Comments by "" (@rstevewarmorycom) on "Did Jesus Exist?" video.
-
2
-
The only seven validated epistles of paul tell us nothing of any jesus on earth, but only the archangel yeshua from the books of zachariah and daniel whose scripture and paul's own visions and dreams were his only sources. Paul never told of any jesus on earth, no ministry, no miracles, no disciples, no teachings, no family origin, and he told only of this archangel yeshua's crucifixion in heaven beneath the moon by satan and his demons, his rise to the right hand of god, and his wish to be worshipped by drinking of wine as his blood, and bread as his flesh, and he called it a "lord's supper", NOT a last supper, and no disciples mentioned or present. Paul's cult dates back to the Greek and Turkish yeshua cult before even 1 AD.
The later "gospel" writers obviously hijacked paul's heavenly jesus and embellished it with a jesus set on earth in 1 AD and died of crucifixion 30-33 AD which they thought far enough back in time to avoid any investigation. They wrote the "gospels" anonymously, also to avoid investigation, and in about 75 AD they released the first of several tries over a couple decades to pass off this forgery, Why? Why to try to revive judaism after the destruction of the temple, which most jews thought was the death or at least the dethroning of yahweh. These writers were likely educated Greek speaking rabbis who wanted to save their phony baloney jobs in the diaspora. So they needed a NEW god, a yahweh version 2 to promote to the scattered jews. So -- son of yahweh!!
The testamoium flavianum is widely understood by scholars to be a forgery by Eusebius in the third century, since Eusebius inherited it from Origen, and Origen said it contained no mention of jesus. Also, it is sandwiched between two accounts of troubles that made it stand out like Liberace at a funeral!! Also copies of Josephus have been found without it! And the reference to james the brother of jesus did not use the word for familial brother, but for admirer, which was a way of saying he was a christian.
And tacitus would only have known what christians who had heard the gospel narrative had told him.
So, you have skipped over a lot of detail to make it seem plausible that a jesus on earth existed!! We wonder now about YOUR bias!! And modern bible scholars are all at least friendly to an earthly hoax jesus, or are determined believers. NOT the way one does technical History!!
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1