Comments by "JLH" (@Kyarrix) on "ENDEVR" channel.

  1. 351
  2.  @BendItMakeItClap69  Are you aware that in the US healthcare and dental care are not available for many? Do you understand that people lose their homes because they get sick even when they've done nothing wrong and taken precautions? Did you know that this issue is treated differently in most other countries? My profession has required that I learn a lot about this topic. Rather than respond in the style of your first comment, take a moment and read what I've written and think about it. I've written a lot and spent time on this because it's important. You felt that the person you were responding to is giving people an excuse, that people lack self-awareness and responsibility but this goes far beyond responsibility and involves much greater issues. A person can be the epitome of responsibility and still find themselves in a terrible situation. Your spouse gets cancer, you need an emergency appendectomy, your child has an abscess in their mouth or breaks their leg. What happens in those situations? If you don't have health insurance, you go into debt and can lose your home. There are diabetics in this country who routinely have to choose between medication and paying other bills, medication they need to live or food. The medication they need is a fraction of the price in Canada. It's so much more expensive here because the pharmaceutical industry, corporations in general, have tremendous influence and power relative to other countries. We don't regulate, ostensibly because of our belief in free markets and we allow profit to come before the needs of our citizens. In the US there is a belief that free markets are the way to prosperity for everyone. Free markets can work when everyone brings something to the table, where we need each other. One person sells an item, the other person buys it. One person sells a service, another buys it and the person selling the service then goes and purchases goods. But there is a point where wealth and influence tip too far in one direction, where one side has so much power that the other loses the ability to bargain and negotiate fairly. For example, if there are 20 businesses in your town, you can negotiate a wage. The businesses need employees and you can, in theory, find a job that benefits both you and your employer. The system works best when both sides understand that they are both necessary. When an employee brings experience and the willingness to work hard, the employer understands that their business is making money because of the work of the employees. It should be synergy, both should negotiate in good faith and benefit. What happens though when there is only one employer? The potential workers lose their ability to negotiate. That employer has a monopoly on employment and you either take what they offer or starve. If one company has a monopoly on manufacturing insulin they can charge as much as they want for it and you have to pay it or die. The only other option is for the government to step in and regulate. But if that company donates a lot of money to your party, if your uncle is on the board, if these are the people you know and socialize with, if the highly paid lobbyists do their jobs, if gerrymandering has resulted in the party representing the minority controlling government and many other factors, you could end up with a situation where that regulation doesn't happen. You could end up with a situation where people routinely have to create GoFundMe to pay medical bills, where friends traveling to Canada are asked to bring back months of prescription medications because they cost a fraction of what they would here. We are the only developed nation that does not provide a basic level of healthcare. We are the only developed nation that allows necessities such as insulin to be priced so high that people can't afford it. All other developed nations and some that are considered still developing do better. The US spends 17% of GDP on healthcare but ranks dead last among the 11th wealthiest countries in outcome. That is a stunning piece of information. It is a problem that we have to fix. Do you understand where this is going? We spend twice as much but our healthcare is the worst. The biggest reason is because the money we spend does not actually go for healthcare, it goes to insurance companies and the for-profit bureaucracy and machinery of healthcare in this country. Everywhere else, and I've lived in other places, healthcare is not a for-profit industry. It's understood that healthcare is a necessity just like infrastructure and that money spent on healthcare should actually be used for that purpose rather than more than half of it going to health insurance companies and corporate salaries. You're familiar with the term infrastructure; roads, bridges, airports, power plants, our taxes are used to pay for infrastructure and for things like school, firefighters and police, the postal service. These are all essential services and we pay for them together because we use them. Similarly, in most other countries it's understood that a basic level of healthcare and dental care is essential. Workers in the US have minimal bargaining rights. Compared to the 60s and 70s, the wealth inequality gap has increased tremendously. Where before a CEO might make 10x the salary of an employee, they now make much, much more. In the '60s and '70s you could work in a factory and support a family at a good standard of living. Now it takes two working and most middle class families still struggle. Here's another piece of information, more than 50% of families in this country cannot handle a $400 emergency. What has changed? Has everyone suddenly become less responsible? When you consider the economic changes that have created this situation, these changes were never in the power of those affected. Every year wealth in the US is concentrated in fewer hands. We have now reached a point where less than 1% of the population have more of the available wealth and assets than the bottom two thirds. This was never the case before, there were those who were richer and those who had less, but this much of a chasm, is unsustainable. In order for a society to work, those who do the work have to be able to live a decent life. They used to be able to and now they are not. There are many more factors and I've written a lot already but this should give you a place to start. You watched this video, that suggests that you are interested in the topic. I spent 20 minutes of my evening writing this for your benefit in the hopes that you will use it as a jumping off place to learn more.
    40
  3. 6
  4. 3
  5.  @mattschrader5047  The last sentence gave away your influence. Jordan Peterson is not someone to take life advice from. Some of the things he has written are helpful for the group that would best benefit from that life advice but a lot of it is wrong. He comes from it deeply conservative background. You would do well to be aware of the valid criticisms that have been made against him. The idea that men represent logic and women represent chaos is deeply flawed unless you happen to be a young white man who needs to believe that he inherently represents light. He thinks that men and women can't really work well together, that women using cosmetics at work are really trying to sexually attract men. A lot of his beliefs are dated. Some of the self-help is useful. Clean up your room. Take better care of yourself, treat the people around you with decency, treat yourself with self-respect. But the idea that we shouldn't try to change society until everything in our own lives has been straightened out is error. Almost no one other than the very wealthy reach a point where their lives are completely sorted out. The reason for that is the societal issues. If you can't work on those until your own life is perfect, you never will. That is the point. It leaves power and influence in the hands of the very few who already have them while scolding the rest to take care of their own issues. That's not possible without some societal change. But if you can't work on societal change until your own life is sorted and you can't do that until there is societal change, you have nowhere to go. Balance. Work on your own issues while also working on the larger ones that affect your issues. Having the wisdom to know the difference and the ability to balance both is the skill everyone should be working on. We need societal change, those with power and influence are not going to create that change because they have no incentive to do so. It's fine to appreciate someone for their good advice while being aware of their limitations. You can appreciate Jordan Peterson for anything he has said that has helped you while recognizing that he is a product of his times and background and that those factors will affect the advice he gives.
    2
  6. 2
  7.  @Shewolfen  I feel your frustration and I feel it also. So many of the people in this comment section don't get it because they haven't experienced it. One of the other problems we have in this country is a lack of education. People genuinely do not get it unless they experience it themselves. Then there are the many who are influenced by so-called conservative media and need to believe that it's the fault of those suffering because if they didn't, they'd feel that they had to do something about it. Everything in your comment is accurate. I represented people applying for SSI/SSD, the system works sometimes and after great delay. If you don't have family or friends to sustain you until that point, you fall between the cracks and your situation worsens until you are homeless with nothing. That is how the system works. With regard to healthcare, I won't repeat everything that I said in the very long comment above that you responded to. It is a source of constant frustration that the majority of the population here has been convinced that this is how it has to be when other countries have working models that are so much better and result in better lives for millions and millions of people. An additional issue is how far to the right we've moved as a country. FDR created the Social Security system and believed in universal healthcare. Today if you were to try to create any sort of entitlement you would be met with screams of horror and accused of being a communist. We don't have a party that represents the needs of the people. The Democratic party is to the left of the Republican party but that isn't saying a great deal because they too are beholden to corporate interests. If you look at the spectrum of political beliefs, our Democratic party is fairly close to the conservative party. There is not much more to the right but there is a tremendous amount of space to the left. In any other country, someone like Bernie Sanders would not be considered a crazy leftist, he would be simply an average left of center politician. That's how far to the right we've moved.
    2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 1