or that any Soviet did anything of any value whatever ( Exhibit A: Arkhipov, which would really puzzle them, given that only Americans are "true individuals"). There are more people who vaguely believe in Hitler's racial hierarchy than have the least radical proclivities. The English and Germans just somehow seem better, you know --- cooler --- than, say, Slovenians or Poles.
People who don't succeed (and success equals money; my god, truth = money) tend to engage in one form or another of self-flagellation and self-loathing. The latest is cross-sex hormone abuse in older teens who never once before felt like they should have been born the opposite sex. I can't think of anything less radical than risking the ability to be a birth parent someday because you don't fulfill the latest "standard" for masculinity or femininity.
The Internet isn't real.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
No we're not. I was in a formerly communist country this fall, with profoundly anti-communist people, who were close relatives of known dissidents. Even they had no problem stating there were some good things about communism. In their country, the communists solved homelessness. Yes, solved. What are we getting in return?
Actually, that's what not being propagandized means. They had no problem saying this. They didn't look over their shoulders first, or fear what reaction I might have.
In fact, I have another example: they were vaccinated, with Pfizer, and instead of pushing it, they matter-of-factly stated the vaccines have been a big disappointment, and that they are holding off on boosters. Imagine what it must be like to have internalized free speech! Sweet, huh? I remember those days.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Elite colleges are questionable themselves -- exactly. Why are they the near-exclusive incubators of future politicians, judges, corporate leaders? But given that they are, admissions need to be rethought from top to bottom. Did these "elite" institutions form a James Baldwin, a John Coltrane, a James Jamerson, a David Goggins, or a Simone Biles? Well, why not? (Two of these five were in the Navy, by the way.) Even eminent black academics often went to the traditional black colleges or to the great state universities, rather than to schools like Yale. Toni Morrison went to Cornell, but only for her Master's, after excelling at Howard. "Something is wrong with this picture," as they say.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@WhyYoutubeWhy Here is a more recent discrepancy: in this interview, she does not indicate that she met a single American at Columbia, professor, TA, post-doc, or student, who was distraught about the degradation of free speech. Do you believe that? If you do, you need to do some soul-searching. Considering Chemerinsky and Strossen have written books about it, considering Bret Weinstein said that HIS students all stood up for him, how plausible is that? This is Columbia, which has alumni who are astronauts, writers, actors, Nobel Prize winners, Olympic athletes . . . WHERE IS YOUR PRIDE?
No, memories for important events are not that weak, and when they are, the people telling a story recognize that, and say so, before they are caught. Are you George Santos's lawyer??
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Naylor Broughton Too bad my content response disappeared. This channel may not allow links, as they can be misused and are hard to monitor, and I had a link to back up my point on "influencers" who tell the blatant lie that you have to "accept responsibility" in order to "turn your life around." (There was a fascinating story about one "Jane Buckingham" who made a career spreading that advice, and then got busted in the college admissions scandal when she did the opposite of what she preached.)
The other point was investment bankers and corporate C-suite executives and corporate raiders all make their millions by minimizing risk -- which means minimizing the responsibility they would need to assume if their bets, er, I mean their investments, go south. Offloading responsibility is how money is made. It is what the corporate form itself is designed to do, shelter people from having to take personal responsibility for the ramifications of business decisions. (That's why Tony Hayward never had to pay back salary, bonuses, stock options . . . Why Wall Street never had clawbacks, etc. That's also why they keep telling YOU to "take responsibility!")
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@TerraPosse The UK certainly does have a higher vaccination rate, and I didn't suggest otherwise. If Germany does, that is a new development. Japan certainly does not, nor does France. Of the major nations Russia is worst. The point is, hesitancy is not solely due to "anti-vax idiocy." Not here, not anywhere. This is one more podcaster making MONEY by fomenting divisiveness, like FOX, Rachel Maddow, etc. This video is politicizing the issue as well.
I thought we had privacy in hospital rooms, by the way. I guess that's over, too.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
rs_ Your first point about VAERS is simply factually incorrect. VAERS has always been plagued by underreporting, and this fact has been demonstrated; whether VAERS has persisted in having this issue during COVID remains to be determined, but we have no evidence to presume the reporting is suddenly comprehensive. The head of the CDC just admitted before the Senate that she does not have the numbers of severe adverse events from the vaccine at her disposal. She testified under oath, thus had to concede she does not have that number.
A vaccine can reduce the risk of myocarditis from COVID but not eliminate it, while at the same time creating a risk of myocarditis from the vaccine itself, especially where multiple shots are administered. So you can't simply substitute the lower risk for the higher. By comparing the one to three weeks following one injection with the longer time frame we look at to determine all of the ill effects of COVID, including myocarditis, whenever it may be contracted, we obscure this fact. IOW, it would not be additive if this vaccine eliminated (essentially) all risk of COVID, and hence of myocarditis from COVID as well, but it doesn't. It wears off pretty fast, too. And then comes the booster.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@capttrips1523 Yeah, I hate everybody else, too.
Most developed countries DO have public housing, and very basic public assistance to avoid actual hunger and homelessness, which can harm an entire population, not just those going hungry and living under bridges, and their young adults start out life with the education they need, and basic health care. Most developed countries DO have excellent public transit, at very low cost, and many have excellent, low cost train systems. The lack of accountability YOU should care about: Wall Street crashes the global financial system, gets even bigger bailouts and bonuses; a Tony Hayward presides over the worst ecological disaster in history (BP's well explodes) and goes on to a MUCH better job and more money right after. Trump has six bankruptcies, no problem. He can be a billionaire and president. HSBC is caught laundering drug money and possible terrorist funds -- oh well. Too Big To Prosecute.
What in the world are YOU worrying about? Wake up.
3
-
3
-
@TheRatsintheWalls So, are you being sincere, or a pious jerk, too? I can't tell. It was incorrect to impute ad hominem, or some insipid values blather, to my posts. Sorry, Bub. It is too obviously not present. These debates are not all about "values." We can quantify this stuff. I agree irresponsibility is a bad thing, on absolutely every level. When you see it on the smallest scale, however, might it be due to systematic demoralization? When you see it at the very top, is it comparable? No. It isn't.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@current_interest He had THREE opportunities, THREE. In February, when he knew and he lied about the dangerousness, again in April, when hotspots were overwhelming hospital capacity and even morgue capacity in a few places, like QUEENS, and AGAIN, when Trump contracted it himself.
Had he come out of the hospital fighting to make his treatment available to all hospitals, and to pass another stimulus, do or die, and if he had talked about subsidies for essential workers, and promised it -- he would have been reelected.
He encouraged resistance to friggin' masks.
His niece Mary is right about his pathological narcissism. He cannot focus for an instant on anyone but himself. His whole campaign was whining about how mean the press has been, and about how Biden (Biden!!) is a "socialist." What a sick _____.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@artmathias9725 That wasn't her point about the mall at all. The point was, it was open for business, without any precautions enforced. The point was double standards and no equity of enforcement. She worked so much harder to follow the rules in her establishment, but it still "wasn't good enough."
I'm sorry that you find it much more important to guess at someone's political identification (in a country where the plurality considers themselves Independent, no less) than to hear what they have to say.
She may have family ties to her state. It's the only reason I ended up in America. I hope I can leave, entirely. Jeering at victims and blaming victims during a crisis -- which is exactly what happened 12 years ago, too -- well, I have had my fill of it, thank you. I don't expect to see improvement any more, especially thanks to social media.
I've lived elsewhere, so I know what I'm talking about.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Bri muddled this. It is illegal to use deadly force in defense of mere property, everywhere. Lethal force is justified if you put any person at risk of imminent physical harm. It is never legal for defense of mere property. Social ills, etc., are irrelevant. The age of the perpetrator is irrelevant. Whether he put a person in danger of physical harm is the only question that matters.
It is a bright line. We have a lot of gun owners in America, and this isn't common knowledge? Wow, just wow.
Also, this is exactly why a carjacking, or a home invasion while there are people in the house, can be met with lethal force. It doesn't matter if the assailant turns out to be unarmed, or was just looking to burgle and thought the house was empty, or was only 13. There is no question about this. It's called "self-defense" for a reason.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
This war should have ended months ago, with Crimea and the Donbass either under the Russian Federation or as independent, Russian-allied regions, and the impoverished Ukrainian people at peace, without their homes and livelihood destroyed. Yes, of course, the US has its paws all over this. But Putin escalated this war. He has clearly fallen into their trap. He is to blame for that.
The US does not invade anywhere without an aerial blitzkrieg first. It establishes dominance, and relies on propaganda and "soft" power, and hard power, to cover its tracks and avoid answering for war crimes against civilians. Yet it has not been winning its wars, either. How Putin expected to is a mystery to me. He must be surrounded by sycophants. This war is both immoral and an unmitigated disaster.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
For a long time, I had a tremendous doctor, but he retired. I was always reluctant to "do it myself" when it came to health care, but after being a caregiver for my father and researching his condition, using the NIH Library of Medicine, and then going through the pandemic fiasco, I've changed my mind. Please carefully research the nutrition, exercise, prudent intermittent fasting, yoga, therapeutic massage, reasonable supplements, etc., that may be helpful, think it over, and then try these things. The sad thing is that organic food costs a fortune now.
As an example, when I find out that a particular supplement is helpful, I first look to see which foods are highest in that nutrient, and how much they contain. Then I know what a normal intake would be. Then I consult Mayo Clinic, including their online store, I consult Memorial Sloan Kettering, and Linus Pauling Center, etc. I'm conservative, but will not stand still for this!
Everyone with these symptoms should get their vitamin D and B12 levels checked, for starters.
Also, the quickest way to make a sick person sicker is to tell them you don't believe them. That can "work" in minutes. 🙄
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
The most common major by far is Business, and has been for 30 years. Most such degrees are a demonstration of docility. In 2001-2002, and 2008-2009, computer science grads were not getting offers. If a corporation will not interview you unless you have a degree, a corporation will not interview you unless you have a degree. I don't believe anyone thinks that is fair. That changes nothing.
I don't think people understand the current labor market.
BTW, daughter of Vietnamese immigrant Mom Kim Iversen has a degree in Philosophy. She always talks about the value of college, and all the women who did pedicures 55 hours per week to make sure their kids went.
Once upon a time not that long ago, a student could pay in-state tuition and fees for a full year at the great state universities (Michigan, Wisconsin, Berkeley, Virginia, Texas, . . . ) with a full-time summer job making the minimum wage. People who did that were a different people.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Denali1600 I will look it up. My simple point is, she told you where she got her numbers. I personally always look at deaths per million, although at this point we do not really know what they include. I will explain.
It took a long time to establish that women who underwent multiple fertility hormone treatments without conceiving were at greater risk of ovarian cancer than those who did conceive. In relation to this issue, of deaths per million, I wonder whether those who had moderate to severe COVID, then were vaccinated with mRNA or other vaccines, in that order or in the reverse order for that matter, now have a higher risk of death.
Multivariate analysis, which can give us the answer, is difficult, expensive and takes a long time. You get my drift.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@S2pidMedia I'm not even sure whether I had it, late March 2020. No testing available to people who had not traveled to Asia. Acute symptoms very brief, feeling lousy for a good six weeks, and just odd. For example, severe chills and night sweats yet little fever, severe fatigue, a little cough, a headache that felt like cicadas were buzzing in my head. Fabric softener mixed with perspiration was the only thing I could smell, and fabric softener made me sick for six months. Could not bear the smell.
Whatever it was, I never had that before. Four months out, not enough antibodies to determine what it was. :/
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@brandonbath6097 You're the one who needs to think this through. I didn't say some guy. I said the father.
If you haven't noticed that all of our rights are being trashed, and that it has already affected you, and that you have every right to try to persuade people never to choose abortion, but not to have state power decide for them, and that stuff like abortion pills can cross state lines, and that your jails are filled, and that school massacres are ubiquitous, as are drug overdoses, as is teenage sex trafficking, as is child homelessness . . . Well, I guess I don't understand anymore. This is your focus? And you think it won't haunt you?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@tooitchy I still remember when the kids who went to college worked all summer and earned enough to pay a full year of in-state tuition, fees, and books. They graduated with very little or no debt -- you were expected to earn scholarships and work part-time. Then, a couple of roommates could go anywhere with their degree -- Los Angeles, Seattle, San Francisco, Boston, New York, get a minimum wage job, and afford the rent. It was a modest life, but possible. People were proud to strike out on their own and live modestly. After all, their parents grew up during the Depression.
By the time I got to college, this was impossible. But the students I'm describing were different people. I envy them. They had opportunity. They expected to do for themselves. It was shameful not to.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Well, explain this to me: a woman I have known my whole life just told me she was once raped, some 30 years ago, while at college. She waited to tell me until after her father died. Of course her father didn't do it (some cop she dated one single time did), but he always told his daughters that rape is extremely rare, and that most accusations are false. I was so shocked that I still have no words.
My father, on the other hand, was an immigrant, very Mediterranean, and known in our community as someone who had a gun and would use it to protect me. He wouldn't have blinked an eye. (You can figure out the rest, I hope. His realism kept me safe.)
Literally every beautiful woman I have ever known has been raped -- literally raped, meeting the full legal definition -- and no one punished in a single case. Explain that. I'm boggled by it. (The social context, by the way, is heavily working class with some professional families who worked very, very hard to get where they are, kids who go to college attend a major state university, and there are few private university graduates, parents or kids, apart from the Catholic colleges.)
Maybe the cohort seeking psychotherapy is less likely to have a firm grip on reality in the first place, and more susceptible to the latest media-imposed hysteria. Maybe the kids from the social background you served are more naive or in denial about how money is made, through pushing just such hysteria.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@brasshouse-fireball First of all, I didn't mention Sweden. Second, you seem to have omitted Germany. Third, and most important, YOUR IMPLICATION was that Native Americans get "all sorts of stuff for free," and that that has kept them poor. Doesn't seem to have made generations of ordinary Europeans poor -- or Wall Street over here, for that matter.
When a student attending a premier state university could earn their entire year's tuition and textbook budget by working full time over the summer, you had more mature, diligent, resourceful, and well-read students here. Now you have indebted, immature conformists who are more likely to go home to live with their parents than to try anything new. Well, they're in debt. And they never had the opportunity to earn their own way, for anything. We did this to them. Just keep it up, bro. Double down. Working out great . . . :/
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@RicArmstrong HOW can you believe this? First of all, you don't see that he was totally self-involved, completely undisciplined, and hopelessly LAZY? I mean, just suppose you liked some of the things he said. Did he DO any of them? He admits to Bob Woodward that he KNEW of the danger of COVID, and downplayed it. He is so stupid, he admits this, to one of the journalists who broke the Watergate story, because Woodward is a lifelong Republican who didn't join the Never Trumpers. This is emblematic of how his brain works.
We have NEVER had so many drone strikes as under Trump, PLUS he stopped collecting data on civilian deaths. Not only that, but he lifted the moratorium on funding gain of function viral research (did you fall for his Good Cop Bad Cop routine with Fauci? He never did replace Fauci, did he?), and he singlehandedly undermined public health when the pandemic hit.
He nominated rank incompetents to the US Supreme Court, because someone else told him who to pick. He doesn't care, his family won't suffer for it.
He did a lot of other things -- worse things -- but I'm only listing what a Trump fan might finally acknowledge. I won't bother trying to convince you he attempted to undermine the Constitution by clinging to power in January, to gratify his own ego and avoid looming financial issues. Or to mention his encouragement of racism, of fascist elements, etc., etc., etc. The man has no limits to his narcissism.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
We KNOW about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. We don't remember Judy Garland, Jimi Hendrix, Elvis, Prince, Michael Jackson, Basquiat, and on and on and on? This should never happen anymore.
If a multimillionaire needs a personal aide to be with them at all times, and needs yoga instructors, massage therapists, mental health counselors, and organic chefs to visit them daily, they can afford all that and more. I don't get it. Not anymore.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@G R No, just have it your way. Most comments are not written primarily for the person they were addressed to, anyway, which means they are flawed -- mine included, obviously.
(BTW, your description of what Mussolini did in pretending to espouse socialism and adopting many of its symbols and slogans, being that socialism held great prestige as a theory in Italy between the wars and in Europe generally, would qualify as a (figurative) "false flag.")
Why did you ignore the rest of what I said? The rest was the important part.
If a lot of people here are ignorant, that isn't true of everyone. Look at it this way: you must realise that Dr. Cornel West, Aaron Mate, Max Blumenthal, Glenn Greenwald, Chris Hedges, Richard Wolff, Briahna Joy Gray, Katie Halper, Kyle Kulinski, Krystal Ball, Matt Taibbi, and on and on and on, are all very astute people, tremendously well educated, AND quite aware that Jimmy is flawed. Why do they make allowances for that? What do you think they all see in him? Sleep on it a little. It will come to you. But to make it easier, another little hint: Jimmy knows he's flawed. He never tried to put on like he wasn't.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@fenix6297 You not only identified the allegedly offensive statements as "pro-Hamas," you identified the "grads" as "pro-Hamas," in the adjective position directly before the noun. My question was therefore well-founded, whether you particularly like it or not. You could have responded by saying, "I know no such thing. I'm simply stating what the issue is to those Wall Street firms." In any case, maybe those firms have no basis at all to think those grads ARE pro-Hamas, and you could have said you weren't endorsing (what you assumed to be) their view. It's not that tough. I'm not afraid to ask direct questions. I hope I didn't hurt your feelings or make you feel unsafe.
I have no idea what "90%" of people "know" about freedom of speech. That has got to be the biggest assumption of the night. Looks like I didn't make it.
Of course you didn't address my other, more important points. It was wonderful to hear Glenn Greenwald tonight. One forgets what an intelligent lawyer and journalist sounds like. All sparring aside, his show was excellent. There are far too many people pushing for a wider war, and he named names and provided direct quotes. Maybe when you settle down, get some sleep, etc., you might deign to watch it.
You could also, like, read the allegedly offensive statement and see what it says. I don't agree with it, but I see no support for terror or war crimes in the statement. (The personal views of some of the people who signed it might be worse, however.) Did you get around to that? Reading it, I mean?
I know, it's late.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@bradleyriles3889 No, in fact, there are not a lot of liberal arts graduates in total, and very, very few outside of those aiming for law school, an MBA, or an MPA. The most common major by far is Business Administration and has been for nearly 30 years. Next come all the health sciences, with Nursing on top. If the STEM fields aren't next, then possibly Education is, but in any case they are again vocationally oriented. Kids who used to major in English now major in Communications or Advertising, and know how to film videos and set up websites.
I didn't say that countries don't need armed forces. I said multinational corporations, which are permitted to function like governments in so many ways, as well as capture (what are supposed to be democratic) governments, should provide their own security, too. Why should I pay for it?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Glenn, a question.
There seems to be a larger pattern that repeats too often to be happening by chance.
The DNC keeps creating lose-lose scenarios: "Russiagate," obviously; Sandmann; Brett Cavanaugh; Amy Coney Barrett; Hunter Biden and his laptop; Rittenhouse; hysteria and unwarranted accusations concerning January 6th, as if the reality wasn't bad enough. The deification of Bill Gates; the continuing power of the Clintons; the nomination of Joe and Kamala. Then of course reneging on the public option, the $15 minimum wage, losing the two impeachment trials, and so forth, . . . even misleading voters about the size of the stimulus checks. Why are they doing this?
Let's take Justice Barrett. There should have been no nomination, as early voting in the presidential election had already begun. Instead, Judge Barrett was nominated and confirmed, and mercilessly abused and personally maligned during the process to a degree that I don't think anyone before her had ever suffered -- not even Kavanaugh. (At least Kavanaugh had a witness he could confront.) So, IOW, everything that shouldn't have happened, happened. The worst-case scenario was engineered into existence with a lot of help from the DNC -- with them imitating some of Trump's most repugnant traits and topping him.
What's up with all that? What do they get out of it?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@2FINE4YOUBABYGIRL In fact, no one who does not have two solid years of living expenses in cash equivalents, in addition to an emergency fund, and a guaranteed base income (T bonds, that sort of thing) can be considered secure. That usually means being really, really resourceful and astute, and lucky -- or having a financial net worth of a million per person in the household, and little or no mortgage on where you actually live. That is what financial advisors tell their rich clients, so that they never have to sell off assets at distressed prices. Because most people, even affluent people, one day will.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@keithwilliams8342 Prove it up. Let's see a reading list, syllabus, a taped class, etc.
EDIT: a breeze to find; I just did.
This was interesting -- the suggested reading list for undergraduates in English, to complete before they come to campus:
Anne Brontë, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall
Charlotte Brontë, Jane Eyre; Villette
Emily Brontë, Wuthering Heights
Charles Dickens, Great Expectations
George Eliot, Middlemarch
Elizabeth Gaskell, North and South
William Thackeray, Vanity Fair
Hm. Looks rather classic to me. (In France, they'd be reading Zola in high school, so there's that. The Anglosphere tends to be to the right of most of Europe. Not always, of course, but as a rough generalization.)
2
-
@chiphill4856 Sure, and thank you! Also, as soon as you ask them to back up their allegations, they have nothing to offer. Of course not.
There's a lot that is wrong with university today, but nearly of it stems from serving the concerns of corporations and imitating the business model. (Big example -- the "competitiveness" and the cost, and the erosion of free speech rights, which are essential nonexistent in a private sector workplace, where you most certainly can be fired for your opinions or for upsetting your coworkers with your views. Another tell -- the costs are going up vastly more than the quality of the education they provide, which they are able to impose based on branding. Classic business model!)
Try to get a right-winger to admit any of it! THEY demanded that schools be more "business oriented." Well, the most common major for at least 30 years now has been Business Administration. Next comes all the medical fields, with Nursing on top. And the typical workplace is not a First Amendment forum by any stretch.
2
-
In actual abuse cases, it is very, very common for the abuser not to be available, or to refuse to come in, which is that person's right. Only a court order can force a person to submit to a psychological evaluation, and those are hard to get, as they should be. So, in this field, researchers and clinicians HAD TO find ways to figure out whether the person who does come in is being truthful or evasive, etc. This psychologist is Board certified in two specialties and she assessed Heard. She never said she assessed Depp. She looked for corroboration or contradiction in the records she did have, for both parties.
And Depp had no obligation to see her. Totally his call, proves nothing either way. Just like you have the right to remain silent.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@silkart1 You can give an opinion about a relationship. You can never diagnose anyone you never met. It is a bright line. If you say this psychologist crossed it, I don't disbelieve you at all. You sound knowledgeable; show me where. One timestamp is plenty, since a psychologist is not supposed to do it even one time, ever.
If a real abuse victim comes in, and the perpetrator won't, can you diagnose PTSD in the victim stemming from the relationship that you never saw in action, and never heard about from anyone but the victim? Why or why not? I say of course you can --- as long as you never forget you could be wrong.
By your logic, could Heard have stymied the psychologist who testified for Depp? Heard could have prevented the BPD diagnosis by not agreeing to see her, but she couldn't prevent her from giving her opinion based on the rest of the data she had.
(Don't you wonder why no other therapist diagnosed BPD in Heard, but this brief assessment revealed it? This is why we all have a right to refuse to see a psychologist, thank GOD. I said from the start, if Depp was asked to and declined, I support him. His business, his choice. Refusing proves nothing either way.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gigi9301 You're so sweet. I'll modify that to 250 dates with guys better than these.
I don't know what to say about the larger issue. We hear too much about the sensationalized horror stories, and yet we also know about a lot of bad relationships in real life. I don't know how to gauge this any more. Take a pause, trust in your instincts, and don't be too quick to believe what anyone tells you, and don't be too eager to spend time alone with anyone you don't know well, are important rules today. On the other hand, go out for a casual dinner in groups of friends, whenever you get the chance. Think of safe ways to meet more people and observe them. I think casual dinners, with three to six people, to be a plan. ;)
Lots of outdoor dining around, still, and that improves the mood and the safety factor, not just for COVID. ;)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I remember that story. I wondered how it was that the medical staff had the right to violate patient confidentiality in that particularly brutal way. I frankly didn't believe the story. Sorry to hear it made such an outsized impression on you.
What makes you feel so sure the vaccines are both safe and effective, and suitable for everyone? The evidence is not in favor of those beliefs. As for these excess deaths, we don't know what factors are at play. Previous exposure to COVID, recovery from COVID, the many negative effects of the shutdown, which include physical and psychological harm, the vaccines by themselves, the vaccines in combination with COVID or COVID exposure -- all possibilities need to be explored, and multivariate analysis is not a simple process. We may not have answers for a long time, which means it's time to get serious and begin the hard work.
Anecdotes don't prove what is likely, but they do indicate what is possible. One relative by marriage, 80 years old with some weight issues, died of COVID. He was fully vaccinated. I know of no one else who had severe COVID.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
BMJ (formerly, British Medical Journal) reported on some suggestive data that vegans, vegetarians, and modified vegetarians who eat fish may be at lower risk of severe COVID and death. DW (German) picked up the story right away. American press will not touch it. Why? This is one study, and is not definitive, and DOES NOT say vegetarianism prevents COVID, or is as effective as vaccines, or anything like that. It's simply information. I've been eating foods high in quercetin like mad (apples, sweet onions, garlic, capers, etc.). I mean come on, we can all do better.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nomchompsky3012 There is nothing remarkable about this. In true cases of domestic partner violence, the abuser frequently cannot be located, or cannot be made to come to a psychologist. Nor can anyone make him, short of a court order. It's his right to refuse, and that proves nothing either way. So therapists in the field have to develop methods to assess the person who does come in, and to have some idea of whether they are being truthful, guarded, evasive, etc., about what is going on. This never occurred to you?
If Depp declined to talk to this woman, I don't blame him. I have no idea why Heard agreed to talk to that smug celebrity hound with the muffin basket.
2
-
2
-
It isn't so much a matter of maximizing profits over the long term, but making an unearned fortune very, very quickly that leads to toxic workplaces. This is the result of financialized capitalism, surely the last stage. When something like social media, a combination of powerful advertising (i.e., propaganda) and mass surveillance (i.e., everyone spying, resenting, and informing on one another), produces overnight billionaires, we must know the jig is up. Profitability over the long term is always based on exploitation, but it does create some measure of market discipline because extreme toxicity will always risk long-term profits. But toxicity can work for a while, just like amphetamines. That's what the capitalists want, now.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I agree with that. Some researchers have been pointing out that the best childhood vaccines, administered at the right time, make children's immune systems stronger overall and resistant to other infections, not only the one against which they were vaccinated. I say research vaccines and be sure to get those. See what other countries are doing. I always check other countries' ministries of health online, like UK, Switzerland, the Scandinavian countries, Germany, France, Netherlands, etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@o77eh Small part, lived there over 5 years, had to learn it. Mother made me. :)
It's my third language. Listen online, you'll catch on. I like Thinkerview, news of the weird (just kidding). They just dropped a new video, have got to watch. I like Aude Lancelin, another great journalist who got kicked out of a prestigious mainstream media job.
Seriously, listen an hour a day, put it in the background.
(Paradis is a translation of my real name, which really does mean paradise. If I were British, maybe I'd go by Eden? Hmm . . . Cela ne me dit rien.)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kdnick8584 When all of these politicians went to college, a minimum wage summer job covered a full year of tuition and fees, in-state, at all the great state universities, from Virginia to Michigan to Berkeley, Texas, SUNY, Minnesota, Illinois -- no exceptions. Almost anyone could cobble together enough for room and board, between jobs, grants, and a few hundred a month from parents. Books were cheap.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@johneubank8543 So . . . The new list of Bad Foods includes . . . Red onions, fresh garlic, ginger, parsley, olive oil, avocados, black olives, capers, kimchi, goat kefir, arugula, broccoli, zucchini, red kale, spinach, beets, tangerines, blueberries, raspberries, cherries . . . Sure, buddy. LOL
I eat garlic raw.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@joeymac4302 There are certain accusations that one would expect the accused to refute. Failure to refute them is not proof of wrongdoing, but it usually raises questions, and may even be circumstantial evidence that tends to point to wrongdoing. Trump's taxes are a perfect example. When ALL other candidates release theirs, AND we know Trump is a businessman with many farflung interests, bankruptcies in his past, etc., so we KNOW his taxes would never be pristine, and HE knows no one expects them to be pristine -- well, at that point, you do have to wonder what the heck he's been hiding.
Given the concern with misinformation and voter manipulation, you WOULD think that a possible future president would want to declare the emails to be fraudulent as soon as possible, if it were possible -- to make sure the electorate was not left wondering about it. You know, for our sakes, the good of the country, etc.
Anyway, tonight Joe decided to lie about Hunter, and avoid the real issue as usual. Trump looked like he was flummoxed that two could play that game! Not to mention, Joe has real experience in that arena. I'd say his lying came across better. He's on a roll.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@-ABC- Gates has been around influencing our lives for closing in on four decades now. He will be 66 in a few weeks. Tell us what great strides we have made thanks to him over the past few decades. This happens to coincide with the worst period for completely unjustified wealth disparity, a grotesque attack on civil liberties, pointless, murderous, endless wars, catastrophic climate change, and an obviously corrupted ruling class unlike we have ever seen. Also, a new hopelessness. Check the mass shootings, the gang activity, the opioid crisis, the homelessness crisis, the killings by police . . . The lack of good art and literature in America. Then, this interview is the best one of your whiz kids can do? Only collective intelligence and a spirit of cooperation can solve our problems. Not a handful of Wunderkinder.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@chrisking6695 Do you understand that during the past 15 months, YouTube was Jimmy and Stef's livelihood, because COVID prevented them from doing any live shows? Do you also understand that Ana, and now Cenk, tried to deprived them of that livelihood? They were trying to shut Jimmy up, and scare him away from criticizing TYT? So Jimmy told his side, with complete context, and videos, to demonstrate what working at TYT was like, back when this happened. Ana had Jimmy's vulnerabilities pegged all right, but she SURE miscalculated about AARON!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@louurich9087 The problem with the trades is having to save like crazy, because you might have to retire 10 to 15 years before everyone else, when the reality for most people is having to work until 70, 72. Liberal Arts at least gives you a foundation so that you can retool later.
As for what most people study, well . . . the most common degree is in Business, and has been for about 35 years, if not longer. Next come the Health Sciences, with Nursing on top. What did you think people were studying? College is trade school for most people.
As for a Bachelor's in Business, unless a person gets a CPA or takes advanced mathematics and finance, that is a useless degree -- apart from signaling docility. An English major with a calculus sequence and a minor in Economics will get into law school or a top MBA program first. Most people in liberal arts are planning to get an advanced degree, of which there are many besides MD, JD, MBA, or PhD: MSW, MFA, MPA, MPH, MLS, DPsy in clinical psychology, school psychology, etc., and a bunch more I can't remember. Still, basically agreeing with you. Of course STEM ebbs and flows, and for exactly the reason you said.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Esteban Oviedos I have lived elsewhere, my entire surviving family lives elsewhere, I get my news in several languages, and I don't agree with you.
Your are spouting ideology, not objective facts. That people are not trying to leave the US is the "tell." They (we) most certainly are. You also know how to get under people's skin, by telling the people in the most troubled developed country that they have it SOOO good, and that they don't know it, because they are insular and spoiled. You know exactly how to get them to feel inferior and guilty, and you know it will work, thanks to the nature of ("majoritarian") American mentalities.
Well, I don't have an American mentality, I don't get all my news in English, and I see through you perfectly. Shame on you, to spout this during a pandemic in the country with the highest number of deaths. Shame!! Take your ideological talking points and make them elsewhere.
2
-
@Esteban Oviedos Shame and guilt are not the same thing at all, and you certainly did start out by trying to make Americans feel guilty for "having it easy." This was before the other person wrote extensive comments, improving the tone of the discussion. (Question: why did you do that? What's it to you? If a fortunate person has mental problems, all the more reason to feel sorry for them, perhaps even pity them.) As for whether it is so much easier to live in the US than in other countries, I heartily recommend James Baldwin. There is no better essayist of the latter half of the 20th century. He died in the late 1980s, which shows just how prescient he was. Of course he ultimately left.
FYI, I'm not from the sort of background you might imagine, my parents met in a refugee camp, they were from an "undesirable" ethnicity, and my father did not come across as "lily white." I could tell you stories about that, and I'm putting it mildly.. Also, remarkably enough, my worst mistake in life was optimism, which is probably the result of too great an assimilation. So save the psychobabble. America is a diverse country, you never can tell who your interlocutor is. :D Or what they've experienced.
The instinct to kick someone who is down is ugly however and wherever it manifests itself.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@andersonandrew112 I am already very close to certain that you are a white American. Nowhere else have I found a mass obsession with "competition," so called. It's like a weird religion. Well, if you don't see the effects of this vaunted "competition" yet (which in itself is astounding, but such are the effects of indoctrination), you are about to. If you think growing inequality, the opioid crisis, financial manipulation on a grand scale, youth depression, extremist militias, and mass shootings have been bad so far, well . . .
We'll see how "successful" people are if the U.S. embarks on more costly and dangerous wars, and the dollar loses the reserve currency status it now enjoys.
But even in the best of times, there is a problem with "competition" that even Socrates saw: there are two ways to come out on top. The first is to make yourself as excellent as possible. The second is to undermine everyone else. Socrates lived in a society where more and more people took the second route, and we all know how that turned out . . . the same way it always does.
2
-
@aerodylluk2543 It isn't ignorance of how to get out of poverty that keeps people poor. It is the fact that no matter what they do, they keep getting the same result. They keep getting discounted, disrespected, and dismissed.
Look at it this way: if a person works hard, will they be noticed, and rewarded? They may be. Let's say they usually will (not evident, but possible). The result could also be quite different: the hard worker may be viewed as a chump, and people may smirk behind their back. Or the boss may decide, "this person must be after my job. Why else would they work so hard?" I think we all know what happens next.
Even a small amount of prejudice can have a massive impact. (Look up "sensitive dependence on initial conditions." It's not just a concept in physics, it applies to all sorts of complex systems.) Working hard is essential, but it will not be rewarded -- it may not even be understood -- outside of the right context. The hard work has to occur where hard work matters, and where other people understand its meaning and are willing to honor it and reward the hard worker. In a lot of places, that does not happen. In a lot of places, politics matter far more.
2
-
@andersonandrew112 Most new businesses fail, no matter what their founders do. We're about to see a whole bunch of them fail pretty soon, in fact.
Also, no one works 70+ hour per week for years on end, or even for months, without respite. That does not happen, due to diminishing returns based on sheer fatigue. The body and brain can't function, the risk of a car accident goes up, etc.
When people exaggerate about how hard they worked, and you sense they are angry (the discourse almost always includes a phrase like "busted my butt," or a swear word, or both), underneath that you very often find deep resentment, because they really weren't enjoying it at all. No one can sacrifice their whole life pursuing money. They end up resenting everyone -- those with more, and those with less. Everyone else is to blame, for something or other. If nothing else, then for "high taxes." How is that better than "blaming the system?"
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@daniellove162 Who ignored any of that? The obvious default is to allow them to be sold, and the steep uphill climb is to question them. At some point, we need to pause and reassess. Because at present, there is no such discussion -- as usual, where technology is concerned. People dive lemming-like to embrace an apparent convenience, and don't even consider for a moment what grave effects on privacy it might entail. That is the story of 21st century consumer technology. Any proposal to limit it in any way is met with instant derision. Well, all of these "conveniences" have turned people into howling toddlers, for one thing.
Who cares whether I impress or not? That seems to be your obsession, not mine. And ultimately, I don't care. That's the real default, for everything. Make a buck off of the Next Big Thing, or turn the page.
P. S. Are you pictures any good?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@KH-aug I'm a huge opponent of that, but allow me to remind you that 15 is the most common age of consent in Europe, and 14 may be more common than 16.
If it were up to me, I'd put it at 18 in general, and 16 or 17 only where the age difference between the partners is less than four years. And I'd put it at 21 for creating or transmitting certain images of oneself, and similar activities. In other words, I'd tighten this up a lot. Apparently, based on what the law IS, most people disagree with me -- sadly. Before you defame anyone, however, take that into account.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@brianhillis3701 This is always the story you're told, and it certainly has a grain of truth, but state schools did NOT have to lose tax revenues and force up prices to build football stadiums, luxury dorms, and sports complexes. It was a choice. The VAST majority of students have vocational majors, and have for decades. What do you think the single most common major is? Business, of course -- and it has been, for decades. Then come all the health-related majors, with Nursing at the top. A Business degree, without either enough accounting to pass the CPA, or enough advanced math to understand finance in depth, is USELESS. Those are people who hate to read and can't write, and don't complete a year of calculus. Of course they don't speak a foreign language unless they learned it at home.
A Business degree without rigour is a demonstration of docility -- nothing more. It also signals that your parents weren't very imaginative, and worse yet, weren't rich. The oligarchs look down on that. Oh, the irony!
2
-
@brianhillis3701 Well then you do know. But you also must know that labor markets change, sometimes rapidly. I remember when the "tech bubble" burst right around the same time as the 9/11 attacks, and Computer Science majors were unemployed. Come 2003, fresh grads with the same degrees were preferred over those who had worked part-time at Staples since their 2001 graduation, selling computers. Graduate into a serious recession, you risk not catching up for a decade. So, what to do? Going back to school, with more debt, sounds completely insane, but . . . Well. What would you tell your son or daughter? I would not want a Computer Science major to settle for Staples, that's for sure. I'd give them as much money as I could, and have them take a night class at some high-prestige, expensive joint! You play it as it lays. :/
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@steves6756 "You and only you are responsible for your plight in life . . . "
Those who lost loved ones on 9/11, in Iraq and Afghanistan, to the COVID pandemic, pediatric cancers, mass shooters, medical malpractice, rogue cops, or who were victims of Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, so-called clergy, etc., etc., etc., not to mention those who lost a chunk of savings thanks to countless frauds like Enron, or because of pension funds that invested in fraudulent CDOs and swaps before 2008, etc., all thank you for that.
I can advise you about one thing: don't try to become a real writer.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@BurroGirl You know, when I heard that in parts of India, ivermectin was being given to all the residents of a particular state as prophylaxis, I thought it was just a typical Internet rumor. Later I found out, from a legitimate news magazine, perhaps Forbes (I forget), that the Indian government most certainly did distribute ivermectin as prophylaxis, and that WHO strongly objected to this decision and cautioned against relying on ivermectin in this way. In MY opinion, the SCIENTIFIC approach would be to attempt to determine whether this course worked. There are undoubtedly confounding variables, and some sort of multiple regression would need to be employed, and a causal relationship might not be established, despite our best efforts. Still and all, if a person is not curious, and rejects these QUESTIONS, then they are not employing a scientific approach. They are deploying propaganda. No thanks.
2
-
@BurroGirl Well-designed studies have their place, as does epidemiology in actual practice. In fact, the latter has to be considered. It should be obvious why. Every fully approved drug has to continually be monitored for its actual effects on actual people, using it in their actual, daily lives. The NIH's official position on ivermectin is that it warrants further study, and that there is not sufficient data to recommend it, or to tell doctors to refrain from prescribing it. Go to the website and see. Or, if you want to hear actual scientists discuss this pandemic, you could listen to Lex Fridman interview Dr. Racaniello, who is a virologist at Columbia University. (Both he and Fridman are, of course, vaccinated.) But maybe I misunderstood you. Do you not want to know whether the use of ivermectin in India made a difference, assuming we can determine that? Surely you can't be saying that you don't want to know. Everyone wants to know.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Since it seems that no one is going to give Wolf the right of rebuttal, I hunted down a few videos of her myself. I don't pretend they were a representative sample -- in fact, in light of the recent censorship, they are likely to be the ones that survived. In any event, from the few I saw, what struck me were all the times she was very careful to state that she was not a medical doctor, that she was not a statistician, and that she did not have the necessary expertise to take a hard look at the data. Then she called upon people who do have that expertise to get involved.
She had no trouble saying three little truthful words that would have made all the difference over these past three years: "I don't know."
I don't hear that from Klein. I don't hear that from any administration mouthpiece.
On the other hand, I also noticed that Wolf sometimes exaggerated the risk of certain side effects that we now know to be common, but that were systematically denied or minimized by the CDC, FDA, NIH, and other bad actors. I don't like or approve of either one, or regard exaggeration to be an antidote to minimization. It isn't. We WERE lied to, by those with an obligation to tell us the truth. The only corrective to lies is scrupulous truth-telling.
On balance, I find Wolf much more likable and believe she is sincere. I also find it much easier to check her claims and forgive her errors, but only because she is more humble and concedes her limitations. But as I said, I don't like or endorse exaggeration any more than the poisonous gaslighting we have been subjected to. Exaggeration makes it too easy to dismiss the truth that the problems with the vaccines are serious and are not being given the attention they deserve --- and to write people off with pressing concerns as "conspiracy theorists." That that move still works (still!!) is disappointing.
I agree wholeheartedly with your points. Thanks for the Gray Zone recommendation. It sounds great.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Reckless Ron I have noticed that well-written comments are much more likely to be disappeared, in one way or another, than are bizarre rants, and this has been true for as long as I remember -- certainly over 20 years. The worst rants stay up, and really vile abuse stays up. One ostensible explanation is that the well-written posts contain factual assertions, and anyone can single out a statement of fact and call it misleading, based only on what it emphasizes. On the other hand, rants are "opinions." Opinions can't be deemed false so easily (even a baseless opinion is someone's opinion). Notice how sinister this is: it makes you think everyone is nuts, that no one can think rationally, and no one out there agrees with you. It makes you think you're really alone.
I think it's deliberate. I've seen it too many times, for years, and everywhere. I only joined YouTube when my state shut down in 2020, and YouTube is exactly the same as every other platform. Everyone I know who takes the time to post interesting stuff says the same thing.
You mentioned the unusual vaccines you've had. Are you a veteran?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@yigalordbanette8044 There's another factor here, too. Granted, in the homicide case of a woman, especially one having an affair and contemplating divorce, there is always a spotlight on the husband. I don't deny it's a common pattern. Fine. But there is also another pattern that isn't rare, either: woman and man, or woman and friends have a big fight, woman stalks off, then meets with foul play. This is more common in cases of unmarried women than married women, more common at night than during the day, etc., but it is hardly unknown. People fixate on one possibility, and don't even consider whether media is skewing their view.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Richard Garcia I totally disagree about Gray, but I'm not naive about what you mean. Dore does not have power, and women like Gray and Halper and Susan Sarandon are in it based on the principle of the matter. But to take the most extreme example of what you mean, Harvey Weinstein, who was powerful, had so many of the women he oppressed (and worse) not only afraid to speak out (having seen what happened to those who dared to speak out), but also praising him to the skies. These types of dynamics are tragic. They lead to women resenting all men and being mistrustful of all men, which is crazy unfair. Well, you are overgeneralizing, too. Dore is so obviously working class that he turns most bourgeois people off. How can you miss that? That's what's happening with Dore! He has no real power. People support him in spite of his rants, because he is often right.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@nickmaliha983 Oh, a lot of people do, actually, and did. Noam Chomsky and Tariq Ali come to mind first. Harold Pinter sure did, as did the entire editorial board of Le Monde diplomatique. Oskar Lafontaine, Alain Badiou, Jose Saramago come to mind as well. Danielle Mitterrand had serious qualms about it. The list is long.
I think Americans have trouble standing up in these sorts of situations not just because the average affluent person (with a supposedly good education) is not very well educated, but also because the US has a history of savage civil rights abuses and war crimes. Hence Americans are extra afraid of being accused of complicity, every time anything that could possibly smack of complicity in atrocities is concerned. And we do know atrocities were committed in the Balkans, especially by Serb irregulars in Bosnia.
Anything that requires nuanced thinking is avoided, for fear of being denounced. So, when affluent Americans get their marching orders, mooing and braying in unison is the norm.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@thomashasty2936 Intense, unrelenting propaganda, fear-mongering, forced isolation, and economic insecurity was imposed from above, followed by a mandate they had promised would never be imposed, thus dividing society in two -- and they hid what they knew, such as the inability of the vaccine to prevent illness and spread. People who noticed contradictions were vilified unrelentingly. This was imposed top down. That isn't what happened during either the Russian Revolution or during the rise of Hitlerism. There was no bottom-up movement at all. It was ordinary, working people who were scared but also baffled -- this seemed to have come upon them like a lightning strike on a sunny day. VERY few ordinary people sought to control strangers. Browbeating came from bourgeois managerial types, including the C-suite, doctors, academics, the best-paid media spokesmodels, etc., and it started in 2020, long before any vaccine. "Essential workers" were abused and manipulated, and ridiculed for being afraid to go to work while being told to be afraid. This used to be called a "mind f***."
Funny how many were economically ruined --- but a few became millionaires and billionaires. Ha ha.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Dantianblue Pub Med article from August 2023: "The pooled hazard ratio (HR) revealed no significant association of COVID-19 vaccination with all-cause mortality (HR = 0.89, 95% CI [0.71, 1.10], p = .28). Regarding cardiac-related mortality, the pooled HR suggests that COVID-19 vaccination is associated with an increased risk of cardiac-related mortality (HR = 1.06, 95% CI [1.02, 1.11], p = .007). Subgroup analysis showed that the male gender is significantly associated with an increased incidence of cardiac-related deaths (HR = 1.09, 95% CI [1.02, 1.15], p = .006). In conclusion, COVID-19 vaccination may be associated with a small increase in cardiac-related mortality, especially among males."
That's what they admit so far.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@beyondthemaya3881 YOU need to understand something: schools have been conducting shooter drills for a decade now. NO ONE with the least bit of talent is going to teach your kids. Anyone with ability who goes into teaching will want to teach the children of the 1%, or, at most, down to the 10%, in the richest suburbs. Just keep it up. Because any child of Tucker Carlson will be just fine. Yours, not so much.
So just keep it up. Encourage lost boys like this, who don't even get a GED, don't have fathers in the home, and pick up various delusions from cynical strangers on the Internet. That's intelligent all right. If 2020 looks bad to you, wait until you see 2040. But maybe you're a paid troll, so you don't care, this conflict was made for you. Cha-ching!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Pan-Britannic Traditionalist Conservative Of course I do. You think modern day rentier are just landowners? Oh boy. I'm not going to say what I'm thinking. Did you stop reading books in 1900?
"Russia and China have no safety net." First, that is either incoherent or untrue; second, a non sequitur. (Are you saying they DON'T educate their children? Are you suggesting they infantilize them, to boot? Well, if they are as intent on building up their militaries as you claim, I think you have your answer right there.) YOU really don't know what anyone is talking about!
Listen, I don't have a dog in this fight. My family is in Europe, literally all of them, and if I live long enough, I'll join them. You just keep it up. Makes no difference to me, old chap.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ICUFREE2 But this is well known: it is the phenomenon of double consciousness most notably and eloquently described by Franz Fanon, but also many others as well -- quite a few other writers and scholars originally from the Caribbean. It is the simultaneous construction of an identity, coupled with the full consciousness that that identity is denied and a false identity is imposed upon you by the oppressors. So in the end, you know your mind and their mind, but they only know their own mind in a limited, unreflective way, convinced as they are that their construction of reality is the "true" reality, it is "scientific," "realistic," and all that. In fact, they don't know what's going on at all.
I'm just writing out what you've always known.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I wish Jack would speak in a more coherent style. After listening to Justin Jackson and Briahna Joy Gray today, this is uh uh uh, like, uh getting, uh, painful, uh, like, y'know what I, like, mean? HA. HA. HA.
Detracts from an important point.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Maybe you don't know what that's like, to be a crime victim as a child.
I frankly don't see how someone who made it as a best-selling author, really made a fortune, and then returned to school later in life to complete the doctorate she always dreamed of -- at OXFORD, no less -- and in the meantime was married to a New York Times journalist and had two children, was divorced and remarried, to a very successful US Army veteran and security expert, can possibly be "committed to being a victim." Sounds to me like she committed to being a winner, which she is. And to telling her story, no matter how much it exposes her to these insipid analyses.
She couldn't be browbeaten into accepting medical interventions that she had reservations about, either. How many people resisted the push to vaccinate? She did.
That's no victim.
You appear to need to believe there is less rape than there is, and that it's less bad than it is. Is that true? If so, why?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ManjariIR Few people have the knowledge or the time. Who will take off 10 to 12 weeks from work and do a "DYI rehab?" I mean getting up early every day, going for a walk in nature, having the very best organic food, walking or biking or swimming again, reading, or writing, or painting, or playing music, getting a massage, yoga lessons weekly. And above all, calm talking. No shouting. No blame. At first, the person should never be alone.
Yeah. I'm serious. You try this, then if it doesn't work, you get professional help. The issue, obviously, is that you want to avoid prescriptions if possible.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Jimmy, in every European country, everyone has to say socialist-sounding things. It's why the Nazis called themselves "socialists;" there was no hope for any opposition party that didn't. Everyone from Einstein to Oscar Wilde called themselves a socialist, and this was in contrast to communism, in fact, used not in a technical sense, as a historical moment on the road to communism, but to indicate a more moderate left wing stance.
As you can see, this is still true. She is very far right, by European standards. Of course, being in the opposition to the neoliberal elites, she will say many things that the Left also believes. You were right to notice her support for Ukraine.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Goodhello369 Wrong about what? That AP is purely an elective, not a required class? That a private non-profit entity, namely the College Board, sets the standard for the course? That no one is ever required to take such a class for high school graduation? That if an AP class does lead to actual college credit, then it is legitimate -- and if it doesn't, then it is misleading the students who elect to take it?
Or that a seminal article was written well over a generation ago, before this became the bruhaha and political grift that it now is?
No, all that stuff is true.
Oh, wait. You're telling me that there are public school teachers who don't know any of this, and haven't read these authors, and are just spouting propaganda they are told to spout, and taking home a paycheck? That such teachers actually exist? In 2023? I'm shocked, I tell you! Shocked, shocked!!
2
-
2
-
@Goodhello369 Just read about it. Bottom line, anything can be relabeled, just like in false advertising or counterfeit goods. Parents have to review the actual materials and ask to see what their child will be given in school in order to know what is actually being taught. However, what Bostic was involved in is elementary school curricula, which is where the laws against CRT are stringent.
This has no bearing at all on elective AP classes in senior high school, except insofar as parents should always ask to review the required reading. Texts should be available to them to look over, during board meetings, parent-teacher night, parent-teacher open house, PTA meetings, etc. I'm all for it. None of it should be hidden or mislabeled. And AP should be accepted for actual college credit, as promised, or it's not real. My position from the start.
The one good thing about classes from home via Zoom is that more parents found out what was going on.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@tonyrmathis All sorts of things are possible. Perhaps the Vietnamese are descendant from aliens who came to earth from another planet. That might explain it.
But I'm genuinely puzzled. When did I say more money was the answer? Isn't "more money" what Wall Street always needs? (Seems that Trump, Bannon, the Biden family, Nancy-kins, etc., all do, too.) You also seem to know who is "causing the failure." And "preventing to [sic] who depend on them from seeking alternatives." Who would that be? Who can you pin that one on?
The educational system in the US is the most capitalistic of all, since it relies heavily on local taxes for its revenue, guaranteeing vast inequalities AND training its charges to view this as "natural." Moreover, the private school system is so different, and teaches such vastly different things, that it may as well be in a separate country. It is evident that there isn't any commitment to universal public education based on equal opportunity. In fact, a conservative columnist over at The Atlantic writes about it this month. Great article.
France once had a system within which anyone who presented themselves for the aggregation civil service exam, the highest rank for educators and a requirement for eventual university teaching, would have to teach the upper grades of lycee for a number of years, wherever they might be sent. Simone de Beauvoir did that. She taught high school. (Not in Paris, either.) No cushy nonsense back then. Today, I don't want to ask. (Though it is interesting that Melenchon wants to see Latin and Greek widely taught in the public schools, so maybe there is hope?)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
scottmoore37 I'm sorry, but you're late to the party. Our discussion went far beyond this already.
It's like barging into a discussion about the latest German study concerning rare heart damage from some recently deployed vaccines and piping in with, "but measles can be dangerous" when no one is disputing that.
No, what this is about is suggesting a radical medical treatment that has the grave risk of sterilizing a person and limiting other major life activities, as well as having unknown risks to their cognition and their ability to enjoy intimacy some day, while they are still a minor and cannot know what they might be missing. Is how "society perceives you" more important than that? How perverse is that?
I'm still against making such treatments a crime, as is Abigail, but the case for making them a crime turns out to be stronger than I realized. I only hope it never comes to that. We have far too many criminal laws already.
On a related note, however, when a teenager, especially an adolescent girl, suddenly displays severe gender dysphoria when she never had the slightest indication of experiencing that before, maybe we need to find out whether she was bullied, molested, or sexually assaulted. Maybe that needs to be the first question.
Considering what is happening to kids in our society, it would come as no surprise that to treat some of these kids effectively means to treat the trauma stemming from what what done to them. The backlash against "me too" has not been lost on them; I think a lot of them are more reluctant to tell what happened to them now than they were before -- and they'll be "affirmed" if they just say they don't want to be the gender they were born to be.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@adolfolerito6744 I like having the actual information laid out like this. But notice, for example, in my state, 11% of the total population had a confirmed case of COVID that came to the attention of state health authorities. By now, it could be higher, so let's say 12%. (The true number could be much higher, 20 to 30%, but that is not known, and most of those cases were undoubtedly mild.) Of those 12%, under 2% died (roughly 1.85%, but let's go with 2%, which mirrors the US as a whole). So, 0.24% of the people in my state have died of COVID since the very start of the pandemic. This is a huge number; after all, 0.1% of one million is 1000. But that puts a different spin on it. The fact that so many people who had moderate COVID had organ damage and other problems, including major depression, is a better argument to take the risk of vaccination -- if it works. But that's starting to look questionable as well. More and more fully vaccinated ARE contracting moderate COVID. It is only fair to ask: is vaccination giving people a false sense of security? Maybe we better be less "vaccine-centric." Maybe other avenues, like better prevention and treatment, need to be found, in addition to vaccines.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Yes, there are Israelis who support a real peace and justice movement, and consider Israel as devolving into apartheid, if it isn't there already.
Israel has more people in that movement than the US does, and they are more genuine, trustworthy, and ready to take real risks for justice, and are not on the take, from anybody. Or did you miss that part?
In fact, one was a prime minister who was assassinated. Huh.
And Katie barely scratched the surface. These comments, from Americans, are meaningless. Let those people -- those Israelis -- be heard. They live there.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jamesgarvey8402 The technical reason Social Security is not a "Ponzi scheme" is that the new dollars coming in are from payroll taxes on salaries that generally keep pace with the overall economy (and when they don't, younger people still in the labor force usually have options), whereas the payouts do not keep pace with real inflation.
Social Security benefits are never raised to account for the full impact of inflation. Hence, the benefits depend on the salary you earned pre-inflation, for the rest of your life, and the only sure way to rectify that is to return to work -- which means you contribute to the system again. That's not a Ponzi scheme.
What Social Security is dependent on is adequate revenues -- just like police, fire, public education, DOD, DHS, and well-maintained bridges and highways.
And what you need to worry about is whether the continued growth of the stock market is dependent on privatizing Social Security and Medicare.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Scott Covert The point was to make the university more like a business, rather than the unique institution it once was, taking its inspiration from Plato and Aristotle. Well, now we're there. The most common major BY FAR is Business Administration, and has been for at least 30 years. The next most common is, broadly, the Health Sciences, with Nursing in first place. Students graduate with serious debt, so of course most treat university primarily as a trade school. Academic freedom has been dumped in favor of Tone Policing, and the new Advertising/Marketing landscape of Facebook/Twitter. To get a job, students learn to massage their image and stay on the good side of HR departments. So, the schools are giving the kids what they need to make money.
A lot of people wanted university to be a business. Well, what's wrong now? There's no free speech at a business.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@bobbunni8722 No, that's what happened when states withdrew tax support from their state university systems, and then government-backed LOANS to individual students, not actual support for schools, came in to occupy the space. IOW, another money-making scheme for FIRE (Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate) was born.
Now, a student whose parents are not already rich dare not study what he has a real flare for. He has to study what will be instantly marketable upon graduation, so he can pay off his loans. Any other course is a risk. But studying in an area where you might turn out to be outstanding, and actually create new things, is better for you and for society in the long run. Dare you try? No, you must live in debt peonage. FIRE will see to it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@lydialutz My goodness. Where to begin?
No. It's futile. You're unaware of the history of the term and its recent use, or what the central characteristic of a baseless, often conspiratorial, explanation is: it grossly violates Occam's Razor, and new iterations of it are typically grosser violations. In other words, in response to contrary evidence, it gets more and more complex.
I still remember when George Bush didn't want to answer an inconvenient question and his eyes lit up, a smirk formed on his face, he pursed his lips, and said, " that's a conspiracy theory." Magic words. No further thought needed.
Your government thanks you for continuing to push this "narrative." Narrative!! 🤣
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@SpellboundTutor There is proof Fauci lied about masks and herd immunity and several other things. The truth about the lab leak theory is that if this virus was enhanced in some way, chances are that fact makes for a stronger case for vaccination, not weaker. Sounds like "natural" immunity is not so likely, and predictability of the course of the illness, or future mutations, is less likely. Those are reasons TO vaccinate.
But that's just it, lying makes people more scared. It makes people believe something really big is happening, like when parents will lie to children to hide the truth. I had a minor operation two weeks ago. When they told me that major emergency surgery could be needed, and a blood transfusion could as well, THAT is when I calmed down. The worst case scenario, presented to me honestly, is what made me exhale. That's how I knew I was being told the truth.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@josearaujo8616 Anyway, I don't agree that we have new forms of value creation. I think we are creating more behavioral addictions, more hidden means of risk shifting and, above all, more efficient means of rent extraction, while the traditional rents (housing and the like, which are literal necessities) are spinning out of control, to the point where more and more people can no longer afford them.
If we shared equally in the growing productivity of labor, we would all have shorter work weeks and work lives in the manufacturing and distribution sectors. At that point, more ambitious people could change careers between 40 and 50, and work another 20 years at a more reasonable pace. If they entered management, they would actually know something. Those who wanted to retire and live modestly could, but that would not mean having luxuries. It would mean no wolf at the door. And no billionaires setting up their own pseudo-countries, either.
As matters stand, we are on the precipice.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@norman_5623 Thank you. I am so surprised that no one seems to be clear on this. Even in Texas, the conditions you have to meet, such as attempting to use something less than lethal force, or proving that lethal force was necessary without trying other means first, ends up enriching criminal defense lawyers. (The offender won't get your property, but the lawyer will get a chunk.) Various Castle Doctrine laws have to do with occupied structures. In lots of states, you have no obligation to wait and see who is breaking into your house while you are at home, much less waiting to see whether that intruder is armed. You are presumed to be defending your life and limb, and you can use deadly force. It will not matter that the person turned out to be unarmed or under 18. :/
When a drunken kid tries to break into a house he thinks he has a right to enter, and he gets killed that way, people act surprised, but the truth is, the person inside the home is presumed to be defending himself and had a legal right to shoot. I know one kid in Colorado died right in the doorway, but the homeowner was with an infant and was not legally in the wrong (we can talk about ethics separately). The kid broke in. That is a tragedy.
A nation full of gun owners doesn't know the rules.
I'm shocked every day. Shoot me now, put me out of my misery. ;(
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@marieroxylox1456 1. "Gender Studies" (the new name for Women's Studies) degrees are rarities, accounting for about 0.5 to 2% of all degrees. The others you mention are relatively uncommon degrees as well, compared to Business, and they lead most often to Law School. "Gender Studies" may be a pre-law degree as well, or the person may go on to an MFA, MPL, etc. Or, doctorates, of course, and then writing books (there is little point to a PhD if you aren't going to write actual books, plural, although some historians and political scientists do work as civil servants for the State Department). Gender Studies is not usually a terminal degree that can lead to a job, true enough, the way an EE degree pretty well always will.
In short, the degrees you mention have nothing to do with the prohibitive cost of higher education, or make much difference concerning anyone's inability to pay back their loan.
Sorry for knowing stuff. You're right, it is useless. And worse than futile. Why did I even write this? I clearly had the wrong major.
2
-
@ubiquitousdiabolus Well, people with those degrees typically go on to get an MSW, an MFA, a Master's in Education, a JD, or even an MPA or MBA (if they took enough math). Or they go to college primarily for social reasons, then get a paralegal certificate, or they train in one of the med/tech fields, and get hired before those without the BA. Yes, I know people like that. Yes, a major hospital will hire a person with any BA plus certification to operate the MRI machine or to give mammograms before they will hire someone from community college. Fair or not, it's simply true.
A friend who was a Marine and then got an art degree from one of the best schools in the world now sets up communications infrastructure (anything and everything to do with connecting to the Internet, etc.) and they fly him out all around the country to do the work spectacularly well, and make it LOOK NICE, too. Hectoring kids into majoring in Business or Nursing when they don't want to is the mistake. You have to like what you're doing to do it well.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ASheepNoMore I suggest you look more closely. The survival rate is much higher in people under 40, but in men 50 and over it is already worse. Did you know that? In women who are normal weight with no underlying issues, the virus becomes dangerous after 70. Then there are aftereffects from having COVID. My friend's brother developed blood clots from COVID, including in his lungs, and he was in excellent health. Women get less sick, but are sick longer, with greater risk of depression and cognitive problems. This is true. It's not their imagination, there is a BIG sex difference in response to COVID and to COVID vaccines across the board.
I have questions, I do hesitate pending full FDA approval, and am paying attention, but I am not opposed to vaccination. We get flu shots, and we KNOW that COVID is at least ten times more dangerous, easily.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gnlout7403 No, actually, most reasonable people (and thus also the law) would not treat those words, in that context, as a genuine threat. The fact that she calmly called in a 911 report rather than FIRST seeking safety, by removing herself from the area proves she did not, either.
Please don't go into law enforcement.
Should I really believe you? One of my closest friends was a Marine, enlisted right after 9/11, put in 13 years, and I cannot imagine him agreeing that was a genuine threat. He would have thought the guy was rude and abrasive, but threatening? I'll have to ask him, I'm curious now.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Suze, @thegoodsmaster Exactly! And I am serious when I say so many new "jobs" involve propaganda production: all MSM, all social media, advertising, marketing, public relations, think tanks, NGOs, foundations, PACs and other lobbying organizations, all political party jobs . . . I am sure I am forgetting something big.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@OMGAnotherday Nice discussion, thanks. I'm also becoming very concerned about the effects political measures to alleviate spread have been having. Constant focus on health, pitting people and groups against one another, and stoking abnormal fear of disease and death has been going on for so long that it is starting to kill and cripple people, too.
I saw a video from Switzerland about people who have declined vaccination, and it was very interesting. It was obvious that some people's reasons were nonsensical, and some expressed normal, human concerns. The side effects are bad enough that everyone knows someone who had an inordinately bad experience that they probably should not have exposed themselves to, since they were too young to be at serious risk from the disease. And to be fair, it may not just be vaccines; the constant din about health may have added to their stress, slowing down what would have been a faster recovery from the side effects. This can happen, too. I bet it has. I still remember when "wholistic" was taken seriously.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TheRatsintheWalls BUT that is NOT what I'm doing. Did you read my whole comment? My point is, he ignores the people who are not only getting basics taken care of despite their irresponsibility, but are vacuuming up billions, even trillions, while causing clear, identifiable harm, to everyone, that we can document. It's not impressions, opinions, etc. HSBC really did get away with major money laundering. Major Wall Street bankers and others did manipulate markets, LIBOR, etc. The BP well did explode, and leaving BP made Tony Hayward vastly richer. Vastly. I can have a real discussion with anybody who sees that, too. I don't care how conservative they are, culturally or otherwise. Thus guy punches down, knowingly or not! Time to WAKE UP.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mkhud50n They are almost certainly hiding the origins of the virus. They did hide the initial outbreak. I'm more interested in what else they are not telling the rest of the world, that they have an obligation to tell.
I was opposed to the lockdowns, by the way. Early (by Feb 1), short, and really hard may have made a difference. Mid-March to June 1 was just torment and economic ruin for millions, with very limited benefit, if any, and side effects we are still suffering from, including poor mental health, irrational fear, and the willingness to do anything they tell us to do to avoid another lockdown. The unethical and probably illegal vaccine mandates were a product of the irrational fear of COVID and of new lockdowns.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@gavintrades3425 Easy: fifty years ago, minimum wage jobs covered rent, medical care, and in-state tuition literally everywhere in the country. This gave people opportunities to become educated, live where they want, and try out different jobs without being petrified of ending up on the street. The top four quintiles in income had a chance. Now, only the top quintile does; in fact, only the top 10% is truly secure.
No, Silicon Valley and Wall Street have not provided us with a better life. They have provided us with a financialized service economy and mass surveillance, plus advertising we can no longer spot and defend ourselves against. When people are always watched and don't make real things, count on lying to be a major job description. No, it's not good.
Also, if you've ever lived in different cities with different levels of inequality, you know from experience that less inequality is better. Some inequality is normal; San Francisco level makes no sense.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I'm reminded of the possible breast cancer cluster in the San Francisco area, which took a LONG time to analyze. It turned out that the number of cases, though higher than what may have been expected, was within the norms of the demographic affected, and the "cluster" was not statistically significant. Yet it was important to let women know to be vigilant, and do what little we could determine might lower risk (such as exercise, occasional fasting, more plant-based foods, vegan days, etc., and of course regular mammography).
Similarly, we DO have a problem with vaccine injury, and we DO need to get to the bottom of it. Screaming at the victims is vile. Multivariate analysis is not easy, and takes a long time to complete because there are unavoidable judgment calls to be made. The report from Germany that Dr. Campbell highlighted in his previous video is a basis for starting a serious inquiry, never mind all of these other studies. I don't prejudge how it will end, but there is too much signal amidst the noise. Dismissing it is bad faith, and does nothing to reassure the public concerning the integrity of the medical system.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dnbjedi Well, read the critiques of Jung. The notion of archetypes is too strong a hypothesis. There is ZERO reason to think you need to believe in such things to obtain ethical guidance in any sense: either because they embody ethical truths in some way, or because they are a useful fiction, to help you set up a worthy goal for yourself, a North Star to orient your life. If you read the Socratic dialogues of Plato and Kant's work on ethics, this stuff would not impress you. Kant was very deeply Christian, AND saw the need to put ethics on an entirely nonreligious foundation. If you like archetypes, read Robert Greene for your entertainment instead.
And anyway, which archetypes have staying power? This stuff doesn't speak to me and never did. I don't come from the same folk tradition as Peterson. The ethical truths we actually have in common, as people, are far less "fancy."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@protonx80 Well, mathematics is humanity's universal language. When explained correctly, everyone will come to agreement on it -- meaning that yes, if we agree to adopt these starting points, and agree as well to these rules of inference, then we will agree on the answer. So, you don't get your own mathematics and your own mathematical truths, no matter how strongly you may feel. Math, like every language for that matter, is a collective product. You may be used to dictating elsewhere, but you don't have that privilege here.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CanoeToNewOrleans Do you know what happened? Sullivan is a law professor, and continues to be. After there was serious police misconduct in the Harvey Weinstein case, with a detective coaching a witness and hiding exculpatory evidence -- both of which have constitutional implications -- Sullivan briefly joined the defense team. The hue and cry was deafening. They hounded him out from the position of Dean because they no longer felt he was on the side of protecting women. So Harvard, in a magnificent show of feminist solidarity, fired him and HIS WIFE. Don't take my word for it. Look it up. (In my opinion, and although I would never have had anything to do with Weinstein personally, I think the case did become interesting after the police misconduct came to light. I support anyone who wanted to join the defense for that reason, and college students are supposed to be mature enough to understand why a lawyer would. They are adults. I admire Sullivan, actually, for daring to take a hugely unpopular case.)
If universities are among the most inclusive places, then we are in a bad, bad way. Every larger office I've been in is more diverse than any school -- authentically diverse. I think many schools are looking to groom a certain type of alumnus, and that they tolerate differences of opinion among majority-background students that they would see as "threatening" among minorities. The diversity is superficial. Anyway, a possibility to consider.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I have an idea. You could read the class action complaint and actually see what it is they are asking. If you had any idea of what those years are like, you would know that anyone with any sort of setback that affects their mental health should not be excluded from their previous activities and their friends and their life. Throwing them out of school, and prohibiting them from visiting campus, for no reason apart from their major depressive disorder, is astounding.
If you had cancer, you would not withdraw. You would undergo treatment, and then return to your life -- your job, your friends, your social activities, and you would be advised by your doctors not to isolate yourself.
So, is "old school America" a place that excludes the less-than-perfect? Is that part of its "tradition" of Social Darwinism and eugenics? I wouldn't doubt it. Maybe "old school" is exactly what got us to this place.
It's also remarkable how many future political leaders and prominent jurists spent an inordinate amount of time at Yale getting drunk. That wasn't a "community disruption" somehow. But it certainly was "old school."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
No one will admit that the vaccines approved in the West are a disappointment at best. We do not even know how Chinese, Russian, Cuban, etc., vaccines compare. Why isn't this simple data, such as it is, and so early after vaccine development, available? We should have all the available information.
I read some suggestive data on Sputnik V being just as reactogenic as other vaccines using adenovirus as the vector, but not causing fatal blood clots. Well? What happened? Was that true or not? It was being tested in South America, and it was available in Mexico. What have they found out, if anything?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@aquato33 Well, if the issue concerns taking up space in hospitals, how was the second surge in 2020 managed, which was far larger than the first? Lockdowns to slow spread where medical resources actually are taxed to the breaking point could become necessary, but that isn't an entire economy. There are other, more effective measures possible -- finally, at-home testing kits will be covered by insurance. They have been in Germany for a long time.
The POINT is, massive lockdowns did not end the pandemic, but did serious harm. And Sweden, which had no lockdowns, has a lower case fatality and per capita fatality rate than we do. Japan's rate is phenomenally low, despite hosting the Olympics and having a relatively slow vaccine rollout. We need to share information.
We also had record drug overdose deaths in the US . . . BTW. :/
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@antonioj123 The most common major by far is "Business," and has been for 30 years. Most such degrees are demonstration of docility. Where has that gotten anyone?? Either that, or the "Business" major takes enough advanced math, finance, and accounting to get an MBA and CPA, and maybe even a CFA. Or a second degree in IT.
Once upon a time not that long ago, a student could pay in-state tuition and fees for a full year at the great state universities (Michigan, Wisconsin, Berkeley, Virginia, Texas, . . . ) with a full-time summer job making the minimum wage. People who did that were a different people.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jimosborne2 Actually, we do have a problem with "no," since it is a ritual for many people. It doesn't mean what it would mean when I say it. But I'm petrified of pointing out even more "diversity" that every adult knows about but seems to send you off on a tirade.
I've never been a fan of any of it, so don't come for me.
It's a question of who we jail, who we ostracize, who we banish from a job or career, isn't it? And on what evidence? If you don't ever want to watch Brand again, and you want to tell everyone else not to, based on this report or on far less, that's no problem. Go ahead. I find him almost unwatchable anyway. He sounds crazy half the time, and his style of comedy only rarely lands with me. But that's just my view. We live with people who are very different from you or I, and I don't plan to jail them all, or force them to cower in their homes, based on some anonymous accusations made to the press about things that happened years ago. That's not moral, that's madness.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@DoctorCataclysm They may self-censor, and almost certainly will. You must think public employees are more courageous than they are.
Socrates was controversial in community college; what he had to say was too stirring, and went beyond color by numbers. What the administration wanted was insipid textbooks and multiple-choice tests. IOW, punch the ticket and move on.
I should know, I used to teach community college part time, back when I was more public spirited than I am today.
Socrates' sexuality didn't usually come up, but if we read Protagoras or Symposium it did. The Apology, no, Gorgias, no, Republic, no. I did not bring up extraneous matters, NOR did I censor anything.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@garthdryland First, these numbers are prelimiary -- I have read research papers with the opposite conclusion. Second, there is at least one glaring flaw in your reasoning: you are comparing known cases of COVID where young men were suspected of having myocarditis and tested for it (when we know that in young people, COVID can pass unnoticed), with reported cases following a vaccination. You know whether someone was vaccinated, and you know to watch for the side effect -- it was first reported two years ago. You may not know if a young person had COVID, because it is so often very mild. So that denominator in the COVID group could be much larger, and the myocarditis rate smaller, than you think it is. Then there is the problem that we don't always know who had COVID before being vaccinated. Vaccinating those people could turn out to have been unwise, especially if they are young and have robust immune responses.
But just parrot one study. Whenever I finish a post like this, I pause to wonder why I care.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@margottfon330 Well, that is true, and I say that as someone who is quite agnostic. In fact, if hypocrites do make headway in churches or other religious institutions, it is so often because MOST of the people who attend are very sincere, genuine, deeply devout, and therefore have a lot of trouble believing that others, who appear to profess the same faith, are actually . . . Fakes. I think people often fail to appreciate how emotionally devastating that experience can be. Happens all the time, though. There are reasons hypocrites target churches, schools, etc., places we expect to find more trust and tenderness, etc.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Lindsey0007 I'm so sorry, and I know how it is. Truly, I do.
I know of seven cases, confirmed, where people suffering from cancer were emotionally abused or excluded -- five were women, mostly with breast or ovarian cancers, and two were children, both boys. Yes, even pediatric cancer -- it's staggering. A person has to look for ways to find emotional sustenance and reinforcement. I can also tell you from experience that American culture is the worst where obsession with money is concerned, and bullying is rampant. It is VERY hard to maintain perspective. I spent five years outside the States, which was a revelation, and even I've been worn down.
I have found reading helps much more than any more modern media, because the process gives you more control. Journaling is rewarding. I have found that I can lose myself in the arts. But it is still very hard. I also regret saying this, but giving others a "second chance" has almost never been a good policy -- which is hard, since I am only doing what I would hope others would do for me. Sometimes you can't. When you know who someone is, don't talk yourself out of believing it just to have company.
These are not good times. It is very, very hard to maintain perspective and know that it is not you. Societies in decline are not fun, and we are always taught to self-blame. That is nonsense. This society is not doing well. Do all the things that could help you. Don't skimp on good food, exercise. Take breaks from news. Do the thing you liked most when you were 16 or 14, or 22. Reach back. Be kind to yourself.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@thehumanity0 Let's get specific. Why should someone who has never been outside the country, who has never had a passport, who never listens to the BBC, much less news in another language, who of course is monolingual, who has never been to college, and who hasn't gone to a library since high school, believe there is a pandemic? Do you see lots of evidence all around that the politicians YOU want to protect from "infighting" are taking it seriously, and appreciate the urgency?
Who and what do you think needs to be protected now? Nancy Pelosi, with her infamous trip to Chinatown and the hairdresser, and who thought eating luxury ice cream and chocolate was a strategy to keep one's chin up during shutdowns? Really? Then she needs to pay you.
2
-
2
-
@thehumanity0 Don't swear at me. It's not my fault that you can't follow a carefully laid out argument. Actually, you did follow. Swearing is what you do when you know you've been exposed. The fact of the matter is, while there may be plenty of reasons to be tolerant of Sanders, there are no such reasons to refrain from challenging Pelosi. I'm not going to repeat my argument to someone who swears. You're tedious. Justin Jackson said it well. So did Katie Halper, Max Blumenthal, Briahna, Dr. West. Where are the progressives in the Biden cabinet? Who did Pelosi appoint to a committee chair instead of AOC? A woman who DID withhold her vote in 2018, and who started out her political career as a Republican. That was low, BTW.
You DON'T talk as if there is a pandemic and a looming recession, or worse. You failed to acknowledge it as a factor in making M4A urgent, and voting against M4A risky. So I can no longer despise the people who really wonder whether the pandemic is a "hoax." They are simple people, and don't understand how the jaded operate. All they know is that their jobs are disappearing. But I'm supposed to care about the political class because . . . Help me with this, LOL.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kevinsyd2012 To follow up, by comparison, in one study, the MMR vaccine caused one death in nearly 3 million doses. The rate of probable adverse events, all types, was about 3 per 100,000 vaccinated (not doses, but people). That is a vaccine known to have significant benefits, lowering deaths from infection in general in children, not just deaths from measles, mumps, and rubella.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jfangm No one can create anything independently of government. First, the limited liability corporation itself is a creature of the state, and has certain rights as an entity independent of its principals, agents, governing board, and owners. Second, governments confer patents and aggressively protect intellectual property. Third, they provide courts within which to litigate contract disputes. Fourth, they protect global air space and shipping lanes. And fifth, they favor large corporations by allowing them to externalize these and myriad other costs. That's just a start. We could get down in the weeds as well and find several dozen other ways corporations depend directly on government, over and above basic research and the five items already mentioned.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kwg5044 Say what??
You wrote: "Jordan's wife had nothing to do with this except for your personal censorious defensiveness."
Where do you see that I did any such thing? Can you be serious?
Then you conclude with, "The real question right now is why you are reacting emotionally to something I didn't say." Is everybody Hillary Clinton now? Er, um, you . . . just did what you accused me of doing. I didn't.
First of all, Wolf did not make a career out of her trauma. And in fact, if she was able to produce books, and obtain a doctorate from Oxford, and meet and marry an Army man, all as the result of trauma, that is called heroism. That kind of creativity in the face of pain is among the highest achievements a human being can aspire to. (See, e.g., Dostoevsky.)
That is exactly what you do with trauma. I don't know whether she did, but she certainly did not let it stop her.
My strong style of writing does not mean I'm "emotional." It means I can write.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@JorgeAlbertoJerez What is the case? Citadel, Yellen's benefactor, owns RobinHood, which prevented BUYING of GME, but NOT selling. It put its thumb on the scale in favor of Wall Street hedge funds, which themselves are creating systemic risk AND getting fabulously rich off of that risk. Where is their "market discipline?" RobinHood could have recommended a suspension of ALL trading in these stocks to the exchange. Or, also neutral, it could have raised margin requirements on those involved in such (unwise) trading -- i.e., trading in speculative, momentum plays on borrowed money. That's fair and reasonable. But no.
IOW, any investigation for market manipulation of those using RobinHood to trade is beyond her purview now.
You are being disingenuous. I don't know what is in it for you to pretend this is all above board, when it clearly is not. I'm not dumping on Yellen, I tend to like her, as these sorts of people go. (Nor did I suggest she should step down. No such hint.) That is a red herring.
I'm not going to waste any more of my time, thanks but no thanks.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@user-xg3uy6hq9g I can use logic: if a person is in shock and paralyzed by fear, then they are not in a normal state, capable of doing normal things. If x, then y.
"How many people come face to face with someone like that under those circumstances?" Who was "someone like that," at the moment she came "face to face" with him? What were "those circumstances?" Based on what we know now, or based, obviously, on what she perceived then?
We know what is "normal" through case histories of other crimes. We also know based on the fact that other countries mandate calling for assistance if you are able to do so and do it safely, and failing to do so is considered a crime. This is called "nonassistance a personne en danger." Such lack of assistance in those societies requires an explanation, and such societies generally include civil law/Roman law countries (common in Latin American, Latin Europe, Russia, and elsewhere).
We, I admit, have no such general obligation. So I guess it is normal not to call in that sense. In my opinion, I don't like to see it normalized from an ethical point of view, but, as you can see . . . well. We are on our way.
Good luck to you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
michael nola I'm so sorry that you imagine you have deeper insights of the underlying logic of federal legislation than others do. I submit that you cannot predict what would happen if M4A were put to a vote, anymore than the result of the last election could be predicted. (Did you expect the Democrats to lose seats in the House, and fail to take the Senate outright? Did you expect Trump(!) to take Iowa, Ohio, and Florida? I didn't.)
It's one thing to posture about M4A, and quite another to be called upon to vote on it in a formal roll call. What you're describing is what usually happens. But that's not what always happens. This could turn out to be one of those times when the usual doesn't happen. I mean, they do keep telling us COVID is an emergency. Isn't it?
One (additional?) "small" problem: millions have lost their health insurance, and millions more will. Do you expect them to line up meekly to take a vaccine that has been approved on an accelerated timetable, if it turns that the side effects are significant, for most people? You do, huh? And are they also supposed to believe they should trust a government that has done next to nothing for them, and that holds them in contempt? If they're on their own in this, well, they have no reason to feel obligated to comply.
You think most people don't know that every other country has universal health care? You think they're all so stupid they don't know the care is generally better?
Let's have our legislators take a Brave Stand. Let's see how that shakes out.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@bluelanterns2982 The NEJM, Nov 13, 1997, has an article on the Nuremberg Code, 50 year anniversary. It pertains to experimentation on human subjects. It is very worthwhile to read it, and to keep an open mind about how various mandates constitute an encroachment on basic human rights. There is NO WAY an EUA can possibly support mandates. In any case, who can force you to go to a doctor for any treatment, ever? That is your choice. You have to consent. People can be quarantined for public health reasons, or obligated to wear masks, or any number of things, but they cannot be forced to accept any intrusion on their body. You have to PERSUADE them to give consent.
It isn't "a thing," my arse.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Sam j What cherry-picking? That was her life. What have you done for your mother? Furthermore, she is a married woman expecting a child. Where is your respect for that? (Just can't hold your tongue?)
Her father won a lottery and put aside the money so that all three of his children would have college funds and no need for loans. Very commendable, I agree. A very cool thing to do. It doesn't, however, buy the right to profit from his relationship with her. (In my own life, I always cut my parents a lot of slack, so personally, I could never hold it against a father, but family relationships, especially divorced family relationships, are complicated. I won't judge others. Anyway, parents SHOULD educate their children whenever they can. It is their job.)
People think Meghan Markle "got more than she deserved," somehow, hence the hatred. You focus on her because you find her very attractive. That is an opportunity to practice feeling attraction without having to lash out at the object of your attraction because you can't possess that object. It's a good discipline to learn. It is a skill that is less rare in other societies, I can vouch for that.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kevinsyd2012 The October 23 article you cited states that the data they used only went up to March 24, 2021, well before the Delta variant came on the scene -- and long before they could determine the effect of gradually waning vaccine efficacy. Since that time, boosters have been recommended. In any case, a vaccine that prevents, say, 75% of the vaccinated from transmitting a virus for a period of 6 to 9 months can only slow the spread of that virus. And no particular individual will know when their own immunity will wane, or whether one day they have mild COVID that feels like a little cold, they plan to test but somehow don't, and they transmit the virus to someone else.
Not to belabor it, but when you go ad hom, well . . .
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@josevigil4233 I have listened, at length, and I admit I've only read excerpts. I think it's a huge pity he gave up pursuing philosophy seriously. I have no doubt that he is talented.
I'm not trying to censor him. I'm giving my opinion, which is at least as valuable as anyone else's. I think there is an essential dishonesty in all of these gurus, and their primary concern is not in making you happier, but more docile, so that you'll be less of a "problem" for your family, friends, job, the medical system, the nursing home. I went back to an old writer lately, none other than the compulsively irreverent, spunky and brash Eric Jong, in her earliest works. It's making me happy. It's making me want to do stuff. I'll worry about "spirituality" later.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@zeusathena26 On the contrary, there is as much hesitancy in Germany as in the US, and more hesitancy in France and Russia than in the US. But it is less politicized in most of the rest of the world, that is true.
Do you seriously think telling someone they were not injured by a previous vaccine when their doctors told them they were, and then trying to provoke guilt in them, is persuasive? Persuasive to what purpose? Anyone who succumbs to disrespect and takes a medicine they do not believe is good for them based on sound reasoning (and that has not yet received full approval from the FDA) is not functioning as a responsible adult. They are just bowing to pressure.
Look up CDC information, or any other official source, and see what it tells you about vaccine efficacy. We hope and believe immunity lasts longer than six months but we do not know. We believe immunized people with mild "brealthrough" infections are not highly contagious BUT we do not know. We think booster shots will be needed, and that people may choose different types of shot from their initial vaccination, but we do not know. IOW, no scientific basis for your pontificating.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ginalynn6963 Gina, you are spreading outright lies. If what you say were true, why does every country have a vaccine program, including those outside the US sphere of influence?Also, some, like Pakistan, are offering many choices, none of which are mRNA. They may be right, they may be wrong. But they are clearly not "under the thumb of Big Pharma." China has vaccines, as does Russia, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba . . .
This is why I question whether the wildest anti-vaxxer stories aren't planted to make everyone hesitant look STUPID.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@benisjamin6583 YouTube followers? And it's spelled "ad hominen" -- but pointing out hypocrisy is not ad hominem. His recent health issues are just another example of being incapable of walking the walk, and of being a human being who displays himself as being wise but is no wiser than anyone else. My personal life remains personal, and I'm not going to risk compromising my privacy to prove something to some stranger, but yes, I have done far better than Peterson -- with refugee parents. Of course I have three degrees. How about you?
If he's a hero for you, ask yourself why you need him to be your hero. Not only have I listened to him, but I've read all the major works he recommends on his website. A combination of Nietzsche and Jung gets recycled pretty regularly, and is known to appeal to the youth, especially young men. (Did you know that? Well.) Peterson needed the money, for real (his family has long-standing health issues, sheer bad luck, not self-generated), and he found a way to monetize it again. I'm surprised. I also read a few chapters of his book, the ones that looked most promising, and felt sorry for him. Worse than I thought, much worse. At least he speaks to people most of the insipid chattering classes ignore. I'm not sure that most of what he tells them is so good, however. Very few gurus ever have anything good to say; pick your flavor of self-serving, because that is what they are.
"YouTube followers!!!" The new desert of the unreal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dorianoeser1529 Certainly. She was demanding to be placated, or else she was going to expose Dore, and she had his note to prove her case, since that apology was an obvious admission of wrongdoing. Whether there was any promise or concession he could make at this point, such as a firm commitment to stop "running his mouth," to the benefit of Ana, was left ambiguous, though of course Ana's intent was clear. IOW, she got her message across, yet obviously without risk of prosecution. You'd think she practiced this stuff, or something.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that were implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere. (The bad ones get implemented immediately.) Starting to see a pattern?
So, who was so disappointing? The students were fine. You are biased against them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hazmat5118 Well, I agree that early variants, including the original virus, were clearly more dangerous to older people than current variants are. It now appears that even early on, young people were often asymptomatic, so the vaccines were probably not as helpful to them as to those over 40, and especially over 70.
I think at this point we know a lot of people were injured by the vaccines, but now the discourse is shifting, so that those people are being scared they they will never get better. This is unbelievably cruel, and appears not to be the case. Jennifer Sharp, who just wrote, directed, and appeared in the documentary Anecdotals, said that she herself is almost back to normal, and most of her side effects ended within several months of taking the vaccine. They were not trivial, but her life was not at risk and she is much better. For her, the real story was the silencing and shunning she was subjected to after she had a reaction -- which may have made her symptoms worse. That ticks me off hugely.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The term "conspiracy theory" has been weaponized. People who do not understand evidence-based reasoning or Bayesian probability, even on a bare, intuitive level, and spin a more elaborate conspiracy when a simpler story is revealed to be baseless, are giving real conspirators the perfect cover.
RICO was designed to address something.
Extensive research into clandestine operations has revealed astounding conspiracies by the FBI and the CIA to dupe, use honest artists and writers as fronts, experiment on people with psy-ops protocols, and assassinate dissidents. Read Frances Stonor Saunders, read Flint Taylor. Or read The Atlantic on Ted Kaczynski, the "Unabomber." Or watch a BBC doc by Adam Curtis, take notes, then do your own verification of the claims.
The real strangeness of the world, and of what people will do to one another, feeds these theories and the anguish of the people who believe them.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@chedderburg No. Most humans want the reputation of seeking good, because that reputation is rentable. You can monetize it. Saying that most people seek good is failing to appreciate goodness. Goodness is not common.
I can personally give you, off the top of my head, seven examples of people who were emotionally abused after contracting cancer. Two were pediatric cases. I represented one of them in education rights, for free. We lost in the end. The one person on our side quit. In another case, the company payroll clerk tried hard to get a woman fired for it, because health insurance premiums would go up. Do I need to tell you she was very vocal in support of charities? She read her Bible at lunch.
Very few people are good, even fewer are evil. Most are mediocre. The mediocre are more likely to do what the evil want them to do, or at least what won't attract the attention of the evil. It's safer.
Frankly, you come across as someone who never tried to stop evil. If you had, you'd know. (BTW, I already offered my home to Ukrainian refugees if needed, through a Ukrainian friend. You?)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kommisar. Read what I said again, and try using your imagination a little. Do you remember what used to be major issues? Here is one example: there was a time when during parent-teacher night/open house, every child's mother and father were expected to come. Well, some mothers worked nights, and some fathers wouldn't come without the mother. Then also, some fathers were handicapped or absent, and some mothers had died. Do you think these "deviations" from the teacher's notion of "norms" were always treated sensitively, or that they are treated with sensitivity now? Do you think a little kid should have had to announce that "my dad left," or "I don't have a father," or "my mom is in a wheelchair?" (Why?)
Do you think there are no children now whose parents are LGBTQ+? Do you imagine they aren't vulnerable to bullying or exclusion? Do you expect instant universal agreement on how that should be addressed? Well then, accommodating a diverse population will ALWAYS raise issues.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
You seem to discount the power of Western/Anglosphere propaganda. Think back when the USSR collapsed. (I agree with SFC that it did not have to, by the way.) The Soviets were not so weak relative to Reagan and Thatcher that they had no hope of reforming and continuing. American society, in particular, is much weaker than it seems -- and every crisis proves it. (E.g., COVID followed by waves of riots, drug overdoses, shootings and mass murders) The typical American college grad knows less mathematics and science than a European 17-year-old, or a Russian 14-year-old, and is more likely to need (really need, not feel like they need) psychotherapy. The Soviets folded anyway, because they believed they needed to spend their treasure on useless armaments. Nor did they believe the 1990s would be as devastating as they were. They were too optimistic, actually. The same thing could happen now. Look, Greece is in the state it is for a reason. It blinked. It was persuaded that it had to. Hmm . . . No it didn't. A deft combination of smoke and mirrors, plus the will to be without principles or mercy when embarking on war, keeps the dollar where it is. It's still working.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sovereignD What are you talking about? This is a contagious disease. You HAVE TO rely on others to protect you. I will grant, in THIS society, that is exceptionally problematic.
Trump had three opportunities to change this trajectory: in February, when he knew this was airborn. A hard shutdown, over by March, followed by prudent measures to keep the little fires from spreading. A second chance, after COVID already took root, to take scientific recommendations on mitigation seriously. Even a third chance, after he and his family got sick! He could have showed compassion for others, and pushed hard for stimulus. He blew that, too.
People don't like to be reviled, jeered at, and blamed, for falling ill. Just keep it up.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@integrallens6045 I will grant you, it is not intuitive, and at the extremes, there are judgment calls. But in these college cases, the line is drawn when harassment is directed at a particular student, just as it would be in the workplace under Title VII hostile environment discrimination -- which, by the way, is a hard standard to meet. (Justice O'Connor wrote a lot of those opinions for a conservative Court.)
Students are considered personally more vulnerable and in need of protection because they are young, but are also expected to be able to listen to ALL sorts of opinions and be exposed to ideas they find abhorrent without going to pieces. If they feel threatened by an opinion and don't want to engage the speaker in a discussion, they are supposed to learn to walk away, not run to Mommy. They are supposed to organize their own demonstration, or write for the school paper about it, etc. Yeah, well . . .
After the COVID disaster, I don't know how anyone is willing to give the government more power to encroach on any Amendment, including the Second. Personally, I regret having to acknowledge that, but facts are facts. A free society means taking personal responsibility.
My best friend hated guns, then married a veteran who had them. He asked her to join his gun club and give it a chance. If she couldn't do it, he'd get rid of them on the principle that all the adults in the home should be trained. Well, she ended up practicing marksmanship and winning matches. :)
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@tessa63627 I didn't see this until now. First, there is no data whatsoever on the AGE at which surgery was performed on the people in this meta analysis. Second, here is a line from the study: "Overall, follow-up time from surgery to the time of regret assessment ranged from 0.8 to 9 years." Say WHAT? How can you even mix such disparate time frames, much less generalize over a reproductive lifespan? Even nine years is not a long time, and does not respond to my point. Third, a 1% regret rate is equal to 1000 per 100,000 cases. Were this a side effect of a life-altering, irreversible drug or other treatment, it would require warnings. Fourth, I saw no mention of puberty blockers, perhaps because young teens were not in the samples? You go and read it and show me if that treatment is included. No one is trying to curtail adults in pursuing their happiness.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that were implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere.
So, who was so disappointing?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@liuj88 In one segment, when they were discussing the civil rights case brought by the "Central Park Five," Amber cited completely discredited evidence, and it was evident that no one on the panel had read court documents that were easy to find -- I certainly had no trouble. In New York state at that time, to maintain a civil rights case on that basis required not just dismissal of charges but exoneration, which meant actual evidence of innocence. (Only recently has that requirement been very slightly relaxed -- by the current, conservative Supreme Court, opinion by Kavanaugh, of all people.)
This media is like any other: whenever I know about something independently, I find gaps in their reporting. In a more astute age, we called it talking heads.
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Natalie-earth Literally no other country I've heard of recommends vaccinating infants. I'm, like, if Switzerland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, etc., don't do this, it is automatically off the table. If they do, I may consider it. But if they don't, I won't. That's where I'm at now. ;/
Different countries' ministries of health have English-language websites now, and I check. Someone actually told me I was lying, and that that is not possible (!!)
Er, yes. Yes it is.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@BiologyalwaysWins You can find these studies from about nine months to one year ago; further studies have shown that the immunity wanes, so that today, most people in the hospital are vaccinated -- though proportionately, it still looks like the "vaccines" reduce the risk of hospitalization, but less and less through time. I've found them.
I have been following the ministries of health of other countries, to be honest, not the CDC. The NIH will publish studies from abroad, and I look carefully to see where the journal and the researchers are based. It takes some research to find them, but they are there, and the benefits are not particularly impressive except for the oldest patients. On balance, it appears men over 50 and women over 60 benefited, and in general people over 70 benefited the most, but they were almost certainly not informed about the risks, to obtain their consent in the first place.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@phazemekaniks What am I getting at? The fact that mandates for everyone are known to be ill-advised. That is the evidence. Who is telling YOU, or people like you, not to get vaccinated? You're not a teenaged boy, are you? You haven't had a case of COVID and a serious reaction to the first shot? I'm not a doctor. I'm not judging your personal medical decisions. We aren't debating medicine here, but social policy. Keith Olbermann isn't a doctor, either, or a psychologist. Or persuasive. Or sane. He'll turn people away from a vaccine that could benefit them with his bizarre rant. But you think, what? That Joe Rogan or Russell Brand, or Jimmy are the problem? How? Russell and Jimmy got vaccinated, Rogan had an appointment to get the J&J vaccine when it was pulled. He stated his parents were vaccinated, and he was happy they were. I think his wife is as well. Cut the crap, sheesh.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@kakip7700 Well, just a few days ago, I was remembering the ceaseless suicide bombings in Israel the summer before the 9/11 attacks, and how after the attacks, everyone forgot how tense the whole year had been. So don't accuse me of being oblivious.
That something happened does not surprise me. That this happened today, on October 7, 2023, at daybreak, certainly does, yes.
The entire world has bad leaders now. I knew that, too.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@davidaponte3600 I was speaking of a case where the offensive individual apologized in writing and promised to never repeat the conduct, and the apology was by all appearances accepted. That's why I mentioned a contract.
When this has happened, what do you think about repose for the perpetrator?
The b u ll sh-t we see here on this particular video is bad for victims and bad for women. Moreover, if your daughter is saying that purely verbal harassment should be treated the same as homicide, rape, and similar offenses, then I do not agree. But as far as anyone having the right to speak of their own experience and feelings, at any time, that's obvious. Ana can try to use this incident to silence people, and the women on MR are free to join in. THEY are arguing for censorship. I'm not. I agree with everything you said at the end, and I think it follows perfectly well even if a person has no patience for Jimmy's style and politics. You just DO NOT use sexual harassment allegations in this way.
I'm writing in part just in case our buddy, The Feminist, who swore at me and called me a liar, considers coming back, LOL.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@ParalyzedPower Be really kind and tell them that there are a lot of children who are troubled now, and we should be careful not to make them feel unwelcome at school, or to scare them or subject them to teasing, because they are not well. All we can do is understand that they have emotional problems and we can try not to hurt their feelings. But most important, tell the kids in your family: Don't listen to those kids. They are troubled, they are lonely because of how they are, and sometimes they wish everyone else were like them, but YOU are YOU, you are fine just the way you are, and we love you.
Keep it simple and clear. Loud and clear. Don't do anything to start a tug of war; that's what provokes an adolescent to side with their "friends," to "prove" they are brave and loyal.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Let's be clear, however much the US is responsible for the last 8 years leading up to this escalation, Putin was wrong, first, to escalate when he chose. There were still alternative courses. Second, the Russian allies should have secured the Donbass months ago. The current fighting is sheer brutality. I don't minimize America's role. But we all know the non-NATO world has to deal with them, knowing full well who they are and what they do . . . Sorry. No apologetics for Putin. He, too, is presiding over a catastrophe. He made grave choices too, gravely wrong. At least from the look on his face, he realizes it. As for Biden, Pelosi, and the rest of that motley crew, well . . .
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hizzlemobizzle This could be a very good experience. He needs to think it through carefully. It used to be that anyone who qualified could go to university in most European countries tuition-free, so that is huge. I lived in France for five years in the 1980s, and can tell you, two or three years to perfect the language is essential, and much more valuable than just one year (it takes a year to get your bearings), but more than three becomes a real problem UNLESS you get a job with an American company. My family had strong ties to France, a lot of family friends lived there, my parents were born in Europe as well, and all in all, I lost my assimilation to American society in that length of time. That was a mixed bag, to say the least. In short, I wouldn't change it for the world, but I advise people not to stay more than two or three years without reconnecting to the US in a meaningful way. It gets hard if you stay a long time and then try to come back. You change too much.
I have to retire in Europe. I cannot make it here as an elderly person anymore. I'm a foreigner where I was born.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Let's see what Libs of Tik Tok has actually done:
On the one hand, collecting videos actually, voluntarily posted on social media by various people, particularly those teaching young children and minors in general, is a public service. People have a right to know who is forming the young, and whether they have sound judgment. No argument!
On the other hand, Libs of Tik Tok didn't just "curate" these videos. She made extremely inflammatory comments, accusing the makers of the videos of some of the most heinous crimes against children. Not hyperbole; she really did call for arrests for what is essentially free speech.
You see a good guy in this picture? Lorenz, by the way, is the last person to expose Libs of Tik Tok, if anyone should. Big "if."
Sure Libs of Tik Tok is a public figure. Don't go down the "power differential" rabbit hole. Anyone can destroy anyone now. We all know that.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@askaneconomist8265 Purchasing power can account for ANY difference. In 1968, a couple both working full time, minimum wage, could afford an apartment in Manhattan, never mind Queens. Los Angeles, San Francisco, Denver, Seattle, . . . theirs for the choosing. A minimum wage summer job covered a year of in-state tuition, fees, books, and supplies in every state.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The previous post has some good thoughts. I wonder if other people have convinced you to feel self-loathing? You do know that literal heroes, who have saved lives while under fire, have had anxiety issues -- plus PTSD, plus phobias. I'll never forget the anonymous memoir of one man who said that if he had not been decorated for bravery, he too would think he must be a weakling and a coward. But he knew he wasn't. Part of your brain is not sending the correct signals, and other parts know it. That's why you suffer. If you felt no blame for simply following your impulse to avoid what your brain is telling you to avoid, you wouldn't be suffering. It's your knowledge that avoidance is objectively unnecessary that makes you suffer. Well, ignore the negative voices. Don't try to stop them or argue with them. Just note they are there, note that they are not unfamiliar, because you've had them before, and then give yourself permission to go about your day without heaping criticism on yourself. Always do as much as you can, plus try to do just a little more.
Have you ever read any memoirs of people who lived through WWII? I remember a video of Jacqueline de Romilly, in which she said that the clarity of the years of the Resistance to Nazism had made that time easier to bear in some ways than the subsequent decades of peace, relative safety, and much greater confusion. You don't know who has it objectively harder in every respect.
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have a question.
Where do people study mathematics, as a major or a (full) minor? Or do they, in the US and UK? Where can someone who is solid but not gifted learn calculus, differential equations, advanced statistics, abstract and linear algebra, real analysis, etc., except at university? They can't teach themselves, or go on YouTube. Well, maybe one in 10,000 actually can.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fubartotale3389 I apologize for saying "you," especially because it was meant in a more generic sense and it did not come across that way at all. What I had in mind were the people one or two generations behind you, making fortunes as social media "influencers," and in other advertising-related and "infotainment" (i.e., propaganda) fields. The Facebook, Twitter, Linked-In, etc., fortunes are essentially that.
Even Dore (55 years old) was a bricklayer. People like you, who were born right after WWII and the Great Depression, had entirely different lives, and I know that. Anyway, I do apologize.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zakglove6536 He was tried and convicted. The burden shifts to him to prove actual innocence, because his appeals (concerning whether he received a fair trial, whether the evidence was legally sufficient, etc.) were exhausted. He lost every time.
If the DNA on the duct tape were from someone else, someone whose DNA is in the criminal database, then they would have to start retesting a lot of the evidence. Only then could they move for a new trial. What they mentioned about chain of custody being a problem is true, but it really shouldn't be. They know to preserve all evidence in a major case, and they know technology advances. I think it is fair to test this. It's a long way from establishing innocence, though.
Consider something else: this is sad, but true. Don't imagine that everyone who comes across remains immediately calls the police. Yeah. They don't, and we all know why. It is not rare for remains to be contaminated by a third party, or even a negligent evidence technician. :/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@yn5568 But they were not discussing school choice at all. Bri was putting that issue to the side, to point out that nearly every school -- public, private, semi-privatized/charter -- will face the same issues of accommodating competing interests, UNLESS all of the parents have some say concerning who will be admitted. If you can run a school like a condo association, or like a commune, then you can be certain that every child will come from a home with values generally in line with your own.
I'm not clear why either that, or school choice, have a bearing on this case. There was a CRIME. Crimes happen in schools. Students commit them, teachers commit them, support staff commit them, people from the outside barging in shoot up the place, etc. I think the focus in this story must be on safety.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@deanok306 No, BRITISH sources. That was where the report came from. Well, the credible report anyway. I don't follow CNN, etc., for anything important, or really anything.
Reuters: Sept 20 (Reuters) - The White House on Monday criticized the use of horse reins to threaten Haitian migrants after images circulated of a U.S. border guard on horseback charging at migrants near a riverside camp in Texas . . . Reuters witnesses saw mounted officers wearing cowboy hats blocking the paths of migrants, and one officer unfurling a cord resembling a lariat, which he swung near a migrant's face.
The Independent: Sept 22 -- The second-in-command at a union for US Border Patrol has tried to defend the use of horse reins around migrants in Del Rio, Texas, where tens of thousands have arrived from Haiti. . . Recent images from Del Rio have shown migrants fleeing Border Patrol agents on horseback who are wielding their reins like whips, with a Reuters witness catching an agent unfurl and swing one in front of migrants.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DamonBrazzellUkesploitation That was what I noticed when I lived in France. Parents were frequently unmarried, but the dads were more involved than in the States, married or not. It was funny to see guys in a leather jacket, chain bracelet, and smoking, with a baby carriage. When we saw one with an infant in a snuggly, a child by each hand, and a child car seat strapped to his back, my mom and I just looked at each other.
There, the idea of not being a dad because you aren't married or you don't get along with the mother was anathema. It was incomprehensibly unethical. There was no one, man or woman, who didn't want to raise their kids.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@entium1 After the savings and loan crisis, the Reagan administration (Republican) PROSECUTED at least some of the wrongdoing. After the 2008-2009 debacle, the Obama administration (Democrat) FAILED to prosecute a soul. Not ONE person. No clawback of bonuses, either. You mean you forgot?? (Or, you think it is partisan to give credit to a Republican administration for doing something, however small, about enforcing laws pertaining to finance? Huh. Surprised.)
In any event, the POINT is, the person who started this thread with the first comment was exactly right, and you are a trash talking __ who has been neutralized. You can stay up to keep bloviating if that's how you do "self-improvement." No one believes you, if they ever did.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davesears9681 I don't know, and don't think so, but I don't like this whole picture. Unacceptable risks, likely undertaken because of corruption, an accident, and very serious incentives to hide the accident and then to find ways to use the event as an opportunity -- sure. It would hardly be a new phenomenon. This kind of the game plan.
FTX and the 2008 financial crisis both worked a lot like that, and they had nothing to do with viruses. It's a very generic pattern, isn't it? FTX likely had more intent behind it than a legitimate accident would, but 2008 definitely has these features. The BP GoM spill, too, had a few of these features. Tony Hayward became a commodities trader after that and made vastly more money. Perverse incentives are structured that way.
But anyway, an actual grand conspiracy, instead of mini-conspiracies to cover up misdeeds along the way, is not impossible. I don't think there was anything like that going on, but I would never say you're wrong. I keep questions open until I'm really satisfied that I have a true answer, or that I'll never have an answer. :/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rsaggar Agreed completely about origins; not as sure about vaccines, as I have family in an area that offered a variety of vaccines, including Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Sputnik V, and Sinovac, and many chose Sinovac. My family got Pfizer as soon as they could, had no hesitancy at all about getting vaccinated, and now acknowledge the vaccines were a disappointment. Doctors in their region do not recommend boosters for the time being except for those with comorbidities or, of course, for those age 70 and older. They live in a non-ideological society in southern Europe, where saying stuff like this is not a cause for controversy, much less "cancellation." This is all "matter-of-fact" for them.
The safety/efficacy profile of each of the major vaccines is still something we don't have enough solid information about. You have got to wonder why.
Great talking to you, and it is heartening to hear that people still remember that brave Chinese doctor who went public, then died.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrisrhule1760 Who decided to lock down the country, not for weeks but years, and to go on a wild campaign of denunciation against anyone who refused to comply? When did we have a CALM, reasoned discussion about COVID, in a united spirit? All we had was the worst divisiveness I have ever lived through, the impoverishment of MILLIONS, a mental health crisis, and vituperation from ALL politicians, regardless of party -- who themselves got richer, "somehow."
Wow, just wow. Mattias Desmet. Remember that name.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here is the actual First Amendment issue:
Let's put this case aside. Let's try a pure hypothetical. A man abused his former wife. She, however, abused him as well, and engaged in truly odd psychological behavior intended to goad him, rather than making honest attempts to get his abuse to end.
Does he have a right to tell his story? Can he publish it? Suppose he tells the truth about her abuse of him, but fails to acknowledge his abuse of her? That may be a pretty seedy discourse, even an infuriating one, and partial, and misleading -- but it is not defamation. It is First Amendment-protected. Or at least it used to be. "Be careful what you wish for."
As for Depp, he has never faced charges. He has only sued, in two countries now. The crowd has you believing he's the victim.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shahbazshaikh9169 No, your math is wrong. It depends on combinatorics, i.e., how many ways are there to select 20 students from 1000 students, where order is unimportant and repetition is not allowed. But of course that omits the fact that several students who previously dated Teacher A could all take Teacher B's class, etc. You're not accounting for a lot of possibilities.
All people come with feelings, and feelings always matter, but limiting how much one person's feelings should influence policies that deprive others of opportunities is not feelings-driven. I have NO problem with you or anyone else thinking this controversy is enough to turn you away from voting for Morse, just like some people decided not to vote for Krystal. It is the systematic smear job that should worry you. Every single student "victim" of an adjunct lecturer could one day be smeared in the same way, for one thing or another. If you don't see that, I frankly envy you. I was once optimistic that way, too.
If you want to lobby for a rule that no faculty of any rank can ever date a student at the school where they are on the faculty, you are free to do that as well. The reason there is no such rule is partly because of the math.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@StaryWkurwiony I don't know whether you know, but lawyers can get disciplined for lying about something so momentous. They risk a black mark on their license.
Now, you could say he has connections, and so forth, so he is hardly vulnerable, but he practices law not only in the US, where the current government is on his side, but also in the UK, where lying about stuff the government ardently supports is not protected speech and can lead to serious trouble. In short, it's not very likely that he would risk it.
But you didn't consider that, huh?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@elyg I'm pretty sure you never read Brandenburg v. Ohio, RAV v. St. Paul, the Westboro Baptist Church case, or any harassment case, or any book on propaganda, or free speech, or antisemitism, or anything, probably. Or listened to a single Glenn Greenwald talk on any of these issues, like, ever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Stormer13 It has been shocking to me how much is known and not shared -- and how much is censored as well. Dr. Campbell has spread the word on Vitamin D in particular, and zinc is of some help as well -- plus, there is evidence that these vaccines may work better in those with ample vitamin D levels. (Or maybe it's just the D!)
When I write about something I've read in a peer-reviewed journal, in a measured way and with references, it is almost always taken down. Look up lysine-arginine ratios, for example, and what the good ones do for viral illnesses, including this one. The least expensive foods have excellent ratios. Look at which foods are high in vitamin K and quercetin. Similar result. When it dawned on me, I felt so dispirited. Of course these are not "cures," or sure-fire prevention. No one said they were. But failing to tell us what we could DO is unconscionable. I'm being careful here in what I say, not to attract censorship. :/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MsGarnet77 I read it, and I wasn't impressed that it was solid. To his credit, he gave a summary of all the reasons his numbers could not be compared to a carefully controlled study, a true audit of VAERS, and so forth. Saying that, I don't want to suggest that deaths due wholly or in part to the vaccine aren't happening, or that he didn't detect a signal that necessitates immediate attention. The people who should be racing to study this are failing us.
At this point, they will need to do a multivariate analysis, because so many things have changed, or been imposed on us, all at once. This is not going to be easy, and the fact that they are not urgently looking into the question of vaccine safety is one of the most shocking and disillusioning things I have ever experienced.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chococat746 I agree with you about the ACLU. Depp never sued on the NDA itself, and I don't know why that is. (I wonder if the ACLU advised her it was unenforceable, and why that would be?) The standard for proving defamation is entirely different from the standard for breach of contract. That this was a relitigation of their divorce, not a defamation case, should be obvious, and the result is absurd. If she was abused at all, even if she was the worse one of the pair, she had the right to publish that article. It was substantively true. Abusers have First Amendment rights. Even murderers do. As for Depp, being liable for his lawyer's speech for one cent, much less throw in a couple of million, is mind-boggling. Did Heard prove Depp and the lawyer conspired to float a phony story? And even then. If Depp told him the story, it's confidential. If the lawyer floated it himself after finding out it was weak and could not be presented in court, then he should be personally liable, not Depp. Depp has the right to share anything with his lawyer, anything he thought was true, or suspected, or believed, or even felt, or his pure speculation without proof, etc., and expect his interests to be protected.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@franklin9400 You don't understand my point. If you understand that Section 230 blocks liability, then don't talk about the proposed law, to limit young minors' use of social media, as being an impediment to lawsuits, like Robby seems to have alluded to, and that some posts here imply. There already is no liability.
Section 230 does more than that -- it allows platforms to remove posts without liability, too. Just because they remove some does not mean they assume risk, have to be consistent, etc. In other words, they have editorial control without editorial responsibility. Maybe that's necessary, but in any case you clearly don't know that law if that's all you think it's about.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@meltedsnowman9637 The upshot is, none of you want people to have rights. If KR had been killed, you'd want the killer convicted, even if he had a viable self-defense claim, as is obvious. In fact, KR is alive and well and has a viable defamation claim, but that other twit says he should just eat it "because Tucker," or something. What happened to "a nation of laws, not of men?" Just kidding, this country still has obvious remnants of a slave society, where it's all about who you are. Blech. Proud to say I'm emigrating.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@archstantonainthere4526 Look, some contracts are adhesion contracts. A student loan is not exactly that, but it's in a gray area for sure. What do you say to someone who got a job after high school, and at 21 they see no future for themselves above $18/hour without a degree? Not every girl can be a plumber or an electrician, much less a truck driver, or a foreign car mechanic. People in retail see promotions blocked. RETAIL. It is evident that, right or wrong, college is increasingly necessary. Back when it wasn't, like, FIFTY years ago, all of the great state schools had such low tuition that a minimum wage summer job paid a full year of in-state tuition and fees, and you could cobble together scholarships, work-study, and a hundred bucks a month from home to cover the rest. Or, you could work minimum wage for a year, live at home, get about 5% interest on a savings account, and pay for four years of tuition yourself, and use summer jobs for room and board. Now, when college is far more necessary, the money isn't there and kids have to borrow. What happened? On top of it, loans cannot be discharged in bankruptcy BUT accrue extreme amounts of interest. You don't see how unfair this is?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mr.e1026 No, you are not right. Every university, public and private, maintains First Amendment fora on campus, and the rules in force consist of the full panoply of First Amendment rights as developed in a long series of cases: Brandenburg, RAV v. City of St. Paul (be sure to read that one), Phelps (the Westboro Baptist Church case), and many others. The rules that govern such a forum are NOT the rules that govern the dormitories, classrooms, dining halls, amphitheaters, libraries, and other places where students study and live, and where a code of conduct is in full force -- or supposed to be.
The rules that allow some students to chant pro-Palestinian slogans on the quad (whose meaning, by the way, is a matter of legitimate controversy) are THE VERY SAME RULES that allow students to fly an Israeli flag and support Likud. The very same. That neither one can do it in a dining hall, or when targeting individuals in a confrontational manner, doesn't mean they are subject to discipline for a lawful demonstration taking place on a designated First Amendment forum.
You could consult PEN America for an excellent explanation, which these university presidents were utterly incapable of articulating.
Or, you could just join the anti-free speech crowd. The First Amendment protects you as well, in your rush to embrace that position. The Fourth Amendment has been trashed for safety-ism, why not the First?
BY THE WAY, I was working in a government office when the US was on one of its bombing activities, against where my immigrant parents were from. A coworker praised the bombing in front of me, but expressed concern about the architecture being destroyed. Did I have a "discrimination" claim? Oh please. Don't be absurd.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What "heritage" do you mean? As an example, if you are Irish, is there any impediment to learning Gaelic, Irish folk dances, going to church every Sunday, reading Joyce or Sally Rooney? If you are English, you can't trace your ancestry, study Beowulf and The Faerie Queen, act in Shakespeare plays, become a Russellian agnostic, support the royals? Who is holding you back? Le champ est libre.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@allangibson2408 Explain why Pfizer has joined the FDA in keeping the original test data secret. Explain why the head of the CDC admitted under oath, in cordial, not adversarial questioning by a very polite Senator (and properly so, for a change), that she does not know the number or rate of severe adverse events.
There is no question that for anyone over 30 and healthy, not getting vaccinated is a crap shoot. They are taking a risk. COVID is rarely serious under 30, but by 50 it is a big deal. What they don't know is the risk on the other side, because Pfizer, the FDA, and the CDC refuse to tell. It is also obvious that COVID is generally curable, and the very wealthy have no problem getting treated. Open your eyes. Trump, Chris Christie, Nancy P maskless getting her roots done, Gavin at the French restaurant, AOC at the Met. They are furious with Joe Rogan for letting the cat out of the bag.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LadyBug1967 Well, Princess Diana and her oldest sister both had eating disorders, and Diana contemplated suicide. George W. Bush certainly drank to excess in college on the weekends. Justice Kavanaugh did as well. Then of course there is also the Unabomber, who was a child prodigy in mathematics and a PhD and professor long before he became a psychotic killer and recluse. Maybe they all knew they had to hide their problems, and had support to help them cover it up. Are all of these people younger than you?
I think these women were naive to admit anything to anyone. You don't tell your school about your mental health issues anymore than you would tell your boss. Discrimination is almost a certainty, and in any case, you are now dependent on their mercy. Federal law protects the privacy of medical records for a reason. Of course everyone needs to confide in others, but you have to choose carefully. Bill Gates tried to get Paul Allen to quit Microsoft when Allen was diagnosed with cancer. Allen lived over three decades after his diagnosis -- that is over 30 productive years he might have squandered. People need to take a lesson from this.
Of course there were depressed students in your class, students who thought about killing themselves, and students with odd combinations of learning disabilities and talents. They confided in the art students, musicians, theatre and literature majors, not the sorority sisters, and they certainly never told a professor. They were smarter about life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Esteban Oviedos What do statistics matter to Americans on the verge of homelessness? Statistically, Seattle homeless live in one of the richest cities on the planet, because Bill Gates and all (or most) of the Microsoft Board and C-suite live there. Obviously, the concentrations of wealth make poverty worse, not easier to bear.
Always so bizarre to hear about "Daddy Government" on the one hand, and then the Soviets on the other! Daddy Government describes the sweet spot of the Western European mixed economies, which were market based but had extensive social safety nets, to make sure that everyone had the basics, and could count on a decent wage as long as they did their job. Actual socialism is rugged and demanding, and it produced a Gagarin, and a Zhukov, and an Arkhipov (who saved the world when he thought he was about to die). If you say it wasn't worth it, who can argue? But that has zero to do with Daddy Government. Not to mention that the spoiled people in America today -- are the "elites!" (Jeff Bezos, who sent porn selfies to his girlfriend while married; Bill Gates, who stopped by Jeff Epstein's digs more than once. LOLOL Or my personal favorite, youth marketing maven Jane Buckingham, who gave young people a good talking to, for being too spoiled, while committing fraud to get her own son into college! Read up on her.)
Really, retire the talking points. They are old.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@za-ir5ni I can tell you specifically that no vaccine that was mandated had undergone the usual approval process, that no vaccine was tested to demonstrate that it halted transmission, that patents were not lifted, immunity from suit for injury was complete, data that should have been shared was instead guarded, and that initial safety signals that in all previous drugs had been taken seriously and investigated were brushed off in this case. That's for starters. Private schools reopened for the wealthy in the fall of 2020. Do they have superior hygiene or genetics? All of that points to something other than the emergency we were told this virus was. Now it's turning out that treatments were defective (early use of ventilators, failure to treat bacterial pneumonia, etc.). Remember how Trump and Chris Christie bounced right back, as did Joe Rogan? You know they got monoclonal antibodies that were not available to most people. Vaccination of kids and teens who had had COVID and recovered easily was mandated for school or college. Pregnant women were given vaccines based on very little study, and it took a while for doctors to concede that the mRNA travels throughout the body and is excreted in breast milk for days.
Harris also forgets that the J & J vaccine had to be stopped due to several deaths from unusual strokes.
Republican states tend to be poorer and have more chronic illness than Democratic ones. Poor people in the Democratic states died more often, too. Still, no Medicare for all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@utah_koidragon7117 I have no idea what you mean by that. What I stated was accurate. If someone, somewhere is trying to milk this (just as big pharma has), how does that affect what I said? And who is suggesting any particular therapy for long COVID that has any resemblance whatsoever to trans? It's exactly the opposite: better nutrition, better sleep, more fresh air and exercise, fasting protocols, certain vitamins --- those are the interventions that doctors are suggesting.
I had unusual fatigue after an unusually severe cold in 2019. I got a complete checkup, and a recommendation not to baby myself and to take long walks, which I started doing that very evening. My doctor predicted I'd be fine in 2 to 3 weeks. That's exactly what happened. I've had post-viral syndromes that lasted much longer. I've known people who had had viral meningitis, viral pneumonia, mononucleosis, etc., who took nearly a year to get back to feeling 100% like they did before getting sick.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
rs_ I found his reference to Italy, for introducing fines for not being vaccinated, thus making it a misdemeanor/minor infraction. Did you see where he said lockdowns alone are fascist? Some of the tactics being used, such as where police beat or teargassed anti-mandate protesters, were ridiculous, and yeah, I see a tinge of fascism in that. The fever pitch hysteria over any questions about these top-down directives, and hyperbole from people like McCullough, who has a few ostensibly good points to make, really angered me. There are no "sides" in honest, empirical investigation. Reminds me of Adam Curtis documentaries, where he shows the false flags to be false flags. Or are they? Yeesh.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"TSA officers confiscated a record number of guns at airport checkpoints in 2022, agency officials announced Tuesday.
The Transportation Security Administration said they discovered 6,542 firearms over the course of the year, 570 more than was found in 2021, which previously held the record.
The agency reported that 88% of the guns they confiscated were loaded at the time.
All those guns can be a costly mistake for travelers. In December, TSA raised the fines for carrying a gun through airport security because of the increase through 2022.
Previously, an unloaded gun carried a fine between $1,500 and $2,475 and a criminal referral, while a loaded gun found at airport security could lead to a fine between $3,000 and $10,000.
For the 241 guns found in the last two weeks of the year, the maximum fine for a loaded gun could be as much as $14,950. Repeat offenders could rack up fines for even more, according to the agency's website."
Yeah. We take this stuff very, very seriously.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Instead of worrying about a YouTube channel that started in a stand-up comic's garage, take charge. Take your child to a cardiologist, a hematologist, a neurologist, see what they say, start eating organic vegetables, cut out all unhealthy snacks or added sugar, take walks with him in pretty scenery, around forest preserves with geese or deer, or beautiful fall colors, and insist that your child WILL get better, matter-of-factly. Don't model depression, don't model excessive concern. Have after-school art projects out for him, if he likes that. New books, new paints. See how that works.
Instead you think a YouTuber is an issue? Because he doesn't support vaccine mandates for children? You've got to be kidding. Tune him out. He doesn't matter, he's not in your life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RyanRamboer-sv3pm Well that's funny. I took my first Shakespeare class of my life, at night, grad level, at a "no-name" state school well known for high actual diversity and leftist activism. We studied Richard II, Henry IV, parts I and 2, and Henry V, plus the history of the Plantagenet kings of England, and Holinshed's Chronicles, which Shakespeare used as source material for his histories, among other things. Some brilliant commentary as well. No. I'm not kidding. It was phenom, one of the best classes I have ever had.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RyanRamboer-sv3pm How do you know? That is basically saying that my Shakespeare class was a gross anomaly. Do you check out syllabi and reading lists, at other schools, to get the flavor of what's going on? When I was in college, back in the age of electric typewriters with memory cards (undergrads rarely had computers of their own, though grad students did, and one of my friends built his own computer a few years later), we knew what was going on. We read syllabi and browsed bookstores before taking a class. When a prof graded unfairly (which usually meant you had to follow a conservative Republican line, or get a C or D), the whole campus knew. And very few conservatives ever did that. They were generally honorable. Leftists accepted that they would have to read what was assigned on the syllabus, then go out on their own to read the leftist view independently. They didn't expect to have profs who agreed with them.
My point is that we got the lay of the land by doing the work to discover it ourselves. Now, with everything at people's fingertips, they don't bother to point, or click. If you want me to believe that "literally all the big schools" are virtue signaling instead of doing any rigorous scholarship, you need to produce some evidence. I simply don't believe education has become degraded to that extent, and at every major school. (Or, am I an optimist? Again? LOL)
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RyanRamboer-sv3pm Coming back to this particular clip of this particular teacher, if she doesn't retaliate against students who reject her views when she grades them, and if she doesn't call on them less, or treat them differently in any way, obvious or subtle, on account of their political positions, then she does have a First Amendment right to say what she said. It's that simple. And obviously, the student does as well. Her demeanor was poor, but even I know that's nothing new. Most people who think this through will disagree with her. Again, that is no big deal. Seriously, so what? Two things: if students feel too intimidated to argue the point, if they feel her presentation, in substance or style, is chilling their free speech, then that is a problem. If everyone has free speech, then there is no problem, but if the students believe they do not, then there is. I think that's relatively easy to solve. Second, I'd like to know how the Zoom classroom was breached. Students don't have a right to great teachers, much less to have teachers agree with them on controversial issues, but they do have a right to privacy on Zoom. A class via Zoom is supposed to be a strictly controlled-access platform, live or recorded. Did the teacher do anything to cause the breach, or was she negligent in preventing it? If she did, I think that's a bigger deal.
1
-
1
-
@RyanRamboer-sv3pm That she would grade unfairly, too, is of course possible, but it's a lot like jury service. People have an opinion about a case, but when they take an oath, see the entire trial, and begin deliberations, they usually put aside their feelings and take their duty seriously. So, when she sits down to grade, she probably does something similar.
Of course, she might also think she's on a mission to stop white male supremacist fascism. Then all bets are off. LOL
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@peterpeters2412 You miss the point. "Doing your own research" was once universally lauded. Now it is universally denounced. That is what is called propaganda. That is what we are being subjected to. You're stating there is a sound argument for caution when advocating doing your own research. You're right. No question. But no one is making any argument. Instead, people with legitimate concerns have been subjected to jeering, defamation, vilification, being fired from their jobs, and every other abuse you can think of short of beatings or prisons. And it's all been based on lies, half-truths, and assertions that no one could make because we simply didn't know certain things about the vaccines in January 2021.
I had a doctor lie to me. He told me categorically that no one had died of any COVID vaccine, at a time when it was already established that one of the vaccines was the probable cause of lethal strokes, and it was paused for that reason. Why did he do that? If I were not an avid reader, I would not have known. He lied to me, and I have a Master's in ancient philosophy and philosophy of science, and a JD. How free does he feel to lie to "ordinary" people?
Now we know the mRNA vaccines have been implicated as well. Clearly they are not suitable for everyone, yet given the way they have been politicized, doctors are afraid to make the appropriate risk/benefit analysis when counseling their patients. (The real disgrace is that any doctor can look at the websites of the ministries of health of other nations, like France, Germany, Switzerland, and the Scandinavian countries, and see what they are recommending, and compare it to our CDC. That alone should open some eyes.) What a sh*t show of shameful manipulation this has been.
1
-
@peterpeters2412 We both know how badly this pandemic was managed.
You can't lie to people -- no matter how ignorant you think they are, and no matter how ignorant they actually are.
You can't browbeat them, while declining to provide universal health care, or even take a vote on universal healthcare. It's still their life. You can't coerce vaccination, then jeer at those injured by it or minimize what they're going through. The malpractice lawsuits, not against the manufacturers but the doctors who minimized serious side effects -- some of which were truly rare and unexpected, granted -- are unlike any I've seen before. When a woman comes to an ER with symptoms and she is sent home with tranquilizers three times, and only when she comes back a fourth time is it established that she has Guillen Barre syndrome (probably more unusual from a COVID vaccine than the flu vaccine some years, and very rare from those), that is unacceptable.
I have met well-educated people who have declined a flu vaccine ever since the swine flu debacle in 1976, which was not a catastrophe and was rectified quickly. No one tried to bury the truth -- once a problem was detected, of course the information was shared. I don't understand why over 40 years later they mistrust a flu shot, but that should tell you what happens once you lose trust.
While Trump was still in office, the main players in the DNC (Biden, Harris, Pelosi) assured us that there would be no vaccine mandates, and that medical privacy would not be suspended. We all know where that went. And when you add in the rampant censorship and the obvious effort to cover up the origins of the virus, what do you expect people to think?
People have a right to be disgusted. Comics help diffuse that. It's poor solace in my book.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@o77eh Why? Lack of citizenship cannot deprive anyone of legal personhood, or the liberties the Fourteenth Amendment protects, but if you are not (yet) a person, you're not a citizen anywhere. So what? You don't have to be a citizen to have your liberty protected. You have to be a person.
If embryos and fetuses were legal persons, the question would not be up to the states to protect them or not, and to what extent. The Constitution would protect them, setting some minimum standard. "Let the states decide" means they aren't legal persons, and applies because they aren't. Overturning Roe v. Wade (and its progeny) would take us exactly there: the states get to decide how to regulate abortion. In fact, if any state choses not to regulate abortion, offhand I know of no federal law that would step in to do it. There might be one (a federal ban on "partial birth" abortions, based on a federal statute, obviously, not the Constitution).
It's obvious Cavanaugh and Barrett want the law to go there. This case won't let them.
If you have another argument in mind, let's see it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First of all, Isaac was smeared by Rolling Stone. If their goal was to promote vaccination, they certainly made a mistake.
Second, he just told you his team has said nothing to him about getting vaccinated. Moreover, there are limitations in what an employer can mandate. Do you think it could require women to use birth control? That would reduce health care costs for everyone, which is no trivial matter. Could it refuse to employ HIV positive people?
If routine, regular testing is as good or better than vaccination, should an employer accept that in lieu of vaccination, or should it be allowed to require vaccination? In any event, the players' union will have something to say. And don't be naive: NBA bosses may not want to take the myocarditis risk with their stars, even though it is very small, but they are keeping quiet about it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Huh?? Let n=2.
3n, 3n+1, 3n+2 partition the positive integers. An integer having any one of these three forms can be even or odd, depending on whether n is even or odd.
0, 3, 6, 9, . . . , 3n, . . .
1, 4, 7, 10, . . . 3n+1, . . .
2, 5, 8, 11, . . . 3n+2, . . .
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
C M Keep telling yourself what you want to hear, just like CNN, MSNBC. At least Moore doesn't make that mistake.
Had Trump sounded the alarm the first WEEK of February (okay, too much to ask, of him), OR if he has not systematically undermined and flouted public health measures (still too much to ask), OR if he had come out of his own COVID case with some humanity, and MADE SURE we'd have stimulus and access to quality treatments, he would have won.
As it is, you sound like a liberal excuse-maker: "I'm not responsible!!! My hands were tied by The Bad People!!!!!! Why did they DO this, to MEEEEE?"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
di C Well, you're being kind. I readily admit I did not grasp that Saagar's mention of the Nixon transition (or so I thought, yikes) and Ryan Grim's explication of what Nixon actually did before the election referred to the same event. All I can say now is wow.
Timelines matter -- for me, in missing it, but even moreso for the analysis. "Transition" and "prior to an election" are two very different animals.
I'm not saying it's a big deal because by all appearances I was duped, but because it really is. No wonder our politics are what they are.
I was looking forward to the Flynn hearings, I thought the district judge was brilliant. Enough of lying! Under oath no less, during a plea hearing. And if this was an FBI setup, all the more reason to expose it. Let all chips fall where they may. Because the FBI does this to people without Flynn's resources, and routinely gets away with it. No wonder Flynn got pardoned. The whole scenario was about to be played out in open court, can't have that!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michigandersea3485 Your post stayed on my mind for several days because it is brilliant. Your daughter is very lucky to have you as a father and she is going to be one very happy young lady someday. What really strikes me about your plan is that high school was supposed to prepare everyone for a good job. That's what it was supposed to do -- and it once did. Bravo for not being passive in the face of deteriorating education. Once she has that solidly in place, why not major in art history, if it's truly her passion? Exactly!
One other thing that struck me, living outside the US for five years, and later teaching as a community college adjunct (not my main job), is that people really underestimate what good decisionmaking, planning, and most of all hard work can do. Too many people believe in some sort of inborn talent, and think things should be easy, or the person must not be "good" at them. This is so wrong. They completely underestimate what an extra 30 or 40 minutes a day can do, when practiced over a period of many years. That's the difference between not understanding math and breezing through introductory calculus. I'm serious, it really is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tonya--7704 Whether she was abusive as well is not an issue. If he wants the court to order the sheriff to start seizing Heard's assets -- her house, her car, her bank accounts, her jewelry, etc., etc., he has to prove that the article she wrote was false and that it was responsible for costing him $50 million in film deals. This testimony bears on whether his reputation was already damaged, by far worse allegations, in many news outlets. This is relevant. Whether Heard is a worse person than he is may be true, but it's not relevant. I kind of doubt it, though. He had 23 more years and two more relationships to do whatever it is he does.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@steves6756 How many languages do you speak that you know "the general consensus" is opposed to the obvious proposition, to anyone who doesn't have the mentality of a cult member, that "the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all?"
That stuff is pretty old, and pretty much everyone in the world, cross-culturally, in various traditions and including the full-blown agnostics, have noticed it long ago.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@steves6756 You said I was wrong because you disagree with me, and some blather about supply and demand, which presumes a free market -- which exists exactly nowhere. Adam Smith discussed in detail how a free market can be distorted (wrongly undermined, according to him, and here I agree) by the rentier class (think, feudal privileges sans titles). Adam Smith saw that issue long before the age of monopoly came along, which rendered his free market model as obsolete as the notion that the sun revolves around the earth. The basic features of modern life are all dependent on monopolies. Or, how do YOU think you get electricity, natural gas, running water, etc.?
In a free market, you could NOT impose wages low enough that full-time workers are unable to eat or find a place to live without public assistance. Your profits would be driven down by competitors who could offer workers better pay, consumers a product of indistinguishable if not better quality (it's called innovation) at roughly the same price (again, innovation), and people would then patronize those businesses (the ones with the smiling employees), and never eat at McDonald's.
But there is no free market. That's why this sequence did not happen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that were implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere.
So, who was so disappointing?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@leomessifans I'm thinking I have to spell it out: I think ALL of this is a disaster. I think anyone who has become inured to accepting it -- as MANY have -- is fooling themselves in ways they cannot foresee at the moment, because most people have no idea what is going on in the big, wide world, or how much it can and will affect us.
Case in point: read The Jakarta Method. Then do some serious study of how much we supported Islamic fundamentalist extremists to oppose leftists, even democratic, Euro-style leftists, all over the world -- leftists we have long accepted in the governments of our closest allies. Then think about how much money we owe everyone else at this moment (trade deficit, national debt in foreign hands), and then count up our military bases all over the planet, and think about what they are there for. Does all this look good to you? Or, do you prefer to take sides over two candidates who are both a disgrace, and unqualified to be small town mayors?
Go for it. You may not have the luxury forever. Enjoy while it lasts. :/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@impliedlines711 I agree that anthropology was essentially nonexistent at the time. I'd have to see a sample of Hugo's writings, not just a comment here or there, in the original, to judge. For example, an attorney will argue by conceding a point he knows he cannot win. So, even a death penalty opponent may argue that if we believe death should only apply to the worst of the worst (typical trope in such cases), that precludes people who committed their crimes as minors, or who were mentally disabled at the time of the crime, or psychotic at the time of execution, etc. You concede what you think you can't win. The lawyer doesn't dare bring up blanket opposition to the death penalty, or he risks limiting its application in the here and now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@drewskij2175 Except that we revise our views of history as new information comes to light, just as we revise our views of current events as new information comes to light. There's nothing pseudo about it. That is what historians do. The word "revisionist" is used as a signal to oppose whatever it is that is labeled that way, and to silence people -- no different from the way a whole host of words are used now: fascist, racist, anti-Semite, homophobe, transphobe, communist, Putin puppet, Assad apologist, tankie, anti-vaxxer, wow I've barely scratched the surface.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@danielgeistzer513 I haven't forgiven anyone who tried to muck with my life to the point of literally jeopardizing it, and I feel no burden at all. Struggling to excuse the inexcusable, on the other hand, would be a burden. That would sap my energy to no good purpose. I don't worry about that stuff.
On the other hand, whenever anyone who has harmed me has been identified and punished, I immediately feel sympathy for them. But while they have a little mob of lackeys around them, praising them? Nope, lol.
I think this "forgiveness" business is gaslighting. We hurt you, and we got you to hurt you, too, unless you come kiss our hand.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hollenfeuer1 I already got this spam from you once, thanks.
FDA approval is a rigorous process involving advanced statistical analyses such as multivariate regression. We've only just learned of the remote myocarditis and endocarditis risk. Once the full analysis is completed, the risk could turn out to be smaller than we think, or, if not, we may find that there is an easy way to determine who might get it, and everyone else can rest assured that it won't happen to them as a result of the vaccine. What do you think full approval means?
News reports don't substitute for this analysis. Right now, people who know someone who apparently got severe side effects from the vaccine are reluctant to take it, when those side effects could be rare, or related to some other medical condition -- or, they may turn out not to be side effects at all, but coincidental. Or the result of catching a bad cold right after getting vaccinated (my European relatives were told to take extra care not to get sick for 72 hours post vaccine; no one here has been told that, that I know of).
In short, everyone I know reluctant to take this vaccine has experienced at least one life-altering medical mistake, has all their other vaccines, and wears a mask. IOW, I don't know the nut cases whose stories we've been regaled with. As for what millions of Americans have taken, that includes a whole lot of stuff that no one should.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This author appears ignorant of basic facts of social psychology. For example, you will never get at the truth concerning whether a person is happy; what you will find out is whether their social group values the assertion that they are happy, or considers claiming to be discontented a signal of greater depth, intelligence, higher ethical standards, and so forth.
It also depends on whether a group considers candor imperative -- whether you owe it to everyone to answer a survey truthfully, or whether you can build yourself up a little -- and whether it is considered immoral, or even sinful, not to express happiness, which is a sign of gratitude toward God. So . . . A researcher has to use various indirect methods to find out who is truly happy.
Do any of the people on Fox look happy to you? They are railing against someone or something at least as much as the clown show that is The View. Both are fact-challenged for some reason. The View may be worse, but the difference is small. That's the current media market.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@omnibus5359 Well, then you didn't see the full JRE program I'm referring to, which Rogan made after he recovered. Not Instagram.
Obviously Dr. Gupta was not his source concerning MSM production techniques. He is a doctor, he was there to discuss COVID. On that note, the current NIH website states, "There is insufficient evidence for the COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel (the Panel) to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19." (emphasis added) It recommends further trials, and discusses the rationale for studying it. The Indian government distributed it, en mass, and against WHO advice, as prophylaxis. I've never seen definitive information on the outcome, assuming we can avoid a post hoc fallacy.
Are you sure you're up to date? :)
1
-
1
-
@omnibus5359 Sloganeering. I practically know the essay by heart. I taught it frequently. Who's pretending some sort of "culture clash?" Posturing has a long and (ig)noble cultural tradition here. And who brought up conspiracy? Well, other than you!
If you mean story, say story. If you mean claim, say claim. If you mean subject, say subject. If a word with an Anglo-Saxon root has greater specificity, then ditch the more general and fuzzy but pretentious Latin root.
Bad enough you have to say "narrative." Now I'm treated to "SPIN a narrative!"
And "the narrative being changed is that . . . " Wow, I've heard of passive voice/agentless sentences, but this one is in a class by itself. I'll have to write this down, it rocks.
I don't know what those insider acronyms mean. (Orwell mentions that, too.) I gave you the information. Look it up yourself, or don't. I've also demonstrated that your comments on ivermectin are somewhat misleading, in light of what NIH says -- not that any celebrity testimonial should ever be given weight, either.
What a zoo. LOL . . .
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Gretchen K. So, you're going to quote dictum from a case that has been overruled, and that does not apply here in any event. The New York Times malice standard applies here -- and even I agree that it creates too high a barrier for plaintiffs in defamation in the contemporary world. (But the First Amendment is under a lot of attack lately, so it may just be best to leave New York Times malice alone. C.f. recent dissents from denial of certiorari by Thomas and Gorsuch, however.) Speech and writing, like the allegedly defamatory article, is presumed to be First Amendment-protected, and it must be proved by clear and convincing evidence that it is not. (I.e., Depp in this case must prove it.) The old chestnut that "you can't evade the consequences of your speech" is true, and vague, and illuminates nothing. WHO should mete out the consequences? And WHAT should those consequences be?
You must not have ever practiced in this area. Don't get so angry. Pick up Nadine Strossen, or Chemerinsky.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@skontheroad I know what happened in that case. It's one of the worst examples of lawyering I've ever seen, starting with not fighting the jurisdiction and venue. It's useless to try to discuss this. Once Depp planted the defecation image in the jury's minds, the case was almost certainly lost. If that was false, he succeeded in smearing Heard and can never be held to account for it (it's not perjury if he, in his inebriated state, believed it, and she cannot sue him for defamation because sworn testimony is immune from suit). He did vow to destroy her, in an electronic communication made years ago. The real pity for the public is that they were misled, yet again, about what was going on: they were losing First Amendment rights, and for what? A relitigation of a sick divorce case? For the pleasure of stoning a disturbed woman who married a drugged up man? The multimillionaires and billionaires will be fine. Money will always be speech.
1
-
1
-
@skontheroad Here again, you are missing the point. Whether she was abusive to him as well, and whether she was in fact the primary abuser, has no relevance to the truth of the article. Did you read the article?
You know, if you really don't care about your rights, and if any abused husband believes the aftermath of Depp v. Heard will help him in any way whatsoever, I do not know what to tell you. Any case where a stereotype is disrupted should matter, one would think, stereotypes being that men abuse women but not vice versa (in the case of physical abuse, it appears to be three to one men abusing women, but that's still a substantial number of women abusing men; in the case of severe emotional abuse, it's definitely not that high, and could even tip toward women, though we don't have firm data). But I can tell you, that will not happen. Some men may threaten women with defamation, but they are likely to be bluffing, or very rich -- and if the latter, the estranged wife already knew what the guy could do to her. In short, this case will have no bearing in family court, where these issues are considered for the rest of us non-hundred-millionaires.
Refusing to wake up with the clock striking noon is really unattractive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@quantumfairing2216 Of all the people who have spoken out publically in the US concerning the pandemic, I like Dr. Eric Topol the best. He is more "pro" COVID vaccines than I am, but he has pointed out certain crucial facts: among them, first, the US has taken a highly "vaccine-centric" route which he does not agree with; and second, EUA and full FDA approval really are different, and the difference does matter. I agree wholeheartedly. Also, this is how a logical, consistent, HONEST doctor sounds. He was among the first if not first to signal a problem with Vioxx, the arthritis drug that turned out to harm the cardiovascular system. I think he was first, in fact. He's great. I trust him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@moloney55 You missed the part where she pointed out --- correctly --- that Title VII has had so little effect because the lawsuits are prohibitively difficult to prove, or even to bring (meaning, to survive a motion to dismiss), regardless of merit. (If you had any notion of the EEOC procedural hurdles involved, not to mention the need for having a good $30k on hand to start, you would know this.) Employers know, and act accordingly. And if they spend a little money on counterproductive DEI nonsense, they have added a layer of protection.
As for the set theory "proof" you propose, that requires believing that the distribution of genuine merit in the two groups you've designated as sample pools is different. If it is THE SAME, then merit hiring is not undermined at all. (E.g., set up two sample pools of numbers containing an identical frequency of prime numbers and draw from each; you have the same chance of ending up with prime numbers as you did before.)
But if people just substitute one criterion for another, then yeah. The one substituted out, or put in second place, WILL suffer. No kidding. That was an unwarranted assumption on your part, huh?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Individual_Lives_Matter Well, this truncated "biography" just happens to use the same tactics as those denouncing Thomas Jefferson (he owned slaves, had children with a slave who were not recognized, put together his own Deist Bible by literally cutting up the Bible and pasting it into a commonplace book, etc.). Does any of that have a direct bearing on his role in founding the United States or the Constitution? These are not easy questions, actually.
In fact, Marx, like Jefferson, read Latin and Greek --- only Marx went further by completing a doctorate in ancient Greek philosophy, and a thesis on several presocratic philosophers. That wasn't included, was it? Raoul Peck did a nice film on it, if reading is not your thing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@javonjamayal Until yesterday, we knew that many, many healthy people who have never touched a hormone may have fertility issues, and that fertility can be problematic for many perfectly healthy people. Until yesterday, we knew that hormone replacement therapy in adult women can cause cancer, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and cognitive issues.
Suddenly, transitioned kids will have no problem being birth parents, and no problem taking hormones. Sure, buddy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@garrettolson5516 "Off-label compassionate use of medications, particularly in an emergency, is a very well-established practice, and is often the ethical thing to do. Or at least, it was. Ending that is not a good thing. Rethinking it, fine -- but then allow all of the doctors who were featured yesterday testifying before Congress to weigh in. They should be heard from first, because they were right."
They WERE right about the origins of the pandemic, the prudence of forcing vaccinations, particularly on the young, the effectiveness of the vaccines to stop transmission, the harms associated with locking down the world, the CENSORSHIP, and the need to study other approaches, which these studies prove was necessary, because you had no idea ab initio what would work and what would harm more than it helped.
Rethinking it, fine. Name calling is not thinking.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LastBref RFK Jr has appeared wherever he has been invited, including most recently on The Hill. Is Briahna Joy Gray right wing now? Or is she hereby "right adjacent" according to you? Kim Iversen as well? Does circular reasoning suddenly sound right to you? (On matters of free speech, consult Strossen, Chemerinsky, and Justin Driver.)
But more important, why shouldn't a bona fide Democrat address the working class that has been migrating to the right for two generations now, which has proven to be a true catastrophe, for them and for everyone? There was a series of articles in The New Yorker by Paige Williams taking an in-depth look at the Kyle Rittenhouse family, including his drug-addicted father (divorced from his mother) and his activist older sister, who participated in BLM demonstrations after George Floyd was murdered, and including the fact the Rittenhouse has worked full time while going to high school because they are that poor. A "left" that cannot recuperate and rehabilitate someone like that is unworthy of the name. Every European leftist knows that, intellectually and instinctively. America has no left.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@djddm8760 Read some real biographies of truly great people. I don't mean some rich guy, I mean a Martha Argerich, or a J. M. Coetzee, or a Picasso, or a Bette Davis, or Miles Davis. Find out that they had broke absolutely every "rule" you could imagine, and that a good many years of their lives were, by conventional measures, a mess.
Well, I'm inspired, anyway. "Make no small plans" is about the only cliche I like.
You haven't noticed that the self-help genre, especially on the subject of making money, is propaganda? It's telling you what the current elite wants you to do. I mean, that's useful to know. :D
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Oh please, all this stuff about "socialist indoctrination!" In the US? Business administration has been the Number 1 major in college for over a generation, and business administration is often less rigorous than an English degree. It simply shows docility, that you WILL do whatever your boss tells you to do. The next most popular class of majors are in the health sciences, excluding psychology and biology. Psychology itself is very popular, and can qualify a person for a clinical MSW and beyond. So is biology, and it can also lead to a job related to health care, from laboratory technician, to pharmacist, to doctor, to director of research.
I've just described close to half of what college students actually major in, as in real life. Do people not know this? Seriously?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nealorr5086 If the plaintiffs-respondents win this case, they will certainly have injunctive relief. A tort claim for damages seems farfetched, but an expert on current law would need to take a hard look and see whether any such case could be brought, against anyone. For most of those who wronged the plaintiffs, they probably can't be held liable at all, or, if their actions do rise to that level, they would be granted immunity in this case.
If the Supreme Court entertains the government's argument, that means they didn't deliberately violate their oath. They had a good-faith belief they were upholding their oath, and happened to be wrong. That means immunity.
Have you ever heard of anyone going to jail for violating someone's First Amendment rights? No, huh?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@uggligr I'm sorry. I appreciate that now. It is assumed that everyone knows about it by now, because of all of the coverage it got as "Russian misinformation." Glenn Greenwald left The Intercept over being censored on this issue. His substack tells the whole story.
In short, Hunter Biden was suffering from drug problems, and he took his laptop in for repairs and forgot it. After a period of time, it allegedly became property of the repair shop, who shared it with Biden opponents. The contents of its hard drive became public, and includes horrible pictures and other material concerning Hunter, and also some cryptic emails and similar texts that seem to discuss kickbacks and include Joe. Its contents are being investigated. In the meantime, Hunter is suing. I'm not sure where these investigations, suits, etc., are going; I have not been following those
There is also a serious allegation that it was BIDEN who planted the story that the laptop was fake and that the Russians planted it, and that BIDEN asked the surveillance agencies to assert that it was "typical of Russian disinformation." An open letter to that effect was signed by about 50 or so such people (CIA, FBI, and so forth). This may have been illegal for Biden to do. Biden almost certainly knew it was real. In essence, it was Biden who asked the surveillance state to interfere in the election to prevent this material from being treated as real. The major networks all listened to the surveillance state and reported that the Russians planted it, probably.
Hunter never categorically denied it was real, and is now suing, which means he has to admit the laptop was his. He could still claim the data on it was compromised, I suppose (and I suppose it could have been, once he lost control of it); however, no evidence of tampering with the hard drive data has emerged so far.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Robert C. Christian So . . . A hyper-billionaire spends a lot of time with someone he really doesn't know, in the hopes of getting more money from him, for philanthropy. Hyper-billionaires do this routinely. After all, they need to raise money for charity, and they should leave no stone unturned in their quest to help the poor. It's a sacrifice they make. Sure, a rich guy like Gates really should vet anyone he spends a lot of time with, especially before aaking that person for marital advice, but vetting is, after all, expensive and time consuming, and Bill's razor-sharp instincts told him it would be fine. Got it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@therealcirclea762 All the Terrible Places you mention, where no one has "freedom," have higher higher life expectancy than the US. And of course less obesity, addiction, random, crazy violence, and general dysfunction. But if you can set up an enclave, go near-hermit, you certainly have a better "opportunity" to do that in the US. I mean, look at the Manson family, or the Unabomber. If they had just left other people alone, no problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@therealcirclea762 No, the court can appoint a lawyer to a case, usually from a panel of lawyers who agree to be available, but in principle any lawyer who is a member of the bar. If the lawyer does not want to take the case for any reason other than one recognized as presenting an ethical problem, he must petition the court for permission, and possibly even face reprimand. Not that reprimands usually happen, but that they could.
There are even crucial moments in a case where a lawyer cannot withdraw, either formally or simply by quitting, unless he is desperately ill or something, without risking his license to practice. This is true even in civil cases, even where the lawyer took the client himself and later wants to withdraw. This is true even when the client has stopped paying. The lawyer needs the judge's permission, which must be requested by motion and becomes part of the public record of the case. A client can always fire a lawyer. A lawyer cannot always quit a case. Even a fired lawyer has to submit a motion to withdraw, to the court, so it becomes part of the public record that the client fired him.
Look it up.
You did not understand the post. So why are YOU talking about someone else's IQ points?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rishpanjeet7479 A free market places the means of production in private hands, and allows free competition to allocate optimally all resources that can be allocated using a market mechanism, while recognizing that some cannot. Smith was for allowing the Invisible Hand to operate not in every area of human endeavor, but in any area of endeavor where it could operate to allocate resources optimally. Hence his warnings about unproductive concentrations of wealth in the hands of a rentier class (read, a new, oisive, uncreative and unproductive aristocracy . . . how right he was). Monopoly capitalism is what free markets devolved into, with the capitalists capturing most of government power in various ways, hiding their tracks whenever necessary, and bragging openly whenever useful. What we have is the reign of monopoly capital. Free markets were a nice idea. Free markets are not capitalism, and were never intended to give rise to black-hole-like concentrations of wealth whose pull cannot be opposed. But believe what you want.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SlowPeace25 So then the owner of the car is a victim of karma, too. He's suspended from his job, he's being investigated for a homicide, and he may be prosecuted. And having a mere child interfere with his car is obviously karma. If he were a Good Person, no one would have touched his car, least of all a Child, because as we all know, Children are messengers from Higher Dimensions, revealing to us the Universal Essence, and teaching us about Who We Really Are.
I'm sorry you are on such a low Spiritual Plane, but I trust that your interaction with me will improve you. I mean, your interaction with Me will improve [you]. That's what I meant to say.
You're welcome! I love helping. :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lukethibodaux790 They executed anyone who had any tinge of Marxism -- they were the first to die. They didn't take control of the means of production -- you mean you've NEVER seen those utterly chilling bids submitted by various German corporations for building the concentration camps, complete with facilities to gas people, not to mention the gas? I wonder who taught you this rot. At one time there were literally no anti-communists who made this mistake. "The two were related." Yes, well, anything that has come out of the industrial revolution and the rise of modern social classes is related; anything that has its roots in 19th century imperialism is related; any living mammals that arose after the extinction of the dinosaurs are related.
You can tell this stuff to Americans, who don't go to Europe, or if they go, it is in the same spirit as they would go to Disney World, but you can't tell this stuff to me. Don't waste my time, I have a Murakami novel to read. Yes, we all have our petit bourgeois pleasures. (If you prefer overtly anti-totalitarian stuff, The Land of Big Numbers is excellent, especially the first story, "Lulu.")
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RyanKearney0 On the other hand, she could argue that she was actively misled into believing her work was satisfactory. A hearing officer could side with her, so you are right about that.
There is also constructive discharge. If your boss is abusive, you don't have to stay and take it in order to obtain unemployment compensation. These are fine points. The general rule is that if you are fired for cause, that means no benefits.
Then there is the problem of short tenure. If she has not worked, say, 10 of the last 12 months, or 12 of the last 15, etc., (depends on the state), she can't qualify for unemployment benefits anyway.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How do you know they were all due to irresponsibility?
I lived in a country with a perfect abortion law: elective only for the embryonic stage (seem to remember 10 weeks), with an affidavit to begin the process ("I, Marie DuPont, hereby declare that I am a mother in distress, . . . "), mandatory counseling, no same-day abortions, and if money was a factor in the woman's decision, she had to be sent home with a packet of information about welfare benefits to think it over some more. Medically necessary abortions were decided by three-doctor panels, and they were humane. No way would anyone deny Mrs. Cox, and the state paid 100%.
They cut abortions by between a quarter to a third. It was great.
France under a Socialist. Believe it. Of course, they later liberalized the law and ruined it. Figures.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LordZombieZanetta I wasn't gifted in math, but I suddenly fell in love with it (after studying Plato, and having a great math TA in college). I LOVED a text not used as often now, by Loomis. It trained my intuition so perfectly, I can't tell you. I have a very algebraic and logical mind, but decidedly poor spatial intuition, so Loomis was a godsend. I never once got a limit problem wrong, and I used to buy other books for more practice and do all those problems, too. Thanks to Loomis, I understood a lot of the three dimensional applications I would never have gotten otherwise. If Thomas had been our sole textbook, I'm not sure I would have succeeded. (I got all As.) 😊
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RossJacobs I didn't say the emails were authentic, and the story about how they were supposedly discovered is a hoot. Nor, as Glenn Greenwald pointed out, do the emails contain any "bombshells." (Does anyone doubt Hunter drops his dad's name for personal gain? Hardly evidence his father is involved, or even knows about any specific instance. In fact, it's a reasonable conjecture that Hunter hides a lot from dad.)
So "Russia" is your go-to? I thought you actually might have a reason to cite Russia, other than that the story worked well before, and it's a nice safety valve for American bigotry, which is about to explode. The more stories about the "Foreign Enemies" among us, the better. The hate has got to be deflected somewhere.
Censorship, and Section 230 immunity is the big story here. How do they all get to do whatever they like, and have blanket immunity all the same? Even newspapers have to be mindful of the "NYTimes malice" standard.
Krystal is correct in objecting to the disgusting hypocrisy -- though that is not news, either.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@billjameson1254
1. You're right, you don't understand.
2. He wasn't rich. Nor do I care. It's crass to talk about money. That's the last thing I ever cared about. A capacity to deal with the world such as it is is essential, certainly. Money hoarding and money worship are not; it's a turn-off.
3. If you READ carefully, you'd have gleaned that he said racist things that could apply to my own family. That's an ugly discourse. Who delves into that? On a date??
4. Then the stuff about sex -- at best, he has no ideals, and at worst he has issues, to put it euphemistically.
5. People of all different ages are here, including divorced people. Are you a gatekeeper?
6. I'm well past the age where a new life partner is important to me, and I'm culturally non-Western. I could never get along with the type of person I just described.
7. Not all women care about money. You think I should have played up to a lout? Why?
8. This one never got a kiss. 😅
As I said, no man should feel they have to put up with a woman who has the same traits as this guy. I hadn't thought of him in years. I do remember his first name, though. It took a moment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Richard Garcia You know what? At least I can appreciate that you are sincere. You had an actual event in life, something real, and maybe more than one, that made you feel as you do. I can respect that. But don't imagine that it's everyone and everywhere, or that certain "signs" are universal indicators of that kind of mind in a woman. It just isn't true.Thanks for participating again.
Most people don't have a good love life these days. I do not know what happened. I know social media and the electronic landscape in general are not helping.
I'm reading a book on PTSD by Francine Shapiro and I expected it to deal with combat veterans, or major accidents and health challenges, or serious crimes -- that sort of thing. Well, so far it talks about romance a lot, and how trauma can derail it. More interesting, actually. Also, and she's no wimp, she says that many so-called "ordinary" traumatic events in life can give rise to PTSD, and that such issues are simple and can be treated in a couple of sessions. She herself had cancer a long time ago, while in graduate school, apparently cured. I don't know if anything else traumatic happened to her. They told her at the time that her prognosis was "we don't know" and "good luck." (!!) I have to laugh, gallows humor.
EDIT: Just found out she died last year at 71, and that during her childhood her sister died.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ludlow 889 Where did I say I support shutdowns? Much less shutdowns with no discussion of alternatives? I said the opposite. A handful of hotspots had hospitals and morgues overwhelmed, and drastic measures had to be taken -- but it would have made more sense to do a hard, brief shutdown of those areas, rather than a nation-wide soft shutdown. Dore himself asked why small businesses had to close, but Amazon warehouses stayed open.
I couldn't find most of the data you cite, and you didn't answer my question about the LOGIC. If it's true these tests are generating huge numbers of false positive results, then it is USELESS to look at death rates by seropositivity, since the seropositive might not even have been exposed to the virus, much less sick from it. You have to look at case mortality -- how many confirmed COVID sufferers, who actually got sick, died of their disease.
Personally, I'm more upset by the shutdowns, and consider them a danger to my health and wellbeing, than I am about COVID. I'm not afraid of COVID. But my personal feelings about the thing don't matter. Medical science matters.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ronweber4508 Um, I'm not sure who his followers are. I'm not. I know he has neoliberal tendencies, and that he has made the wrong call many times. I find some things he writes to be among the best high-brow entertainment found anywhere, and he definitely has one thing right: don't get mired in self-help pablum, ever. It is neither realistic nor good for you. Read actual biographies of actual brilliant, accomplished people, and see what a hot mess their lives were. But see what they did, and how they did it, in spite of everything.
Anyway, when I open a standard book on "creativity," and it puts Jobs or Gates in the same chapter (sometimes in the same sentence) as Shakespeare or Einstein, I already know I'm reading a POS.
This video tells us Greene's thoughts on the New Irrationality. He's right, as far as it goes. I don't see him trying to snow people, or close off very necessary and legitimate debate. I have a LOT of questions about every aspect of the pandemic, and I am not so naive not to realize that I need to be careful how I word them and to whom I pose them. BTW, an interesting aside: I follow news in French, too, and in France, it is the (far) leftists who are raising questions and insisting on open debates; they are raising very questions and objections that will get you smeared as a "fascist conspiracy theorist" here. F I G U R E S.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@StinkFingerr Do people not know why affirmative action in college admissions was legal until yesterday? The legacy and donor pools are disproportionately whiter. Actually, what Kennedy hinted at in his tweet about affirmative action is legally accurate: affirmative action can be legal ONLY to correct past discrimination by the very actor who is now implementing affirmative action to make up for the harm they themselves did. (Not society, blah blah, but they themselves.)
The universities never argued that. (They argued the Bakke standard and so forth.) They never admitted that the affirmative action was to make up for discrimination. That's because they don't want to admit where the discrimination comes from: it comes from the legacy pool and donor pool, which they will NEVER give up. Not yesterday, not now, and not tomorrow. Instead of giving an opportunity to a deserving minority kid, they deployed the policy against Asians, and limited Asian enrollment.
I think the real problem is that the leaders of the country are drawn so disproportionately from these schools. After the college admissions scandal (and Jeffrey Epstein, the icing on the cake), you would think there would be some way to reduce their influence. It's not as though Michigan, Texas, Berkeley, Cal Tech, and U of Chicago cannot educate people. Quite the contrary.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@utah_koidragon7117 Well, this is just an anecdote, but it is true: when I went to a country where standardized testing cannot be used for school selection (it isn't legal), and that had super hard achievement testing for everything -- advancing in school, teaching, civil service, you name it -- I took the GRE under the worst conditions I have ever seen and made the top 99.9%, the best I ever did.
Anyone who works hard can get a perfect score in math, or close to it. The work it may take, and the time, is why people don't do it. Granted, it would take a couple of months for some, and a couple of years for someone else, I get it. But these are not tests to determine genius. The Asian kids get the scores by working for them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ham burges Here is one that pops right out. When Harris pointed out that something like 5% of Democrats, but over 20% of Republicans were "vaccine hesitant," he made not one but at least three obvious mistakes: first, the "vaccine hesitant" include those adamantly against any vaccine, those with grave doubts about THESE vaccines, those who believe their legitimate concerns have not been properly addressed, and those who want the vaccines to be fully approved before giving them to kids or to most people under 40. Pretty diverse bunch. Second, is everyone a Republican or a Democrat? Maybe most seniors are, but most young people are Independents. Left those out, I see. Finally, you can't presume correlation means causation. At least there, they were able to identify some rotten actors on Fox that flatter their viewers with antivax garbage, while they themselves enjoy concierge service for all their immunizations, including especially these.
The innuendo about the alleged insanity of any scientist or research physician with doubts about mRNA vaccines was egregious. The point could have been made without calumny. But getting people emotional is how he makes his money now, too. In that, he's not so different from Ingraham et al. It's too sweet not to pick up.
These are all well-known fallacies of informal logic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Truth_or_Jer Ah, half smart. Yes, as a private university, it has no obligation to embrace the full panoply of First Amendment freedoms, but it has chosen to embrace them. Supposedly. It could have chosen speech codes over free speech --- but it didn't.
Speech codes can be tricky, too; no Palestinian flags means no Israeli ones, either. No Palestinian scarves? So, no Star of David, either. Maybe. (One's political, the other religious? Hmm.) That's when Title VI of the Civil Rights Act comes in. That's how Harvard, a private university, got in trouble discriminating against Asian students in admissions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, maybe you should look up the complaint, which is available online, and read it. It states what the law says about the rights (not "privileges") of those with various handicaps. If federal law says you do not have to accept a "brutal" world, then maybe you don't. If federal law says you have a RIGHT to REASONABLE accommodations, provided you are able to meet the REASONABLE demands of a school (or employer, etc.), then guess what? Looks like you do.
By the way, they are not suing for money. They are suing for injunctive relief, to make Yale obey the law. Cheeky of them, what?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What standard is it that elite, hyperrich white American males have to meet? If they get addicted, not to a legal drug, but cocaine, they are having "struggles." Fine. But just tell me, what do they have to do? I agree, legalize and treat, absolutely. Everyone deserves a chance. No, PLURAL chances. Everyone deserves many chances, no question. But once you have chances, is there some standard?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tobe2btobe So much of MSM lied incessantly about Orange Caligula, that I would have to think carefully and do meticulous research to compile a solid list of ten or twelve atrocious things he actually did. This is a shame. Don't you see that?
The evidence in favor of vaccination is grossly insufficient to mandate it, much less to treat it as a panacea, and even the most ardent proponents of vaccination are becoming concerned (see, e.g., Dr. Eric Topol, who has reservations about America's overly "vaccine-centric" approach).
I'll tell you who is against mandates in other countries: LFI and PCF, the French hard left and the Communists. Ponder that. And that is in a society WITH universal health care, tuition-free college, universal pensions, and generous disability benefits -- not one where all risk is offloaded to the individual, and if you're harmed you're on your own. You don't know what you're shilling for. At least get paid well. Have something to show for it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mattdillon4398 I don't think you understand. This was his own lawyer's argument in court. His attorneys are the ones who cannot lie to a judge in a proceeding, they could get severely sanctioned, and it could cost millions. His own position is that he is primarily dealing in opinions and entertainment, AND his audience knows.
In another thread, I got accused of being right wing because I agree Rittenhouse is entitled to try to prove his defamation case. It's a high bar, and anti-SLAPP statutes protect the media. I doubt he can win (or settle well), but he has every right to try.
As for Tucker, I think he has said many atrocious things, including egging Rittenhouse on, as if minors should cosplay security guard/paramedic while toting an AR-15 during a riot. But so far, he is being more truthful on Ukraine than most people, sorry to say. Yeah, I admit that -- I am VERY sorry to have to say it. What a shame it's true.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@charlesmanning3454 That may be exactly right. 9:40 was a stronger statement, though, and surprised me.
If there are a handful of cases, among the tens of millions vaccinated, which received compensation from the 1986 fund, they should make that information available. That doesn't mean the vaccine did cause the injury, just that they met the legal burden of proof to get funds. I don't say broadcast the numbers as "Breaking News," just state them somewhere in the literature. To be honest, I also think individual shots for each illness should be available. I understand why they're not, and I understand that it's for good reasons, but I still believe it should be a matter of choice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, chances are they could not have developed enough evidence within 72 hours to charge him, so they needed to press for a confession. If he had remained silent, there is some chance they would have had to release him. That's why they go for the interrogation right away.
A case like this could have been a murder suicide, even without a gun near any of the bodies. They had no autopsies, and no evidence about which gun killed them, or even if it was just one gun. No one mentions blood splatter or gunpowder residue.
If my child, at 15, had been one of the other three, I am not sure I would have wanted him to be interrogated. Everyone has the right to remain silent. No one has a right to lie to investigators, and each of these kids could be considered less than truthful. That's normal at their age, after such a trauma. But it's on their juvenile record now, video and all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Raining Clean Taking the numbers shown on Worldometer, our case fatality rate is now clearly below 2%, and this number scales (so that the U.S. matches my state almost perfectly). Earlier in the pandemic, it was about 2% or 2.1%. Infection fatality rate is known to be lower, but estimates range. (There is a pro-vaccine researcher who put it at less than half. But I believe the CFR is a more solid statistic.) I've seen no commentary concerning the substantial plunge in the CFR. Literally zero, though a decrease of, say, 20% would seem to merit attention. Then, in some countries, CFR is clearly below 1%. Do we hear about what they're doing? Never. Instead, we hear hate speech and bizarre rants about "anti-vaxxers," when it is known that vaccination rates among people who have a real risk from COVID are lowest in underserved communities.
Just a moment of reflection brings all of this to mind. Just a moment of tuning out the din. I've lived through previous rounds of hysteria, but of course this one is the worst. They have to get bigger each time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@michaelhalbherr3683 And my point is that you can do all those things, and more, and all it takes is one drunk driver, or an environmentally caused cancer, to take you out. Or working your whole life for a corporation rife with crime (think Enron, BP), or be mercilessly harassed or threatened at work while trying desperately to overcome a family tragedy, or be arrested for something you didn't do and played no role in, or be present in the building during a school shooting -- some kids have gone through two of those, now. It seems to me that anyone who is mature must understand just how little we do control, starting with who our family is, whether we have older or younger parents, or brothers and sisters, how long each of those people live, and what they need from us before they die.
As for getting pregnant while still in school, a lot of people would end up having no children had they made "goodness" their priority. Kids fall in love, after a fashion. So? Perhaps it is immature and irresponsible, but it's not all negative. It has a poignant side. For some, it's a reason to get up in the morning and work at two deadening jobs. You don't know anyone like that? I know lots of people like that.
Maybe you're just ungrateful and take random lucky breaks for granted, and instead of working on that (something you can control fairly well -- ironically enough), you prefer to jeer at people you've been taught to label "victims." That's not very smart.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JohnM-sw4sc In the late 1970s, no one finished college, then moved back in with their parents, with no savings and a pile of student loan debt. No one. It did not happen, barring serious illness -- and even then, it was unusual. Occasionally, brothers, sisters, or first cousins would team up to split the rent. That's as "bad" as it got.
College was hard, in-state tuition was nearly free, and graduation meant something. People worked summers to pay for their full year of tuition, fees, books, and supplies. And were very proud of themselves, rightly so. Nor did you need college for most jobs. Not even trade school was always essential -- companies trained you, paid apprenticeships trained you. Now, college + internships, with barely a stipend?? That you spend on commuting, lunch, and a new computer, if that? (And trade school loans are even more likely to default than college loans, last I heard. At least they are smaller.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is true. Not only that, but when it comes to significant viral illnesses, the typical pattern for women is to have a less severe illness, but a LONGER period of time to full recovery. Men get sicker, and, at the same level of illness, get well quicker.
This is true of flu, of meningitis, of pneumonia, of mononucleosis, of hepatitis . . . and it is NOT NEW. You are absolutely correct.
When you combine the biological facts with all the mental stress, gaslighting, forcing vaccines on people who do not need them because they are young and have recovered from a case of COVID, etc., yeah, I'm not surprised that women are having a worse time. Feeling "socially unacceptable" is generally a bigger problem for women, sad to say.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Pan-Britannic Traditionalist Conservative Absolutely. The major investment banks were being offered annual bonuses sufficient to set their principals and their principals' children up for life, and were screaming, "no, NO!!" but government forced them to take the money. It even forced banks in Germany, Iceland, and lots of other places to trade in exotic derivatives and swaps. They all screamed no, but, alas . . . Same thing happened with LIBOR, the repo market, HSBC money laundering, recent market manipulation, etc., etc. They all keep saying no, the government keeps forcing them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
46:41 There certainly was discussion on the French left concerning the COVID measures. The first person I heard push back on firing medical personnel who worked throughout the pandemic, were exposed and recovered, and then declined vaccination was Fabien Gay, the Communist Party leader. Clémentine Autain questioned certain measures, such as vaccine passports, and she usually votes with the PCF.
In the end, the left in the National Assembly made it illegal to ask a minor their vaccine status, and after that, no one confronted anyone. The victory of the New Popular Front came as less of a surprise to me than most to people. Had they not taken this stand, they would not have won, I think.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mandywhorwal642 Let's say someone who has committed a murder "deserves to die." How does that give the state the right to execute them? I'm serious. They are singularly inept at determining who is a murderer, and at executing murderers, and have proven themselves inept in both not just sporadically, but systematically. Your question is theoretical. Even if you're right, that has nothing to do with the issue.
Why do you think all other developed countries have ended capital punishment? Not because they think someone who, say, tortured a baby to death, or shot some 70 young people in cold blood, should get a "second chance." Nor are they wimps, nor are they stupid. U.K. ended the death penalty after executing the husband of a woman murdered by a serial killer, after that serial killer testified against the husband. That did it for U.K.
Watch that documentary on the four sailors, the "Norfolk Four." Then come back.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Great points! I'm not sure, though, where Wolff gets his historical timeline wrong, because he did not talk very much about WWII. I may have missed it. (Timestamp?)
BTW, after watching Adam Curtis's latest documentary, I read Limonov, "It's Me, Eddie." Limonov was a very disturbed and disordered man, but the story of Russian emigres in 1970s and '80s New York, many of whom wanted back in to the Soviet Union but could not go back, is really fascinating. The book is hard to find except in libraries. It is out of print. (Also, a warning: If Henry Miller is not something you can stand to read, this is probably worse.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@katyt7470 I think that's a great interpretation. Very eloquent as well.
The notion of a "church of one," and God in direct communication with one's own conscience, is very much an American notion, and is highly anachronistic for England. The God you describe could also be the God of Judaism, Islam, and to a great extent Plato as well, not to mention Antigone. In other words, it is a very abstract idea, and just happens to be Christian (or seem to be Christian) because Jane happened to have been born where she was. You're exactly right, the established church of that time thought it was scandalous, which is a totally different issue. America had no such thing as an established church even then. So in some ways, we can see more in Jane Eyre because of that, not less.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@naasking "The brain as information processor," which in turn is posited as explaining the whole of consciousness, is not uncontroversial, to say the least. I find it interesting that in order to examine consciousness, Penrose starts with the experimental observation that under anesthesia, we become unconscious, and then as we are brought out of anesthesia, our consciousness is restored to us. Any of this other stuff that talks about consciousness being reducible to observable behaviors that include claims about have consciousness, or "uploading" our disembodied consciousness, reminds me of a new version of Skinner, and we all know how that was demolished.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This makes all the difference. There are already lawsuits filed here for medical negligence following an alleged vaccine injury, the propaganda being so thick that people do not want to admit injuries happen. In one complaint, a woman alleged she was sent home from the emergency room three times with a diagnosis of "generalized anxiety." The fourth time she was rushed to the hospital and diagnosed with Guillain-Barre. I will grant you, that side effect is very unusual but not unknown. It is rarer than blood clots or myocarditis. But doctors are supposed to know it can happen. Anyway, the problem was the lack of care. She consented to the vaccine, knowing no drug is perfect.
The typical person, non-millionaire, when they need to go to the doctor, will first debate with themselves whether it is necessary and what it will cost. This past May, I got a $4600 bill for an MRI from August 2019 that I was assured would be free. Don't think this is unusual. It is ordinary. The hospital fought the insurer and the final decision came so late because of the pandemic. I have no way to fix this. I can apply for assistance.
I'm a lawyer. I worked for a federal court. This is how we live. Too bad so many people lie online. I can appreciate if you are skeptical. All of my living relatives are in Europe now, and they all got vaccinated -- later than here, but without drama or mandates. One older cousin's doctor did a blood count before each shot, and administered it himself. They treated a new technology as ""of course" requiring more caution.
1
-
@danihesslinger7968 I haven't been working, but I only want to do civil rights. Federal court was very low pay, but it was one of those rare low-paying "prestigious" jobs. Becoming a lawyer here is easy. It's just a lot of work, really a LOT, but not conceptually or emotionally difficult like medicine, or like the more challenging PhDs. Anyone who wants to can do it, and any Bachelor's degree can serve as pre-law. There is no required program. A music student can go to law school, an elementary school teacher can go to law school. Nurses with Bachelor of Science degrees are highly sought after. They can also take the patent bar once they finish and pass the standard bar. Also, going back to school for law in one's 30s is common. Early 40s as well. People still have time for a 25-year career, i.e., plenty. I wouldn't even recommend longer for most people unless they become a judge.
Just heard from a judge I used to work for. Really wonderful person.
1
-
@danihesslinger7968 CONGRATULATIONS on your victories! I love these stories!!
Yes, we first get a Bachelor's, in any field, which is usually 4 years but can be obtained in anywhere from 3 to 5, or even 6, if people change universities or majors. Then you must take the LSAT -- Law School Admissions Test, which is really an "aptitude" test and surrogate adult IQ test (Americans really believe in IQ). After that, almost everyone who can afford to go to a law school, be it private or public, can find one to admit them. Only the very best schools are hugely selective, and reject many brilliant applicants. Law school is three years, followed by the bar exam, and once you pass the bar, there is no internship requirement. You are a lawyer. Two summer internships are expected but not required. Not doing them usually means serious trouble getting a job later, but has no bearing on licensure. It is also possible to go to summer school both summers and finish in 2 1/2 years, or work after the first year, take night classes, and finish in four years rather than three. Very flexible. (And, quite a few lawyers are not very competent. I bet you guessed that part!) Medicine is much, much tougher.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Janet Baker Just let me say, first, you're right. But I meant, ALL presidents are bellicose. This one did not stand out as being moreso by any stretch, essentially due to laziness. "Average" war mongering, experimenting with new weapons, etc., however, is already a lot. We have the largest military, and the US Department of Defense is the world's largest employer, with bases all over the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Ndisikasewe What I found disgusting and shocking was that a woman who is supposed to be an eminent legal scholar --- who clerked for Justice Ginsberg --- cannot explain the First Amendment. Or distinguish between what is a full First Amendment forum on campus and what isn't. Or show concern for the rights of ALL students.
At a state school, at a demonstration on the quad, students have a right to chant "from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free." What they can't do is target Jewish students and show up with that stuff at their dorm or cafeteria. That's harassment. That could get them expelled.
This was crystal clear when I was in school. Why are you so quick to give up more rights? You know the Fourth Amendment has been trashed, correct? You fell for that little Stefanik's act, who was fundraising? You think she's all worried about Jewish kids? You think Jewish kids aren't demonstrating for a cease fire, too, and chanting, too?
Wow, are you easy to manipulate. I wish I were evil, it's clearly the way to make bank.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@doomguy510 Exactly, she was sincere, naive, and without a trace of guile. Since when do you tell armed officers that you have OCD, that you slapped someone (which neither the officers, nor the 911 CALLER, witnessed), and so forth? That is naive. Consult any lessons you like, produced by attorneys, including some who have been police prior to taking up a legal career, on what to do during a police encounter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheMarsCydonia LIAR. You are conflating "conversion therapy" involving the attempt to force a person to change their sexual orientation, with therapy aimed at encouraging children and adolescents to accept the body into which they were born, whether that be male, female, or, in rare instances, intersex. If a person hates their body, supporting them in loving their body is not conversion therapy. They aren't trying to convert them from something they naturally are (such as gay, lesbian, bisexual), but looking for ways to help them accept their biological body. When that proves impossible, then you consider more invasive therapies.
I'm so glad trans is mostly an affluent white problem. One less thing foisted on people of color, whew!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
O'Blivion Back to the straw man -- no one, not even DORE, said it was "okay." And WHAT, exactly, is the demand now, post written apology and written promise never to repeat that sort of remark, seven years later? Why is this an issue NOW?
As for your blather about the (nonexistent American) "left," I refer you to the inimitable Ash Sarkar. ("I'm a communist, you idiot. No, I'm literally a communist.") No one should miss that romp; do be sure to look it up. And if you don't laugh, ask yourself why.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nolitetebastardescarborund9761 Yeah, well, French swearing is saltier, and more concrete, shall we say? I know it's toned down in translation. The literal translation is what I said, and people use that verb in other expressions. They know its literal meaning.
French has a register of strong language that is just shy of swearing, and it's quite colorful. There's a substantial vocabulary in French consisting of expressions comparable to the British "bloody mess." Americans don't have too much like it. What we did have was highly gendered, homophobic, etc., and can no longer be used, for good reason.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So far, Putin's only clear success has been with the currency -- he proved, without any doubt, that Western financial interests cannot destroy the Russian economy using decrees and papers written in poisoned ink. Thank God for everyone on Earth that he did succeed in that (Greece, take note! China and India certainly have).
Even that success was ultimately undermined by the criminal sabotage of the Nordstream pipeline.
Why don't we all admit that overall, this WAR has been a disaster, for all concerned? Putin was wrong not to try to avoid this, first by calling an emergency session of the UNSC, with proof -- which he had -- of Ukrainian troops planning another, more massive offensive against the people of the Donbass. That was the only ethical course, the only place to start. He DIDN'T start there. No free pass on that, sorry. Never. How can anyone excuse not doing everything possible to avoid this WAR (not "special intervention," my GOD).
Every war that can be avoided, MUST be avoided, paraphrasing Chris Hedges and many others. The sane ones, the ones with hearts, minds. To fail to do everything to avoid a war during a pandemic, just when people were looking forward to a more normal spring, was unconscionable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@richvid9814 Okay, honey. I studied philosophy of science at the Paris IV, among other things, and I really don't have time for this unserious video. What does one case prove? One case, accurately reported, tells us what is POSSIBLE. It does not tell us what is usual. In biology, one single case is very unlikely to be limited to that one single person and true of no one else, but that, too, may be turn out to be true. That, too, is not impossible.
The clinical studies for these vaccines were inadequate. THIS is why, or at least one major reason why, there are so many questions remaining, and there are so many confounding variables present at this point that it becomes very hard to figure out what is going on, what the real risks are, what the risk/benefit calculus should be, by demographic, etc., and various forms of multivariate analysis will have to be done. This will take time and money. We won't have anything very solid to rely on for a while.
What I think people should do is consult the ministries of health of more civilized countries and see what they are recommending. It's all online.
What was the point of your post, other than to flaunt your assumption that everyone besides you is stupid? Looks like you provided evidence for the opposite.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JavierBonillaC So then does my lousy quality of life come from the free market as well -- or do we chalk that up to being all my own fault? 🤣
Ideologues, spare us!
The OP was outstanding, and very Aristotelian, actually. It thus predates any such debate about Mao or Marx, or Jesus, for that matter.
(Were you . . . jealous?)
Here's a thought: If The Market has decided that McDonald's and reality television are worth more than Barenboim, Einstein, Mozart, and Zizek put together, is that proof that they are?
The opening discussion of ascent of the rentier class, which Adam Smith warned us about, and for good reason, is excellent. Adam Smith predates Marx -- of course. Don't pretend this is so tough by diverting the conversation to the usual nonsense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LA Seriously no self-reflection. I consider it beneath childish to attack people rather than deal with their ideas. You have, in black and white, precisely what I think of her views, and either you don't read, or you don't understand what I wrote, for reasons I that are opaque to me. Refusing to denounce her is not cheering her. Maybe you should find the article in the NYTimes that I mentioned, it might be a reality check. You're seeing everything in terms of personalities. I don't understand how this happened. Do you not see how this approach is not working? Glenn Greenwald just posted two videos on Ukraine that are not policy positions but methodology positions -- they are a plea for cooler heads, and for understanding and resisting emotionalism.
I just said Iverson recently made a video where she said Putin has larger, more sinister long range aims that include undermining the West. SHE said that. Thus, you see that possibility, too. You agree on that point.
I don't understand why you don't see that this is not a time for name calling, that this is serious now. I think you do, or you wouldn't bother talking to me!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Oh please. JD, MBA, CPA, MD, DPharm, MPA, MLS, MFA, MSW, Bachelors and Masters in Nursing, Physical therapy. . . how many jobs am I up to? I didn't mention pure science or mathematics.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheRBReaper I stated that pre-meds often don't major in science. Try again. My point was that a ton of various jobs DO require college, and this includes many that are NOT STEM.
I've known pre-meds majoring in philosophy, anthropology, and of course psychology. Pre-med requires a lot of science, but not a major. In fact, a concentration in, say, chemistry or physics is less valuable to a doctor than a well-chosen array of classes from several sciences, plus perfect grades. Statistics is more valuable to a doctor than advanced calculus. I had enough math to be a physics major, but that's deceptive: the minimum required is nowhere near enough to really do anything with it.
Do you know any pre-med students? Or any smart people, in any field? You should meet some. Also, a logic class might be helpful.
1
-
1
-
@TheRBReaper If you get in trouble, do you go to an engineer, or a lawyer?
If you insist that doctors are STEM, all right. They aren't unless they go into research, but that hardly changes the basic point.
Given that I have more math than the physics or engineering majors at my university needed to graduate, should I claim I'm in a STEM field? (BTW, Do you know anything about the Symbolic Systems major at Stanford? Philosophy is a required subject. Anyway, you obviously don't know anything about the Symbolic Systems major, etc.)
I don't believe you're an engineer. In my advanced math classes, I never met an engineer whose logic was as poor as yours, asking me what my point was when it was obvious. You also seem to know nothing about what people study at university, or what sorts of jobs a college degree leads to. Looking at your posts as a whole, an attorney would make sure to examine your transcript and contact the registrar to verify it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@C_R_O_M______ First, you've misstated the theory: the worker himself and society must value the task. Mere activity is not labor any more than passing gas is art.
Second, is any audio or video of your debate available? Have you read Technofeudalism? Have you sat in on his classes?
Third, I'm being scents oared too much, including from saying so. I wasn't planning to engage this much. I guess the much-vaunted market values scents or ship; if intermittent reinforcement schedules draw us in, cha-ching. Thus, a measure of s or s has greater value than free speech -- but only is money = value.
It should be obvious that you can't refute anything I said with ad hominem against Varoufakis. You also conflated my theoretical point with my examples. And I just gave you one more. Private entities that are allowed to assert ownership over what operates like a commons (like a modern-day public square) will make more money without free speech than with it, by operation of intermittent reinforcement, which creates much stronger habits. This leads to cents err sheep, astutely applied, having the greater value by far.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@WitlessSod I didn't say I didn't hold him responsible. If he is a fraud, then he's a fraud, and he is to blame for being a fraud. And if he turns out to be a fraud and Jimmy fails to admit that he is, then, AND ONLY THEN, will I denounce Jimmy. No problem.
You're so quick to judge and categorize and reject the slightest nuance because that stance has served you. Goody for you.
People like Magnus are not going anywhere. You can't shun them all, relegate them to perpetual basement dwelling, or line them up and shoot them.
Some people take more risks than others. The former are generally more creative by nature. They make more mistakes, get into more trouble -- and discover more good things and new ways of approaching this poor life. That's how it is. You are SO cramped. You can't demand that everyone be like you, or condemn them as Nazis, or something, if they deviate from YOUR lead. SHEESH.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LordLewsTheDragon All but the part about racial disparities is false or tendentious. And you're cooking the books, too. The total number of people who go to college today, which includes community college, is 40%. You also seem to assume that they want to go, as opposed to having to go because there are no good jobs for them. (You think there is a sudden passion for majoring in business, the top major for three decades now? Or is it demonstration of docility?) Jim Crow ended in the 1960s, and in 1970, the mass incarceration had not yet begun (or, in some cases, resumed).
You seem to think the size of an apartment indicates more freedom than the ability to leave school debt-free, join with a friend, or get married, and take off to live wherever you wanted -- New York, Seattle, San Francisco, Denver, it didn't matter. It was up to you. Why is that a fair tradeoff? I don't see what's so great about having a space that's bigger, but you're stuck there, with fewer people than ever before.
You also seem to think that technology has not contributed to a dystopia where you yourself can't move very freely unless you are very wealthy, but a mob can follow you around the globe and destroy your reputation and your prospects, in perpetuity, and the state and private conglomerates can find out anything they want about you, without a warrant -- or worse yet, use a computer program to profile you and manipulate you without your knowledge or consent, so that it is not even you who anyone is interacting with, it is their two-dimensional construct of you, providing them with just enough information to get you to do what they want. I'm omitting the ease with which a person receives death threats now, and the number of guns per person. Those have too many causes to unravel, but the trend is not wonderful.
Also, look into the use of militarized SWAT teams. Those used to be used rarely.
I would like to compare our infant mortality and maternal mortality of today with that of Sweden or France 30 to 50 years ago, and to compare trend lines as well, and then to see what it is by race and class. That would be instructive. Is the huge increase in autism, ADHD, and even childhood bipolar disorder real? Gender dysphoria, too? The increase in diagnosis certainly is, but that could be part of the medicalization of childhood -- many psychiatrists sincerely believe so. Then there is also the issue of healthy lifespan; end of life has become a nightmare for far too many. The bare numbers hide more than they inform.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@soapdispens3r It is illegal to use deadly force in defense of mere property, everywhere. Lethal force is justified if you put any person at risk of imminent physical harm. It is never legal for defense of mere property. Social ills, etc., are irrelevant. The age of the perpetrator is irrelevant. Whether he put a person in danger of physical harm is the only question that matters. It is a bright line. We have a lot of gun owners in America, and this isn't common knowledge? Wow, just wow.
Also, this is exactly why a carjacking, or a home invasion while there are people in the house, can be met with lethal force. It doesn't matter if the assailant turns out to be unarmed, or was just looking to burgle and thought the house was empty, or was in middle school. There is no question about this. It's called self-defense for a reason.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@oleggorky906 Lenin's parents were considered to be a "fine Russian family" -- despite having no, or almost no, Russian ancestry. His parents' marriage might have been illegal in a few states here at that time. It wasn't evident whether or not it was interracial! LOL
Drawing racial lines is perforce racist, every time. But directly experiencing the fact that the lines are drawn in different places by different peoples destroys the whole idea that it could be "objective" in any sense, rather than arbitrary and wholly socially constructed and imposed. After living in France long enough, the American lines got blurred for me. For a while I wasn't always sure who was considered black. I think I know now. My parents never did catch on completely.
Anyway, a long story in order to justify the observation that saying someone is Ethiopian and Orthodox when they are West African might not be so innocent. It might not just be based on a proper sense of shame for accepting a slave as a gift (gawd, even saying that makes a person nauseous, doesn't it?). A lot of non-Western Europeans would never consider Ethiopians, Sudanese of the upper Nile ("Nubians"), etc., "black." They do draw a line (with "better" on "their" side, as usual), just not in the same place. But maybe I'm being a little too cynical. I don't know. Just something to think about.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timothycarey3883 What do you mean "held accountable for their words?" If you mean that any speech that is First Amendment protected can nevertheless be subject to a successful lawsuit for damages, that is flat-out wrong. No branch of government can impose penalties of any sort, even civil penalties, on First Amendment protected speech. Nor can any branch of government collude with private actors to censor speech the government itself cannot censor because the censorship would violate the First Amendment. Government cannot use new media as its cat's paw, to do what it cannot do directly. Well, not legally anyway.
Consequences for bad speech are generally more speech, not government censorship.
When MSM stated that the Hunter Biden laptop story was probably Russian misinformation, and they turned out to be wrong, do you think they should face "consequences?" Not legal consequences imposed by the government, no -- they have a right to be wrong. Major embarrassment and a commitment not to repeat the error, I hope so, but no one can force that on them for their (factually wrong but nevertheless protected) speech, either.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timothycarey3883 In general, you're right, a private entity is under no obligation to provide anyone with a platform, that's the general rule. But could the telephone company use that rule to deny service to Trumpers, Communists, or supporters of BDS? No, they can't. A monopoly or near-monopoly of an essential service can't do that. Nor can government muscle social media companies to indirectly censor the accounts the government itself cannot censor directly. That is also illegal.
Who is the "they" who should shut it all down? Odd statement. The government can't. These companies have features of both monopolies and common carriers. They are a new kind of creature and already have benefited from very favorable regulation.
(BTW: I never joined Facebook, Twitter, Linked In, etc., and only joined this during the lockdowns to save videos.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@misssadied193 Reagan supported legalizing immigrants who arrived illegally, he was the first to tax Social Security benefits, he ended income averaging for federal tax purposes, which had helped new graduates get started, he broke unions, he started the massive deficit spending and he began the financialization of the economy, with real manufacturing sent offshore, homeless populations started appearing, his CIA created and supported Osama bin Laden, he propped up Saddam Hussein, weapons were secretly sold to Iran to funnel money to Central American guerrillas who executed "leftist" nuns. There's more, but I'm tired.
The fact-free life must be fun. Why shouldn't you get to have your own facts? What's the point of money, then?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Who's lying? If I report that Trump states X and X is a lie, or that Trump's lawyers say X and X is a lie, did I just lie?
If I report that the White House asserts that the Nordstream pipeline was destroyed by Russian agents, and that turns out to be false, did I lie? If I report that leaders of the DNC believe Trump was elected in 2016 because of Russian state interference in our election, and that turns out to be false, did I lie? Or did I accurately report what members of the DNC stated?
Your final paragraph is just a new anti-free-speech slogan. Congrats, please do destroy the last good thing left. The Fourth Amendment is gone, the Fifth, almost gone, the Eighth . . . well, at least we don't execute people for what they did as minors. I guess that's something. Kalief Browder is not here to tell his side, however.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rudiklein No. The surgeon's fee for brain surgery is a remarkably small percentage of the total cost. Everything else is separate, including emergency room, operating room, intensive care, imaging, in-patient physical therapy and rehabilitation, etc. There is no insurance that covers absolutely everything. If his total bill is between half a million and a million, $60k out of pocket is not extraordinary. And if he was earning a lot before the accident, he cannot qualify for assistance or even a 0% interest payment plan (moderate income and pediatric cases get 0% plans routinely). In the future, if he is unable to work and earn what he once did, he will qualify for some sort of assistance (reduced or waived copay and 0% payment plans).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The categories of unprotected speech are clear. The government is supposed to meet First Amendment-protected speech it does not like with MORE speech, not censorship in any form.
Why would the government go via a back door to tell social media this or that statement is a danger or a lie? The government can announce it loud and clear, publicly. They can tell FB, Twitter/X, etc., that x, y, or z is false or dangerous, at the same time that they tell ALL of us that x, y, or z is false or dangerous.
Kim, it won't be oral argument that decides THIS case, it will be the briefs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@C_R_O_M________ The true risk profile of certain mortgaged-backed securities and the exotic derivatives based on them proved to be very, very bad, and paper that was deemed to be worth billions (perhaps trillions?) suddenly became worthless in the market (that is, literally no one would buy it).
Think of it as very sophisticated, complex counterfeiting, and what happens when the veil is suddenly lifted from many eyes at once. Game over.
In the meantime, vast fortunes were made, and kept. Principals and agents of corporations are not personally liable, and if they all did the same thing, they can cover for one another, find experts to testify on their behalf that these were business decisions, etc. No way to make them disgorge.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheHuxleyAgnostic Glenn quit The Intercept, which he founded, because THEY BREACHED HIS CONTRACT. They thought they could, because they paid him so much. They thought he'd fold. They not only refused, contrary to his contract, to print the substance of what he wrote, they also attempted to prevent him from publishing the article elsewhere.
So, he quit. When someone violates your contract, and you can't persuade them to respect it, you walk away. This was about a contract. He's a lawyer, he knows he can't tell editors out in the world how to edit -- and as a First Amendment advocate, it wouldn't cross his mind to try.
1
-
@TheHuxleyAgnostic The local shop analogy is worthless because the Internet is global, with near-instant access almost anywhere in the world, and has immense, virtually limitless capacity for data. The local shop bulletin board is small, under the shopkeeper's easy access and control, and doesn't enjoy broad federal immunities from lawsuit, either.
In a recent case, Yelp did not have to remove proven defamation. By proven, I mean in court, a final judgment. The victim had to find the long-gone defendant and get a court order to make her take it down, and couldn't. Yelp is immune, and refused to take it down by its own volition. How would you like your business smeared?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@blakebunch4485 Oh really? That leading professors who were lauded everywhere and who had control over MANY other people's careers were in fact using their positions to demand sexual favors with impunity is just another "me too" story? First of all, Wolf came out with her accusations YEARS ago, long before it was fashionable, and many have corroborated her account concerning the atmosphere of impunity at Yale during those years. You just haven't been paying attention. No, this has more in common with the Jeffrey Epstein story, as far as I'm concerned. Just add three to five years to the ages of the victims.
I think people are just jealous of anyone who went to an Ivy. Maybe she earned it. She recently went back for a doctorate, later in life, to fulfill her dream despite not needing it in any material sense. She went to Oxford for that. She likes to work hard, clearly. Her current husband (only her second, nothing strange there) is a US Army veteran, by the way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's a dreadful federal law. Many workers with state pensions, such as police officers, firefighters, other first responders, teachers, and other school personnel have an offset on their Social Security pension. If she vested Social Security by working 40 quarters, her offset will be small, and if she waits to age 70 to draw on it, the effect is small. If she inherited her husband's Social Security, the offset is enormous. Looks like Social Security made a mistake. As long as she filled out all the forms correctly, they shouldn't be able to claw back so much money for their own mistake. :/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zacg_ My assertion is that a tort plaintiff has the burden of proving that the alleged defamatory statements made against him are indeed defamation -- which means they must be false. That's what the plaintiff must prove. OJ couldn't meet that burden.
It's not just a matter of being found not guilty of the charge. In OJ's case, the state didn't prove its case to the satisfaction of the jury, so he was found not guilty. He did not have to prove factual innocence. In Rittenhouse, there is no question he shot three people, so he himself had to demonstrate self-defense. No comparison.
And yes, in principle, when making statements about minors, a somewhat greater duty of care is usually required, because minors have fewer ways to defend themselves. That may not matter for statements made about Rittenhouse once he turned 18, even if he was 17 when he did the things that were denounced.
If you can calmly apply those rules to this case, you can figure out the rest yourself. Easily.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't want my money going to finance any private scheme where I have no voice, and should have no voice. If we are going to unfund universal, PUBLIC education, then I want my cut back, to use it for me. I'll spend it on night school. I'm not going to fund charters, private, and all that, for only some, and where there is no possibility of democratic control. As I said, as a matter of principle, I have nothing to say about what happens in these schools, nor should I. But then you can't have my money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, with the latest variant, mild breakthrough infections are possible. You may find you need to go into a crowded area. I picked up a couple of test kits, containing four tests in all -- and was out over $50 dollars with the tax. I recently had cold symptoms, no fever, went to the CDC website and based on the advice I got there, I stayed in for three days then took one of my at-home tests, to be safe. Not to infect others, basically. I would have preferred not to feel as though I were under house arrest for three days for a mild cold. I cannot afford three tests. If I could have tested more times, I would have stayed in one day, not three.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rayfish007 The issue is, can you chase an individual who is bearing a deadly weapon on the good faith belief that he constitutes a mortal danger to others, and claim self defense/defense of others? (Hmm. Waddya think?) I'm not coming back to this issue again, so let me just tell you once: the REAL issue in this thread is the persistent insinuation, or outright contention, that the people Rittenhouse killed "had it coming." THAT is what I object to. Self-defense is a concept neutral to identity politics. Got that?
As far as the legal process is concerned, (1) I do not support laws that AUTOMATICALLY treat juveniles as adults, such as invoked against Rittenhouse in this case; and (2) I will be perfectly willing to accept a Not Guilty verdict (on the homicide-related charges, not the gun charge) if it is the result of a scrupulously fair process. I also wonder whether various militias are preparing to intimidate the court, and trying to sway potential jurors already -- if not with political persuasion, then with something more "physical." I'll be paying attention. Because that's what it already looks like to me.
You need to care more about your country. I'm being serious. No other country has had the mass shootings, even by kids, that this one has. You need to think about why that is, and not worry so much about defending Rittenhouse. He was not supposed to have a gun.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jamesandayladodge4815 I don't support some of the laws he was charged under, which mandate that minors be charged as adults in all such cases. I disagreed with that from Day One, and even inane comments "in support" of Rittenhouse that I see proliferating will not sway me.
Jimmy Dore brings opposing viewpoints to his show. I respect his choice of guests here, and when he invited a "Boogaloo Boy" or however you spell it.
Rittenhouse wasn't hunting, nor was he properly supervised by an adult parent, guardian, or adult acting in loco parentis, nor are the adults around him doing him any favors now. Instead of arguing that he had a right to have an AR 15 (!!), maybe you should open your eyes and see what a disordered KID this is, and how the adults in this picture have deliberately led him astray, and continue to lead him astray, when it's his entire future that's on the line.
What I've said implies zero approval of any riot. Zero. If you can't see that, you have the vision problem.
YOU have "politicized" this incident. Of COURSE you accuse others of doing precisely what you are doing. Every time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zephyrus001 The "context" (lord how I hate that word --- remember how it came out of the mouth of Amber Heard's "expert witness?") is a narrow one: its utterance during otherwise lawful assemblies in designated First Amendment fora like the quad. That is where Brandenburg v Ohio, RAV v City of St. Paul, etc., etc., apply --- and make no mistake, they do. They are not relevant in the dorms, dining halls, classrooms, amphitheaters, libraries, or pretty much anywhere else, and do not apply in the First Amendment fora, either, the moment one student or group singles out another for targeted harassment.
This is also a great example of First Amendment jurisprudence in another respect: plenty of legitimate Middle Eastern scholars will tell you calls for intifada are calls for resistance, not genocide. It's not up to government to censor them, absent a "compelling interest," a standard the government cannot meet in light of the cases mentioned, where laws against actual cross burning and Nazi symbols were struck down as unconstitutional.
Kind of sad when university presidents can't explain it. Isn't it? :/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zephyrus001 Where is the factual predicate here? There is no question that targeting and confronting a Jewish student individually and using words that can reasonably be construed as advocacy of genocide IS Title VI harassment. Who did that, at Harvard, MIT, or Pennsylvania? I'd expel them myself, and I'm sure they can find a lawyer to bring a civil suit for intentional infliction of emotional distress.
As for the rest, I support free speech in traditional or designated First Amendment fora. These standards of review are a long discussion, and I'm reading Chemerinsky again (his constitutional law textbook) even as we speak. His short book on campus speech, and Nadine Strossen's, are both must-read. If you don't agree with Strossen, she has nevertheless set the mark. Anyone who wants to say anything coherent about free speech, especially at university, has to grapple with her analysis.
Yes, she is that good. She explains exactly why odious speech is better left alone than suppressed, however counterintuitive that may be, with many examples.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@James Herndon Wow. You sound like a University of Chicago person. I don't know what night school options, or special certification, or alternatve education stuff they offer right now, but I can't imagine your liking anything below that level. I mean, if you ever need the piece of paper to make it official.
Chicago (the city) is the best kept secret for higher education. Everyone knows about either coast, when SAIC is where the single most influential dean of the Yale art school got his MFA. "What can a person do with an ART degree?" Well, the only real rags to riches story I know was an art major, who went into advertising but later was sorry to have spent his whole life in that field. I know someone who graduated from SAIC this year, a former (nearly lifelong) Marine before that. Started his own business and has a new job right now, plans to open his own gallery some day. And has made art during the pandemic shutdowns. Also knows how to set up cable and Internet, weld, and make furniture by hand. He's a good actor, too. He's a doer.
Some of the schools in Chicago are world-class, and the ambiance is generally more sensible and serious. Maybe NYC has as many options. I doubt that anywhere else in the States is comparable. A lot of schools have become a four-year camp for the immature, true enough, and they don't even teach free discussion. BUT there are ways around that. Lots!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I used to dislike Peterson. After his recent bout with drug reactions and habituation, etc., I feel for him more than I did. This audience reaction for the most part reflects the fact that people do not read, and that they greatly reward self-serving discourses. The fact that they do more and more is a bad sign, not a sign of healthy self-criticism or resilience. That a Peterson can make millions on this spiel is a bad sign. I think that Peterson himself realizes it, and even worries about it at times.
He is one odd dude. Some combination of Jung and Nietzsche gets recycled every few decades in right-leaning Western societies, and Peterson caught the wave and really rode it this time. He also has had a lifelong obsession with Russia, another tell. Westerners get obsessed with various "mysterious, enigmatic" non-Western peoples on a regular basis, with Russia being a favorite of those who cannot relate as much to people of color. (So, Tibetan Buddhism won't work.) It's all so predictable.
He did do one good video, on creativity, at a major Canadian art museum. It wasn't political, and he was so much more honest and spontaneous in that one. It's the only one of his I've ever seen that I like.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@amandavieira2543 You didn't know at 11 that you would still have it at 21; if you had it from your earliest sense of self until well into full-fledged adulthood, then it makes sense to believe you would have it all your life. At 11, that would not make sense, because we know that people change a great deal between 11 and 21. Human development imposes that on everyone, cis or trans.
But when it comes to trans, I have to wonder how much of social presentation is imposed anyway, just as it is on cis people, and how much is more fundamental and may require invasive medical treatment, beyond what an individual can simply adopt as a mode of presentation and lifestyle on their own, and to h*ll with what anyone else thinks about it.
Do girls really like pink? All of them? (Do they all want to be cheerleaders?) Seriously, that's weird. No one would come up with that rot on their own.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zdubzz1280 In the US, the following are First Amendment protected when they are engaged in as a demonstration of political or social positions or beliefs: cross burning; swastikas; Israeli flags (flown, or shredded); Palestinian flags (flown, or shredded); American flags, ditto; protests against "anti-Christian moral decay" at the funerals of fallen soldiers (if not so close as to disrupt the ceremony and mourners); and calls for violent revolution. ALL of that is free speech.
First, there is no evidence anyone called for the genocide of Jews. Second, if it happened during a demonstration, I think it should trigger an investigation, but not automatic punishment. It's not clear on its face whether it is outside the limits of free speech, and it very likely isn't. Third, private universities don't have to embrace the First Amendment. If they claim they do, then they should do so proudly.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@@TOM-TOM-TOM " If you disagree with the study author's conclusions, you can't really use the info from the study, if their conclusion is wrong, then everything about their study is most likely to be wrong."
This is not the case at all. This is the very reason for peer review, and generally represents the scope of peer review. Barring evidence to the contrary, reviewers will generally assume the integrity of the data presented, and then see whether the conclusions follow rigorously from that data. That's all that peer review generally is.
If someone presents the study data without stating that its conclusion differs from their own and why, that may be misleading. Or it may be advocacy. If they elect to present the study, what matters is to be meticulous about reviewing the data and taking care to draw sound conclusions from it.
I just saw a study the other day concerning magnesium that looked to me to be too sanguine about the risks of having too much magnesium in the bloodstream, and advocating too strongly for increasing magnesium intake, especially among those who are suffering from COVID. True, the data indicated that low levels of magnesium were a much more common problem -- widespread, in fact -- and that having too much magnesium is really unusual. Still, I didn't think the conclusions were solid. I believed the data -- I had to, to come to this view. You do see that, right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nope, more than that. Collecting videos that various people actually, voluntarily posted on social media, particularly those teaching young children and minors in general, is a public service in my view. People, especially parents, have a right to know.
But Libs of Tik Tok didn't just "curate" these videos. She accused the makers of the videos of some of the most heinous crimes against children. Not hyperbole; she really did call for arrests for what is essentially free speech.
You see a good guy in this picture? Lorenz, by the way, is the last person to expose Libs of Tik Tok, if anyone should. She is one of the worst hypocrites I have ever seen. And she's incompetent. Also, I disagree with power differential arguments, in principle. (We can distinguish governmental actors, including their major contractors vs. all others -- that makes sense.) But anyone can destroy anyone, now. We all know it, too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@June VanDerMark Except that there sometimes is that one exception, that one out of ten million. I can believe it is literally that rare. The issue for kids that young in any event is medication. And if a gender reassignment is wrong at 17, I don't think it necessarily becomes right at 18, "do what you want, your own business." It may be right at 25, or 35, or never.
If one day we regard this as more akin to a lobotomy than it is to sound treatment, then it should not be done to anyone. But I doubt that; I think it is time to treat everyone as an individual, using the basic principles of first do no harm, doing less is generally better, fully informed consent, including being informed about what we don't know, and the precautionary principle: the burden of proof for the benefit of any intervention is always on the proponent.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@apethae1 I have worked in both as well, and you may not realize it, but you just proved my point. Of course people are pushed out of their jobs -- in academia, and in the private corporation, in precisely the way you've just described. It's practically a human algorithm by now, and it works like a charm. Of course certain people are protected -- in business and in politics. (Harvey Weinstein sure lasted a LONG time and had many, many friends, until the winds changed and his films started flopping.)
The central point is, in business, no one has First Amendment rights. You can get fired for expressing your views, even outside the workplace, and it is legal to do so in the private sector. In academia, this, too, is more and more the case, and the reason comes down to a very similar mindset. (I will bet that the tenured faculty in the fistfight was either a political animal extraordinaire, or a "star," with lots of publications and name recognition. He was not a run-of-the-mill tenured prof.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Buttlather Well, the poorest neighborhoods where I live have unbelievably bad basic services. You see dangerous empty dwellings, you see broken sidewalks and potholed streets, you see apartments so far below code that they are dangerous and catching fire all the time -- and of course the first thing anyone does is blame the residents, who usually had nothing to do with it. Then the concept of food desert is real --- whenever a nice store opens in a neighborhood close to a poor area, you will see very poor people buying groceries, even at Whole Foods when they have sales. Liquor stores, convenience stores, and small storefront churches, empty lots, broken sidewalks, impassable streets, broken street lights, flooded streets, lead pipes . . . and why? Why would one part of the same city have new schools, sidewalks, streets, and street cleaning every month?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RadiusG60 A good education was a leftist value. Under Mitterrand, French kids could start Ancient Greek in 5th grade, and complete two years of college-level Mathematics in high school. The Soviets gave medals for achievement in Mathematics and Physics, not just music or sports. Le Monde printed notices of births, deaths, marriages, and doctoral thesis defense, and the student who wrote the best philosophy essay for the baccalaureate was interviewed on all the major media outlets. Mélenchon wants to bring back more Latin and Greek. By comparison, DEI, LGBTQ, and all this stuff look like strategies to make a quick buck, divide everyone, and turn them away from what matters.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rowsy91 Shows what you know. Do you think France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Norway, Russia, etc., pay for college tuition? Annual fees only. As for the late, great state universities, a summer of minimum wage work, full time, covered a full year's tuition. Yes, at Michigan, Texas, Wisconsin, Virginia, Illinois . . . I think California might have cost even less.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasonmataafa5983 EVERY single developed country found a way to provide all of those things for its people, and for that matter, in 1970, in-state tuition at all the premier public universities was something a kid could earn with a minimum-wage summer job. Then, when you graduated debt-free, all you'd need to do was to team up with a couple of roommates and you could afford an apartment in Brooklyn or Queens, or even Manhattan, not to mention anywhere on the West coast. Health insurance was cheap.
There was once a time when none of this was an issue, and now it's insurmountable for most people. You need to take a hard look at what changed.
On a side note, when universities were affordable, calculus and Shakespeare and foreign languages were typical college subjects --- as were Nietzsche and Marx, for that matter. Now we're debating identities and pronouns.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fredschnerbert1238 How do we pay for Medicare for the elderly, who need the most medical care? How did in-state tuition used to be something that was covered by a minimum-wage summer job? Yes, a year at U of Michigan, or UC Berkeley, or U of Texas, and on and on and on. When you figure that out, come back to us.
Health insurance issues are the number one reason people hesitate to start a small business. School debt, and not just for college but for a whole host of vocational programs, is a major reason kids live at home instead of getting on with life, getting married, etc. But you worry about "TAXES!!!!!" Great, keep it up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@buffy4500 More politicized, absolutely, but have you been watching French news in the original? But everything is going to have that special viciousness, here.
I haven't checked the weekly numbers, but last time I did, Germany had about the same number of fully vaccinated as the US, France had fewer, and Russia far fewer. Japan has very few. Only UK embraced it, but Oxford developed their vaccine. Serbia had an impressive rollout, with a wide choice (three non-mRNA and one mRNA vaccine, see the PBS report on that), but it seems to have stalled.
I really did look this up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SpellboundTutor This is not a scientific question in which the empirical evidence changed in this short period of time. It is a public policy question. The political winds shifted.
Exactly: The fact that people who are injured are on their own, they can go shove it, is precisely one source of mistrust. The pattern is the continual offloading of risk on to those least equipped to bear it. Health, education, unemployment, disability, retirement, everything. This is why no European left supports mandates -- and this, in spite of their excellent comprehensive health and disability benefits. At least they can deal with it, rather than face isolation and scorn.
Sad: it was Dore who pointed out you're being trained to hate that one guy in Wisconsin. And so you do, complete with swearing. Bravo. You proved his point. That is sad.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@heathfairbairn2460 I analyzed each question based on the actual facts of what was said, by the student posing the question, and by how Bannon took it and answered. And I showed how all the questions showed perspicuity, and that from them, an overarching theme emerged: Bannon has some very good policy suggestions, and those go nowhere. You should think about that. But more to the point: everybody here, or very nearly so, thinks exactly like you do. One lone individual does not -- and you are apoplectic. You can't stand it. (Is that your underlying weakness for Benthamism that has you so agitated? You always count heads, as though they were money? I'll bet! The continent holds a more Kantian view.)
And you are compelled to insult me, and you think I have a problem. In fact, I'm not qualified to comment! I've failed to honor your feelings!!
You must not embarrass easily. Either that, or recursive thinking isn't happening over by you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@natashak8946 In other words, he can't cite a study. But more to the point, have you ever found a study concerning happiness, fulfillment, flourishing, etc., that helped you make major decisions or plan your own life? Such "studies" exist not to accurately describe phenomema, but to shape behavior ---- much like the information (and absence of information) we've received to push vaccination. Sometimes they contain good efficiency tips for breaking an iphone habit or cleaning your house.
A good novel or two, or three, can give you more insight, because art is more likely to stir your unconscious and your imagination, lead you to productive dreams that tell you something important for your own life, etc. These decisions are too personal and too individual to be made on any other basis.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@init100 It is known that Biden held back witnesses who were literally, physically present waiting to corroborate Anita Hill's testimony, and he denied them entry. But if he said "high-tech lynching," and, as we all know, words are Magic now, they create reality, then that settles it. What are actual bodies next to Words?
In any case, there is no such suggestion. You are taking a metaphor for a literal description of who did what to whom. That's . . . I want to say bizarre, but in 2023, I feel like I'd be going out on a limb.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@djinghiskhan9199 CDC: "During January 1-December 31, 2023, a total of 58 measles cases were reported by 20 jurisdictions: California, Colorado, District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, New York City, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wisconsin." This is due to anti-vaxxers?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ansillypants I had a less severe case, a typical "girl" case, LOL, around a typical age (about 19) and was cured, with no true relapses, but I feel that I missed the comprehensive treatment plan I needed. So, I overcame an illness, but never really came into my own. No flourishing, that's for sure. Health is more than just not being sick. :/
Before, when there was no FMLA, people couldn't take off from work to do what truly needed to be done. (Today, they can't afford to, but that's another problem.) If everyone could get three solid months of attention: a walk in a wooded area or on a beach every day, yoga every day, an excellent diet, massage every week, some sort of meditation or self-hypnosis, some sort of art to work on, and someone to pay attention to them, LOTS of hugs, but also to insist on a schedule, love and warmth without coddling or slacking -- you'd see a lot of stronger people bouncing back. What is three months in an entire life?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lepidoptera9337 Nor did Marx claim his theory of historical materialism could make any such predictions. He predicted the eventual end of capitalism, gave reasons why, and presented a theory of something better that could displace it -- just as capitalism was in many ways vastly superior to feudalism and mercantilism.
Even Nouriel Roubini says Marx is great on descriptive economics, but not on prescriptions. IOW, what Marx said IS what capitalism does. What you believe can come after is a different matter, and will depend on how greatly the world is poisoned (by environmental toxins, unstoppable climate change, viruses, etc.).
N. B. Engineered obsolescence creates profits quickly and pollution and toxic landfills just as quickly -- not to mention people who are less and less resourceful. As in, when I was a kid, most people knew how to rebuild the engine of a car. Now they need a keyboard and power source to write anything.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@janeknight5070 I DON'T CARE!! Can you be serious? How about None of the Above? How about, I Was Not There? How about There Is No Reason To Believe Samantha?
I think I'm old enough to be Harry's mother, too, more or less. How can someone your age still be so easily led?
"Fact-checked" by whom? After the pandemic, you should be wary of any such claims.
I think you're all relishing the mass flogging of The Woman Who Married Harry, and that would have been the upshot regardless of who married him. It was for Paul McCartney's wives, all three. The first had to develop cancer at a young age to be acceptable to the mob. The last one is grudgingly accepted for the most part, if not liked, because most of the hate was spent on No. 2, and Paul is old now.
Do you plan never to grow up? Why?
Anyway, done here. Carry on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Snipergoat1 Oh, advertisers are amoral! And they do damage! Not only that, but lobbies and pressure groups lie and bribe to get their way. Fancy that, it never occurred to me.
If the only damage they do is to the revenues of a multi-billionaire, that would be one thing. In fact, such groups have been behind every sort of manipulation and atrocity. The "science" of shaping attitudes and behavior has reached dizzying heights. If a small group of well-placed masters of propaganda wanted a world war before this decade is over, the chances are far from negligible that we would have one. And everyone who mouthed their slogans would think they were coming up with something original. I assure you, they would.
I know you think you've "got me" or something, but I don't even get your point. Suppose Musk sued and won. Would a court order ADL to cease and desist? Would advertisers be obligated in any way to come back to X/Twitter? (Would they do it of their own volition, based only on the outcome of a lawsuit? Ha.) No. Money would change hands. Money. If you see some higher principle at work here, please be clearer. I actually don't understand. I'm not being pigheaded, I actually don't.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Re: the resume study -- I had thought everyone knew about that study. They appeared not to believe it.
Look, there is a real problem with what you tell kids. I would never tell a college student, much less K - 12, the truth about the workplace and workplace hiring, and it's not only because of race.
A person who keeps getting passed over for jobs that less qualified people get has to remember that the person hired may be related to someone, money may have changed hands, that person may have slept with someone or may have done drugs with someone for that job, not to mention a whole host of less nefarious things like lying, flattery, denunciations of others by friends, jealousy of something on a great resume that turns the interviewer off and leads to hiring the less accomplished, etc. People who aren't from big cities may not understand how common corruption is. I don't want to tell a KID this stuff.
It wasn't rare to get one's friends to make derogatory social media posts about a competitor and positive statements about oneself during hiring season at the most prestigious law schools and MBA programs. Some people were sued over it. It's also no secret that an "ordinary" job won't hire someone from an Ivy, which is harsh -- suppose you want to work in a bookstore while you write your first novel or before leaving to join the Peace Corps? Patti Smith worked in a bookstore. Actors wait tables.
This is a message you have to craft carefully and deploy only when needed. The goal is always to strengthen the young person to rise above the fray and be happy and successful in life, not to feel hopeless or dejected. Even Jordan Peterson said a few good things about this issue, such as never let anyone in the workplace punish you for your virtues.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@4foxsake571 It doesn't work for several reasons: privatization of public goods always undermines the public goods. See, e.g., Adam Smith on the rentier class, not to mention the privatization of the commons of his time. Second, MUCH of the charter school experiment has ended up in looting of public monies. The best informed parents make grave mistakes, and children have to meet educational milestones every year (as we've just seen) --- they simply cannot afford failed experiments. Third, and related, the quality of charter schools and established private schools is extremely variable, possibly more so than the quality of public schools in a single tax district. No one can deny that the very best are outstanding, but the worst are nightmares. So, the fate of minors again depends on who their parents are, how much money they already have to support academic achievement, and how well informed they are, plus a hefty dose of sheer luck?
The New York City public schools and City Colleges educated generations of immigrant children to the highest achievement. Look at what was different then. Not just school, but the culture of school. Who upholds that now? The people on top are the most clever liars. Integrity is for chumps. You think the kids don't notice?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ArchlordZer0 I urge you to watch the videos I posted. It is obvious you are not familiar with all sides of the argument, which is The New Big Thing -- the Foxification of the country, where everyone only listens to people they agree with.
I will grant you, it is very annoying to listen to an opposing argument poorly drawn. That is why I gave you a link to a guy who has lived in the rustbelt AND did his doctorate at Cambridge. And Aaron Mate, who of course urged voting for Biden.
Or, don't listen. Suit yourself. But then I really don't care to waste my time. I have a hundred pages to read today, etc., . . . I also have somewhere to go. (I can emigrate.) I know it's rude and brusque to say so, and to put it so baldly, but I am hoping to see signs of people waking up soon. It's late in the day . . .
You think it over. Sleep on it and come back.
P. S. Also, the Supreme Court doesn't work that way. For example, we have Medicare now. The Court would not oppose expanding it. There is no basis to object to that. Abortion, marriage equity, a higher minimum wage than the national standard will exist in most states. The Court can't do anything about it, even in a worst-case scenario. The erosion of the Fourth Amendment is the most frightening, and that has been going on for 50 years. Even a few extreme right wingers have been afraid of that -- for good reason. The worst part is, society itself has participated in accepting limits to our Fourth Amendment rights. The "reasonableness" standard is changing, and we have been complicit. Big mistake.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ArchlordZer0 Bad faith time waster.
Seder places far too much emphasis on the Supreme Court to the detriment of what matters, namely ELECTING people to the executive and legislative branches using the appeal that was proven to work. To wit: in EVERY congressional race where a Democrat embraced the progressive agenda the people want, the Democrat won, and wherever the Democrat opposed it, they lost.
It is NOT true that the Court can overturn an expanded Medicare. People 65 and over have Medicare now. It is not true that the Court can affect the minimum wage. We have (an inadequate) minimum wage now. This is settled law, not subject to whim. The legislative branch decides these things. ELECTING progressive people changes these things. Electing DNC neoliberals hands over more power to Wall Street -- and FYI, business litigation is MOST of what is on courts' dockets today, Supreme and otherwise.
It isn't obvious to you that the DNC just failed spectacularly, that it should have been a landslide against not only the WORST president ever, but a man who is clearly unhinged? I mean, his tweets alone should be enough to sweep his entire party out of office. So. What happened? You still want a SOUNDBITE? I wish it were so easy. (Did Seder convince you it is? I doubt that. Even I think better of him.)
You should care about informing yourself. If you don't, I don't. Your joint, soon not mine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@graywalkerjoin3rdparty74 You think that being held liable and having your assets seized is not a punishment? Yes it is. It is a civil penalty. Second, Depp has the means to obtain the BEST legal counsel in the world, but somehow subjected himself to the British court system, and his lawyers were unable to warn him about what you just informed us of. How did that happen? If he lost work AFTER losing a defamation suit, by what rights do you imagine he is entitled to compensation? He subjected himself to a foreign court system, lost, and as a result, had contracts cancelled. That's not a result of the article, it is a result of a court case. By the way, this case is not about persons, it is about a writing. Have you read the article alleged to have been defamatory? Just curious.
The deeper issue here is that we are turning into little mobs at the drop of a hat. I saw through MeToo. I knew it had rapidly deteriorated into a mob. It hurt men without protecting women. Depp v. Heard is doing the opposite, and it has unleashed a more ferocious mob. Will things get worse before they get better? I don't want to contemplate that. At some level I cannot understand, I really cannot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@varsityathlete9927 Well, that's true, but . . . Discussing some sort of parental alert, comparable to the system for rating films, and having a small label on various media (music, video games) does not strike me as a prioir censorship. It can devolve into that, true. But if done correctly, it can also just be information. Look what happened in film: the R rating broadened far beyond what anyone would have predicted. No movie that is not totally porn is ever rated X. I agree with that, by the way. But back in 1950, did anyone think Midnight Cowboy and Boogie Nights would be R? Good that they aren't X, but . . . It's kind of funny.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Fugeeface Entropy I don't mean that if someone is obsessing over Facebook, then they are right wing, or tend toward that view. I mean the people who I know, in the real world and independently of any social media presence, to be right wing, are all on Facebook incessantly. I was suspicious from Day 1, never joined. My way of life has slipped away to such an extent that my family in the US died out and I have to emigrate. I'm not complaining. I might as well say, "I get to emigrate," instead of saying I have to. AOC is not "left wing." AOC and Trump are just two varieties of comic-book media freak. The Hulk needs a nemesis for the story to play. That's all.
One day the dollar will not be the global reserve currency. Perhaps not in our lifetime, perhaps in 20 years, or 50 years. Or twelve. Then you'll see what mass suffering is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@plateoshrimp9685 If it's not obvious to you why you need to push for real change now, not tokenism that might incrementally improve a few people's lives, until the next crash, pandemic, and environmental catastrophe, then I guess you're comfortable, naive, and lacking in imagination.
We have been hearing about incremental improvements to American health care since the mid-1980s. Close to TWO generations. Try somethin' else, maybe?
You're also assuming that what usually happens will happen this time, too. And that pushing for what SHOULD happen won't bring M4A any closer. Why would you assume that? We are not living through a true catastrophe? Okay then, back to the usual, but don't laugh at anyone who thinks COVID is a hoax. The DNC is acting like it is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@curiouscanuck Well, my father and my mother's only brother were WWII British Army veterans, and I singlehandedly took care of my father in his old age, at great personal sacrifice, for five years. So maybe you should reconsider what ugly things you said to me. I doubt you've done more than emote. Your ugly words sound like they're from someone with zero perspective on real life, and a rather bizarre fantasy life, to boot.
I don't see reasonable posts, like "it was wrong to speak publicly about their family matters, especially now." (I think that's true. I would never have done it, or suggested anyone do it.) Instead, I see tit-fot-tat, extremely vicious and escalating personal attacks on them. How is that taking a stand? It's joining in by taking sides and doing the very same thing. This is a social media disease. Get well soon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@utah_koidragon7117 Not at all. I said that there are objective reasons to watch her more closely, but certainly not to draw any conclusions. I actually mean what I say, and I don't engage in slogans like "plausible deniability." (I, unlike you, have no need to.) You claim you know she cannot possibly be a fascist, and has said nothing that could cause anyone to take a closer look? Have you or your parents ever lived in Europe, Italy in particular, but elsewhere where there were allies or collaborationists, with the Axis? Never mind, the answer is obvious. You are breathtakingly monolingual and monocultural, and beholden to parroting your local crowd. Too bad your country is so well-armed and run by nefarious elites.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@christines8529 No, Harvard DOES benefit from federal funds, even though it's a private school, which is why it must also obey federal anti-discrimination laws. That's why this lawsuit made it all the way to the Supreme Court. It is rich enough to finance all of its needy students and to extricate itself from depending on public money. But that is surprisingly hard to do, and complicated, so it won't. Besides, the money is green.
What I really think is that these elitist institutions shouldn't have the stranglehold on society and politics that they do. I think their legacy pools and "special development" pools are just as discriminatory, or more, than anything else they do. If they want to be modified four-year country clubs for the Jared Kushners (or Chelsea Clintons) of the world, bless them, they can rely on First Amendment freedom of association and go their merry way. But then they go on to affect the lives of the rest of us, and of the rest of the people on this planet -- and they do it for their benefit, on our dime.
A really interesting read was the letter Harvard's President wrote when it was revealed just how much Harvard was mixed up with Jeffrey Epstein. Am I changing the subject? No. To me, this is the heart of the matter. We argue about who is qualified to be admitted to Harvard -- and I say, who cares? Why are they then "qualified" to control the lives of the rest of us? They clearly are not. That's what I care about. There is no way to make Harvard admissions fair. There are too many qualified people vying for too few seats, and too many people who want to game the system, and can. Why do so many people apply? Because it really is as close to a guarantee of success in life as you can possibly find at age 18. But why is it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The business about crossing state lines with a gun is pure red herring. There was no evidence he did.
Two factors are under deliberation: (1) a person cannot contribute to creating the need for using lethal force to defend their life, and then claim perfect self-defense. (2) In using lethal force to defend their life, a person cannot act recklessly, given the circumstances.
The real tragedy is that under Wisconsin law, carrying that assault-type rifle openly, at age 17, is not a crime. Let that sink in. After how many mass shootings, they still can't pass reasonable gun laws? To cover MINORS, in public, not in their own dwelling, at least? Apparently not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Richard_Potato Actually, no, that is not correct. The IQ measure, which you seem to assume is a measure of "intelligence," is actually highly correlated, and regarded as highly predictive, of formal educational attainment in the present system of secondary and higher education. What can happen and what usually happens are two different things. A person of normal intelligence may or may not have a high IQ, and may or may not attain a doctorate at Oxford. Whether we can nevertheless consider attaining a doctorate at Oxford, especially later in life out of pure intellectual desire, as a marker of a high IQ is beside the point you've made. It need not be such a marker -- no necessity there, as Bertrand Russell used to say. On the other hand, it almost always is.
Yeah. This took only a couple of minutes. Glad I could help.
1
-
1
-
@Richard_Potato I'm sorry you did not understand my post, or what performance on an IQ test (or any other aptitude test) means, or pretty much anything else I said. I will not take the obvious jab at what that might mean about your "intelligence." That would be cheap, and of course incorrect. You are obviously flustered.
IQ tests do not measure "intelligence;" there is no test that can, for lots of reasons. IQ tests correlate very strongly with educational attainment in the present system, as it is commonly found in the West.
You really don't know what either you or I are arguing. That's kind of . . . funny. (You bring up drink. Is there a reason it came to mind?)
BTW, didn't you know that there have been some Nobel Prize winners in the hard sciences who had a rather ordinary performance on IQ tests, documented?
Even Roger Penrose was not considered gifted in math because he really took his time and did problems slowly when he was young. Already as a child, he understood that the right answer was more important than the fast answer. He already knew math was different from other things he was being taught. (You do know that IQ tests are timed, correct? Speed strongly influences score. See the preceding paragraph and make a conjecture as to why there are true geniuses in this world who did not perform well on IQ tests.)
And Russell is famous for making the distinction between necessary truths and contingent ones, and deepening our understanding of their ground, later using various pithy formulations when making the point in his talks.
In any case, a person's performance -- in writing books, in completing a doctorate at Oxford -- is evidence of their intelligence. There is no need for some test to "prove" what is already known with greater certainty by other, more reliable, means. These aptitude tests usually take a few hours, and only rarely may be administered over a number of days. What someone actually does with their life, over years and years, trumps whatever those tests might turn up.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Agnar669 Even the existence of what you deem to be "the empathy center" is no more than a decade old, controversial, and frankly, the nature of the labeling hardly sounds scientific -- it smacks of a desire to become well-know, publish books in the popular psychology/self-help domain, or achieve tenure. Everything is advertising now, and a lot of money is at stake.
Only recently have we learned that the notion that antidepressants work by bringing neurotransmitters into balance was a metaphor, and didn't have a scientific basis. It certainly sounded scientific.
If you think that Harry and Meghan are doing unethical things, what prevents you from saying that? Why are you trying to don the lab coat of science to make it sound more objective? You have no idea whether they have a diagnosis, or what their diagnosis is, and you weren't with them when they claim they were systematically undercut and made to look horrid to the British public. You must know nothing about their tabloid culture. It is the most vicious in the world. Your "science" is Fauci-style, a claim to an authority you lack.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@andrewdegeorge9649 Well, this dictator who invaded another country just scored another coup, and not incidentally, one that is good for his economy and not good for the dollar: scores of countries want to join BRICS, and among the six that will join soon are Argentina, Ethiopia, and Egypt, not to mention the Saudis. Mexico has expressed interest in joining, and Turkey (a NATO member) is interested in the proposed currency, if and when it is issued.
Your mainstream media is leading you down a primrose path. For the record, I am opposed to Putin, but facts are facts. I was surprised that this happened during the war. Ponder that. I thought the war was causing the BRICS to fray. One would think so, huh? Oops.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ffffnnnnul2125 Except that it's wrong.
Major corporations spend more on LOBBYING than they pay in taxes. And rather than paying taxes, and reducing the federal deficit, they buy Treasuries and get paid INTEREST, from the federal government, which means those very same tax revenues they are able to avoid.
In the meantime, it is they who need the court system (and its police power) to assert their intellectual property rights and thrash out their contract claims, it is they who need 700 bases in 80 countries to police the global shipping lanes and prop up the dollar as global reserve currency . . . get it? Just keep looking.
This stuff isn't too tough to understand.
You could start by taking a look at what was done by the government during the pandemic, and who profited the most, as well as how each little decision seemed to have an independent, "scientific" basis, but all of them together pointed in one direction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rusty_Spy Trump had a personality cult, based on ersatz "strength." He changed his tune every 24 hours, then claimed he didn't. He signed on to what any flatterer put in front of him, whether it be bombing Syria, executing an Iranian general via drone, or trying to flip Venezuela -- none of which the DNC opposed, by the way. He and Fauci played Good Cop, Bad Cop on COVID, he knew about it in January and hid what he knew, and failed to stand in Fauci's way when Fauci wanted to end the moratorium on gain-of-function research. It should have been strengthened.
I agree about not letting a day go by without challenging the DNC from the left. Why do you think AOC doesn't? Better yet, why do establishment Dems need to be pushed so hard and still won't go?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@justinshin2279 All right. Let's presume that all the medical and scientific community who advocate mass vaccination have the best motives. This does not mean that the consensus is correct. You don't perceive the intense pressure to conform? I've never seen anything like it in the realm of science or medicine. Succumbing to pressure is the most human thing to do, but you can't call it noble. The people who do it don't believe they are doing it. And we have policy decisions to make which must be open to discussion.
The way the actual news is trickling in is not painting a good picture. A fully vaccinated person with a breakthrough infection may be less likely to be a super spreader, but that is not clear. Not anymore. The Guardian just reported that teen boys have a higher risk of hospitalization for myocarditis from the mRNA vaccines than they do from a COVID infection. The Swiss ministry of health considers a person fully vaccinated if they had a proven COVID infection and then received ONE shot of an mRNA vaccine. India did use ivermectin as a prophylactic in certain areas, and the WHO strongly criticized that decision. (I have not found clearly credible reports on the result of that choice, and I remember thinking at first that it was a rumor. That is pathetic.) Do you see consistency here? Or good reasons to question what we are being ordered to do?
This is a new virus, and a relatively new technology that has never been pressed into mass use before. That usually means proceed with caution, and justify your steps. Persuade people, rather than bully them. Why doesn't it this time?
I had a bad impression of Malone simply because he agreed to appear on Bret Weinstein's show, and Weinstein opposes vaccination. Well, Jimmy and Stef WERE vaccinated, and Malone had COVID and does believe that certain groups should be vaccinated. I don't think that everything Malone says in this segment is true, but I don't find him to be generally lacking in credibility or doing any kind of disservice. We NEED to reason this through. The top-down diktat is causing chaos.
We're now in a world where Russell Brand is making more sense than most people. Good gawd.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@markusmuller6173 I don't recall either of us proving anything, but only one was observing the principles of modal logic.
Seriously, though, now that I think about it, I grant you it should be obvious, to anyone, that there were problems at that house long before this crime -- based on how frequently the police were called, for one thing. I don't know the full extent of those problems, nor am I in a hurry to hear about them.
I am quite content to allow the legal process to play out. I hope they take it nice and slow, and investigate carefully, and that they respect all the survivors' rights.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Intervention by Russia's central bank . . . " No, . . . people need energy to manufacture things, grow crops, transport foodstuffs and other goods, and heat their homes. They do not need Mastercard, iPhones, McDonald's, Google, or Twitter to manufacture things, grow crops, transport foodstuffs and other goods, and heat their homes.
I know, it's counterintuitive. /s
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ashleecantu6470 Well, what makes you so sure I'm not one of those people who cannot be vaccinated at this time? I am not afraid of the unvaccinated at all. I take for granted that I have to limit where I go and observe the rules that were in place before any vaccine was available, and take tests -- which I am glad to do, and which vaccinated people should be doing as well, given the growing body of evidence that the protection OF OTHERS (as distinct from protection of vaccinated persons themselves) that vaccines afford is not extremely robust and wanes rapidly. But I make no demands. This is just my view.
The vaccinated have excellent, though not perfect, protection against death or hospitalization due to COVID for at least six months, which should persuade most people to do it. I don't expect others to go get vaccinated for me, especially not with these vaccines. I categorically oppose coercive tactics. Kyle himself took Johnson and Johnson. Check how good the protection of others works with that one.
In France, the CGT (hard left union) organized a demonstration of vaccinated health care workers in support of their unvaccinated colleagues and against mandates. A mainstream publication, L'Obs, carried the video and all the comments praised the CGT for their humanity. That's called civilization. The Scandinavian countries do not mandate vaccination, either, or recommend it for the very young. There is a reason why they all have longer life expectancies and healthy kids, while we had record drug overdose deaths last year.
I don't know about this other stuff you're saying. What does this have to do with my post? Who and what do I have to "call out?" Are you all right?
Don't you see this IS NOT WORKING? It reminds me of the hatred and panic that swirled around HIV.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@penelopelopez8296 I know how you feel. All I can say, honestly, is find refuge in a much-loved hobby, a person, sports or solitary exercise, hiking, biking, one of the arts, and above all, read every day. Read in more than one language. You can shed this feeling.
Also, these people are not worth your agony. I'm not saying to ignore the world and where it's going. I'm saying don't let it get to you to this point. They are not worth it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I listen to podcasts from other countries about these vaccines, and the most intelligent critique I heard was logically structured very much like what you just said. Here was what one professor of medicine said, in a society where vaccines are generally much better accepted:
First of all, speak to your doctor about whether you should be vaccinated. Too much of what has been presented to the public is advertising, not information.
Second, all of these vaccines have a significant risk profile. Be aware of that. Our annual flu shots are far less risky.
Third, as for the data, people under 50 in good health are not at high risk of death or disability from COVID. People 70 and over, really, REALLY are. Ages 50 to 70 is a highly individual determination. Most probably do have the risk that makes vaccination highly advisable.
Fourth, never discount the psychological costs of not being vaccinated. If you are truly afraid of contracting COVID, if the past 12-14 months of isolation have taken a toll on you, this is a very good reason to get vaccinated. Prolonged stress and isolation, poor sleep, etc., is harmful to health. This should be part of any risk assessment.
Fifth, at this point we hope the vaccine, if administered rapidly, will help keep the virus from mutating into a variant that the vaccine is ineffective against. We hope, but do not and cannot know. A yearly shot is within the realm of possibility.
Finally, we also have reasonable hope that the vaccine will protect others, not just the recipient. Unfortunately, we don't know that yet, either, due to the problem of vaccinated asymptomatic carriers. We don't have enough data to assess that risk at present.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here is a research topic, which would be difficult to explore, for objective, apolitical reasons: Are women more susceptible to messages of innate inferiority, and more likely to give up if they are told they lack some ability? For example, if young women are told there exists powerful evidence that men are superior in mathematics, are they more likely to give up mathematics, compared with men who are told women are greatly superior in foreign languages? Will men nevertheless persist, or not?
If there is a difference, what accounts for it? Is it correlated with things like propensity to depression? These are just questions, I don't know the answers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Kurgana Here's a hint: who are the students appealing to, to ban this speaker? The authorities. But the authorities in this case are clearly state actors, and cannot curtail constitutionally protected speech based on objections to its content. In your own home, there is no way anyone can frame that as coming from the state. You're not a state actor, you're exercising your right to free association. And you don't have to have anything to do with Pence.
If people actually listened to this whole video, the main points are all there. I'm no fan of Robbie's, I find him childish and smug, but everything he said was right.
Anyway, college has become a trade school with some fancy resort properties put at the students' disposal. Maybe they shouldn't bother inviting anybody to speak unless it's for career advice, stock tips, etc. People begged to make university more like a private business, where as we all know speech is severely curtailed. Business was considered the ideal model. Well here we are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@helengunter378 I'm so sorry for your loss. This was a very short time. I know how it is. No words for it.
As for this gossip, all of these people are complex, with complex lives and unusual struggles. We can't know what happened, or how it was understood or misunderstood at the time. Meghan was treated badly from the beginning, before saying or doing anything, by people who thought she was wrong for Harry. Some people who are treated badly rise to the occasion, some don't, and most try hard for a long time, then break and lash out all the more. Some people take being blamed for a minor misstep by their staff in stride, calmly and with a noblesse oblige attitude. Others feel it as a personal slight, assume it reflects on them, and crumble right away. No reason to hate anyone. Obviously the noble attitude is better, but no one is perfect.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@speckledmike PROVE SOMEONE SAID PRECISELY THAT. Sounds like something you read into something someone said.
But more important, how do you suggest the sexualization of children be stopped? Exactly how do you communicate the message effectively? Did you know, for example, that beauty pageants for toddlers, complete with swimsuit competitions, exist? Did you know dance competitions for preteens that imitate adult erotic dancers exist? Do you have proposals for doing something about it? Do you think you can do something about it without showing what it consists in? You cannot legally ban a movie if the distributor sues under the First Amendment to lift the ban, without showing the whole movie to a jury.
This is apart from whether such competitions "normalize pedophilia." You say so, without any evidence. But they are certainly not good for kids, even if they lead to nothing worse. I don't need persuading.
I think anyone who endorses first person shooter video games for kids under 18 is endorsing something that harms brain development and normalizes homicide, but I don't expect to convince anyone, sadly. Applying a slander term to them never occurred to me. Quick and dirty, huh?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ryanthomas4069 False. You don't understand Bayesian probability. If your risk of X is very, very tiny, then clinical outcome is less important in making a cost-benefit analysis regarding preventative strategies and their risks than when the risk of X is higher.
Do young people contract severe COVID with myocarditis at all? If they don't, or very, very rarely, then the fact that it presents a danger to them is not a reason to take a vaccine known to cause an apparently milder case of myocarditis more often than COVID itself does, especially where, as this study acknowledges, there were a handful of myocarditis deaths associated with vaccination. The study also listed the 90-day time frame as a possible limitation on the value of the data. This simply acknowledges the fact that we don't know long-term outcomes for either COVID or the vaccines.
I'm an attorney who specialized in the federal rules of expert witness testimony under Daubert. This is the common sense interpretation of risk analysis, and it is also the law. You're the one who has projected feelings (and dumb slogans) into the discussion, for some reason. Some obscure reason.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@debutts7723 Oh please. You had a point, possibly, until you said "Tim Pool." Well, thanks for letting us know what you think. Or not.
At any rate, it's obvious you don't follow Dore, which is certainly your prerogative, and I know he is not to everyone's taste -- understandably not. But if you don't follow Dore, then you do not know where he fits in the left wing landscape, or why a Cornel West, Richard Wolff, Chris Hedges, Max Blumenthal, Briahna Joy Gray, Matt Stoller, etc., etc., will come on his show, and will defend him to a large extent, even when they disapprove of certain tactics he uses. You don't know he was a bricklayer, you don't know he was the youngest of 12 children and grew up without a bookshelf in the house, you don't know he had to declare medical bankruptcy due to a rare disease and was so despondent over it that he was suicidal, etc., etc.
"Tim Pool." Oh brother! This is why people on the real left will not let you smear him. Clear now?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@debutts7723 There has been no "Dore about-face." As fo "these guys," Hedges and Wolff, they are both rich -- as in, independently wealthy. They have absolutely no need to appear on Dore. The suggestion that they might is preposterous. It's a risk for them, if anything! As for the rest, you've distorted what I've said. Of course. Have it your way. As a matter of fact, the neolibs almost did lose the election to Trump, as anyone who is objective must see. If they took the Trump threat seriously, why did they run Biden/Harris? Why didn't they start in November 2016 to plan for 2020, to run a truly popular candidate? This election should have been a landslide for Democrats, not one where they barely won the White House from that menace, and lost seats in the House. (BTW, every more progressive Democrat won, and it was two progressives who handed over the Senate to Democrats, FINALLY. The DNC types barely hung on.) Anyway, keep it up. Who cares?
1
-
@debutts7723 Nice how you pretended I didn't say this -- early on, in fact:
"At any rate, it's obvious you don't follow Dore, which is certainly your prerogative, and I know he is not to everyone's taste -- understandably not. But if you don't follow Dore, then you do not know where he fits in the left wing landscape, or why a Cornel West, Richard Wolff, Chris Hedges, Max Blumenthal, Briahna Joy Gray, Matt Stoller, etc., etc., will come on his show, and will defend him to a large extent, even when they disapprove of certain tactics he uses. You don't know he was a bricklayer, you don't know he was the youngest of 12 children and grew up without a bookshelf in the house, you don't know he had to declare medical bankruptcy due to a rare disease and was so despondent over it that he was suicidal, etc., etc."
If you don't like Trump, don't imitate his lack of candor. BTW, do you think Dr. West needs to be on Dore? LOL . . . I mean, how farfetched can you get?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@drebk These types of stories make me suspicious -- I begin to think they are being deliberately spun to erode constitutional rights. That's the pattern we see. People do fall for it. In this case, it was naive, gentle Gabby who made statements to police she should have been taught never, ever to make. We have a whole video of it. The only statement anyone should ever make in her position is "I feel unsafe." All the rest can be sorted out later. Any confessions, admissions, etc., if they should ever be made, should only be made in open court, under oath, with counsel present. Nowhere else, ever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SteveK139 The story that people rushed at Rittenhouse, who they believed -- rightly or wrongly -- was an active shooter, because the media uses terms like "assault rifle," and scares them, and not because, say, Columbine, or Sandy Hook, is beyond laughable. You can think whatever you want of Grosskreutz, but at that moment HE believed he was saving lives, not interfering with self defense. A high school sophomore knows more psychology.
A generation after Columbine and Wisconsin's legislature was incapable of drafting a reasonable and constitutional gun law with respect to minors. They get paid because . . . Tell me again.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Back to the central question: no, these are not wonderful times, and homelessness and drug abuse should tell you that.
Fifty years ago, minimum wage jobs covered rent, medical care, and in-state tuition literally everywhere in the country. This gave people opportunities to become educated, live where they want, and try out different jobs without being petrified of debt or even ending up on the street. The top four quintiles in income had a chance. Now, only the top quintile does; in fact, only the top 10% is truly secure.
Silicon Valley and Wall Street have not provided us with a better life. They have provided us with a financialized service economy and mass surveillance, plus advertising we can no longer spot and defend ourselves against. When people are always watched and don't make real things, count on lying to be a major job description. No, it's not good. And I haven't even touched on the political class, or the pandemic.
Also, if you've ever lived in different cities with different levels of inequality, you know from experience that less inequality is better. Some inequality is normal; San Francisco level makes no sense. No job is worth 10,000 times more than any other. Work isn't organized that way.
1
-
@christopherleslie Yes, of course I looked at data. First of all, nearly everyone either had one roommate or was married, and sometimes, people had more than one roommate. That means that two people sharing an apartment spent well under 25% of total earnings for rent. To live alone comfortably, it is true a person would need to make about $3.00, hardly out of reach for a high school grad. But people were convivial, and didn't want to live alone.
$1.75 per hour, 40 hours per week (the norm) meant that within 10 to 12 weeks, you earned a full year of in-state tuition and fees. In other words, the lowliest summer job covered it, for an entire school year, in-state, exactly as I said.
No one lived with their parents because of a lack of money, or because of debt for college. It was either a choice, or the result of some illness or disability. A college grad was a free human being.
I personally know people who did it. We haven't even started to talk about the intense pride that working your own way through school brought to a teenager, and what the freedom to live wherever you wanted, in a vast country, without needing a TRUST FUND, meant. The exhilaration can't be captured in numbers. But you didn't even do the math. You just eyeballed it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Actually, no one can teach you that. But they can at least point you in that direction, making it more likely that you will grasp it for yourself.
The problem is, no one wants to take those courses: calculus, real analysis, abstract algebra, set theory, topology, and serious foreign language and linguistics courses, including a classical language.
Bertrand Russell is always good, to illustrate the trajectory of a brilliant person's thought, and what he did upon discovering some of his most cherished ideas were wrong..
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Actually, we do not know what is behind this wave of non-COVID excess deaths. (If you go to the anti-Campbell websites -- don't; I did it for you -- you will find them insisting that not getting vaccination is causing excess deaths. Of COURSE they have no idea.) The point, however, is that we need a dispassionate assessment, that a multivariate analysis must be done, that it is complex, not easy to do (you can't leave it to an "algorithm"), and takes time and prudent judgment --- all the essential things we lack, thanks to the mass hysteria that has been directly imposed on us by our governments, MSM, and the elites who direct them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In most of the English-speaking world, the people who made serious money in their prime will have outstanding medical advice and care for the rest of their lives. As far as they are concerned, the rest of us should hurry up and kick that bucket.
In my city, before the pandemic, the very richest neighborhood had a mean life expectancy very close to 90. The very poorest, about 60. Yes, the richest live almost 50% longer on average than the poorest, though of course the concentrations of excess deaths among the poor are in infancy, and then again after 65 or so (no point in having them collect a SSA, i.e., government, pension).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So, you advocate limiting the most fundamental life choices of people while they are very young via bribery -- or do you call it a nudge? Because you think they're "evil?"
You do understand that rape is not rare, that reluctance, and all too rational fear to express reluctance, is ordinary, and that rich women, and rich men's girlfriends, will always have options -- including IVF and surrogacy? You get that part, correct?
Maybe the problem is general culture. Like from books and discussion and writing, and keeping serious journals, and thinking a lot, and wanting to know things and to be fair.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@karagi101 Yes, such as inflation (undercounted), unemployment (undercounted), labor force participation rate (a pretty honest number, relatively), consumer debt (also very solid), budgetary deficit (same), national debt (same). Then there is the debt-to-GDP ratio, a subject of endless, rollicking good debate and general amusement. Now don't get me started about the current zero reserve requirement, or derivatives and swaps.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@utah_koidragon7117 That isn't what happened. The major difference is in the state tax support for higher education. I will agree that regulations have caused an explosion in the size of college administrative costs, which have mostly harmed education. The small benefits some regulations provided could have been accomplished at very low cost. At any rate, that is the second most important cause of skyrocketing costs, after the withdrawal of state tax support. Then, there are also the dubious building programs at so many schools that have increased costs. (Does every state school need a luxury sports arena? Really?)
Minimum wage certainly was a living wage. I once lived on it with one roommate.
Who works their way through college now? In four to five years? They cannot be in school full time and working enough hours to cover both. It can be done over a somewhat longer time frame, yes, but not on the usual schedule. The least expensive state school near me graduates people on average after 7 years, and offers a lot of night classes. Most students who go there live at home, and they have their degrees by age 25 or so, which is not so bad. It's easy to continue for a Master's also, which is good. The more expensive state schools all require loans.
1
-
1
-
@fritzforsthoefel8031 All of those high skilled workers depend very heavily on the "low skilled." Who do you think provides child care, elder care, taxi service, landscaping, pizza, coffee? Who picks the crops and delivers them? Who do you think cleans office buildings, schools, hospitals, shopping centers, airports, and commuter trains to the suburbs? Who do you think picks up all the high rise garbage, not to mention medical waste? Who makes sure the sewage goes where it's supposed to? None of that can be outsourced to China, yo.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't understand. In 1950, the US population was 6% of the entire world; today it is about 4%. That is a relative decline of about one-third. In 1950, easily 60% of Americans had an excellent standard of living, and a very good quality of life based in large part on being able to trust that the standard would be stable or would improve, not decline. In 2023, who in the US has that? 10%; 20%, maybe? Not more than 20% since 2008-09, if that many. What about the other 80%+?
China's interests today are in Africa, not Taiwan! Compare China's position during the Greek solvency crisis with that of the Western powers (i.e., banking interests).
I wish that Peter Zeihan were asked more big-picture questions. He has interesting ideas, I would like to hear how he views these facts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Actually, medical ethicists such as George Annas stated after the anthrax attacks that vaccines may be urged upon people but can never be coerced.
6:41 How in the world would anyone under these circumstances not WANT a vaccine? And if the vaccine was effective protection, why would 100% compliance be needed --- an unattainable goal in any event? No, if think it through, it does not make sense.
The fact that (1) full corporate immunity from liability for vaccine injury, (2) full patent protection, (3) a demand to protect IP for up to 75 years in response to FOIA requests, and (4) no rapid sharing of information across national boarders all happened, and are obviously inconsistent with vaccine mandates, should have tipped rational people off that the biggest danger was not the virus. Something else was afoot. I grant you, this does not tell us what. But this is not how anyone acts in a true emergency.
Jonas Salk refused to patent the polio vaccine and he tested it on himself.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Dez083 The fact is that polio vaccines BMGF promoted throughout Africa and India -- oral live attenuated vaccines to be precise, which are no longer used in any developed country and haven't been for years -- carry the risk of seeding vaccine-derived polio outbreaks, because they can and do replicate and mutate. This is amply documented and has been known for years. (If you're not much of a reader, that's not our problem.) And Gates' claim that safe, modern polio vaccines are logistically harder to deliver to the global south is a LAUGH. He can't afford it? Oh, that's right. Jeff Epstein promised him money, at those dinners. But he failed to deliver.
Notice I haven't even touched on the shambles he has made of education in many communities with his experiments, or his dubious promotion of GMOs in food, or the self-dealing characteristic of his foundation that has been described at length. But more to the point is his quite obvious inability to connect with other people in any normal manner. Compassion is missing. It's evident that it is, and it does matter. No one is required to trust someone like that. Get him off the world stage. If he wants to direct how global health is handled, when he has zero qualifications, then that is not generosity. That is buying power over others' lives. That is all he's been good at doing.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Dead_Guy_Bob No, I think what we mean is that medical intervention in a minor child to create irreversible transitioning should be extremely rare if not prohibited, that only age-appropriate sex education should take place in school (so that before about age 12, you make sure that every child feels welcome, no one is bullied, and you say that every family is a nice family, whether it has one mom and one dad, just one mom, just one dad, two moms, two dads, a mom and a trans dad, etc., but you do not go beyond that before, say, the 6th grade, and you save some stuff for senior high school), and that pronoun changes should be shared with parents whenever a child's actual safety is not at risk.
You know. That sort of thing. Get it?
(No? Yes?)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vincentschicchi4647 You know what? It's just another push toward private schools, as if we needed one more.
Public school kids need to be sure that the AP classes they take, and the AP exams they pass, really do lead to college credits. If it turns out that almost no college will accept this AP exam for credit, then it should be scraped, because it is misleading. If colleges do give credit for it, as promised to the kids who take the class, then leave them alone. Politicians are not experts on curriculum, but they can enforce basic "truth in advertising." They should not be censoring, and they should care whether public school kids get the same opportunities as private school kids, as much as possible. That is their real job.
I would bet anything DeSantis never read those authors. Nor did he look into the objective value of the curriculum for obtaining college credit -- and warning people if there is an objective problem. (That serves all "sides.") Then Whoopie Goldberg is even more ignorant. She sounds like she has no notion of what the issue is, and just wants to push something that sounds like it agrees with her biases. We already know what an expert on history she is. /s
Everyone in this picture is making bank. Do you see them, er, working?
Pandering, more like, for their own advantage.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hania5928 Well, I started a reply and the tablet crashed, so I won't bother continuing at length. Dr. Hughes is a perfectly normal expert witness, with much better experience and credentials than you usually see, and I can tell you as an attorney, these complaints about her are trivial. It is the jury's job to be fair, and they are entitled to discount all of her testimony if they consider that fair. Consulting notes for correct dates is normal, not noting every impression is normal, and introducing the data upon which you based your assessment is normal. Hearsay is actually a difficult subject, even many lawyers misunderstand it, and Depp's lawyers are right to object whenever they suspect the line has been crossed. It's not a big gotcha, it's what they do, and should. They were usually overruled, but were right to object anyway.
I'll tell you what concerns me. I've lost count of the number of mass hysterias that have been unleashed on the public since Russiagate, and they've only been succeeding one another at shorter and shorter intervals since March 2020. I fail to see why so many people are this invested in the sordid private lives of two very rich people who engage in serious drug abuse and for whom $10 million is spare change. I don't identify emotionally with either one, much less see my life reflected in theirs -- and yes I've been lied about, and left a job because of it. Who hasn't?
Every defamation case chips away at First Amendment freedom of speech. We already have a problem in that area. You might not remember, but when Gabby Petito went missing, a mob formed in front of her ex-boyfriend's parents' home, and demanded that police violate their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights. This was insane. Even immoral people have First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment rights, even very immoral people. Even murderers do. Among other things, the pandemic invocation of "emergency powers" degraded these rights. This is what worries me. This, and the way people seem to lose their minds, not seeing that this time, the hysteria is just like the last time, and the time before that. Any mob can go after anyone. It does not care about truth.
It's funny. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn describes exactly such an incident. Pure genius. How did Twain know?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@robertmadison1205 Yes and no, because under the Constitution, all federal statutes are the law of the land, but all federal statutes have to have some provision in the Constitution that gives Congress the power to legislate on behalf of everyone, and preempt laws to the contrary that might exist in the states. And then of course federal laws have to be consistent with the Bill of Rights, etc. The U of North Carolina part of the case does implicate the Constitution in a way that Harvard doesn't, because it's a state school. No state can discriminate against people in any way that the Court has held to be unconstitutional. Right now, Harvard can do pretty much what it wants in deciding which of its applicants to admit, but not on our dime. Congress could probably change that, too, by invoking the 14th Amendment, but don't hold your breath! :/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The 1980s sowed the seeds of EVERY disaster. Osama bin Laden, financial deregulation, full immunity from liability for vaccine injuries, soaring trade and budget deficits, a decline in union membership and industrial sector jobs, and Iran-Contra. That decade even gave Epstein his start.
Oops, I forgot the end of affordable education. In 1980, no one needed to go to a private university, and people easily paid in-state tuition with minimum wage jobs. Today, we are in the age of private K - 12, with tuition the size of a professional income.
1
-
Why don't we all admit that overall, this WAR has been a disaster, for all concerned? Putin was wrong not to try to avoid this, first by calling an emergency session of the UNSC, with proof -- which he had -- of Ukrainian troops planning another, more massive offensive against the people of the Donbass. That was the only ethical course, the only place to start. He DIDN'T start there. No free pass on that, sorry. Never. How can anyone excuse not doing everything possible to avoid this WAR (not "special intervention," my GOD).
Every war that can be avoided, MUST be avoided, paraphrasing Chris Hedges and many others. The sane ones, the ones with hearts, minds. To fail to do everything to avoid a war during a pandemic, just when people were looking forward to a more normal spring, was unconscionable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LVArturs On the contrary, the initial economic sanctions of the Russian Federation were swift (no pun intended) and literally unprecedented, and at least some people in the US/UK were sure they would cause the Russian economy to implode. When it looked like Ukraine and Russia might come to some cease-fire agreement, UK intervened directly to tell Zelensky to desist. As for "slow-walking support," first, what do you call these 12-figure appropriations? Second, what do you call the sabotage of the Nordstream pipeline? Third, suppose that what you call "slow-walking" is just a reflection of the struggle in the US between the hawks and the ultra-hawks, as well as the realization by both that the "best" they can do is bleed Russia; they cannot expect to beat the Russians. It would be materially impossible, absent changing the character of the war yet again and taking a bigger risk than they are prepared to do, not to mention that it could unravel the skein in a lot of other places, including Taiwan, the Korean peninsula, Iraq, other parts of the Middle East . . . What evidence do you have that the Ukrainian military as currently constituted -- meaning without American advisors and possibly even foreign troops -- could make use of that materiel? Do you consider any of the reports that weapons shipped to Ukraine are already being sold and turning up in places like Africa credible? I don't claim to know, I claim the reports are quite plausible.
Sorry, what you've said makes no sense based on the information I believe to be accurate. I will admit that we are all steeped in propaganda. For both the war and the pandemic, I've looked to background information from well before each one materialized. Only there have I found anything that strikes me as honest and clear. And I see no good guys in this picture.
This is quite apart from the issue of whether the Western military-financial powers should be meddling in Eastern Europe at all. You seem displeased that they are "slow-walking support," when there is no reason they should be offering that brand of "support" at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LVArturs Sorry, we've already been through that. You are wasting my time.
Your sedition scenario, after the US first supported a coup in Ukraine, is beyond laughable. So who, exactly, is the traitor? Maybe you live in an area that does not allow access to information.
Anyway, I'm going to block you from my thread. If you were sincerely interested in the truth, you'd do what everyone who has that interest does: you would consult the preeminent sources of information on Russia from well BEFORE Russia invaded Ukraine. Stephen F. Cohen at the 92nd Street Y comes to mind, when everyone present said "you don't think Russia would actually invade Ukraine, do you?" and he answered, yes, I most certainly do think Putin might invade. Those are the types of sources I use. (He died before the recent escalation of the war began, of lung cancer. Huge loss to mankind.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marcusmilling5296 First of all, higher infant and maternal mortality certainly DO have a very large effect on overall life expectancy; life expectancy does not fall on a normal curve, hence the mean life expectancy is, well, not very meaningful (the mean is informative only where you have a normal curve, so that both median and mode are close to the mean). Second, what matters is life expectancy at retirement age, not at birth. Consult an actuarial table for that, like the ones the life insurance companies use.
Plato lived to 80, Sophocles to 90; the human lifespan has been what it is for millennia. In their cases, longevity could very well have been thanks to their diet and the mountains, seas, clean water and air around Attica, plus the custom of walking, and practicing gymnastics for life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The antitrust case, which he lost but never paid a real penalty for, the history of Microsoft, the accidents with vaccines, his dishonest support of GMOs, his experiments with charter schools that failed (and many of the schools had to close), the proposal to include microchips in vaccines ("only in places like Africa and India, where record keeping is hard"), and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, which was closer than he let on at first. The fact that he is nerdy is the reason why he got away with so much. He doesn't seem sinister, just nerdy.
That's pretty bad.
You should also look at his ultra-extravagant lifestyle. Very strange for someone like him, who is supposedly a scientist at heart.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@_this I said "probably," based on your choice of tropes. But you're right. Emulating your cheap ad hominem, even a little bit, was wrong of me. I frankly do not understanding kowtowing, in the face of all facts and reason. It baffles me. But a lot of people do it to appear rich, don't they? It's a strategic choice. Just like a recent survey showed the majority said they were not less happy today than they were a year ago -- in the midst of a pandemic, thousands dead, social distancing, racial tensions rising, and a looming recession! Why do this? I don't get it. You denigrate yourself by erecting FALSE IDOLS, and saying what you think they want you to say. That, in my opinion, is YOUR problem. You don't need to have that problem. You can ditch it right now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Giovanni Magz The first one pertains to what I consider comparable to a crime against humanity, so if I must pick one, that one has got to be the most odious.
Since you obviously, and rightly, hate Trump's lies, then you must agree with me that to emulate him in any manner, however slightly, and to give his (frequently crazed, and often dangerous) supporters any reason to doubt the news media concerning the truth about Trump and his habitual lying, is the wrong road to take. It's wrong to do, and it won't work.
Isn't that what you mean? Yeah. Thought so.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
False premise. It is illegal to use deadly force in defense of mere property, in every state. Lethal force is justified if you put any person at risk of imminent physical harm. It is never legal for defense of mere property. Social ills, etc., are irrelevant. The age of the perpetrator, time of day, etc., all irrelevant. Whether he put a person in imminent danger of physical harm is the only question that matters.
Also, this is exactly why a carjacking, or a home invasion while there are people in the house, can be met with lethal force. It doesn't matter if the assailant turns out to be unarmed, or was just looking to burgle and thought the house was empty, or was "only a kid." There is no question about this. It's called self-defense for a reason.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sbondesson You are welcome. Their freedom to smear people with impunity is shocking. Now, the line between uncovering facts in the world, and reporting on what people believe, thanks to social media amplification, has been blurred to such a degree that I wonder whether anyone would settle with a Richard Jewel today, absent a hashtag hysteria.
The one newspaper that refused to settle with Jewel, on the ground that they reported the news as best as could be determined at the time, according to them, won in the end. You can probably imagine what is likely to happen now, without reading any more than you already have. But it is a horrible story, because a hero who saved lives during a terrorist attack was smeared. He got his reputation back, but it took forever.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tripe2237 Well, in the US under the First Amendment, it is unlikely this conduct could be disciplined in any way, and I agree with free speech (see Nadine Strossen and Erwin Chermerinsky). On the other hand, you give great reasons why this man should not be listened to. I feel more and more sorry for him, frankly. HE is not well.
"JP creates chaos and mental distress in his fans and detractors alike. Read these comments and tell me he doesn't. He's doing it in this video!" Assuming that is true, my response would be, so what? In the US, that is no reason to curtail anyone's freedom of speech and expression, and at the rate things are going, the US won't have that one civil right, the only one that truly sets the country apart, for much longer.
All someone has to do to discredit nearly any demonstration is bring a swastika, and there are people who won't see through it -- they will be afraid to ask who brought the swastika and to what purpose. This is a bigger problem than any of Peterson's insipid grievance mongering.
He doesn't see patients anyway. I wouldn't advise going after him in this manner. It creates another pseudo martyr. Some of the stuff they have cited him for is frankly nutty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tripe2237 But that is exactly my point. Peterson is not treating patients. He has no captive audience, no persons dependent on him for their psychological well being, and only a fan club that would do well to find a different person to take advice from -- but they are all adults, they are not presumed to be vulnerable, or to be consulting him from a position of vulnerability. Trying to yank his license is giving him exactly the publicity he craves, so that he can go on the largest platforms in North America with his grievances. The only time it would be sensible to do yank his license would be when it actually is imperative to protect PATIENTS. But he no longer sees patients. And unless he is lying, actual patients did not complain. (Lying about the proceeding against him would be something they could take into account, however.)
Having a license to practice psychology isn't an endorsement of his political views. And in the US, a lawyer can state that he supports eugenics without having his license lifted. What he can't do is demonstrate that he has contempt for his oath to support and defend the Constitution. Pretending that eugenics is the law and inducing people who come to him for advice to believe that it is the law, and that the 14th Amendment permits it, would be grounds for disbarment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rjsjrjsjrjsj You know, you should have some points of comparison. People who cannot control themselves, who take to Twitter in that manner, who fail to appreciate the weight of words, and who blurt out stuff about a soon-to-be confirmed Supreme Court Justice in front of whom they should ASPIRE to argue one day soon, do not have the temperament to train top lawyers, or to set an example for them. The US has become a giant high school ("with money" --- Frank Zappa).
I said the same thing about Justice Barrett, and my politics could not be more different from hers. A nomination (_any_ nomination, not her nomination) at that juncture should have been blocked ab initio, which the Democrats failed to do, but their minions took to Twitter, to smear her. It made me sick.
Here, Shapiro admits BIDEN is responsible for the whole thing. I agree. Take it up with Biden. You don't cast aspersions on the candidate instead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@pmm8621 I'm reminded of the possible breast cancer cluster in the San Francisco area, which took a LONG time to analyze. It turned out that the number of cases, though higher than what may have been expected, was within the norms of the demographic affected, and the "cluster" was not statistically significant. Yet it was important to let women know to be vigilant, and do what little we could determine might lower risk (such as exercise, occasional fasting, more plant-based foods, vegan days, etc., and of course regular mammography). Similarly, we DO have a problem with vaccine injury, and we DO need to get to the bottom of it. Screaming at the victims is vile. Multivariate analysis is not easy, and takes a long time to complete because there are unavoidable judgment calls to be made. The report from Germany is a basis for starting a serious inquiry. I don't prejudge how it will end. There is too much signal amidst the noise. Dismissing it is bad faith, and does nothing to reassure the public concerning the integrity of the medical system.
1
-
@pmm8621 Did you know, for example, that last year the Swiss Ministry of Health recommended only one dose of an mRNA vaccine to all those who had recovered from a proven case of COVID? My closest friend received her first dose, not knowing she had already been exposed to COVID, then was sick from COVID, then was rushed into her second dose as if she had never had COVID by her doctor and the state health department. Her side effects were massive, and included a serious bout of memory issues. She should have waited three months for the second dose. She now refuses boosters. Do you grasp why? Please think it through. No one would admit to her that they did not know what was best, and no one would apply the usual principles, such as the Precautionary Principle and the Hippocratic Oath, to her case. No one treated her as an individual, and now she has lost faith. NOT GOOD.
Don't try to lay this at the doorstep of the John Campbells of the world.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Buttlather Constitutional rights are something that cannot be taken away from you, by ANYONE in the elected government, at any level, without amending the Constitution. You have the right to decline to exercise them. You have the right to try to persuade others not to exercise them. The right to use birth control, including forms of birth control that may prevent a zygote from being implanted, falls under that very same analysis. A lot of religions oppose artificial birth control. Some even frown on rhythm. They have a right to advocate for their view, but not to criminalize those who disagree. . . . Well, now the state gets to run your life in one more way, and by "state," that almost always means the richer lobby. And you think it's progress!
Tell me, were you fooled by the vaccine mandates? How about the Poor Johnny Depp uproar (a First Amendment case)? Or did you want Brian Laundrie's parents to be forced to give up their Fifth Amendment rights, "for Gabby?" How come I saw through all of it -- and ALL of it goes in one direction. You lose rights, and you feel sure ("feel," the operative word) that something else happened. Something good for society.
It would be 🤣, but it's not.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dnbjedi Archetypes greatly violate Occam's Razor. I have seen a foundation for ethics laid in a much more compelling way, without making such strong assumptions about where they come from or what basis they need to have in any "collective unconscious." So I reject the elaborate story. Kant, for example, can explain the foundations of ethics in a way that has nothing to do with archetypes whatsoever -- and he understands why he should.
If someone says to you, "those stories do not speak to me, they leave me cold," what will you say in response? People who believe in hierarchies will say, or insinuate, that they are above the "nonbeliever" in the hierarchy, and that the hierarchy is real. Anyone who disagrees, disagrees because he has a "naturally" low position. You don't see this is implied by Peterson, and that it is nonsense?
You don't see that in Socrates, you don't see that in Kant. It's a fraudulent move.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
No one can decide but you. There is a sweet guy in Canada named Dr. Moran who always links to the actual journal article with the data. He is pro-vax but first of all pro-truth, and pro-civil liberties. Lex Fridman interviewed Vincent Racaniello, a real virologist from Columbia University, who is also pro-vax but not insane. Lex made it a point to underline that each of us should have the right to decide for ourselves. They also discussed ivermectin rationally.
The honest doctors are admitting there is a lot they do not know. I was just watching news from France, where the government has gone full authoritarian with the public, massive mandates, firing people, etc., and there are demonstrations every week. The guest on the show said that across the border in Spain, there is less coercion, more public admission when the truth of the matter is still unknown -- and more vaccination as a result. I am not shocked. No sane person is.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PearComputingDevices I speak three languages fluently, watch news in all of them, read regularly in two, and have some knowledge of two others, lived in Europe for over five years, my late father and my mother's only brother were both WWII British Army veterans, always had friends and family in Canada and Australia (uncle wisely opted for the latter), etc., etc., etc., etc.
Where do you get YOUR notions?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marwynthemasterful6369 In all seriousness, the cars are, first of all, surveillance devices, and they have spurred the drive for new sources of lithium that has resulted in destruction of clean water and farmland all over the world.
Feeding the war in Ukraine is no achievement; as many as a million Ukrainians are believed to be _____.
The value of ____ in allowing the paralyzed to walk is still highly speculative, and judging from primate experiments, is probably too dangerous.
X, formerly known as Twitter, is still censored, though it doesn't appear to be as sinister as before. There is not a strongman from _____ to leaders of the CCP that he hasn't cozied up to. (You know how to fill in that blank, right?) The list of who allegedly likes what was particularly funny. For those who follow crowds, good to know.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jeremiahdavis360 It's impossible to give a single figure on scores needed for admission, since admission isn't based on scores. First of all, all applications, regardless of race, are divided into legacies and "special development," before any other factors come into play. "Special development" is supposed to be for people like Olympic athletes or gifted musicians, or winners of major science or mathematics competitions, and thus based on merit, but these can also be people whose parents gave a million dollars to Harvard. You can buy your way into a private school, hon. Not directly, of course, because they could still reject you, but if you want a real leg up, the right color is green.
We fight over crumbs. Passionately, over crumbs.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Suddenly, we have an entire gallery of miscreants "sure" that Chauvin should be acquitted. Gosh. Remember when this happened? I do.
"President Donald Trump remarked on the death of Minneapolis resident George Floyd, after video was released of Floyd being killed by a police officer who restrained him by pressing his knee into his neck for nine minutes and cut off his oxygen supply. The video sparked outrage across social media and the news, and has lead to widespread protests across the city.
"I feel very, very badly. That’s a very shocking sight," Trump said about the video, according to the Associated Press. He added, "That was a very, very bad thing that I saw. I saw it last night and I didn't like it...what I saw was not good. Very bad."
“This has nothing to do with politics and is only about making sure justice is done, and anyone who suggests otherwise is only seeking to sow division and ignore the President’s unwavering support for the African-American community,” Deere said. The president has been making an open bid to win Black support for his re-election in November.
On Wednesday (May 27), Trump tweeted that he has instructed the FBI and Department of Justice to investigate Floyd's death:
At my request, the FBI and the Department of Justice are already well into an investigation as to the very sad and tragic death in Minnesota of George Floyd....
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 27, 2020
....I have asked for this investigation to be expedited and greatly appreciate all of the work done by local law enforcement. My heart goes out to George’s family and friends. Justice will be served!"
Even TRUMP saw it, back then. When did the talking points change? Who changed them?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I have no problem at all with Libs of Tik Tok "curating" videos that adults themselves voluntarily posted. In some instances, it may be a public service. I tread carefully around any "power differential" arguments as well. Also, it must be known by now that whatever a person posts will subsequently escape their control, and whoever doesn't know that by now is probably too dim to teach.
However, in this case, Libs of Tik Tok actually accused people of the worst crimes and called for their arrest, when all they could point to was a First Amendment-protected video. Sorry, I won't bite. None of the videos I saw were illegal, and some were probably parodies. All of that stuff is constitutionally protected. Whether their judgment is so poor they need to have observers in their classes or be suspended or fired is not for me to say -- or for Libs of Tik Tok to say, either. Schools have well-paid administrators. They can do their jobs for once.
I once read that nobody likes the First Amendment, not really. I see what they meant.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jj3682 No one said there was a rich guy behind the curtain. I wonder, though -- how do you account for the massive shift in wealth to the very top, which has been going on for 50 years and has been accelerating wildly since the 1990s, especially since financial deregulation? Are all of these people "working harder," "working smarter," or "adding value?"
If giving people money were so sure to ruin them, and was fraught with such risk, please explain why rich people have highly sophisticated estate lawyers, place money in trusts for future generations, place money in off-shore tax havens, and even buy their children's way into schools like Harvard? Who would want to ruin their own child? Seems like they all do. How odd.
The founders of these various tech companies were worth several billion by age 40 if not a decade sooner. That is like accumulating $1,000,000 a year for every year since the birth of Jesus. Please explain how anyone "earns" that -- especially by creating something like social media. (You can't eat it, wear it, or use it to heat your house, but it can be used for propaganda and surveillance simultaneously. Brilliant invention, huh?)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@-ABC- There is not a single major publication, independent of his public relations machine, that has not criticized the Gates Foundation's influence on education. You can't miss it, it's been that bad. Read it if you care. Even an investment book, Alpha Brain, talks about an egregious mistake Gates Foundation made in determining causality in their poorly-thought-out initiative to impose smaller class sizes, which ruined some very good schools. Anyway, it's a common mistake, which is why it was used as a paradigmatic example by the writer. It was then amplified, because lots of foundations copy Gates rather than doing their own research, assuming that he must be right because he's so rich.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@utah_koidragon7117 Not at all. You can vote and petition and argue for any law, such as a tax, or Social Security, to be changed -- just as we are doing now. The Social Security Trust Fund is not invested in the stock market. Government programs may have some features of contracts, but they actually are not. When it comes to freedom of contract, such as you have to buy a given stock or to decline to buy that stock or any stock, if government creates an obligation for individuals to do that, it is probably an infringement on the right of contract under the Constitution.
Could they get around that? They could get around most things, yeah. Some want vaccine mandates, others, investment mandates . . . How did we live without all this?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AceRamone A "status" stemming from any medical condition or disability cannot disqualify you from being a lawyer. Obviously, it can from being a pilot, and in some states from having a job where you have access to firearms, but these are considered exceptions to the general rule: the Americans With Disabilities Act protects the disabled. There is no general disqualification from practicing medicine, but certain specialties, like surgery, may be off limits. On the other hand, if a person commits any offense during a manic or depressive phase, that changes the picture entirely. They are not excluded on account of their illness, but on account of their crime. Even having said that, though, there are lawyers who were once convicts: Shon Hopwood is the most famous example. He taught the president's daughter at Georgetown University School of Law. Some psychiatrists have definitely had serious disorders, and have written memoirs about the insight their own cases gave them in treating others with similar issues. A psychiatrist with a history of mental disorders would probably be part of a group practice, and wouldn't go out on their own to establish an independent office. It might be a condition of his license to practice with others and be open about his challenges.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TNerd The opposite is true. At Stanford, Chicago, or an Ivy, Gender Studies can lead to a very solid MFA, MBA, MPA, MSW program, or law school. Or PhD, where you WILL get tenured. At community college, take math and science. Tons and tons, every math they offer. Get certified in something, as a backstop. Gender Studies is for Stanford people. They will get HR jobs in Silicon Valley. (Alas? :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@patrick6213 Nonsense that the Second Amendment is "crystal clear." What does the "well-regulated militia" clause mean? (Does it mean the Uvalde shooter had a constitutional right to buy an AR-15 on his 18th birthday? Really?) What do you make of the fact that the "arms" it mentions are technologically nothing like the arms of today, and modern bullets didn't exist in the 18th century at all?
An embryo is alive and belongs to our species, as is a zygote, as is human sperm, as are human ova, and life exists as an unbroken chain. None of these facts has anything to do with personhood. A woman may mourn getting her period after trying and failing to conceive for months on end. So may a man mourn along with her.
I don't care at all about Democrats, nor do the Democrats care about women. We had a right that we lost. After all the rights we have seen curtailed in this century, especially since COVID, I submit that this was not a good time to lose one more. I don't know what was wrong with "CHOOSE Life." I support both the "choose" and the "life." Persuade women not to choose abortion. Then step back and don't criminalize their decision. They're the ones who have to be pregnant, and I hope you don't propose to police pregnancies as well --- or shut down fertility clinics. (You do know they eventually discard embryos, don't you?)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Ustasi were a small group of Nazi collaborators who were able to exterminate Yugoslav Jews, Serbs, and resistance fighters (such as many Croatian and Slovenian Catholic priests) because of the Nazi occupation. Nedic had a national socialist ideology, but wasn't in a position to participate in any genocide, and Chetnicks were a very mixed bag. Most were simply royalists by default and resisted the Nazis and helped Jews escape. Yet some (very few) even committed war crimes. They weren't as centrally organized the way the other two groups were.
The March 27th revolt that brought down the Yugoslav government which had signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler took place in Belgrade, and most of the participants were Serbs. Their ethnicity was not central to their resistance.
There weren't many Ustasi, this is true, and most regions of Croatia had few or none. (Did Dalmatia have any? It wasn't a hotspot of collaboration, that's for sure.) They were able to do what they did only because of the Nazi occupation. It's not likely they would have been able, or willing, to do anything of the sort had there been no blitzkrieg and no occupation.
In 1941 and after, most Serbs were to the left of most Croatians. Most Serbs were less racially biased than most Croatians. Generalizations, yes, but factual ones.
You're just taking sides instead of telling the truth. "It was them, not us!!" --- that stance always reveals who you are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@miller-joel "Leffler et al. (29) used a multiple regression approach, including a range of policy interventions and country and population characteristics, to infer the relationship between mask use and SARS-CoV-2 transmission. They found that transmission was 7.5 times higher in countries that did not have a mask mandate or universal mask use, a result similar to that found in an analogous study of fewer countries (30). Another study looked at the difference between US states with mask mandates and those without, and found that the daily growth rate was 2.0 percentage points lower in states with mask mandates, estimating that the mandates had prevented 230,000 to 450,000 COVID-19 cases by May 22, 2020 (31)." Not hard to locate and verify these studies. Oh, it takes some WORK, true. But if your ideal is to become rich from, say, Bitcoin, then I understand your reluctance. No problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nottheonlydreamer9512 You fell for that, too? Here, I can't blame you. All three university presidents FAILED to stand up to religious harassment on campus, FAILED to take a clear stand on free speech, and FAILED to explain exactly how and why the First Amendment applies to the unique setting of a private college campus. When they should have been eloquent, they were diffident, smug, and barely coherent.
But all things considered, don't take the bait. What is going on, and what they want you to think is going on, are two different things as usual.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@C_R_O_M________ Apart from the fact that a philosophy grounded on universals was suddenly deprived of any semblance of universality, in other words.
But you just echoed my point: they saw the lay of the land and figured out how to gain power quickly under those conditions, which was their sole aim. They certainly did have to kill a lot of leftists to do it, who then ultimately defeated them. Red Army (75%+ of all casualties inflicted on the Wehrmacht, i.e., the actual Nazi fighting forces), the Resistance in France, Italy, Yugoslavia, Greece, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Anabee3 Where did he advocate for deceiving anyone?
If he committed a crime, or did anything that could give rise to a lawsuit, absolutely take him to court and call him to account. Or, go to the press, get the Internet to condemn him, and so forth. That's a person's right, too -- but I don't respect that. When you enter into any affair and marriage isn't on the table, you know you're taking a chance.
From what he has said, quite openly, about his misspent youth, it is not a shock to me that he has relationship problems now. I wouldn't have dated him.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@chrism7969 I think that there may be a way to censor the actual giving of medical advice directly to particular individuals, whether that advice be sound or not. It may be excellent advice, but it shouldn't be given, just like a doctor cannot diagnose someone they never met. As for conspiracy theories that do actual harm and defame particular people, the leading purveyors are being sued, and the plaintiffs are winning. Just showing people how that happens should be enough.
Another interesting fact is that such theories have at times been planted by various governments, for the purpose of discrediting all critics and making them all appear to be in league with the wackos. Adam Curtis, also UK, has documented this. Some of it is funny. US and USSR/RF have both done it. These days, a Russian troll farm will float a story as an experiment, to collect data on the reaction. They don't care whether they persuade, they want to study what happens. Seems more sinister? Hard to say.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gortnicktu3177 I'm not of any school. I accept that it's possible that Shakespeare did not write the plays (or at least all of the plays) attributed to him, or at the very least did not write them alone. Perfectly possible.
I have not read this author's book, and have only heard her in this one interview, which amounts to clever at burden shifting. She presented no real evidence in this interview, apart from the indisputable fact that there are serious vested interests set against reopening the issue and reexamining the evidence we have. That does not change the fact that she has the burden of proof here, not those who believe Shakespeare was the playwright of those plays, within the meaning of that term in his time. (Modern notions of authorship were not current then.)
These other candidates for being "the real Shakespeare" were all more powerful than he was, and England was always a class-ridden society. Why didn't they insist on placing their names on this work? Even if the theatre was considered risque, and we know it was, you would still expect the real writer(s) to whisper about it to someone, especially after a triumph.
If it were to turn out that one of them was the author or principal author, I'd find that interesting. If authorship was in some sense collective, just as theatre is a collective art, that would be even more interesting. (Personally, I doubt that it wasn't collective. But that's just an opinion, and my opinion is not evidence of its truth. Laugh out loud.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
False. It is illegal to use deadly force in defense of mere property, everywhere. Lethal force is justified if you put any person at risk of imminent physical harm. It is never legal for defense of mere property. Social ills, etc., are irrelevant. The age of the perpetrator is irrelevant. Whether he put a person in danger of physical harm is the only question that matters.
It is a bright line. We have a lot of gun owners in America, and this isn't common knowledge? Wow, just wow.
Also, this is exactly why a carjacking, or a home invasion while there are people in the house, can be met with lethal force. It doesn't matter if the assailant turns out to be unarmed, or was just looking to burgle and thought the house was empty, or was only 13. There is no question about this. It's called self-defense for a reason.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kevinsky86 This is nonsense. Why won't anyone link to the actual law, or the case where it was applied? The harrassment was severe, and in the US it would have given rise to a civil suit, but not criminal charges.
I don't agree that hate speak that is only tortious (defamatory or intentionally inflicting emotional distress), but not a true threat, should be considered a crime. However, the target of the hate speech in this case could have brought a civil suit instead, and gotten a much better recovery than the size of the fine. Title VII harrassment at work is also a civil matter, not a crime.
France has a criminal law against severe and persistent harrassment on any basis, no special protected categories, in the workplace. There was a case of systematic abuse over a period of years, leading to several suicides, and the principals of the employer got jail time. Good.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stephenwilliams3213 I agree that that is the correct question. The problem is, to answer it, we would have to go back in history to find out the projected harm of swine flu at that time, versus its known harm, and we would also need to figure out the projected harm of COVID compared with its known harm. I hope you realize that currently, we do not have clean numbers on that. Second, there are lots of ways to deal with a novel drug that has serious, unexpected side effects. You put a black box warning on it, you limit use in those under 50, you stop requiring it for anyone. European countries have done all of those types of things, after being hysterical for a while as well. In France, it is illegal to ask a minor about their vaccination status. It's a misdemeanor. (As a practical result, no one is asking anyone.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The divide-and-conquer is obvious: Some of these people will lose their homes to the BlackRocks of the world. Only some, so that the rest breathe a sigh of relief and turn away. Then those who think they're safe will see a series of other, seemingly disconnected things happen, like persistent problems with utilities, especially water, then tax issues that require paying a high-priced lawyer to fix, but it does get fixed, seemingly . . . Death by a thousand different, tiny cuts . . . Ultimately, they will be priced out. Oh well, "get a better job, . . . "
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@americangirlx4 If it were MY kid, I'd get them into a program of outdoor activities: sports (non-competitive at first), caring for animals, tending a garden, and stuff like that -- outdoor work and play. I'd give them some form of art lessons as soon as they were ready, or music, or drama, and they would be responsible for working on it in return for the privilege. They'd be out every day unless it was literally dangerous heat, cold, storms, or wind, and they'd be on a no-sugar, no refined carb diet, lots of olive oil, organic vegetables, and wild salmon once a month, all that. They'd be up by 7am every morning. If they had to start just by walking for one hour with me by their side or bike riding with me, then they'd start there. And move up. And I would expect a full recovery.
That would be my "unsafe" space, lol. Can we agree on that much, at least?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@beautifully_scarred_lea Let's see exactly what she has to say when confronted with the plain facts of what these drugs do to a child, as explained by someone who knows and is not afraid to speak up. Yeah, I'd like to hear it. (I'm not sure she's aware. As Blaire said, you see pictures of pregnant "transmen" quite regularly. And now we all have to say "pregnant people.")
What I am sure I personally heard Briahna say is that if the "gender affirming care" is made illegal, then that forecloses all discussion and debate -- which would be authoritarian. I wonder if she knows what has been going on around the country with the explosion of dangerous hormones being prescribed to minors. If all you have seen is the Frontline documentary on the subject, you would see no reason at all for any law banning gender affirming care. The cases that documentary focused on all had a clear need for something more than counseling, and where any medication was concerned, they were counseled to "take it slow." That was a tiny number of kids, not the explosion we have seen over the last few years.
I'm with you on the substance, by the way. I find it very suspicious that we have gone from vaccine mandates for children to this. I think it's criminal.
(Actually, France did make asking a minor about their vaccine status a crime. Of course no mandates for minors are permitted. Seriously, it's illegal there. I love it.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@grantmcphee5149 No, I'm talking about the fact that it pretty well ended with the defeat of Operation Barbarossa!
On a more serious note, Alfred Binet invented the first IQ test for one purpose only, to identify children who might have trouble with the academic program of modern universal education, and to find ways to help them succeed in school. It was never intended for any other purpose, least of all to rank groups by their intelligence. When I was in school there, aptitude testing of any kind for university admission, or advancement in school at any stage, was illegal. Only achievement testing counted, because it was objective. If you think they were touchy-feely, well, at the time, the very highest grade was "very good," and was rarely given. Your prof is excellent, or should be. Einstein and Plato were outstanding. Failing the baccalaureate on the first try was common. A perfect score on the philosophy essay, traditionally the first test, made national news, and the student would be interviewed everywhere.
Took an American test there, the old three-part GRE, no prep class, horrible testing conditions, a lousy day for me, physically unwell, several dumb mistakes -- and got a Triple Nine Society-worthy score.
It's the environment, honey. Believe it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That anyone could still believe what you just said . . . you strung together every cliche that still exists, and that has been disproven in every major financial panic over the last 150+ years.
A billion dollars at age 32 is like accumulating $85,500 a day -- from birth. Explain how, say, an "essential service" like Facebook can "earn" that. Well, I can explain it: at its inception, it functioned as the most effective combination of advertising and surveillance -- corporate and government -- ever devised, and the users themselves participated willingly, but not with informed consent.
Anyway, yawn. I don't know about "human nature," but the nature of your character gives me pause. I only hope you are paid to post, and in the present economy I can grudgingly respect that. Otherwise, it's unfathomable.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mrx2062 Chief Justice Boatright, Justice Samour, and Justice Berkenkotter basically agree that the Colorado election code was designed to provide a summary, expedited procedure to decide simple questions, such as whether a proposed candidate was old enough to be inaugurated president. It cannot be use to make a Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3 determination. Basically, what the other four Justices decided violates Due Process.
I think everyone should at least try to read this, to see how technical and abstract these issues REALLY are, and how they don't lend themselves to social media polls, or off-the-cuff MSM comments. You can be sure none of the talking heads, or the "experts" on either side, read the whole case before commenting. They just took sides.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@RobinMarks1313 Well, when one of these vaccines receives full approval, I'll be taking a close look again. It is not necessarily irrational for a person to refuse to sign the EUA release papers, depending on their own risk factors and medical history. I'm going to try to tune out the noise. The way this pandemic has been handled by the political "leaders" in this country has been a disgrace and a crime. I do not want to be influenced by them in any direction concerning my health care. It seems to me that people with diabetes, or suffering from obesity, and men over 50 and women over 60 have mostly had good reasons to get vaccinated. The rest of us? Hmmm . . . That depends.
Even Dr. Eric Topol, probably the most pro-vaccination person I've heard speaking out, has called what we're doing overly "vaccine-centric." Um, YEAH. I found out from watching one of his interviews that Germany and Netherlands can get at-home COVID test kits for free, and routinely test themselves. Wow, just wow.
Anyway, it is too easy to be revolted, and decide once and for all not to get vaccinated. That is letting Fauci et al. have far too much influence over your life. Tune. Them. Out.
1
-
@RobinMarks1313 I don't disbelieve you. At the start of this spring, I was regularly reading European sources on the vaccine, and looking carefully at what they were doing. I can say it has been interesting. France got too politicized, so speaking French ceased to help much. I looked to countries with the highest vaccination rates and at countries with longer life expectancy and better infant mortality and childhood health statistics than the US. For example, Israel told the truth about the myocarditis and endocarditis risk when the CDC was still talking about the correlation likely being a mere fluke. So, now I check Haaretz. UK was allowing longer gaps between the first and second Astra-Zeneca vaccines than originally recommended, with no apparent downside. Some people believe this has increased their effectiveness. Switzerland's health ministry stated that anyone who had had a proven case of COVID (specifying how it needs to have been proven) was fully vaccinated after ONE dose of an mRNA vaccine, and in its seven reasons why everyone eligible should get vaccinated, they omit any mention of stopping new variants from arising, because that is too conjectural to impose on its citizens.
Different picture, huh? As for our "breakthrough" infection rate, at what point is it a breakthrough, as opposed to a failed vaccine? Anyway, I am keeping an open mind, and remaining optimistic about having a good vaccine. I don't know that we do yet. Yet if I were 70 years old and obese, I promise you I would have been first in line.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
To base such a conclusion on only one study, that contradicts the plethora of studies showing loving relationships to be the single strongest predictor not only of subjective happiness and optimism, but also objective measures of physical health, not to mention the myriad studies, especially from UK, that having a low rank in your workplace is literally deadly, even if you do a good job there, is dubious. I simply don't believe it. Studies of things like healthy longevity, which are more concrete and don't depend on any form of self-reporting, are more persuasive, and they show relationships matter.
This study did not even mention the importance of aesthetic pleasures, that come with creating or viewing art. That doesn't matter? To humans? Music, hugs, good food and brisk walks can coax you out of a mild depression, not to mention making happy people feel even better. I hope these COVID lockdowns showed everyone that we need each other.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@travisbickle1689 Actually, you are a lawyer but not an "attorney at law." That distinction is outdated, and few recognize it as such today, but I do know it exists and people do use "attorney at law" in ads, on business cards, etc. That's why. Once you pass the bar, you are an attorney at law for life unless they disbar you. What you do with it is your business. Retire, let the license lapse, etc., you know whether you can practice or not, or if you don't, you will find out the hard way.
Law is pedantic. :/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This dude, whatever his name is, is ignorant of basic facts of social psychology. For example, you will never get at the truth of whether a person is happy; what you will find out is whether their social group valorizes the assertion that they are happy, or considers claiming to be discontented a signal of greater depth, intelligence, higher ethical standards, and so forth. It also depends on whether a group considers candor imperative -- you owe it to everyone to answer a survey truthfully -- and whether it is considered immoral, or even sinful, not to express happiness, which is a sign of gratitude toward God. So . . . A researcher has to use various indirect methods to find out who is truly happy.
Do any of the people on Fox look happy to you? They are railing against someone at least as much as The View.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jorgegonzales9815 Sorry, but you didn't understand what I meant, and you don't understand evidence. Sworn testimony, if offered, that you were expressly told to hide your ancestry to improve your chances for an opportunity most certainly is not a mere anecdote. If it were, then any time a worker testifies that they were propositioned by their boss in exchange for favorable treatment is merely an "anecdote."
If students of any racial minority have to meet significantly more stringent criteria concerning region of origin, lower socio-economic status, sports success, and so forth, than do others not of that minority, that is evidence of discrimination. I never said that "just the fact that the Supreme Court accepted the case" means the plaintiffs have "proven" discrimination. That's not the point at all. If on this record, no reasonable jury could find discrimination because the facts taken as a whole do not amount to discrimination under the applicable legal standard, then the Supreme Court would not have granted cert. The only plausible exception would be if the Court wants to change the interpretation of that legal standard. That's simply a fact. Inform yourself about Supreme Court jurisdiction.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@factmanamerican882 1821 > 1776, 1781, etc.
Second, today, "Judeo-Christian" does not refer to converts from Judaism to Christianity. That it once did tells you that the same term once had a different meaning.
You are perfectly welcome to espouse any cultural values you wish, including those of Thomas Paine, who fervently believed that the Bible led people astray, and away from God.
If America was indeed built on Judeo-Christian values, explain the destruction of the Native Americans, the enslavement of Africans, the two atom bombs, . . . the 2008 financial meltdown, the incessant lying to induce support for endless war, and the existence of a single homeless child. Seems like Amber is the least hypocritical from that perspective.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A kid used to be able to work over the summer for minimum wage, afford a full year of in-state tuition and fees, and oftentimes books and supplies as well, then get a couple of roommates together, go to New York, San Francisco, LA, Seattle, Denver, Austin, Chicago, get a minimum wage job right away, and afford to live. That was post-war America for decades. That was opportunity.
Those kids grew up, too. Not like now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Brie, WHY would it matter whether this was an "order?" The government is supposed to meet speech it does not like with MORE speech, not censorship.
Why would the government go via a back door to tell social media this or that statement is a lie? They can announce it loud and clear, publicly. They can tell FB, Twitter/X, etc., that x, y, or z is false at the same time they tell ALL of us that x, y, or z is false.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Luis Alejandro Hey, are you an example of what DNC is, thus proving my point? Or are you a false flag, covertly drumming up support for Trump? What a dilemma.
And say, is depleted uranium a "sob story" to you? How about to Biden and Harris? Is depleted uranium a "sob story" to them, too? Iraq, Yemen, Syria, Somalia, Afghanistan -- so many sob stories, so little time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The first student brought up a contradiction in Bannon's rhetoric concerning "Judeo-Christian" values, and his response was a little too rambling and defensive.
The second student did the same, highlighting actual contradictions in what Bannon is on record as having said. This is classically Socratic. The answer was very interesting, because Bannon's best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. Travel bans, sure. Accountability for the economic destruction wrought by Big Money? HA. Trump depends on Deutsche Bank. Bannon also used a slogan word in his answer, "triggered." Not a good sign. In general, his style of speaking is above that.
The third student gave him an opportunity to comment on the demonstrators, who were the real deplorables in this picture. No problem. Bannon again gave an answer that shows that his best ideas are NOT the ones that are implemented. The student then pointed out that those who have attained political power are publicly distancing themselves from him, and asked him to comment. Again, interesting. Bannon did not mind the question.
The fourth student began by taking a stand for freedom of speech, and only then asked an excellent question about Bannon's view of Trump's and the Republicans' election prospects in 2020.
The fifth student first thanked him for staying over, to talk to them. Then she asked a very astute question about about political trust. Bannon appreciated the question, and was enthusiastic about answering, because it gave him a chance to talk about the things he is most passionate about. She made a counterpoint, and he tried to play folksy. He used another trope that she did not, "sorry for mansplaining."
The sixth student said that the economic progess was not thanks to Trump, and that Trump did not, in general, solve the problems Bannon correctly highlights. AGAIN, Bannon's best ideas were NOT not not implemented. And Bannon DOES have lots of good ideas.
The seventh student asked a very open-ended question on immigration, allowing Bannon to express himself on a matter he is passionate about, and show off some more of his good ideas. Which go nowhere. See a pattern here?
So, who was ridiculous? I thought it was illuminating. Bannon is interesting to watch. Nothing ever comes of the good policies he endorses -- especially on taxes! Ha.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dnah02 Well, I've had family tragedies and responsibilities, so that was the reason. As a child, we saved up for yearly vacations, always road trips, and took them. The rest of the year, both parents worked 50 hour weeks. I'm the canary in the coal mine; when I hear people say that the next generation won't have it as good as their parents, well, that was true of two generations for us. I haven't been on a plane in this century. I cook everything I eat, every day.
It's not that big of a deal; lots of other countries are affordable. I don't like having to leave, I would prefer that it be my choice on my timetable but oh well. I'm hardly alone.
I still have the illusion (?) that something marvelous could happen at any moment to turn things around. I'll stick to that for a while longer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@realmonster5866 Well, if Congress does not pass a budget, they won't be fined or go to prison, no, but the US could default, bond markets go into a tailspin, and the world slip into a depression. Military pay, pensions, DOJ, DOD, FAA, SEC, DHS, ICE, FBI, CIA, everything -- all the checks would stop. No one but the House can initiate a budget resolution.
If they entered into some illegal conspiracy not to pass a budget, or accepted bribes, or instructed their agents to short the bond market or the stock market --- then yeah, they could even go to jail. They WOULD go.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@adanactnomew7085 But no one says these platforms are not allowed to delete content. Of course they are. The only question is, what level of immunity should they enjoy when they do act as editors? Can they choose to delete whatever they like, and leave up whatever they please (including proven defamation -- they have the right to leave it up, see the Yelp case, Supreme Court of California), and be responsible to absolutely no one for their decisions? You're responsible for the consequences of your speech. So am I. So are newspapers. You, I, and newspapers can face a lawsuit.
"Moderation" is not a neutral act. If one viewpoint is censored but not another, it makes it appear that no one agrees with the censored viewpoint, and everyone agrees with the viewpoint allowed to stand. Usually, complaints about moderation are deleted as well. Just how much immunity for these decisions is appropriate? Hm? This is getting sinister.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lindahammond7759 First, please, PLEASE don't worry. Don't listen to fear-mongering, pro vaccine or con. Just don't. The chance that it is either nonsense, or simply inapplicable to your case, is very high. Second, stay as well informed as you possibly can. From now on, first do no harm. Certain things you can do right now, involving nutrition and exercise, are safe and beneficial, and the standard advice on reducing inflammation is very important. Third, find the right doctor -- that is not going to be easy!
Don't let these people get you down. You are going to be fine. Take it slow.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Rick Vis I'm talking about very recent studies, and those mostly show no difference based on fat content. I know that was once believed to be the issue, but it generally is not found to be. There's even research showing kids benefit from the fat profile of milk from grass-fed cows as opposed to grain-fed, and recommended not limiting it beyond what's just reasonable. One example in adults is a very large breast cancer study. (I hated to say it, what a hot-button topic!) The results were significant. In fact, one hypothesis was that women who drink other vaious "milks" such as soy or almond, have lower rates exactly because they substituted soy, etc., for dairy milk.
Bottom line, the dairy industry, the beef industry, etc., have all propagandized us. I still remember when my family was duped into substituting CORN oil for olive oil. How pathetic. So, we fell for something, too. I can hardly believe it. At least we got rid of iceburg lettuce and had real salads as soon as they showed up in stores.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rmooreg Read the jury instructions, in particular with respect to McGinnis. Obviously you don't know what I'm referring to. As for howling voices, I don't know whether Rittenhouse has the stomach to sue for defamation, but considering what some MSM said about him, he certainly could maintain a case, and win. I'd welcome it. Tgeir lying has got to be punished, they are doing it for money at this point.
The howling voices on the other "side," however, that endorse vigilantism and think it's fine for minors to strut around with AR-15 style weapons strapped to them, and proclaim Rittenhouse a "hero" (and this clown here seems to think nomenclature is the issue, and that nomenclature creates fear of guns -- when two people approached Rittenhouse to try to disarm him after he fired four shots, and many other shots were heard as well, no fear there), well, I see that as a far bigger problem going forward, and much more likely to harm me directly.
Do you really imagine we have the largest incarcerated population in the world, with the large majority non-white, because those other people are Bad People? Do you think they are committing vastly more crime? Really? Anyone who thinks so needs a good dose of Chris Hedges. As for the racial implications of this case, have you considered the analysis of anyone who disagrees with your anodyne view, like Briahna Joy Gray, a Harvard-trained lawyer turned journalist? You should. If I can listen to Grande, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, etc., you can listen to Hedges and Gray.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jfangm Well, how does the quality of life just keep declining then? In 1965 or 1970, a couple of friends could get together and decide to get an apartment in any major city, from New York to San Francisco, and afford to split the rent on minimum wage. No college grad had debt, and high school graduates had a better education than many college grads do today. We didn't live under elaborate surveillance, we weren't forced into bankruptcy by medical bills, drug abuse wasn't rampant, most people read a lot more, guns weren't ubiquitous, advertising wasn't sinister, and the phrase "school shooting" referred to exactly ONE incident. And we didn't have a oisive huckster class of con artist millionaires and even more depraved billionaires.
Nothing truly great is accomplished by anyone who only cares about money. It is simply not possible to aim for doing the least in order to get the most money in return, "profit maximization," so called, and accomplish exceptional things. Did money come first for Einstein, Picasso, James Baldwin, or Jonas Salk? Does money come first for a pediatric neurosurgeon? A concert pianist? Do you really think that's what motivates great artists and scientists? Or even people with a rich family life? (Money hoarding? How pathetic.) All four of those mentioned, by the way, saw themselves as socialists to one degree or another. That's because their entire lives didn't consist of nothing but an insatiable appetite.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@titanstown2452 Who "made" what, and how? They "worked" for it? Do you know what $70 million in a year is? It's nearly $8000 an hour, for every hour of every day in the year. Who "earned" that? How? And isn't it odd, that only about 50 years ago, no one "earned" that much more than the people working under them; the lowliest worker made 1/25 of what the CEO made, not 1/355. How did this get decided?
Elon Musk? Tesla has one of the worse employment discrimination cases filed against it (that for some reason no one hears about) in this century or the last, and Neuralink has complaints against it for primate torture that are harrowing. The court papers are available online; the usual excuse is that "Elon didn't know," which kind-of contradicts that he "works so hard." The case where he tweeted and the stock market reacted is getting a lot of press time, though, as if that were more important. You can find all of this online -- I mean the actual court documents, not someone's dubious regurgitation of them.
What do you think rich people do with their money, besides control others? What do you think it's about? Ordinary people put money to far better use overall.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@malovina This is your example of imposed equality? In a country where a CEO makes 300 times the salary of the average worker, and a "mere" $10m bonus equals well over $1,100 per hour, for every hour of every day, 365/24/7? We have never had such concentrations of wealth, and in obviously unqualified hands.
And ANY school, anywhere, lacks a physical education teacher, and has to beg? (You've noticed obesity and depression? Well guess what, sports help with that, especially after the COVID fiasco.)
This woman is a perfect example of what makes money: producing propaganda makes money. In that way, it is a lot like the Soviet system.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What I find interesting is that it was Naomi Wolf who demanded accountability and consequences for bad acts, and somehow she is getting dismissed. When Dr. Peterson points out how important accountability is, and brushes aside excuses, everyone praises him.
Why is that?
This was not a therapy session, by the way. Wolf is an immensely accomplished person and even went back to school late in life to complete her doctorate, at OXFORD.
She resisted the COVID hysteria. And her husband is a veteran. Sounds to me like a truly successful life. If someone like that can still feel what it was like to be a vulnerable, idealistic, naive teen at Yale, in awe of all the famous people there who turned out to have feet of clay, then maybe that really is a big deal?
When Dr. Peterson's wife became ill, he himself had a problem, with prescribed drugs. You don't hold that against him, do you? Then why this?
1
-
@kwg5044 Gee, thanks. No snark from me, either.
My late dad was a vet, too . . . WWII, ultimately with the 8th British Army (he was from Yugoslavia). When he got very old, and had to have a very long operation, some of the aftereffects of his wartime trauma resurfaced. I was an only, took care of him alone.
The most recent close friend I've made was a Marine for 13 years, joined right after 9/11, then went to art school on the GI Bill. (He doesn't like debt. :)
BTW, one thing I've always liked about Naomi Wolf is that she obviously likes men a lot.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ribanbiangsuchiang1193 You are very welcome! I would look for a program that allows you to complete the MSW in five years, and make sure it is geared toward licensing as a clinical social worker in as many states as possible, which will undoubtedly include working under psychologists and psychiatrists (possibly for very little pay at first). You will get to meet a lot of interesting people. Start out at a top teaching hospital, and later see about joining a group practice. It takes some time to get to a good salary, but you will see more and more opportunities open up as you advance. It is remarkable how many people now prefer to consult an MSW for counseling, because psychologists and psychiatrists are prohibitively expensive.
A community college where I taught part time had MSWs do career and academic counseling. I'm not sure what their specialties were. They didn't have education degrees, but they did have some sort of specialization or advanced courses in educational psychology, and that sort of thing. Community college students often want to go to school for a few basics plus certification for a job, and stay only four or five semesters, so they need more active support for the short time they are there to make sure they get on the right track and finish on their timetable. They often cannot afford to go to school for longer than it takes to have vocational certification.
Then, later in their careers, some MSWs get a law degree and work in juvenile justice or as guardians ad litem for minor children or incapacitated adults. Some just work with divorce lawyers as social workers, without a law degree -- there is a movement for "ethical divorce," meaning the attorney never takes a case before making sure the couple cannot reconcile. Those lawyers usually have an MSW on staff. They don't push counseling since that is not their role, but they do have the social worker do one or two interviews as part of the intake process, especially when there are young kids involved. If the woman needs emergency housing or could be in danger, it's good to have her talk to a social worker right there, rather than sending her elsewhere. It's a flexible field with close ties to medicine and law and lots of interesting work.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timmeyer9191 Plenty of European universities are TUITION-FREE, and they do not employ scads of part-time instructors who have never passed a rigorous civil service test to be allowed to teach at that level. The system of adjuncts you find here is literally illegal in lots of places. In Europe, fees are the equivalent of $750 to $1500 a year, in general, sometimes even less. American students take out loans to go to trade school, and talented students need to be at university, not community college -- which is not free, either. Talented students need to meet real professors and doctoral candidates in their field on Day One. It's bad enough that few high schools provide a solid education. Now you want them to wait two more years? (And then what, an unpaid internship?)
Joining the military means giving up your rights under the Bill of Rights and risking you life. Someone should chose freely to defend their country, not be forced to do it because they have no real choice.
I don't know why I'm pleading for your kids, though. I'm not really an American. If you don't care, I shouldn't either.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@timmeyer9191 When I was a little kid, like 7 or 8, people used to say a girl was going to college to get her MRS degree. They were being offensive and making fun of women, obviously, but in retrospect I only HOPE parents are privately telling their kids exactly that, and swearing them to secrecy. Who do you think has a better chance today, things being as they are, a young couple BOTH of whom have college degrees, or a couple where only one does, or neither? No one is even talking about finding the right person to marry, when that matters the most for a good life, and is really hard to do. Or is Silicon Valley supposed to colonize that, too?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JorgeAlbertoJerez And you "somehow" failed to parse the last two sentences of the first paragraph in my response correctly.
But why make this about personalities, much less throw down little hints about Trump along the way? I have a better idea: instead of MAGA, MATH!
Why would anyone be paid over $800,000 for a single speech? Anyone. One person, one speech.
$800,000 is a perfectly respectable salary for a full decade's worth of work, or an outstanding salary for four years. Salary, not wage. But let's look at it in terms of wage, so to speak. Why, it comes to over $90 per hour -- for all 24 hours in the day and all 365 days in the year. Waking, sleeping, everything. So, why does anyone pay anyone that much money for ONE speech -- especially someone in the private sector, to someone in government?
More important, this should be defended, or ignored, because . . . ?
Because . . . Personalities, better things to do, . . . Trump, . . . Russia (JUST KIDDING) . . .
And unless you are not only an attorney, but also an attorney specializing in securities law, then I'm afraid you are barking up the wrong tree.
In short, a time waster. Blocked.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@shawnwilliam4653 What?
Honey, I think you're all crazy. Like, literally all.
Keeping with specifics, what do you imagine this video "exposes?" It makes it appear as though freedom of speech were a right wing concern!! (Church Committee, anyone? Ever look at their report?)
Let me ask you -- as all the commons become privatized, and all the space where First Amendment rights could in theory prevail becomes privatized, what do we have? Plus a state wholly devoted to protecting private interests, to the point where that's what its military is concerned with, as its first mission.
I don't care how you dress it up, or what weird story you tell yourself. That is a form of fascism.
Moreover, no one in the world went bonkers over COVID the way the Five Eyes did, with the sole exception of a single country: China. (Where a good part of our labor force resides, as it turns out.)
Say. What do you think Taibbi did? What did they tell you he did?
1
-
@shawnwilliam4653 Oh I see, you've appointed yourself hall monitor. Channeling Ash Sarkar's brilliant retort to Piers Morgan: "I'm a communist, you idiot. No, I'm literally a communist."
I don't even plan to stay in this country. It's too far right, too imperialistic, too racist, and too violent -- and too given to mass psychosis, from Salem to the present. I don't want to contribute to its crimes. To a great extent, I've managed not to, actually, and partly by the "luck" of being unlucky.
You know, one mistake your groupuscule has made during Trump was to lie about him -- as if there were not enough odious things that were true to point out calmly. That alone could take months, years. But no. You lied about a liar. Well that's not exactly upholding principles of truth.
At least Taibbi wrote Insane Clown President. What did you write? Oh yes, that's right. A comment to me.
BTW, my family lives in one of those places your country bombed with DU, and that you can't find on the map. I haven't made a wh*t* friend in this century. (Whew!!!)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Exactly. The government is supposed to meet speech it does not like with MORE speech, not censorship.
Why would the government go via a back door to tell social media this or that statement is a lie? They can announce it loud and clear, publicly. They can tell FB, Twitter/X, etc., that x, y, or z is false at the same time that they tell ALL of us that x, y, or z is false. No "hamstring," no problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@steveb9713 I just read Peterson's article, and it is misleading. The paper that was removed was an opinion piece of a prominent research chemist on the sociology of his field. The paper was not within the field of chemistry itself, where we would have to bow to superior knowledge and empirical evidence.
I basically don't agree with removing papers because they are controversial -- let them stay there, so that we know what people really think. But I don't see why the opinions of a chemist on how it's dangerous to extend more opportunities to women and minorities to work in science because it harms the field and weakens "meritocracy," according to him, is any more worthy of being published than anyone else's opinion. His expertise is in chemistry, not cognitive science or social psychology -- or ethics, obviously. Peterson is convoluted, and makes it sound like the scientist's research in chemistry was attacked, when it wasn't. He used his prestige as a prominent scientist to push his personal opinions in a totally different field. That's like when actors tell us what foreign policy should be, or whether to vaccinate our children.
It is not an attack on STEM to say more people need to have an equal opportunity to study STEM subjects.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The most common major by far is Business, and has been for 30 years. Most such degrees are a demonstration of docility. An English degree is more rigorous. In 2001-2002, and 2008-2009, computer science grads were not getting offers. If a corporation will not interview you unless you have a degree, a corporation will not interview you unless you have a degree. (I don't believe anyone thinks that is fair. That changes nothing.)
I don't think people understand the current labor market.
BTW, daughter of Vietnamese immigrant Mom Kim Iversen has a degree in Philosophy. She always talks about the value of college, and all the women she knew who did pedicures 55 hours per week to make sure their kids went to college.
Once upon a time not that long ago, a student could pay in-state tuition and fees for a full year at the great state universities (Michigan, Wisconsin, Berkeley, Virginia, Texas, . . . ) with a full-time summer job making the minimum wage. People who did that were a different people. And they often majored in liberal arts, and made a life for themselves. They had independence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@coursecorrection870 This has been addressed ad nauseum. A small, heavily armed, heavily financed group that infiltrates the armed forces can have vastly more influence than the voters do, and reports that Azov-infiltrated troops were ready to shell the Donbass region again, before this invasion, turned out to be true. At this juncture, both the West and Putin are strengthening the neo-Nazis' hand, and it's doubtful that Zelensky has been functioning as a head of state, or that he even can. The difference may be (I mean may literally: hence, maybe not, too early to tell) that the West has no problem with the Nazis in Donbass, while Russia most certainly does.
So . . . You reject the Right to Protect? Interesting. Or is that only an American Right, like so many others?
All you've done is parrot the talking points you've heard. Is Abby Martin a propagandist? Kim Iversen, Chris Hedges, Aaron Mate, Anne-Laure Bonnel? The analysis of Stephen F. Cohen, from several years ago? See his interview at the 92nd Street Y, where he predicts where we are now. For Bonnel's reporting, you need to speak French, but her documentaries have subtitles. Oh, but you haven't mastered autocorrect yet, I forgot. Before thinking you should decide the fates of millions, learn to spell and write without stringing together buzz words and cliches and utter nonsense, and letting autocorrect write for you. Take a class or something.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vikinglife6316 If you care so much, I suggest you visit the campus. I suggest you examine some reading lists. I suggest you engage students in conversations and see what they say. Or, just believe the same people who lied to us about COVID, Iraq, etc., which includes all the major media organizations.
Those vignettes do not demonstrate that she is telling the truth about being oppressed at Columbia.
If this can pass -- if an immigrant can come to America, obtain her degree at one of the very finest private, Ivy-League universities, have nothing nuanced to say about it, only drop slogans about "woke," claim it was much like being in North Korea again(!) and you will believe every word -- then things are in a very bad way.
No, she's doing her bank account a favor. The fact that this stuff sells is a symptom of the troubled times we live in, not a solution. She's claiming oppression, too. Columbia exists as Columbia since the 1780s. She just got here. Where is your pride?
1
-
1
-
@vikinglife6316 No they're not. Chicago isn't. Princeton isn't, to name two. It's more of an advertising slogan, subject to massive amplification by social media. The universities went along because of the outsized tuition they charge and the pressure to be more like businesses, which have no First Amendment rights for employees, are required to follow Title VII anti-discrimination laws, and exist to satisfy customers. I think Silicon Valley and mainstream media had much more to do with wokeism than the universities did. I think they still do. They want a certain kind of employee, and they are going to get it.
At the universities, it is true that a lot of basically lazy, unqualified people were crawling all over one another to get tenure, because that has become harder and harder to achieve. A lot of them resorted to underhanded tactics, including being "more woke than thou." This has been true many times, and it is bad. Mary McCarthy wrote about it in Groves of Academe -- what? Some 70 years ago? Not new.
A lot of people lack scruples, especially where money is concerned.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nothxgg8324 From the actual court filing, NOT a press release,
"Reasonable people understand that the 'language of the political arena, like the language used in labor disputes … is often vituperative, abusive and inexact.' Watts v. United States, 394 U.S. 705, 708 (1969). It is likewise a 'well recognized principle that political statements are inherently prone to exaggeration and hyperbole.' Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v. Am. Coal. of Life Activists, 244 F.3d 1007, 1009 (9th Cir. 2001). Given the highly charged and political context of the statements, it is clear that Powell was describing the facts on which she based the lawsuits she filed in support of President Trump. Indeed, Plaintiffs themselves characterize the statements at issue as 'wild accusations' and 'outlandish claims.' Id. at ¶¶ 2, 60, 97, 111. They are repeatedly labelled 'inherently improbable' and even 'impossible.' Id. at ¶¶
110, 111, 114, 116 and 185. Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support Defendants’ position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims . . ."
You don't see the wee, little contradiction? Actually, it is pretty big.
Also, as everyone knows, a press release is offered as spin. On the other hand, legal briefs filed in court always argue in the alternative. Most of the memorandum deals with "New York Times malice," which acknowledges the statements may be false, but requires the speaker either to know they are false, or act in reckless disregard concerning whether they are true or false. Sounds to me like that would not be impossible for Dominion to show.
Oh well, we'll see . . .
1
-
@nothxgg8324 Also, you may not know, but "legal opinion" has a technical meaning.
"A, B, C are true," where A, B, C are statements of fact, is not a "legal opinion." It is an assertion of fact. Even if a lawyer says it.
"In this case, we plan to show that D violated such-and-such law, based on documents, affidavits, video recordings, etc." is one form a legal opinion can take. Paradigmatic, pretty much.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mruncletheredge Well, here is why it did to me: The alleged perpetrator, his poor acting skills, his gesturing toward a weapon but no sign he has one, the voice over at that point saying to wait for police, the way he was supposedly apprehended bare-handed, the stick used to beat him, the fact that so many blows hit his shoe soles and other places where they won't hurt, and then the comment at they end that they would let him go. Maybe more stuff -- this was from memory.
I guess we don't need deep fakes. World wrestling stuff, or stuff that is even more lame, is plenty.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You're misrepresenting what she said, just like that segment on fake tweets.
Look at the big picture. What I would like is for the in-state tuition of the late, great public universities to be something a kid could pay by working all summer. Up until the 1980s, a minimum wage summer job covered a full year of in-state tuition and fees, and oftentimes books and supplies as well, at nearly all of the public universities. Work-study covered most of the rest. The kids who worked their own way through school were a different people.
Nor do I want qualified kids to be held back by being shoved into community colleges. This almost always holds back the most talented. They belong on the campus of a real university, with doctoral students around to interact with from Day 1. They need that rush of enthusiasm and motivation. They shouldn't have to wait two more years. Enough of this waiting! That goes for unpaid summer "internships," too. Every internship should have, at minimum, a stipend equal to $15.00 per hour, 35-hour week. Anything else is bull****.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What I find interesting is that it was Naomi Wolf who demanded accountability and consequences for bad acts, and somehow she is getting dismissed. When Dr. Peterson points out how important accountability is, and brushes aside excuses, everyone praises him.
Why is that?
Wolf is an immensely accomplished person and even went back to school late in life to complete her doctorate, at OXFORD. She had already earned a fortune from her writing and raised two children. She did not do this for material reasons. She could have just, you know, bought a yacht or something.
She also resisted the COVID hysteria and pushed back on the vaccine mandates. And her husband (second husband) is a veteran. Sounds to me like a truly successful life. If someone like that can still feel what it was like to be a vulnerable, idealistic, naive teen at Yale, in awe of all the famous people there who turned out to have feet of clay, then maybe that really is a big deal at 19?
When Dr. Peterson's wife became ill, he himself had a problem, with prescribed drugs. You don't hold that against him, do you? Does he "wreak of being violated?" He has dissolved into tears many times since his ordeal. So what? But she can't even talk about what happened to her, and do so unemotionally?
You're making the case for the people who insist that we live in a "rape culture."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@theredscourge And if the company you work for goes bankrupt and you're 45 years old, it's freedom for you, too, when a night class at a university costs $100 per credit hour or the equivalent at trade school, and unemployment benefits aren't affected by your efforts at retooling. At 25, a person needs to count on working 45 years; at 45, the better part of three decades. People who thought they had saved enough for early retirement found out differently in 2001, 2008-2009, 2020, or, if they lacked good health insurance and got a dreaded diagnosis without warning (and despite excellent health habits) at age 58. I don't understand short memories.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@demsandlibsareswinecancer4667 Productivity is an economic concept, and its definition is market value of product produced per manhour worked. It is never optimal to work, say, 12 hours per day; your overall productivity could easily be lower than for someone who works seven hours but diligently, with a fresh mind, and consistently so, rather than working without a break, and then needing to take sick days, etc.
(BTW, my mother is from the same region as Nikola Tesla. We get weird migraines, we love math, etc. Something tells me you know nothing about him except what you might have found on Facebook.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KevinUchihaOG It is based on the Precautionary Principle, which is a way of allocating burdens of proof based on the Hippocratic oath, "first do no harm." Before the WHO was Gates-dominated (as for currently, I don't know), it said that each GMO in food must be evaluated for safety case-by-case; if you understand the technology, you know why, and it does not take much work to find out. You cannot generalize and claim they are all fine. The PP puts the burden where it belongs -- you do not presume safety and try to disprove it. You presume absence of safety and try to disprove that, just as in medicines. But apart from safety, there may be risks of creating monocultures in certain foodstuffs, and thus a need for more technology to "fix" that as a result. There is also the fact that its major innovation, golden rice, has turned up in some studies to be of no appreciable benefit at all. Turns out kids need carrots or sweet potatoes or red cabbage or spinach.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stargazerh112 Re: the last part. We do have a bright line for age of majority, for reasons that are ultimately pragmatic, but well-founded nonetheless. I oppose trying minors as adults. Regardless of anything else, he did not belong in the adult system.
I knew the gun charge was dropped, and I understand why. The problem with the Wisconsin statute was nothing short of a disgrace. These state legislatures do no work, they really don't. Why are they paid?
Barring minors from having most firearms, requiring tests comparable to driving tests for anyone who takes a gun off their own property (out of their home or garage, off their land, etc.), requiring minors to be accompanied by an adult when they carry a firearm, for hunting or otherwise, background checks, and so forth, are all consistent with the Second Amendment. I don't know whether you agree or not, but that is the law.
Then there are simple facts of our sad lives today: Uvalde cuts in favor of having more people carry. I see that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ABagOfLag Oh really? Okay, honey. You didn't know that in his youth he admired the Soviets? Hm, and HOW exactly would a "fascination with . . . totalitarianism" lead him to seek very serious medical treatment for a very serious condition, in today's Russia? (Or to name his daughter after Gorbachev?) Oh brother. I better not step on the toes of an acolyte. You are making me feel embarrassed for you. And I don't even hate on Peterson, or have any truck with those who do. (I have sympathy for him, especially after what happened. I don't blame the victim here. I simply see him for what he is.) I listen to HIM, not his critics, I read HIS website . . . and I have some experience in these matters. A Western fascination with non-Western Europeans is a well-known phenomenon. As is the need hero worship, but you're supposed to be done with that by the time you reach your mid-twenties.
Notice how you have to attribute an ignorance to me that I very obviously do not have, in order to push your "narrative?" I have never heard anyone else point out what I just did -- no one does, LOL!
How about ditching the narrative instead? Sounds like that could work out better for you. I see no evidence Peterson wants you to deify him, although he does seems inordinately money-hungry, still, thinking his family's health issues require more dough than he already has. Wake up.
1
-
1
-
@ABagOfLag I never disputed his research. In fact, its nature, scope and breath was one reason I was surprised that he succumbed to the addiction he did. I would have expected greater caution on his part, but obviously I don't know the details of how quickly that medication made him sick. Many people try it, or are persuaded to try it, and few have the reaction he did. I'm not judging him for that.
None of this has any bearing on my point, of course. My point has to do with how he dealt with his addiction. Apparently Western medicine could not help him. Odd, no? You avoid that issue, for some reason.
None of this has to do with his opposition to totalitarianism, either; if he had such opposition, he would not be a mouthpiece for capitalism, which has given birth to the monster. I think that's obvious. (See, e.g., Hobsbawm, among others.)
I have a doctoral-level degree from an American university, and an advanced degree from a prominent European university as well. Thinking and writing come naturally to me, and I do it fast. I've taught college courses, among other things. Maybe you might want to learn something from someone online? Glean a new perspective? Mature as a thinker? Better than throwing an opportunity away.
I don't see why writing something cogent is worse than throwing off stupid one-liners and hashtag phrases. Clearly it inspired you to write better as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@flamekeeper-oracle13 For her choice to recuse herself from the FIRST case she took and did substantive work on, which she decided represents a conflict of interest with the SECOND one.
Did she ask for advice from a private attorney who has expertise in the rules of professional responsibility? Did she request an opinion letter from the Idaho Supreme Court/Character and Fitness Board,, or whoever it is who is responsible in her state, if anyone?
When I witnessed what appeared to be significant wrongdoing on the part of an attorney, I certainly got some very high level advice on my duty to report, if any, and the advice was not free (nor should it be). Well, California trains you for all that. A lot of people go the cheap route, "a wing and a prayer," etc. I certainly did not. Some were never trained. Not every state does it that way, I suppose. (What I witnessed involved money, however; not poor people . . . smh)
Sorry, this stuff is no joke. Or at least it didn't used to be. Hmm.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There is also something else going on here. According to Reuters, over 17,500 American kids got puberty blockers from 2017 through 2021, AND the numbers were surging every year -- roughly a third of those 17+ thousand got them in 2021 alone. Who ever heard of this, in these numbers, just 15 years ago, nevermind before the past few years?
Where is the basic, scientific curiosity about this? Some people blame "the leftists," or "the schools," or "pharma," or " social contagion." Anything, just to grasp some "narrative" or other as quickly as possible. It seems to me that this is some sort of a mental illness, it is extremely serious, and we need real answers, not another culture war. (Culture wars are money grabs, mostly.)
1
-
There is also something else going on here. According to Reuters, over 17,500 American kids got puberty blockers from 2017 through 2021, AND the numbers were surging every year -- roughly a third of those 17+ thousand got them in 2021 alone. Who ever heard of this, in these numbers, just 15 years ago, nevermind before 2020?
Where is the basic, scientific curiosity about this? Some people blame "the leftists," or "the schools," or "pharma," or "social contagion." Anything, just to grasp some "narrative" or other as quickly as possible. It seems to me that this is extremely serious, and we need real answers, not another culture war.
EDIT: Let's see if this is permitted.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@beavis4play I hate Hamas. I hate genocide, too.
I don't place any trust in Hamas. I don't know why they did what they did.
What's your position on Amy Goodman, Bernie Sanders, Glenn Greenwald, Neve Gordon, Miko Peled, Gideon Levy, Naomi Klein, the ICJ, . . . , wow this is getting long.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@taragnor He likes Greenwald, Hedges, Blumenthal, Jackson, Gray, Halper, Taibbi, Wolff, of course Dr. West, among others . . . . And I'm not interested in your sloganeering ("pixie dust," BLAH BLAH). To advocate for change as AOC has, and then do absolutely nothing except tend her own brand, is vastly more demoralizing than saying nothing. AOC's message ("subtext") is that ordinary things like health care, which every other developed country has, is far beyond our reach even during a pandemic and recession. (We're on track for over 500,000 dead by March, by the way.) How shameful.
AOC is the one who is all talk and no action. You seem to lack self awareness. Say, are you a politician?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If a person isn't paying attention, they might miss one line above: "The cops then used public information to find him." DNA tests for entertainment were not supposed to be "public information." No one thought so. Having said that, anyone who handed theirs over with an expectation of privacy is naive. DNA can always be handed over to law enforcement because that is an extraordinary circumstance and is not done for commercial purposes.
It can also be subpoenaed, and for that very reason, the companies will forego being subpoenaed, and just hand it over in cases where they know they can and will be, to avoid any possible expense. Business is business.
(Of course, once an arrest is made, Kohberger's own DNA can be gathered. A person can also be tricked into handing it over voluntarily prior to arrest.)
But do the people who used these commercial DNA tests know this? Now they do.
Another line: "You do not own rights to the data that comes from your DNA or the DNA of your family members." I certainly do own "the rights" to the data that comes from my DNA, though not anyone else's, insofar as I have the right to say who can see that data. I have never provided DNA except where the results of the analysis were protected by HIPAA. And we do have a reasonable expectation of privacy for that, under the Fourth Amendment, because federal law protects it. So there.
Study harder in law school. :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@josewilliams6094 For the record, in 2020, the private schools around me, all working-class Catholic in my neighborhood, opened in the fall, established the school routine, closed for a long Christmas break and had some online instruction while infection rates were high, then were cleaned in depth and welcomed the kids back. Masks indoors but not outdoors were mandatory. It worked out fine. Sweden is another example of where it worked, with fewer precautions, but I prefer the Catholic school approach. (I'm agnostic, by the way, and was never Catholic.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rgzhaffie Oh yeah? I thought most of them were losers. Meth in their past, etc. So, if someone has a small business and they show up at a state capitol building with big, assault-style weapons, and the pictures are broadcast everywhere, who is going to patronize that small business? Plumber, electrician, remodeling contractor, roofer . . . You'd let that guy into your house after seeing him? Or you'd rent from him -- rent anything, least of all your dwelling? Let's think this through.
Not to mention that there is no reason to demonize small business. Not everyone can stand working for Jeff Bezos. To order the shutdowns without emergency UBI in place was one of the most spectacularly immoral things this government ever did. A year ago I would have doubted it could happen. FYI, in other countries, notably France, it is the hard left that is demanding an open discussion concerning shutdowns, vaccine reluctance, etc., and an exploration of alternative measures -- notably J-L Melenchon, whose FI movement includes Marxists and PCF members.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here's a thought. Research and read articles that predate the Russian invasion: say, from 2013 through 2021. That could be something you could do, to avoid current biases.
Steven F. Cohen, at the 92nd St. Y with his wife a few years ago, is a good introductory video. His interlocutors tried to get him to say that Russia would not invade Ukraine ("after all"). He declined to do any such thing. Then there's Lev Golinkin, The Nation, Feb. 2019, who has been unequivocally opposed to Putin and of course to the invasion. Read up on who we were supporting in Ukraine since 2014. (Who we were supporting is what is not new.) I think you are naive concerning how a relatively very small group in Ukraine has nevertheless had an outsized influence on the government and military there.
As for doubting, pondering, etc. . . . Your musings are important only as long as the dollar is, I'm afraid.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Octavus5 I don't see them as hardships. Why? Oh, the medical thing -- welcome to 2020. All's well that ends well.
There is nothing "morally wrong" with black people. Unless the same thing is wrong with everyone in France, Spain, UK, Germany, etc. There isn't a black problem in America, there is a white problem. See James Baldwin.
If virtue brings money, explain Uber, Facebook, Steve Jobs, Ghislaine Maxwell, Wall Street in toto, and the Veles kids. https://www.wired.com/2017/02/veles-macedonia-fake-news/
Maybe virtue used to bring money. Quaint. I liked that better, too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KL-lt8rc You know, I shouldn't be doing this. It's just a bad habit on my part, started during the COVID shutdown last year. Trying to talk to people who lack a certain literary culture can never work.
But just this once, and never again, I will spell it out: yes, I do believe people are susceptible to propaganda. YOU are a perfect example. It has an effect on you.
Trump propaganda won't appeal to you, but, for example, Maddow's propaganda will, no matter how many of her claims are proven to be FALSE, and no matter that her own lawyers asserted in court, on the record, that Maddow never defamed anyone BECAUSE no reasonable person would ever believe that she was asserting facts. She is an entertainer, a polemicist. Her show, and all the other "the Russians did it!!!" nonsense, is propaganda you believe. That is because its tone and style appeal to you. It makes you feel smart.
So, yes, obviously, propaganda does have an effect. You are Exhibit A.
1
-
@KL-lt8rc Because it is NOT a fact that Russia helped Trump get elected. It is a meme broadcast and very nicely monetized by Maddow and her ilk. I didn't accuse you of watching her in particular. You don't have to watch a particular purveyor of a given propaganda narrative, or, in this case the leading one, to be influenced by them. Next time, don't start out by suggesting someone's English is flawed and you might not end up being embarrassed by them.
Think about what you're saying: there is absolutely no proof that "Russia helped Trump get elected," some of the finest journalists have systematically and thoroughly debunked particular stories to that effect, it has become the go-to smear, and it requires believing that millions of Americans were hopelessly duped, WHILE THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION looked on with its hands folded. At best, a person could say it is not impossible, and suspend judgment. But you insist it happened, and that someone who doesn't agree is triggered, or something. Sorry, that is pathetic.
Don't look now, but your country is close to unlivable. If I had younger generations here, I would not be sanguine.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Wikimedian When have unfair sanctions done anything but steel resolve? We've repeatedly tried to force a coup in Venezuela, and tried to assassinate Castro in Cuba, all to no avail. Of course, in a society more like our own, with massive inequality, a handful of oligarchs who answer to no one, and mutual hatred among identitarian groups, like Putin's Russia, I suppose it stands a chance of working. We've always imposed sanctions on more collectivists peoples, with strong non-European roots, as if that could possibly motivate them to flip governments that weren't already on their last legs. But could it work on Russians? Hm. Maybe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Just a small point . . . did you know that many major corporations pay more in lobbyists' fees than in taxes? Even magazines like Fortune and Forbes, and the WSJ, report that -- because it no longer needs to be hidden. Now here is a fun fact: instead of paying taxes, they pay the lobbyists to write the taxes. Then, the government sells bonds, and the corporations buy them. Hence, the US government owes those corporations money, in the form of interest on those bonds, instead of collecting money from them. They are now a creditor. You work, you pay, your money goes to pay them.
Who has power in this picture? Does it sound like a democracy to you?
Just one small example that you seem not to have been informed about.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@123lowp Actually, your plan to go out on your own is a bigger incentive to your employer to give you a raise, if he wants to keep you in particular, than any skill you could demonstrate. In certain corporations, people get pushed out rather than promoted for being more skilled than their bosses. (Classic scenario in successful employment discrimination/wrongful discharge cases, though they also have to show discriminatory animus, etc., to win. Without that, or without an enforceable contract, etc., it's "just the way it goes.")
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@existenceisillusion6528 No, theorems are not "the result of a proof." There are some good books on the philosophy of mathematics you might want to look at, as you don't seem to fully appreciate the positions you are taking with respect to mathematical objects and their relations. It seems you may be inadvertently saying something other than, or more than, what you mean. I don't know why you cast aspersions at Philipp's education, when his posts were spot on and he clearly can do the math.
Where have you studied for any substantial length of time where university is tuition-free? What languages do you speak? And do you equate money with "success?" Every mathematician you see here has less money than the C-suite at Facebook, or any other large corporation. McDonald's, WalMart, Uber, Black Rock, etc. I know who I'd trade places with if I had to.
In any event, we call the hypothesis of this video a "conjecture" because it has not been proved. But to say that proving it thereby makes it a theorem is a little strange, as it seems to suggest mathematics is invented, not discovered. If this conjecture is true, a lot of mathematicians would say it was always true, and hence was always a theorem of number theory; we just needed to discover exactly why, and satisfy ourselves that it is. (Godel was in that camp, surprisingly enough.)
I don't know if you are disagreeing. I can't tell. Scoring points you are not.
Interesting fact: when the great state universities in America were nearly free, to the point where a minimum-wage summer job paid for a full year of school, students read more than they do today, and put in longer hours studying. Why is that?
The most common major today by far is Business, and has been for decades. Without enough accounting to pass a CPA, that is not a rigorous degree at all. (It sure does demonstrate docility to employers, though.) That is not the usual course of study that you see Europeans embarking on.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mb-3faze You really believe this rot? I am for targeted vaccination based on INDIVIDUALIZED health care, always mindful of the three pillars of human health and ethical treatment: the Precautionary Principle, informed consent, and the Hippocratic Oath --- is that what you call "anti-vax?" "Muzzle the loudmouths for the good of the nation" is a totalitarian proposal. What's the point of saving lives, even assuming you will save them and not ruin them, if it is to live without basic human dignity and civil rights?
I don't know what our government wants, or what the UK or any of the Five Eyes want; their record is poor and their willingness to jeopardize human health with risky experiments is legend. They serve the major corporations first, and the rest of us as an afterthought, if at all. I have every reason to suspect that reducing the average lifespan is not something they are averse to doing, and I know the US has no plan whatsoever to stem gun violence or youth suicide. I look to the ministries of health in the Scandinavian countries, Switzerland, and even France to see what I should consider doing, not the FDA or the CDC.
The Precautionary Principle places the burden of proof of every new drug or other intervention on the proponent, to show that it is safe, effective, and suitable for the individual patient for whom it is being prescribed. We don't have to justify saying no. The burden of proof is not on us. BTW, you heard about the New York case, I hope? Fired workers reinstated with back pay. Is that why you are out of sorts today?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@S2pidMedia I don't at my fingertips, it has been too long, but I have seen cases where the initial approach was certainly not with the intent to kill, and the intent formed in the course of the activity. The right analysis may indeed be what you said -- the perpetrator must have been engaged in some other felony that is dangerous to human life from the start. (I'm going to look for one of these cases, because they are unusual.) Anyway, the law must be specific to be constitutional, but state laws are not uniform, and what is traditionally thought of as "premeditation" is often not required. Or, the requirement is effectively skirted, by saying it can be formed in a matter of seconds, such as in a flash of anger, etc. Premeditation is definitely not the same as "planning."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The technical reason Social Security is not a Ponzi scheme is that the new dollars coming in are taxes from salaries that generally keep pace with the overall economy (and when they don't, people still in the labor force do have options), whereas the payouts do not keep pace with the overall economy. Social Security benefits are never raised to account for the full impact of inflation. Hence, the benefits depend on the salary you earned pre-inflation, for the rest of your life, and the only sure way to rectify that is to return to work. That's not a Ponzi scheme.
What it is dependent on is adequate revenues -- just like police, fire, public education, DOD, DHS, and well-maintained highways.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@googleisevil8958 I lived in a country where, at the time, elective abortion was impossible after 12 weeks (embryonic stage, plus two weeks in case the conception date was incorrect), and abortion had to be preceded by a written declaration of "mother in distress" and counseling -- it was never offered that day, on demand. Pregnancy expenses were paid 100%, including a clothing allowance; abortion at only 70%. After 12 weeks, a three-person panel had to approve, but it was humane. No seriously mentally ill woman at 15 weeks would be denied, for example, nor a woman beaten by the father of the baby well before viability. No one thought a woman should be put through a pregnancy like that. No one. It was the best abortion law I know of. I wonder if they changed it. I suspect they did.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@xyzsame4081 I agree with this. The delta variant originated in India. In this context, to pretend that American anti-vaxxers are an issue verges on the ridiculous. The American ruling class who refuse to lift patent protection and ramp up production, and cooperate with ALL other countries, in a pandemic are the problem. Mexico, just next door, has licensed SIX vaccines, with all three technologies available. Do we even have information on the two Chinese vaccines, which are technologically similar to a standard flu shot? Has Sputnik V caused blood clots like Astra-Zeneca or J & J? Start asking real questions, see if you can get answers.
Or, let's hate on these sick people. That's always an option. I can't believe how easy it is to manipulate people. It is weird. Media can make people believe anything it wants.
(Spelling edit. Hate typos, ugh.)
1
-
@bobthomas6846 Of course. This segment is devised to make you furious with the man depicted. (You don't even ask how and why a camera crew was admitted to a hospital, where confidentiality rules are strict. You don't even wonder about that part.) You are supposed to have contempt for him, and blame him. You're not supposed to wonder why India, which as we found out in March 2020 is an essential supplier of medicine to the US, does not have the vaccines it needs. You're not supposed to ask why other countries, including Mexico just to the south, have a wider choice of vaccines than the US. You're supposed to sign that you read the EUA consent forms and fact sheet without reading them. You're not supposed to know what full FDA approval is, or why it matters. (Hint: $$$ access to the 1986 compensation fund for injury) You went straight to saying you hope these morons die, and you GOT THE MOST LIKES!!
No argument there, you won.
I offered everyone I know who lives alone to go with them to get their shot, and to check in on them. Did you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KRSonbe With respect to his resume, and his repeated plagiarism. I didn't say Biden was the same or worse in general, although he has been casual with the truth concerning various aspects of the pandemic (promising there would be no vaccine mandates, claiming the vaccines prevent contraction, etc., that sort of thing). Trump never lied on his resume because he had no desire to inflate his academics, and he didn't plagiarize because he didn't think anyone writes better than he does. :D
I also wonder about just how much he imposed on women. His reputation while in the Senate was horrible, but back in his day, people thought that was amusing, and even charming. "Randy," they used to call it. By all accounts, Trump was worse.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@KRSonbe Therefore it didn't happen. Say, when did he apologize? At a politically opportune moment, or did he risk anything whatsoever by mouthing the words? Did she accept his apology? Hmm. That's awfully facile.
You're not going to look up his resume lies, repeated and genuinely bizarre plagiarism (such as plagiarizing items from someone else's biography), the article from 2008, or the ones from the time of the Clarence Thomas hearings? No, huh? Well, he did apologize, so . . . If you go back and READ what I wrote, the POINT was not only what he did to Hill, but what the ambience was at the time he did it, how he treated women, and WHY. That's where you can find information about his reputation concerning how he viewed and treated women during that time. That's what you asked about. Not whether he's truly sorry now.
1
-
@KRSonbe Where did you see this interview? More important, was it prepared for the last election, or did it take place back in the 1990s, contemporaneous with events? You do know that people make calculated, self-serving statements, don't you? Did you expect anyone to say anything different during the 2020 election? To paraphrase Diderot, do you job any old way but always praise the master. 18th century. Not news.
I don't recall Hill forgiving him. I seem to recall having read something different, NYTimes, in fact, but I will look it up. She, unlike Biden, is courageous, and not opportunistic. Can the rest of us forgive him? His actions gave us Thomas for life.
(You still don't remember the fake resume and plagiarism, by the way?)
I can't believe Americans. They pick their heroes from among politicians and billionaires. No wonder you're in the sauce you're in.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Most people will be all right. Don't listen to anyone who claims your life will be shortened; that is nonsense. The problem is that, from everything we are able to glean, the risk-to-benefit ratio for these vaccines was far outside of anything that was considered acceptable for any other vaccine, or any other drug for that matter, since we started keeping records. This is unprecedented.
Live super clean. It's not easy, and it's expensive. An anti-inflammatory diet, organic and non-GMO foods, etc., as well as health clubs, yoga, massage, etc., are very expensive. But accept that you very likely need this now. Don't cut corners any more. ;/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cassiescornerreviews6884 What is your source for that? First of all, in Switzerland, the definition of full vaccination includes those who had a proven case of COVID and ONE dose of a two-dose vaccine such as Pfizer (source: their ministry of health). Second, all of these countries have restricted the use of certain vaccines to those over 40 or over 50, and no longer recommend vaccination for the young, or boosters for anyone who is not elderly. Then there are also several special measures taken against mandating vaccination. For example, in France, the National Assembly passed a law prohibiting anyone to ask a minor their vaccine status. It is a crime now to ask, much less mandate, a COVID vaccine for anyone under 18. Naturally, this has effectively ended posing the question, or imposing the mandate, on anyone. Then, the EU parliament subjected pharmaceutical executives to some serious questioning, which exposed the flaws in their initial clinical research.
I bet you didn't know all that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hrs2044 You mean you think only neo-Nazis and white supremacists are losing jobs? You haven't been paying attention. There has been more and more infighting at many major news outlets, and dismissal, over minutiae. As noted, just recently a person who questioned firing someone over the mention, not use, of the n word in an educational context was himself suspended. It's unclear whether he himself used or mentioned that word; most reports I've heard say he did not. I'm not even talking about the initial case, which may have been more egregious than generally reported; I'm talking about being penalized for discussing the case. Blithely saying Slate can fire whomever they want is not responsive. Do you think being fired for racist speech is a small matter? It is generally career-ending. If you agree that racist speech in the workplace is a very serious matter, then it should not be charged when racist speech did not occur. Otherwise, you dilute the principle and undercut the serious nature of a real offense. By analogy, patting someone on the rear at work is disgusting and grounds for immediate termination. It could be grounds for a lawsuit. But it is not rape. Now consider a pat on the shoulder -- is it the same? Please.
But there's a bigger principle involved. Journalists and educators work in fields that (we all used to agree) require free and robust discussion in order to do their work properly. You said a teacher could be fired for being a neo-Nazi. All right, that's fine. Is it acceptable to fire a teacher who presents the history of the ACLU in defending a neo-Nazi's free speech and assembly rights to his class, and encourages debate? Could a teacher present the incident that just happened at NYTimes and Slate to his seniors in Modern American History and Civics class and discuss it with them? How about in community college? Would that be all right? What do you think most teachers would do? They wouldn't bother. Use an old textbook, give them a multiple choice test, and take home your paycheck. Done.
I think this fight in journalism and at the university is all about the money. These people are jockeying for the few plum positions left in a declining profession. They're not protecting vulnerable people, and I doubt that they care. They're fighting over what's left in an economy that creates a handful very big winners, many losers, and fewer and fewer people in between. They'll use whatever they can to do it, too. There's no focus on ethics here, or civility.
1
-
@hrs2044 I see you're still minimizing the letter. It was not just a matter of two members of Congress acting as private citizens and asking some questions, as anyone could do. First, it was sent on Congressional letterhead. Next, it contained a number of pointed accusations, including: ". . . AT&T [and others] plays a major role in the spread of dangerous misinformation that enabled the insurrection of January 6th and hinders our public health response to the current pandemic." Finally, the seven questions were highly intrusive, framed like interrogatories in a lawsuit, and demanded extensive documentation or other materials to substantiate each response; the last question asked whether AT&T and others (a separate letter was sent to each target company) plan to continue hosting Fox, and if so, why.
It's now a problem to decide whether to answer such a letter, and how to do it.
In the meantime, Trump was again impeached, the House leadership again failed to call witnesses to testify at his Senate trial, and he was again acquitted on a party-line vote. I don't see the necessary changes being accomplished.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnneville403 People who cannot control themselves, who take to Twitter in that manner, who fail to appreciate the weight of words, and who blurt out stuff about a soon-to-be confirmed Supreme Court Justice in front of whom they should ASPIRE to argue one day soon, do not have the temperament to train top lawyers, or to set an example for them. The US has become a giant high school ("with money" --- Frank Zappa).
I said the same thing about Justice Barrett, and my politics could not be more different from hers. A nomination (any nomination, not just her nomination) at that juncture should have been blocked ab initio, which the Democrats failed to do, but their minions took to Twitter, to smear her. It made me sick.
Here, Shapiro admits BIDEN is responsible for the whole thing. I agree. Take it up with Biden. You don't cast aspersions on the candidate instead. That shows a poor sense of . . . justice? Hm.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dallasneudorf This gives students a veto over teachers --- which means you no longer have a university. Which is, in turn, perhaps the most honest admission of where we stand. Universities have been businesses for a long time. The "learning environment" is analogous to the modern office, where free speech has no place. Students have the remarkable dual role of customer and worker, but the real clientele are the donors and the business community that will eventually pay them money. My views don't matter. Theirs must be served.
But, tell me, what happens when the students don't all agree about the impact a professor has on the "learning environment?" For example, there were serious demonstrations against firing Norman Finkelstein. Of course, let's be real. Students' views can't override those donors. I mean, after all, students come and go. The donors possess the true hecklers' veto, and if things get heated, law enforcement will be summoned. It's obvious, too, that the smart students will make sure their views match those of the biggest money-bags, I mean, philanthropists.
What a pretty picture. I know the neolibs brought us to this.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I hope I can help you with that. Most people who flail for some reason other than health issues, emotional issues, or simply not doing the work are allowing worry or self-criticism to sap their energy. If all the time that you're studying, there is a little voice telling you you won't be able to do this, oh my gawd what does the teacher want(??!), and stuff like that, then you won't reach your potential. If you are undermining yourself, don't add worry on top of worry. When you notice that voice, just tell yourself, oh, there it is again, and bring your attention back to your work. Ignore it without battling it. If you keep ignoring it, you will find that it will go away.
The other thing is to consider what you're studying. Do you like it? Does it resonate with you in some deep way, or are you studying it only because someone told you you had to pick something that will lead to a job? The problem with that is that for the rest of your life, you'll be in competition with people who LOVE love their work. No one who doesn't even like it can possibly compete with those people. I recommend taking one class in a subject that you are intrigued by or passionate about, and become consumed by it. See what it feels like to succeed, and see if you can repeat it in other classes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@receipts324 Oh, you're thanking me for turning you on to some good books, right? (I mean, egoless people never play one-upmanship games, . . . try to undermine others, . . . and all that weird, childish stuff, right? Why would they?)
You are so welcome! I hope you enjoy Plato (Apology, Gorgias, definitely before The Republic, although Socrates' words in Republic Book X about not knowing what is truly good or bad in life's most tragic accidents is sublime) and Murakami's Underground. Great winter reads! :)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@smasher.338 Ah, I see. You are in some sort of state of delusion. Because everybody has 800 bases in 70+ countries, has intervened in 251 countries over the last three decades or so (per Congressional Research Service reports) and will do so again, as it must, at the slightest threat to dollar hegemony, because that is how it maintains its standard of living, and has the most extensive global surveillance network known to man, and the most sophisticated and pervasive propaganda.
My family lives in one of those places where the US bombed. These days, it's kind of hard to avoid meeting such people.
You should see their "modest" condo. It would cost millions in New York. I've never seen a nicer one in America, actually, including the ones that cost millions. No, I don't think you know how other people live. And these are ordinary people with ordinary jobs. The father was handicapped for a good while, in fact -- but most of the planet has adopted some socialist principles, fortunately, so that didn't leave them vulnerable.
Small heads up: if you are worried about the influence of China in Africa, it might be wise to rein in your billionaires and their vaccines and their IMF and World Bank ideas, and ask people what they need. No, not just the top 0.1% of greed-driven sycophants in their respective countries, who parrot the slogans you love to hear. That will no longer do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@smasher.338 No, considering what they look like, and the stuff they do and did, I don't think so. Do YOU think anyone was jealous of Jeffrey Epstein? How about Ghislaine? How about Harvey Weinstein? Bill Cosby? Bezos? Musk? Leslie Wexner? Don't be abstract. Name some people.
Could there be someone, somewhere who is this primitive? Well, in biology, much is possible, so I guess one should be cautious in making categorical statements. We know no one has ever grown wings or fins, we don't know that no one has been jealous. I say it's rare.
I think this jealousy crap is either projection or pure propaganda. You gave yourself away there . . . "Russia Russia Russia." (Is Putin Hitler, too? LOL)
France is doing a nice job lately. You can't use Paris as your bogey man, now can you?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rifleman4005 I won't argue with anything you said in your opening paragraphs, as it is either a non sequitur or pointless (and by the way, what is it to me that corporations with zero profits can spawn billionaires, and control what I have access to, without my being consulted? Is there some reason I should be impressed, or celebrate that?)
But what in the world makes you think I worship government? Why would I ever think government "cares" about me in any sense? The very same corporations, where I have no vote, run the government, too.
Most of what the US has achieved is thanks to its geography, which has allowed it to grow a powerful army without being challenged, which in turn allowed it to extract wealth from the rest of the world. We can measure the wealth extraction using its own numbers: the national debt in foreign hands, and the trade imbalance. Of course it is much more than that -- a lot of raw materials were extracted very cheaply from the Third World, for generations, apart from extracting slaves -- but those two very current numbers start to paint a more nuanced and intriguing picture. They make you start to ask questions, instead of parroting the same nonsense every day.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@benisjamin6583 On the contrary, I specialized in Socrates and Plato for one of my degrees. Socrates DID walk the walk -- I refer you to some of Foucault's last lectures on precisely that subject, a long meditation on truthtellers (MIT published them). Socrates was always coherent: he said exactly what he thought, and he did what he said. (BTW, in case you believed Peterson about Foucault -- OOPS.)
A person who knows about benzodiazepines and nevertheless turns to them in a moment of despair is NOT coherent. I thought you knew enough about him -- that he does have health issues, as does his daughter, and now his wife, that were not self-generated in the least, in contrast to the ones in which he certainly played a role, and which you assumed I alluded to when you said these clips predate his drug problem. He also has a strange fixation on Russia (he even named his daughter after Gorbachev, look it up), and as a non-Westerner, I always note that. I mean, I like that civilization a lot, it's not foreign to me, but . . . it's something to watch out for in Westerners, generally. Not that it proves anything; it may mean nothing -- just that when you see it in people who don't have those roots, be a little bit on guard. Let's put it that way.
This is a waste of MY time. Have it your way. The Secret made more money, didn't it? As did reality shows. As did casinos, plastic surgeons, all sorts of things. If YOU ever bothered with Socrates, you would recognize that fallacy as one of the key fallacies he pointed out. Popularity hardly proves anything, especially during certain points in history. Like right about now.
I was about to say more, but it's really futile. You could have learned something from me . . . you could have at least gotten a few recommendations for really good books. Well, I have a minute, so: The Apology -- read it carefully, then read it again, then again. See what Socrates says about people who make money to impart pseudo-wisdom. See what he says about the wisdom of the common people, who are usually looked down upon. (A veritable commie before the fact! And so much for hierarchies and lobsters!)
Gabor Mate for real wisdom. Any self-help book that deals with doing something else, rather than dwelling on the self, is vastly better than any straight-up "self-help." So, books on writing, or on music, like The Perfect Wrong Note, or books on acting (Audition; How to Stop Acting), or on investing (AlphaBrain) will always do more for you. If you go for darker entertainment, and wry, edgy advice with literary flair, by all means Robert Greene. And he's probably not someone I agree with politically, or socially, and his advice shouldn't be taken too seriously -- as he himself tells you. But he's really funny, and great at what he does. You can find some good books to read when reading Greene -- unlike Peterson, who is a dead end.
I've just given you so much, and for free! Out of sheer generosity. Imagine, this is not monetized! I can guess your reaction. But one day, when you might be tempted to, say, pop a pill, get drunk, or some such, you just might come back here and start reading, and doing, instead. That would be great. I'm always for that.
1
-
1
-
@benisjamin6583 Have it your way.
If a person is doing well, they say what they say because they believe it.
If a person is not doing well, they say what they say for the money.
(EDIT: Doing well is an inner state, obviously. It is not defined by bank balances, retweets, etc., etc.)
I've caught him in a lot of contradictions, and he spouts tons of nonsense, much of it obviously bad faith and quite a lot of it harmful (such as, for example, his claim about the inevitability of hierarchies, his misuse of evolutionary biology, and his advocacy for LESS tax support for public universities, when he must know that that support has been systematically gutted, ruining the futures of millions, because someone, somewhere is a . . . Gender Studies major!). Still, there's something sad about him that makes him hard to dislike. I dislike most of what comes out of his mouth.
Just one question: why would you think Plato and Socrates are examples of why health is unrelated to the pursuit of philosophy? They both cultivated good health, and were in good health. I think they believed doing so was needed as a first step toward pursuing philosophy, or more precisely, that it was a part of philosophy itself. The notion of philosophy was much broader than just intellectual development. It was to be lived, in every sense.
I'm guessing you thought of them because Peterson uses them as examples, and falsifies Socrates. I seem to remember that, but I could be have him mixed up with someone similar. Falsified Socrates is a popular right-wing trope, right up there with "cultural Marxism," which is allegedly "post-truth." ("Post-truth!" Okay, that is a complete hoot. Tell that to anyone working in an Innocence Project.)
If it is Peterson who is telling you this stuff, then he just misled you again. OH WELL. Don't shoot the messenger.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@brasshouse-fireball University of Michigan: annual in-state tuition 15,558 USD; out-of-state tuition 51,200 USD No, NO ONE can earn that with an ordinary summer job. A working student would have to clear $1300 a month for all twelve months, and still need to borrow for books, supplies, electronics, living expenses. BTW, 40 hours per week at minimum wage comes to about $15,600 net, roughly.
1
-
@brasshouse-fireball More talking points. The single most common major in America, by far, and for decades now is . . . Business. The next most common group of majors are all health care related, with Nursing at the top. A Business degree without enough accounting to pass the CPA, or math beyond calculus, plus advanced finance, is worse than Art History. It's a demonstration of docility and lack of imagination, and it usually means the graduate can't write well and doesn't have the patience to read in depth.
Art History majors are rare. If they minor in photography and learn how to set up a web page, they will go farther in, say, fashion merchandising than any business major could hope to. They might even be better prepared for a Master's in Public Administration, or law school, or even an MBA, depending on what else they studied.
This is where lack of funding for higher education has brought us. It has not made students work harder or more creatively. Debt does not take the place of tax support. It doesn't build pride or a sense of responsibility. The tax support for the great state universities was withdrawn first, before debt schemes were introduced. That's what happened. Sure, it has only spiraled since then, true enough.
One other thing -- a "moral" risk. Price inflation is related to grade inflation. Obvious why!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Asgard2208 I'M conflating? You conflate the NAZIS with "socialists" based on branding, which is as flimsy as it gets. I'm not surprised that people who are unfamiliar with 20th century history might do that, or who have been fed talking points by Fox News, but to see you do it was frankly a surprise.
As for Jimmy's point, Nadine Strossen's recent book on hate speech makes essentially the same point: these speech codes, which on their face come across as feel-good nicey nicey progressive, end up being used by the right to silence the left, in the modern developed democracies. She is about as extreme a First Amendment absolutist as I have ever seen, and I do not agree with her completely, but I respect her the most. Anyone who wants to propose the smallest restrictions on freedom of speech really must read her book and meet her arguments first. Also, after reading her, I can better pinpoint where I would argue for stronger protections: that would be in workplace, the hostile environment standard. (Not in the free press, that is for sure!)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Aqua Fyre He was a Member of Parliament. He was the leader of the Labour Party, a position he won, for five years. The Blairites looked to sabotage him from the very beginning because of the threat they thought he represented to their holding on to their ill-gotten lucre -- and Corbyn was to blame for attempting appeasement. As soon as his supporters suspected he would be nothing more than a milquetoast, feckless, diluted version of Blair, with possibly a little tinkering around the edges, but only if the banks gave permission, of course they fled. Who wouldn't?
For all his many and obvious flaws, and his quite checkered past, a George Galloway would never stoop to that. He knows how to open his mouth.
I'm not British, though I should be. My father and my mother's only brother were veterans of the British Army, WWII, and I cared for my father as the ravages of that war resurfaced during his old age. You're welcome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@galvanaut7119 That study, which is the best one so far, compared myocarditis in all vaccinated, in all unvaccinated, and in all COVID cases. Not in the demographic that accounts for the unusual concentration of myocarditis from vaccination, which also happens to include minors.
I concede that in the review of research I did yesterday, I have found no confirmation of my position OR of yours, and very little information on myocarditis deaths in either the vaccinated or the COVID sufferers, except that they have happened. The only evidence in favor of your general position in favor of vaccinating people who account for a tiny fraction of a percent (about 0.075%, see Statistica) of all COVID deaths is that vaccine-induced myocarditis is very likely to be significantly less serious than myocarditis in COVID sufferers, and likewise endocarditis. Again, no demographic information -- but that could be because it is true across demographic groups. But it does not support your claim concerning relative incidence in teenaged boys. Can you?
Do you know what the current FDA warning on the mRNA vaccines says? I haven't looked.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@denverlove Well, when I was in the French system, all admissions testing was achievement-based, and aptitude/IQ testing for admission to any program was against the law. Each diploma gave you a right of access to the next level. Their production of world-class writers, philosophers, Fields medalists, filmmakers, etc., relative to their population is either the highest in the world or close. The Ministry of Education set the standards. It's uncanny how many of our great writers lived there, too. They have that certain something.
I don't know how they're doing now, since "modernizing." In other words, they started copying us. So far, the results in general are meager, but some good stuff is emerging. I think.
I don't know how Oxford/Cambridge run admissions, but I think their tutorial system is the best education in the world. I also think that any system that throws you into practicums that make you apply what you've just learned is better in principle than studying, writing papers, and taking tests. That's why lab sciences should be part of every degree. I think our system for teaching lab sciences is the best -- or was? That was our thing. And it can't happen online or with AI simulations.
Also, do any of us really know what Russia, China, and India are doing? We hear a soundbite now and then.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@blindliberty4478 If you are asking whether I think Rittenhouse is guilty, I do not know, and I don't think anyone does. I think it is a hard case requiring careful investigation, and I think charging him as an adult is wrong, which pertains to punishment. IOW, I could actually be a juror because I am not biased. But was he "in the wrong" to have gone to Kenosha, and especially heavily armed? Of course. He is a KID. He is not a licensed, insured, and bonded security guard. If any adults asked him to come, they are MORE IN THE WRONG. (Notice how no adult is copping to having invited him to cosplay security/medic? Figures!) Bottom line, he had no business being there.
What is wrong with people?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ResoluteDeicide Oh, if you tell me that they're phonies at worst, unaware at best, and parasitic (someone else has to engage politically, and militarily, to secure this life for them), you'll get no argument from me. Plain as day. But this type of sheer self-indulgence and self-centeredness does not emerge in "collectivist" societies, in whatever way you decide to define that. I mean, follow a historian-archeologist-anthropologist like Emanuel Todd, if you like (probably the best of the bunch on this point). Or consider Marx's vision of an eventual communist society. Or modern-day Vietnam. It really doesn't matter. It's a subculture you find most often in the Five Eyes, and especially in its leader, the US. By far the US. But believe what you like. Blaming the Other is an American tradition.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I read a bunch of stories from several sources about this incident, and skimmed the official report of no racism.
This is what I really think: First, to be wrongly accused of racism, much less fired as a result, is horrendous. Unbelievable. This was the most severe harm suffered, and I hope the employees will have redress. Second, why are people pushed to be so officious? Was there some compelling reason to get campus police to question the student in the first place? The employees were told to do this. Why? Whatever happened to approaching someone, without a show of force, and saying, "I'm so sorry, you can't sit here. It's officially closed for _____. I could help you move over there." Or just leave people alone. Was it THAT big of a deal where somebody sits to have lunch, on a summer day? If the area is closed, spring for a posted sign. Cordon it off. This joint can afford it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why was in-state college tuition once something that kids paid in full, all on their own, with an ordinary summer job? Why was rent affordable for anyone working full time?
If state universities were subsidized through state taxes, like they once were, it would create DOWNWARD pressure on all tuition. On the other hand, loans are just like leverage, and create UPWARD pressure on all tuition.
Financing college using earned dollars is not the same as borrowing against future earnings. A state subsidy of state universities holds the line on tuition, and private colleges feel the pressure to follow suit, at least to some extent. Letting all colleges set their tuition as they see fit, more or less, while underwriting loans (which means borrowing against future earnings) will always create upward pressure on tuition. You find money to pay for it that doesn't actually exist yet, in the sense of having been earned.
Liberalized bank lending for mortgages forces home prices upward as well. You already know this. How did they fool you into not knowing it?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DMAN590 The technical reason Social Security is not a Ponzi scheme is that the new dollars coming in are taxes from salaries that generally keep pace with the overall economy (and when they don't, people still in the labor force do have options), whereas the payouts do not keep pace. Social Security benefits are never raised to account for the full impact of inflation. Hence, the benefits depend on the salary you earned pre-inflation, for the rest of your life, and the only sure way to rectify that is to return to work. That's not a Ponzi scheme.
What it is dependent on is adequate revenues -- just like police, fire, public education, DOD, DHS, and well-maintained highways.
You're welcome. Please clap.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheLordRichard You're also right that the UK numbers are strikingly lower than those in most European countries including Scandinavia, and lower than in the US or Canada. I wonder what they're doing, too? It's interesting, too, because they roundly use euphemisms for mental illness. I know that for a person in deep depression and contemplating suicide, they will say something like "close to a nervous breakdown," or simply, "close to a breakdown." (To me, the latter sounds more like sobbing in public.) This might feel like oppression to some people, as though the real feelings must be covered up, but to others, it creates a welcome zone of privacy. I've read that cross-culturally, the use of euphemisms, and generally downplaying mental illness, are not associated with worse outcomes. All very interesting for sure.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
During the Cold War, the socialist experiment that was the Soviet Union greatly enhanced the living standards throughout Europe by maintaining pressure on the ruling class to behave. Now, the Russian Federation, after having been gutted in the 90s under the ascendancy of Clinton-Blair neoliberalism and globalization, has come back strong and is challenging the West, which in turn is being gutted by its oligarchs. Well, the solution is simple --- we shall blame Russia. I'm not surprised current relations are worse. Bourgeois Norwegians in particular got a lot of free stuff thanks to the Soviets, back when their ruling class had to prove it could feed, house, educate, and heal everyone "just as well as the commies can, or better."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ricksimon9867 There are dozens of countries across Europe that HAVEN'T implemented the same policies as the US. If I post about, I risk censorship. I suggest you look up the ministries of health of Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Iceland, etc., and in addition see what India is doing, for example. If you do some real research, you may be very surprised.
As for what France, Italy, etc., are doing, well, they are provoking mass demonstrations with their policies. The European left is resoundingly anti-mandate and anti-passport. No exceptions.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ricksimon9867 No discussion whatsoever. People "taking sides," becoming hysterical, issuing mandates, being censored for no reason, yes.
Discussion, which is, by implication, rational, no.
Funny, I never heard of anyone getting a breakthrough case of mumps or measles or polio, unless they were significantly immunocompromised.
Posted a quote, NBC news affiliate, one sentence long, with quotation marks, stating that over 100 fully vaccinated people had died of breakthrough COVID as of July 31 in Massachusetts alone. Seems to be missing now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@januarysson5633 I gave my opinion, based on what I know. No need to get tied up in knots over it. The person I responded to, who is not you, made me worry because of his candor, for good reason. In the US, people who are this candid routinely get harassed. If the UK is much more cordial, it would come as no surprise, and I'm glad.
P. S. As an attorney, I've represented pediatric cancer patients whose rights were violated. Of course, I donated my time. Litmus test: if you respond kindly, I'll know you're in Europe. If you don't respond, or double down on rudeness, I'll know you're . . . not in Europe. LOL
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@canadianrepublican1185 And that prevents violent crime and mass shootings, moderates inflation, offers wholesome food at a decent price, makes housing in areas safe for families and kids affordable, ends homelessness, and punishes corruption, market manipulation, and police brutality?
Maybe you should look at what corporations can get away with in the US for a better picture. The discrimination Tesla has been accused of, and the primate torture described at Neuralink, are unlike anything I had ever seen in a major corporation post 1970. The court documents are all posted online. On the other hand, do you think small entrepreneurs have an easy time of it? The last three years should have dispelled that idea. It has been no better in the US than in Canada during the pandemic, and probably worse, since health care is privatized for all but those over 65 and medical bankruptcies did not abate during the "emergency." (The biggest "emergency" was that Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos needed more money.)
The "innovations" that allowed the Internet to combine new forms of advertising and surveillance, and induce people to do nothing about it even in their own private lives -- and even to participate and generate it themselves -- are pretty amazing. I will grant you that. Imagine becoming a billionaire from that, at age 32! That's like accumulating $85,600 a day since the day you were born. Wow, some people are hard workers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Um, WHY would you agree with the underlying right-wing premise, and identify "antifa" with Black Lives Matter? There are myriad reasons to question that identification, and to question the assumption that "antifa" and BLM are always allies. "Antifa" is highly amorphous, and vulnerable to infiltration. See Chris Hedges on that point.
There is no reason to assume BLM would engage in apologetics for the particular acts of vandalism shown in the video presented in The Intercept article. That is assuming what Laura Ingraham always does, with no evidence, of course. (She routinely lies.)
IF you yourself were covering these events, and doing the investigative journalism needed to find out who these groups are, then you could speak authoritatively on it, correct? Too bad TI, with all its resources, did not do that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@philesq9595 "Dore's fans are not ideological, educated, or interested in politics. They are hurting . . . and hurt people hurt people."
Well, thanks for providing actual progressives with an opportunity to practice on you! (Also, that little story about how "once you were a fan of sorts, but then you realized" is a well-known trope, used extensively in infomercials.) The problem with your story is that some of the very best educated and most astute political actors are in favor of ForceTheVote, in many cases, quite frankly, in spite of Dore's communicative style. The list is amazing: Cornel West, Briahna Joy Gray, Katie Halper, Krystal Ball, Kyle Kulinski, Dylan Ratigan, Ben Norton, Max Blumenthal, and, perhaps one of the finest human beings in all of journalism, Aaron Mate. I've course I've missed many. I know I have. But do you realize the intellectual firepower I've just listed? There is no plausible way to make them out to be pathetic.
There isn't all that much plausibility in your innuendo about Jimmy Dore, either, considering who he married. He won life's real prize, the big one. The one that matters. :)
My, my. How could you not see that? But Sam Seder thinks he lacks a swimming pool.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@philesq9595 Um, how shall I put this gently? You are not talking to a monolingual, monocultural American. The way that you are contorting yourself in wild and incessant ad hominem and sheer psychobabble (an attempt, apparently, to . . . get under my skin, or something?) makes me embarrassed for you. You mean you really don't know? This is the best you can do?
Jimmy has all kinds of fans. The people I mentioned all watch him regularly, before inviting him on their shows, or coming on his show, of course. I mean, they are hardly stupid. The only kind of fan he usually seems to lack is . . . someone like you.
When it comes to comments, too, one never knows who is there simply to provoke. Ad hominem and swearing are a tipoff -- though these days, you can't tell just by that. Some are even false flags. I tend to think Sam Seder is too smart to approve your message. I don't understand why anyone would go to the lengths you do, for a politician. There is no one for whom I would write the bizarre, self-referential invective you just wrote.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Before you can get a court to set aside First Amendment freedom of speech, you have to prove it does not apply. Yup. Correct. Before a court orders the sheriff to seize your assets, like your bank accounts, your car, your house and place it on auction, a person has to prove you owe them $50,000,000. Well, in Canada, Trudeau did it to the truckers, and here Biden does it to Russians, but you get the general idea.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fchiarel A brain surgery could easily reach a million dollars, leaving the insured patient with a $60,000 bill. Deductibles, 10% of hospital fees, 10 to 20% of doctors' fees, and so forth, can add up to that. ER may be covered in full, all expenses above a certain limit ($500,000 to $1,000,000, depending) may also be covered in full, but all of that can still leave an insured person, who now cannot work, with a large bill. To get full compensation, he will have to sue.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
What I find interesting is that it was Naomi Wolf who demanded accountability and consequences for bad acts, and somehow she is getting dismissed. When Dr. Peterson points out how important accountability is, and brushes aside excuses, everyone praises him.
Why is that?
Wolf is an immensely accomplished person, who made a fortune with her writing years ago, and even went back to school late in life to complete her doctorate, at OXFORD.
She resisted the COVID hysteria. And her husband is a veteran. Sounds to me like a truly successful life. If someone like that can still feel what it was like to be a vulnerable, idealistic, naive teen at Yale, in awe of all the famous people there who turned out to have feet of clay, then maybe that really is a big deal? It could be, you know.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
In previous generations, this is what the minimum wage could do:
1. A full summer of full-time work at the minimum wage equalled a full year of tuition at a state university. Now, only living expenses were left, and people had ways to meet them (part-time jobs, small loans, help from parents, scholarships, work-study). A hundred bucks a week was usually fine.
2. Two roommates working full-time, minimum wage, could afford a small apartment anywhere -- Manhattan, San Francisco, Denver, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston. Then, they had a base from which to find BETTER OPPORTUNITIES.
3. A married couple working minimum wage could afford their own health insurance and save up for a baby. For real. They did not live in Mom's basement. Nope, Mom was now a doting grandma who babysat for their bundle of joy. People had a future. Life moved forward.
Does any of this sound possible any more? Well, what happened?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
That may be true, and not unusual. But read up on what happened in Kenosha, and on gang infiltration, including KKK infiltration, of police departments.
In any case, defense of property and defense of occupied structures have different rules, as do attempts to intimidate legislators, courts, etc., while in session. It's one thing stand back to refrain from killing a looter, it's another to allow insurrectionists free rein because you agree with them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@katiek.8808 I never said kids should never fail, or never lose. Credit for participation is not an "excuse." Your children may be fine, but not everyone's are -- and by fine I mean not sedentary or obese. Being in front of a screen and shunning all sports is bad for mental health, for that matter. There are noncompetitive sports. You can give everyone acknowledgement for completing a half-marathon, for example, or some other event that takes real work, just like the C student gets the same high school diploma as the valedictorian. Same diploma, different transcript. That's fair.
I was just thinking, I cannot imagine having this conversation in a different language. I've known real hardship. My parents met in a refugee camp, etc. No further comment. There's something bizarre to me about this whole discussion. If you need to invent things for kids to fail at, to teach them what that is, well . . . Good for you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's interesting to me that my parents, as immigrants, had a very bright line of demarcation: a high school student is a pupil, a child. Upon graduation, they are an adult. College students are adults. It was literally a rite of passage in their minds. I thought the American style of bringing up adolescents step by step, and treating them differently at 14, 15, 16, and 17 was so much wiser. I'm getting the sense that this culture has moved to seeing all people under 18 as children, and all sex between adults and adolescent minors as "pedophilia," with all the horror that entails. I don't think that makes sense at 17, or 16. The law is written that way, too, to account for small differences in age (one person 16, the other 19, for example). Teachers have no business approaching students, ever -- nor do professors, no matter the age. Former students who are adults when first approached are a different matter. I know marriages like that. Everyone does. I don't see a problem.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well, you are far from being in charge of your own destiny if this is the fable you spin from Briahna's comments. Someone put you up to that.
It is never ignorant to ask a pointed question. I also wonder why China instituted actual, complete lockdowns, like you see in prisons. Do they know something about the virus that they are not sharing? I mean, apart from its origins, which they probably knew all along. Robbie was the one blathering, rather than acknowledging that China is an authoritarian country, that they have very likely covered up the virus origins, and that COVID's origins may not be all they are covering up.
I love how no one can ask questions. All questions are "questions." All questions have to be probed for their "subtext," so that we can label the speaker and call them out. In the meantime, funny how we missed the fact that we don't know the answer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@beantreats Oh, I see. You might not have had psycholinguistics. A bilingual preschool child is forced to be a good listener, by their environment. It's not a choice. It's a stroke of luck, in a way. If I were up to me to choose, I'm not entirely sure I would -- not before kindergarten, at any rate. I'd go for one language plus music that young.
Yeah, I think having real values, with education of the young being at the top of the list, and standards, like earning your platform rather than having it handed to you based on money, is better. I think pleading for those values is better. But I think in terms of universals, not decadent bourgeois hierarchies and the new pseudo-compassion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@varsityathlete9927 Have it your way. I have some experience in this, more than I would have liked to have had, and I did give a specific example in Malice's case. Did that get censored, or just overlooked by you?
I guess you misunderstood. I wasn't playing victim, I was saying there are people online who are that weird with their celebrity nonsense that a perfectly appropriate observation can set them off.
When a person presents themselves as an podcaster and public figure, and even a public intellectual, they are inviting critique. I have every right to state my impressions. Why was I attacked personally for it? It doesn't make sense.
You want to shut ordinary people up, and give these clowns the podium? Why? If you are an anarchist, isn't that the opposite of what they preach.
I wish this didn't exist. It certainly does. When I first heard about Gloria Steinem's CIA ties, I was incredulous. Well, it was true. I suggest you do some reading and closer observation. You may remember this some day and realize how naive you were. More and more "impossible" things are true every day.
Finks and The Cultural Cold War -- a word to the wise. Then apply what you've read to the best of your discernment.
I'm doing you a favor. You should thank me.
1
-
@kevinschmidt2210 I certainly did give an example. Neither you nor I know what's shadow banned; it's still visible to me.
Why did you assume I'm a man, by the way? Is there anything you guessed right? High school critical thinking -- oh brother. I have a JD, among other things. You need to brush up on your Latin phrases.
When a person presents themselves as an podcaster and public figure, and even a public intellectual, they are inviting critique. I have every right to state my impressions. Why was I attacked personally for it? It doesn't make sense. Why don't you simply disagree and leave it at that?
You want to shut ordinary people up, and give these clowns the podium? Why? If you are an anarchist, isn't that the opposite of what they preach?
Interesting -- Glenn Greenwald got this mobbing for questioning Lex Fridman, although one aspect of his guest's critique of Lex was misplaced, so there is at least something there to push back against. Looks like anyone associated with Joe Rogan is off limits. Maybe you are just very, very naive. That could be it.
Have you ever stood up for a real friend, in real life, or only for Celebrities here? You need a king to feel secure, maybe? This is too fluid for you?
1
-
1
-
@johanstinson I gave a reason as well, concerning his promotion of his latest book, which was utterly phony. Your first full paragraph, on the other hand, has no facts, just your opinion. What reasons for considering him smug, etc., did you just give? Moreover, I invited others to watch him and see for themselves. Of course you're entitled to your opinion, but I see no reasons, or examples of what you found so smug or condescending.
It was only when I said, "this is just my opinion" that the other guy thought he noticed a weakness, and swooped in, calling me the phony. This is usually how interactions in this society play out. This is a move that works. Ask yourself why it worked on you.
1
-
@kevinschmidt2210 Here, let me help you out on the critical think front: the way you argue the point is not to start screaming, "YOU'RE the phony!!!! Mudslinging!!!!!" It is to say something like, "that is a very serious charge that requires very serious/airtight evidence. Even a kid who stole something resents being accused of stealing unless you can prove it -- and rightly so. You have no proof except your impressions. Why should anyone trust that?"
My answer: Fair enough, I don't have proof. But once you've seen this done in many other contexts, you start to see a pattern. Media is in a bad way right now, and heavily infiltrated, so I am going to say something.
The CIA in particular has a long-standing practice to create "alternative" media as a false flag. I think that's too important not to signal.
They always take over whatever media has cultural prominence, and twist it to their purposes. If you don't believe me, look into it for yourself. That is their practice. It's not new.
At least be vigilant. The alphabet agencies have been overreaching everywhere, but especially where podcasts, YT, and stuff like that is concerned, because it exploded in popularity in short time. Things are not what they seem.
See?
You're welcome.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I can tell you why I hated him: he was so utterly lazy and narcissistic, and steeped in getting his way by bullying, that he was incapable of remembering at noon what garbage he tweeted the night before. He overtly supported some of the worst groups in this country. He was a meta-liar: it wasn't just a matter of lying; the Clintons surely do that more than he did. Trump believed he was the sole source of truth. If he says it, it's Truth. If he changes his mind in 48 hours, then that is Truth. When he had the Iranian general assassinated, I had the distinct impression he had no idea who the guy was. When he learned of COVID, he sat on the information, and told Bob Woodward about it, fully expecting it not to matter. The sheer avalanche of falsehoods he uttered was impossible to keep a tally of. Hence he got away with it. This was NEW.
Everyone can name ten Hillary lies, ten Biden lies, ten Bill Clinton lies. Trump altered the landscape. He made that impossible.
As for why liberals hate him, probably something to do with money . . .
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@malachia908 That's not what I'm talking about. Of course most people do not develop a full-blown post-viral syndrome, for any of the diseases I mentioned. But dragging around for months, not yet yourself, and fighting to get your full energy back -- especially if you got sick in the dead of winter -- isn't unheard-of. In fact, it was the usual. More sleep, a better diet, and progressive exercise were recommended, and no drama. Don't tell me it wasn't real.
We are disagreeing about semantics ("long COVID"), and how it should be treated.
Now I'm remembering even more people I knew with pneumonia who experienced this issue. One was initially misdiagnosed, and ultimately had to take off a semester from doctoral studies at U of Chicago. Heavy-duty. She did complete it, of course, but she really had a scare and was tired for a long time. Same thing happened to a woman I knew who was in the army. Please. A severe chest cold with a fever can take two weeks to get back on track.
Maybe people just don't tell you about it? They know what you'll say. 😂
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gunguru7020 All right, but Hunter is an adult. And deeply disordered. I would not expect Biden to kick him out, even over something as immoral and sordid as refusing to pay the child support he owes. I WOULD expect him to prevent Hunter from using the Biden name to enrich himself, in any manner, but especially not by sitting on an energy board in a foreign country with ties to Russia.
You do raise an interesting question, though -- does Biden support Hunter financially, too? Does he give him money, in addition to offering a room, family dinner, and medical care? I'd offer a room in my home, meals, and medical care to nearly any child, if I could. Giving a person like Hunter cash is practically inviting him to overdose.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Not only that, but "hate speech" is not illegal as such. It can be sanctioned only in certain very narrow contexts, and only in civil suits, not criminal: Title VII hostile environment claims, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and the like. Colleges are supposed to use Title VII to inform their own regulations. Nadine Strossen wrote about this extensively.
If you are subjected to hate speech, the position of the government is that you should walk away. If you can't, then you might be able to sue for damages, depending on all the facts and circumstances. If it rises to the level of a true threat against you, then you can call the police.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jaredgreathouse3672 No, no one forced Russia to invade and it was wrong to do it. Certain Ukrainians, under US sponsorship, have been waging war within their borders against the ethnic Russian minority in Ukraine since before the 2014 US-sponsored coup, and were massing troops to attack the Donbass again in 2022, as soon as the spring came. The Russians fell into a trap laid by the US in concert with a neo-Nazi minority in the Ukrainian military, which is small, has a ridiculous amount of power for its size, and which the vast majority of Ukrainians have wanted to rid themselves of for a long time. This explains but in no way excuses the Russians. They did not have to react in this way. It was wrong, and it was stupid as well. The US set the trap, as it had done so many times before, and the Russians rushed right in.
Notice it is also not the first time the US has acted in concert with fascists. Read up on the ratline. Or consider their hopes that Hitler would destroy the USSR, and their view of Hitler as useful. Read up on all the praise Hitler got very, very early on from major Western leaders, including Churchill. This is a long-standing theme in the history of relations between these countries.
(As an aside, none other than D. H. Lawrence said that the US and Russia are the birthplaces of the two great, original literatures of our time. No coincidence about that, either -- at least that's how it seems to me.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@steve1279 Well, we are the only developed country where people are "responsible for themselves" -- and the one with the MOST obesity, opioid addiction, teen pregnancy, cocaine abuse, and . . . COVID. Some of the worst infant mortality, maternal mortality, and shortest lifespans found in developed, "Western" countries. Working out just as "market logic" predicted! /s
If you think "healthy eating" can prevent disease before age 65, wow are you in for a surprise. You don't know any young people with cancer? And you don't know how petrified they are to lose everything? You also don't know most addicts find a way to obtain Medicaid? And that people looking to start a business fear the health care costs, not the other risks?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@steve1279 It's a great idea to teach kids to eat properly. Have you noticed what good, wholesome food costs now? I spend the money, and never go to restaurants. Try avoiding all GMOs. There is no mandatory labeling.
In any event, the POINT is, in countries with universal health care, people take MORE personal responsibility, not less. Why? Well, whatever the reasons may be, the fact of having health care for everyone does not cause them to have poor health habits. They don't say, "well, I don't have to pay for it!" Of course not. The incentive is intrinsic.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sssarzzz I suggest you keep up on the latest news. The US justified its war in Iraq on the basis of WMDs. We still don't know how many civilians were killed. Well, Victoria Nuland just testified on the Ukrainian biolabs -- which, oddly enough, were funded through the US Department of Defense, not the NIH, as one might expect. See Glenn Greenwald's new posted videos.
Now, TeleSUR (Spanish ed) reports China has demanded that the US provide full information and an accounting of all the biological laboratories it funds throughout the world.
The Indian press and even Agence France Press have been raising questions about the DOD funding of biolabs in Ukraine, without pretending we have real answers, and George Galloway was denounced over the weekend for reporting on this. Wish that he were wrong!
But if you dismissed ample evidence of neo-Nazis being given free rein to kill 14,000 in the Donbass region since 2014, you may close your eyes to this as well. It will be harder, however. It's getting harder all the time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sarahg2653 Basically, it's not the doctor I'm worried about. It is these patients, who are relatively rare -- relatively -- and that makes their suffering all the greater. Who gets pregnant at 10, or 12, or 13? Have you ever met anyone? Who has a hopelessly deformed fetus, so severe that they cannot give birth to it normally, and the doctors may even be traumatized by the experience of delivering it? Very, very rare. Imagine what it's like to have to leave your home and your state to find care, and to wonder how you will pay.
We are risking traumatizing people to the point where they won't be able to work, or succeed in school, or to take care of existing children, or function normally in the aftermath. I can't imagine it. Taking care of these people does not require no restrictions. There were restrictions under Roe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Cornel West, Justin Jackson, Briahna, Krystal, Katie Halper, Max Blumenthal, Aaron, Ben Norton, Susan Sarandon, etc., I've left lots out. I guess all of them are impure. Or stupid. Or duped by a crypto-right wing comedian broadcasting out of his garage. How could that happen?
Oh. Maybe the pandemic is real, and so are the millions losing health care in the pandemic. Could be.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@tisbonus What do you think is the issue in a defamation case? It is whether that op-ed, which Depp attached to his complaint, is false. Not incomplete, not biased, not misleading: literally false. I won't answer again. Look up Nolo, look up the Cornell Law School website, read the actual complaint and answer. Look up the "New York Times malice" standard (which makes it really hard for Depp to win -- if they apply it -- and even I have misgivings about applying it in this case).
Or don't. I still cannot get it through my head the degree of ignorance and lack of basic, independent thinking I see. What do you get out of joining the crowd? What do you think this show with two disordered millionaires is doing for you? I can tell you: nothing good. The media has you on a string.
I don't even want to know what you think this case is about, or why you think the tapes don't show mutual abuse -- in which case the article is not false under the law of defamation. It is free speech. If Heard is found liable, it will be reversed on appeal.
As for calling me a troll twice: nope, you are intrigued. I think you might want to know whether the MSM is misleading us -- AGAIN. Take a wild guess.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vegahimsa3057 You know perfectly well that in an Anglo-Saxon country, I dare not say how little I made, because I would discredit myself totally. People are judged by that number. I'm not telling you anything you did not already know.
My parents were refugees, FYI, and there's more to the story. I have a clue.
But putting all that aside, how many Americans do you think make close to $7500 a month, hence $90,000 a year? On the two coasts they do, and in a handful of major cities -- but in those places, real estate eats a third of it. This is an immense amount of money. Only about 10% of salaries are this high or higher, though of course a substantial number of households make more, because that includes more sources of income.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DC-rd6oq Then I have no idea what you mean by saying you"did it alone." If someone, somewhere gave you a job, you didn't invent the job. You didn't bring yourself up from infancy and childhood. You didn't train yourself to do anything you do.
This whole discussion is on the level of some sort of ridiculous sentimentality and magic words, Halmark card "wisdom," and has nothing to do with concrete socioeconomic facts. We are ALL more dependent on society than we ever were, and more vulnerable to what someone half a world away might do, for meeting our most basic necessities. (I don't think that's so great, either, by the way. But I won't delve into magical thinking to hide from it.) If the dollar loses global reserve currency status, then what 9/11, the banking crisis, and the pandemic did not show you, you will be forced to confront.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DC-rd6oq Sorry if you can't handle the truth. I wasn't personalizing this. I'm a lawyer, and I surely did not do that alone. It is my duty, among other things, to know what actually happens in the real world.
As for the larger issues, they are simply facts. We are vulnerable in a way that people who could go to the big city, find a modest but safe room, look for a job, and if they didn't find one, return to the family farm and help bring in the harvest never were. The financialization of the economy, which is relatively new, is what has made us exceptionally vulnerable, and has distorted the principle of reward for productive labor, as opposed to reward for stock manipulation. You missed that, too?
(You were using slogans Limbaugh used to use. You didn't know?)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CroisMoi In ordinary, non-medical, colloquial speech, "cancer" has two meanings. The first is basically the same as the medical/scientific meaning: cancerous cells were discovered under the microscope. The second is that there was an initial tumor and it spread to some extent. Cancer cells from it metastasized.
You might know you had the first, but there is, still, no evidence of the second. A lot of ordinary speech assumes cancer means the second, and without the second, that you don't "really" have cancer. Er, yes, you do. The first alone is still cancer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jaymevogl4338 None of this comes as a surprise to me. I support vaccines that have been carefully tested, and are given with the appropriate spacing. "Vaccinated" versus "unvaccinated" children isn't the correct comparison; it depends on which vaccines, when. That none may be better than lots and lots, into tiny bodies during their first months of life, should surprise no one. Thanks for your post.
BTW, have you seen the Yale News article about vaccines from February 2017, I believe? Dr. John Rose, who has worked on the Ebola vaccine, stated that it takes 15 to 20 years to develop a vaccine -- nearly a generation sounds about right to me. These days, you must read things that were published before 2020, and preferably before 2019, to get any idea of what real standards are. :/
1
-
@jaymevogl4338 At this point, I would only look to what the ministries of health of Scandinavian countries, Switzerland, and a few others, are recommending to make any decision about vaccines for my child. One pediatric vaccine researcher from Denmark, I believe, demonstrated a long time ago that a measles vaccine, administered properly (not too early or late, correct form and dose), lowers the overall childhood mortality rate from many infectious diseases, and that there are certain other vaccines that don't do that. (Hint hint) :/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Of course! The merits of Clinton, Trump, Biden, Epstein, Gates, Bezos, Musk, Pelosi, Ackman, Diamond, Fauci, Collins, and on and on and on are patent. 😂😂😂
Even this couple did very little research or writing post-doctorate. I don't understand why, they could have.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jessd4048 How many times a year do we take polio vaccines? How common are breakthrough infections? I didn't know those vaccines could cause myocarditis, menstral issues, alopecia, and false positive mammograms. Never heard about it. Hm.
Of course, there were some contaminated polio vaccines, with a potentially dangerous simian virus, and a whole generation was closely watched for years, for signs of excess cancer. It appears nearly everyone's body simply cleared the simian virus. This hasn't been an issue in a very long time. There have been recent issues with the vaccines used in Africa causing injuries, but I don't see why that should matter, to us. /s
Anyway, as we all know, medicine is one size fits all. Your body, my choice. Or maybe Biden's choice.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@erikaoliver2591 This is the misunderstanding. If they were both abusive, her article is true, hence protected speech.
Consider this: a man abuses his wife, and goes to prison for it. He writes a memoir, telling the history of their relationship, and all about the abuse he suffered at her hands, both physical and psychological, including some strange things she did to goad him. He tells the truth -- the facts are all accurate, and his opinions are his own. Free speech? YES, it IS.
I was also opposed to suspending the Fifth Amendment to make Brian Laundrie's parents talk, "just this once . . . for Gabby."
Depp decided to sue to be able to say these things about Heard without being vulnerable to suit himself. His testimony is immune from suit. Neat trick.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
She has a poor record for veracity, as it turns out.
So, an immigrant comes to the US, is fortunate enough to be accepted to one of the finest private Ivy-League universities in the nation, which has been here since the time of Washington and Jefferson, she has nothing good to say about it, nothing nuanced, claims that she was as oppressed as in North Korea(!), and you praise her because the media made you think she's "on your side?" She's on the side of making bank.
If she was so oppressed, would she have spent four years there? Why not transfer? More oppression Olympics.
Don't kick George Santos out of Congress. What would be the point?
Columbia exists since the 18th century, and she just got here. Where is your pride?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@foop145 How do I feel? If it's about feelings, I feel it is wrong for me to continue to live in this empire, and that I need to take steps to emigrate.
Every point in your little litany has an asterisk. And the promise of $2000, quickly, was repeatedly made by Biden himself, as well as other Dems on the campaign trail and it was not true. Ha! Where's the $1400? And what happens when all the BACK RENT and property taxes come due? This is pathetic.
Nominating Neera Tanden, for ANYTHING, much less OMB, shows a lack of commitment to Social Security and Medicare, by a candidate (i.e., Biden) who has repeatedly said they should go on the chopping block. Sorry if you don't get the message yet.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Until yesterday, we knew that many, many healthy people who have never touched a hormone may have fertility issues, and that fertility can be problematic for many perfectly healthy people. Until yesterday, we knew that hormone replacement therapy in adult women can cause cancer, cardiovascular disease, stroke, and cognitive issues.
Suddenly, transitioned kids will have no problem being birth parents, and no problem taking hormones. Sure, buddy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is an admirable video. What bothers ME is that we cannot have a discussion of this. Just how much state control over medical decisions do people want, even for minors? Simply asking the question raises howls of "Groomer," etc. Come on. (Of course the other side attacks me for being a transphobe because I am not on board with what they propose.)
I think that instituting a new criminal law is a last resort. And the point about tolerance for an adult (age 18?) who "chooses" to do this sounds broad minded and magnanimous, but wait a second -- if this surgery is akin to a lobotomy, then no one should have it, adult or not. We need to talk this out. If various medical boards can come to an agreement that everyone can live with, then we do not need a new criminal law and we do not need more people in prison. But people like Matt Walsh aren't willing to allow discussion. Do you see how he labeled Iversen? He did attempt to cancel her. I don't believe he cares about kids.
The Hill Rising just did a segment on social workers in Texas who are quitting because they do not want to be required to police and report parents for how they choose to treat a gender confused child. Now the workforce needed to prevent child abuse and neglect that can result in death has been reduced, because of this "cultural" issue. This is nonsense. I may not agree with Kim on this, but her approach, and her right to raise the issue, is something I support completely.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@denysecoop7356 But they are not the president, nor are they running for office.
Every person I know who voted for Trump did so as a protest vote against Hillary, and was soon sorry they did. Well, I do not know many Trump voters. Every last one I do know is cool, and I can understand why they did what they did. Not all are white, by the way.
I voted protest this past election: in person, on election day, for LaRiva to protest Leonard Peltier's continued incarceration. I wasn't absolutely sure I did the right thing, until I heard from Peltier's current lawyer, who is a Navy veteran. He is a peach, a real hero. Slightly more than half of his clients are Republicans pressing First Amendment issues, speech or religion. The biography of both men is inspiring.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kitcat901 777.03 Accessory after the fact.—
(1)(a) Any person **not** standing in the relation of husband or wife, parent or grandparent, child or grandchild, brother or sister, by consanguinity or affinity to the offender, who maintains or assists the principal or an accessory before the fact, or gives the offender any other aid, knowing that the offender had committed a crime and such crime was a third degree felony, or had been an accessory thereto before the fact, with the intent that the offender avoids or escapes detection, arrest, trial, or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
DUH
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@CwyTy EVERY normal person can tell the difference between a dream, a fantasy, and a memory, and does not think of them or organize them in the same way at all. This is just another glib "The Secret" pitch, which is not a truth about the world but a well-known sales technique, combined with the denial of the reality (and, in some cases, intractability) of real mental illnesses, which are not mere moods.
Small example: I was SURE 2020 would be my best year in a decade. I pictured it, and then December 2019 was wonderful, a harbinger -- I thought. This is trivial compared with other tragedies suffered by my family. Good to know, also, that PTSD in our service members is a "state of mind," particularly those who saw their very best comrades die in front of them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@unknownknowable Good points across the board. All of these presentations are not alike, obviously.
As far as what is taught in school: lots of kids are in one-parent families, blended families, have unmarried parents, or are being raised by same-sex married couples, or even a drag queen father. Before high school, the emphasis should be on bullying prevention. Everyone's family is a nice family, everyone is welcome in school regardless of who their parents are. That's what you tell first graders. Later, you say more. (It's called puberty, and needs to be respected.)
The mayor where I live is in a same-sex interracial marriage and they have a young daughter. Richard Nixon's stunning granddaughter, who is big in regional theatre, was married to a man, got divorced, and many years later married a woman. They are raising a daughter, too. No one should ever say a peep to these kids. Young kids have vulnerable moments and should never be teased about their family.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If that were true, it greatly exceeds the previous vaccine safety signal threshold of 1 significant, serious event per 100,000 inoculations. Vaccines exceeding that threshold are closely scrutinized and often withdrawn. This comes to 200 events per 100,000 doses, according to you. I've never heard such a high rate acknowledged before. Something on the order of 80 per 100,000 is the number I've seen for Pfizer, from reliable sources. (I think something on the order of 70 to 120 per 100,000 is more likely generally, depending on which vaccine.)
Say, have you heard? Paxlovid is pretty near worthless.
1
-
1
-
@deadgolfer6345 Whether he had drugs in his system was determined after the fact, and is thus irrelevant to probable cause. I guess we are so used to living as though we were not a free people that we don't seem to remember that absent probable cause, you do NOT have to deal with the police at all. Did he get into a car accident? Apparently he did. Does he have an obligation to report it, if he hopes to keep a driver's license? Absolutely -- and I am for lifting the licenses of a lot more people than get them lifted -- for impaired driving, for not reporting accidents promptly, and pretty much all other significant infractions. And guess what? THAT is the penalty.
There is something called a Terry stop -- which is a very brief encounter based on reasonable suspicion, and does not involve taking you physically into custody. It just means talking to you. Of course police can talk to you. BUT you cannot be arrested without probable cause, prior to the arrest, and not based on stuff that happened afterwards. If that does not "sound right," you need to ask yourself why. You are used to not being free, perhaps? Thanks bin Laden, thanks COVID. Isn't this just swell?
1
-
@jackgranger6539 False, and I have absolutely no idea what you might be referring to, if anything. But more to the point, why are you following me, and purporting to assert to have determined that I, and not you, are lying? I don't know you. I do, however, know the law on probable cause and Terry stops. I am guessing that you are not well versed in that area. I don't know of course. As I said, I don't know you. |Perhaps you edited law review at Yale.
I am blocking you now, which I think I would have done before if what you claim were true, and if you persist in this manner, defaming me even under a pseudonym (which actually has a basis), I will report you. See how that goes. It's not my problem anymore. (Whether it turns out to be yours is also not my concern either way.)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@logicalblackman8228 I don't defend Yoshi. Consider, however, the time line. The point is, there was no need for Rodney to put himself in a position where he could need to use deadly force, when avoiding it was easily accomplished. All he had to do was stay in the house, call 911, and have his firearm ready in case of physical breach of his dwelling. These are WELL KNOWN RULES of self-defense. If YOU voluntarily put yourself in a position where you may be more likely to need to use lethal force, then YOU could be civilly and/or criminally liable. In this case, Rodney was found liable in tort and lost his house. Your justification of Rodney is misleading, because he did end up being liable. Many self-defense laws create a defense against a civil judgment as well. Not what happened here. So, it's not just a matter of ethics.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jimmy911ism I thought he settled. That was the premise. I don't know if it is the case; we presumed it was, for the sake of argument. I agree with your point, you're absolutely right. However, in this case the bare facts are not in dispute. If there were no way to find him liable as a matter of law, the case could not go to a jury. It would be dismissed. So, no trial, no settlement. There has to be a reasonable way to argue that he did wrong as a matter of law -- gross negligence, recklessness, something. Some breach of a legal duty, not just moral. Otherwise there's no case. There's nothing to try.
Here's a contrast: suppose I wake up to find that a stranger broke into my house and is assaulting me. I reach under the bed, grab my gun, and shoot him. He recovers and is now in a wheelchair. If he sues me, the case will be dismissed with prejudice -- and he may have to pay my lawyer. That's because as a matter of law, I did absolutely nothing wrong. The state can prosecute him, and I can sue him, and both are viable lawsuits. His suit against me isn't. There's no legal ground for it at all. No jury gets to hear it.
This is true even if he were drunk and honestly thought we were married.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
DmY808 When you make it so personal, then it is. For YOU.
Political economy is not about personal covetousness, envy, optimism, pessimism, or family tragedy and triumph . . . It's about historical and contemporary economic analysis. It's about understanding what has worked better for earlier generations and in other places. IOW, it's not about you. It's first of all about millions of young people ages 17 to 29 who could become a LOST generation. Most of them may never have the chance you had, no matter what they do. They already have debts, they don't find permanent jobs with a future, marry, start families, or leave home, especially while ACA still lets them stay on their parents' insurance. And for what? For whose benefit? How is all this good?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@cedricrust9953 You are unfamiliar with Stonor Saunders and The Church Commission, or the book "Finks," I'm guessing? Wild guess.
People who have documented FBI, CIA, MI6, etc., infiltration have had a huge uphill battle, because the truth is hidden, and hidden by layers of legal protection. So, all of these reports have been amply supported. They are the opposite of conspiracy theories. They are better established than the results of most investigative journalism, because they have to be.
But if you don't know, "it can't be true."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bret Weinstein would be brilliant on a camping trip during a moonless night when everyone is huddled around a camp fire. I love a sophisticated ghost story. I bet this gig is much more lucrative, not to mention more fun, than teaching biology. He has got the right voice down, too. Great delivery.
Except for one "small" problem: this "Maoist" rhetoric, and "collision course with history," "civil war," etc., is superficially cute and engaging, perfect for the camp fire, but what we could see is another Kent State, only this time with more dead, long before we have anything like the Cultural Revolution. People who take Weinstein's rhetoric seriously will applaud it, and Weinstein's bank account will not be hurting. That's the pattern I see.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sadiyasaleh233 When you go on the attack like that, you could convince people not to call for help, do you realize that? In a lot of countries, failing to help when you can is called "nonassistance a personne en danger," and is a crime. In America, no one has a duty to report someone else's accident if they had no part in it, even if they are safe and able to call. If I were immature, an interaction like this could convince me to just mind my own business, which is my right to do, and never call to help anyone again. You should apologize for assuming my view is baseless, and for attacking me personally. Whole societies make it their law that there are times when you have to call. I never blamed the victim here, I made that crystal clear. I agreed the OP is basically right.
Think about the world you want to live in. Someone called to help you. You attack someone who supports that.
1
-
@sadiyasaleh233 I didn't judge her, much less "crucify" her. I never asked that anyone do what they cannot.
I don't care about the consensus. The "consensus" was, briefly, that anyone who was unvaccinated should be deprived of a hospital bed. Not to mention that if you are homeless it "must be" your own fault. That's an ongoing "consensus." So much for consensus. And frankly, I don't even see the "consensus" you see -- though I'd rather see posts like OP, which I basically agreed with from the start, than people blindly criticizing her. Which is why I did not do so, either.
Suddenly, you're semi-reasonable, BUT you are still casting aspersions at ME and claiming I said something I did not say, or even think, much less speak. You are still putting words in my mouth. Shame on you.
I am less likely to call for help today than I was a week ago, although I still have my ethics, and courage, which I have for my own sense of self, and not so much based on normal, human compassion. We have a completely dysfunctional society now. Consider what you want to contribute to, and how you want to live.
Blocked.
1
-
@sadiyasaleh233 My gawd, your post prior to your last post is a string of lies. You don't even realize it?
If a person is indeed in shock, are they in a "normal" state? No. They are not. Is it always a person's fault that they are not in a normal state, capable of doing normal things? NO. Who said it was?
Who today does not know about how long shock can last, how common incipient PTSD is, how "fight, flight, freeze" is a state a person cannot will themselves out of? Who suggested these things are not real?
That's not what the discussion here is about. The discussion, or at least the legitimate one, simply notes that we don't know whether this is what happened to her. We only assume it is possible.
Just how much baggage are you placing on the word "normal?" And why?
Good thing someone did the normal thing for you, when you needed the normal thing to be done.
1
-
1
-
@sadiyasaleh233 Ha. I forgot to block you. You just demonstrated that I did not blame her in the least. I continued to reiterate at every point that I did not blame her. And if she was severely traumatized, she was not in a normal state, and she may not have been able to do normal things. You can respond to any comment as you see fit, including a comment that was never made and was expressly excluded. If you want to go around misrepresenting what has been said, that is your issue.
A lot of countries have laws that impose a general duty to call for help, IF a person is able to do that, and to do it safely. If they can't, no one makes them. Such laws are, ahem, normal in most of the world. (In the US, we rely on moral persuasion, assuming that still exists.)
I am trying to call you to your senses to tell you that you are normalizing conduct that could come back to hurt you. If you don't care, that's up to you. I certainly don't take it personally. It's not my problem. (Nice little DARVO move, after pointlessly personalizing a theoretical discussion -- is that all ya got?) This time, blocked for real.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stevestevens8749 Well DUH. If two parents divorce and cannot come to an agreement concerning the medical care of their minor child, how do you think a decision will be reached? Either one may file suit, if they so desire. It is their constitutional right.
Granted, it is mostly multimillionaires and billionaires -- and corporate entities -- who avail themselves of the court system, in contract disputes, securities disputes, antitrust, etc., but little people have a right to go to court, too, at least in principle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Don't be so sure everything she says is true. Verify some of it, especially prescribed speech to psychotherapists in the US, where it raises First Amendment issues, all sorts of prescriptions for minors without parental consent, name change by public schools without parental notification, etc. Also, what may have happened in rare instances may not be what generally happens anywhere. I'm not saying it's false, I'm saying if you have kids, do the research.
That said, to me, the idea of depriving a teenager of the opportunity to have children someday sounds criminal, and cultish. The teen cannot know what that will mean to them. It seems like they are eager to risk the fertility of anxious, awkward, nonconforming girls. Sinister.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Polit_Burro Yeah, I'm particularly censored when I point out that we run deficits, then pay interest to the rich. They don't pay; we pay them. We enrich them, then pay them some more.
You would think the average person would have figured that out by now. Didn't the Epstein saga get them to start thinking that maybe the rich aren't so great after all? If the BP catastrophe, HSBC, Enron, the implosion of the financial system in 2008-2009, and social media turned into mass surveillance for corporations and the state, etc., etc., didn't do it already. What will it take? What still has to happen?
Reminds me of the Cavafy poem, "Waiting For the Barbarians."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I would love to have had the opportunity. The early 80s in France with PCF in the government were the best years I've ever seen.
As someone who loves literature, piano, ballet, and mathematics, and hates racism, fast food, drug abuse, school shootings, and video games, and is mostly indifferent to creature comforts, it's not evident to me where I would have had it better. Especially now that our single greatest achievement, the First Amendment, has been eviscerated.
The US dropped two atom bombs. Arkhipov and Petrov, in two separate incidents, stopped a nuclear exchange. Yeah, I'd like to have known more for real. Not evident to me.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@justanoman6497 You know what? I'm going to repeat what I said, which you "responded" to: "I don't agree that it indicates dishonesty or resume inflation. You should do whatever you can, prudently, to get to the interview. You are not inconveniencing people, but trying to get past a robot. If you are not absolutely sure that you deserve an interview, with a person, don't apply at all. If you are sure, then go for it -- do whatever is effective to get the interview.
Don't you say what you need to say to get past the robot and to the human when calling customer service? How is this different? Being insistent about talking to a human is a good sign."
You tried the guilt trip/narcissist routine because I made an excellent point and you didn't like that -- shows how YOU treat merit, in the wild, so to speak. I would not want to work for you. You have a puritanically punitive mind. The worst! I hope the job applicants see through YOU and move on. Next time you experience quiet quitting (a no call, no show), remember this exchange.
1
-
@justanoman6497 If you yourself have no need of a job, I don't know why you apply for the kinds of jobs where a bot screens your resume. Don't you write to those whose work you admire, and very politely ask for an informational interview? That's what classy people do -- you know, the group you claim to be a part of.
I suggested nothing unfair, not even marginally so, and I think you are an equivocating little ** who has the delusion that you are morally superior to others, and I don't doubt for a minute that it is pure pose. (I knew that before you claimed you have the wherewithal not to need a job.) I have not only not victimized anyone, but I happened to be a civil rights lawyer, with experience in employment law, who has prevented immense injustice from getting the upper hand. I also know that every time I've fallen for the Moral Pose, I have ended up being treated extremely unfairly -- and that brought harm not just to me, but to others I care about, including my family. The Moral Pose is just a one-up-and-over strategy; it's not your principle (spelled -ple; "principal" means something else), it's your brand.
Funny, just today I reread James Baldwin's famous essay, Nothing Personal. The irony is no doubt lost . . .
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
zaxx19 Why do you think I disagree?
As for whether a person needs a four-year degree for a white-collar, service sector, office job, let me ask you this: who gets those jobs? Do they need the university training to do the job, or do they need the piece of paper to make it through HR screening and be hired for the job?
Notice I'm not mentioning real qualifications, job duties, fairness, etc. I'm saying employers have given up on high school grads. No, it isn't fair.
I also stand by the notion of opportunity. Only an adult can decide they do not want to pursue a college degree. A minor can't make that decision. At 16, the average person has over FIVE decades of worklife ahead of them, and probably jobs in two distinct fields. Who can tell them what to do? Fifty years is a long time.
1
-
zaxx19 What do you think college kids major in, anyway? The most common major BY FAR is Business, and has been for decades. The next group of majors are all health-related, with Nursing at the top. Very few people major in the traditional "liberal arts" -- and those who do, and do well, go to good law schools or MBA programs, or the advertising world, or story editing in film and television, etc. "Useless degrees?" That's a right-wing talking point. General Business, without a lot of advanced math to understand finance in depth or at least a decent amount of accounting, preferably CPA level, is often pretty useless. A lot of those people don't want to read and can't write. If they also can't do math, . . . ?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Junebug89 You don't see how in the context of freedom of speech and expression, this could be turned against you? We now have proof that during the pandemic, people who spread propaganda and supported coercive tactics had a platform at Twitter, and those who presented actual facts were censored. Case in point: One person wrote a vague and impassioned claim that "children are dying of COVID!!" Look, a child can die of a common cold, so that is of course technically true. In response, someone posted ACTUAL CDC data, with a link, showing how unlikely it is for a child to die. (Some people pointed out that flu is more dangerous to children, which was not a great comparison, since flu is quite dangerous to children, and being just a little less so is no great shakes.) Guess who got censored and sanctioned?
I have no problem with inviting employees to have input on the rules that apply to all speech. They are the ones who have to enforce them, and they have the experience that comes with doing the actual work, so they should have more say than the managers as far as I'm concerned. That's not the same as giving them license to create prior restraints to speech based on the cause du jour that they just got all excited about with their friends -- or that the DNC or the FBI told them to censor.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
When I was in high-school and college, with people in their late teens and twenties, a serious viral illness -- mononucleosis, food-borne hepatitis, pneumonia, meningitis -- took from 6 months to a full year for the patient to be back to 100% normal, as though they had never been sick. These were people in their prime, not middle-aged people with chronic conditions. Why would COVID be any different?
This is all very common, and very well-known. When I was a kid, my father called it "post-influenza weakness" and told me to exercise or walk a little bit more each day. He was right.
Obviously, in this case, we have the jabs as well. That's a confounding variable!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jackgranger6539 They are not representing anyone. Lawyers can be activists, and are allowed to comment on what they think a case will mean for future cases, or what they think the law should be. If you think this segment should have analyzed this case, and stayed there, you have a right to your opinion. I think juveniles should not be charged as adults, and said so from the very first, last summer. A lot of people were surprised, and admitted, finally, that kids shouldn't be charged this way -- if not never, then really, really rarely. I would have never brought this case. That is an activist position. I'm an activist, then. (So?)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnmartin4641 A LOT of people have the credentials for the C-suite; that's how business is organized. If a CEO, CFO, etc., etc., were to leave tomorrow, the business moves on. A lot of qualified people also know what social media is, and have good judgment. This is the kind of guy who would not know he was exercising terrible judgment IF he were getting praise, likes, etc. These people present a risk. If you are telling me that everyone is like that now, and you can't easily replace him, then I agree. You're right.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hrs2044 In short, the "questions" were framed in the style of discovery, as it exists in court. They asked for documentation or other material to support every answer. You think these are ordinary questions, for purposes of discussion?
"1. What moral or ethical principles (including those related to journalistic integrity,
violence, medical information, and public health) do you apply in deciding which
channels to carry or when to take adverse actions against a channel?
2. Do you require, through contracts or otherwise, that the channels you carry abide by any content guidelines? If so, please provide a copy of the guidelines.
3. How many of your subscribers tuned in to Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN on U-verse,
DirecTV, and AT&T TV for each of the four weeks preceding the November 3, 2020
elections and the January 6, 2021 attacks on the Capitol? Please specify the number of subscribers that tuned in to each channel.
4. What steps did you take prior to, on, and following the November 3, 2020 elections and the January 6, 2021 attacks to monitor, respond to, and reduce the spread of
disinformation, including encouragement or incitement of violence by channels your
company disseminates to millions of Americans? Please describe each step that you took and when it was taken.
5. Have you taken any adverse actions against a channel, including Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN, for using your platform to disseminate disinformation related directly or
indirectly to the November 3, 2020 elections, the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection, or
COVID-19 misinformation? *If yes, please describe each action, when it was taken, and
the parties involved.*
6. Have you ever taken any actions against a channel for using your platform to disseminate any disinformation? If yes, please describe each action and when it was taken.
7. Are you planning to continue carrying Fox News, Newsmax, and OANN on U-verse,
DirecTV, and AT&T TV both now and beyond any contract renewal date? If so, why?"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I don't see why that would be the case, unless there is some inherent "aim" of the universe to produce what it did, in fact, produce. But then "probability" is simply the name for our ignorance. The probability that you would exist is, to God's mind, exactly 1, and was 1 all along, because that is what happened. This is not impossible, of course, but notice why it's unscientific: you are assuming what you are trying to prove (namely, Intelligent Design). Intelligent Design puts a scientific gloss on something that is purely a matter of faith.
I don't think you can calculate probabilities for all that is theoretically observable in the universe, taken as a whole, because you are placing the initial state outside the realm of the universe, and who knows what principles of causality exist there? We only understand causality from inside the universe, by observing it. So, it makes sense to take some time t-zero, defined as a moment close to but before the time you were conceived, consider that the initial state, and talk about the probability that you would emerge as you -- and even then, you cannot possibly account for all the matter that could have had some effect on your being conceived. But it makes no sense to define that t-zero as being near the beginning of the universe and then talk about the probabilities that the universe would be as we find it today, and include you sitting before your computer at this moment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lucibeach2697 Not FDA approval under age 16. Emergency Use Authorization, which requires signing pages of consent forms and acknowledging that you have read and understood the current fact sheet. Then the forms state that after you have read everything, you still have the option to decline the vaccine and your health care will be unaffected. Also, EUA means no access to meaningful compensation for most people in case of injury; in particular, no access to the 1986 fund set up for that purpose.
My mother was studying medicine, with an interest in vaccines, when the Nazis bombed the city she was in and everything had to close. I have a doctoral level degree.
You can imagine that I abhor fearmongering, and politicizing health care decisions. Yes, without all that, things would have gone more smoothly, I agree.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@davidforbes2557 I have watched Dr. Campbell, as well as Dr. Moran. But I prefer actual peer-reviewed journals (BMJ, NEJM, Lancet, etc.), and ministries of health in other countries like Norway, Sweden, Switzerland. You should try it.
I, like the PCF, oppose vaccine mandates. I don't suppose you could follow PCF videos, or La France Insoumise. They are not in English.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jasonrudisill299 Nah, it's not that simple -- or maybe it's simpler. Pretty much everybody is taught to undermine everybody else, and turn every encounter into a jockeying for position in a hierarchy. This is the complete obsession with competition that you rarely escape in America. This wears people down. Mix in drugs, other substances, poor sleep, bad diet, bad family relationships, intense new media usage, and of course lots of firearms -- and most people are nuts. Well, hypersensitive anyway. It's normal given the context. If you ever lived in another culture, you's be struck by how much calmer people are, and how what someone says to you or about you just doesn't matter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@BertoxolusThePuzzled Microeconomics over the short term is often a simple summation of zero-sum games -- and, as my late mom used to say, "alas, we must eat every day."
So, for example, a health insurer may eventually approve an expensive treatment, but the approval may come too late. People in the next generation may have no problem with access to that treatment, but the person whose request was not approved when he needed it will be long gone.
Another example: you graduate into a recession and remain unemployed for nine months. When business improves, a new graduate whose credentials are no better than yours will fill the next opening in your field, and you could end up in a job you never wanted, and paid less than you need to live on your own. "Oh well."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1