Comments by "" (@rstevewarmorycom) on "'That's An Absurd Response': GOP Rep And Abortion Advocates Clash In Hearing" video.

  1. You wouldn't know "evil" if it pissed on your head. You can't see your OWN evil here!!
    3
  2. That's your personal reflection of your own internal evil!!
    2
  3.  @jimw.4161  You were raised among christians and have their same tacit superstitions. You think non-thinking larvae are "babies", like some moron. Nobody is obfuscating. They told you the truth but you didn't LIKE the truth! Hitler killed conscious humans, NOT fetuses. Everything you try to say is a lying deception.
    2
  4. WRONG!! It tells us they have the strength of their principles, which 68% of Americans agree with!
    2
  5. It isn't "murder" because a fetus is NOT A PERSON, IT HAS NO MIND!!
    2
  6.  @jcmoore2013  No, it's determined by research to be 2-4 months of age. Purposeful movement and attention and amusement start long before 18 months. So do talking and walking.
    2
  7.  @inthejcurve7968  Lincoln was a democrat, the parties flipped names and purposes in the 20th century. Re: women suffrage, again, that was the party flip. Dixiecrats filibustered, now called REPUBLICANS!! KKK founded by DIXIECRATS, now called REPUBLICANS! Margaret Sanger is irrelevant to PP today.
    2
  8. There is NO hell and NO "god"!! Your superstition about "souls" is total bullshit!!
    2
  9.  @kellyhorsley3229  They fail, or they don't know how to use them because of bad sexual education in this country or by social norms that make women think they can trap a husband by pregancy.
    2
  10. No, they refused to answer a mal-framed well-poisoning question.
    2
  11. A first principle of legal questioning is that you cannot punish someone to change their own testimony. They are entitled to their answer, even if you don't like it. Pushing for an answer you like is called "badgering the witness" and is usually stricken from the record and the jury is warned against giving it meaning.
    2
  12.  @jg1661  His question is dishonest and incites violence by vicious lie!
    2
  13. She never said because the question was dishonest and insulting.
    2
  14. No, they have the 5th Amendment.
    2
  15. They understood his questions were dishonest, and they stood their ground against him!!!
    2
  16.  @lowdown49  There are NO "babies" in wombs. Only fetuses, which have NO MIND and do not think or remember and thus CANNOT be harmed because they don't exist mentally.
    2
  17. WRONGO!! He revealed his and your stupidity and delusion!!
    2
  18. That's NOT a real question within the issue.
    2
  19. NO, IT DOESN'T mean that, it means the question is DISHONEST!!
    2
  20. NO, she WOULDN'T, the courts have upheld the right to an abortion!!
    2
  21.  @jewelpeters294  Fixed, thanks.
    2
  22. No, it doesn't. A non-existent imaginary future has NO bearing on the question. Anymore than we have to run around collecting sperm and make sure each gets an ovum!! A new person could just as well be a Hitler as an Einstein.
    1
  23. That's just your dogmatic fantasy.
    1
  24. No, that's the reflection of your own evil you're feeling.
    1
  25. That's your own reflected evil you're feeling!!
    1
  26. That's YOUR reflected EVIL!!
    1
  27. 68% of Americans support the right to abortion. You're outnumbered in your religious delusions!!
    1
  28.  @soldtobediers  Why would someone who was never born care about anything? Reagan was a dumbass. There isn't any "next world", sorry. There is NO jesus and he lied about coming back, even in the fiction story about him.
    1
  29. Yes, it does, actually.
    1
  30. DISHONEST questions that mischaracterize are incitement to threat and violence by others.
    1
  31.  @acb9318  NO!! Pretending abortion is murder encourages illogical emotional members of the public to perform your terrorism by proxy for you!! No one "chops up babies", that's just more of your dishonest misinformation. Fetuses are NOT "babies", no matter what your fantasy delusion is. A fetus has NO MIND, and cannot BE harmed, unlike born babies. Your dishonest question is more like incitement to riot, which is a FELONY!
    1
  32.  @acb9318  It cannot think, it has never ever had a single thought, the brain has a vegetative EEG trace, and that is the trace of a non-thinking brain.
    1
  33. Proper translation: NO.
    1
  34. She ANSWERED the dishonest questions with the TRUTH!!
    1
  35.  @jimw.4161  Your religious delusion IS the hallucination.
    1
  36.  @patriciabrooks4186  There is NO "creator", that's a delusional religious fantasy. The bible is all GARBAGE!
    1
  37. No, it's based on human rights, rule of law, and total logic.
    1
  38.  @bebebass410  No it doesn't. Your agenda is to end the right to an abortion, while we defend that right. We don't give a fuck what your motives are, but we know that they usually originate in delusional religion. So we also fight to destroy christianity. Many of us are atheists and non-believers, an hugely growing movement in the civilized world.
    1
  39. She's totally rational, YOU'RE irrational!!
    1
  40. No, it means YOU don't KNOW what is rationale, reasonable or logical!!
    1
  41. YOUR heart!
    1
  42. No, MOST Americans agree with HER, NOT YOU!! 68% support the right to abortion!!!
    1
  43. Because of the dishonesty of the questioner.
    1
  44.  @jcmoore2013  NO! You KNOW what being a person is, now you're playing dumb and pretending you're stupid. YOU know you weren't conscious and aware when your body was its fetus. Why? Because you don't remember being one. If you had experienced that you would have remembered it!! Liar!!
    1
  45.  @inthejcurve7968  Reptilian instinct and reflexes only. Without being conscious and aware you don't experience anything!! ALL you just cited are true of FISH!!
    1
  46.  @jcmoore2013  Yes, self-awareness develops at 2-4 months AFTER birth!!
    1
  47.  @inthejcurve7968  A fetus is NOT a person, not a "being" at all because it cannot think or remember. Thus it is the same as a lower meat animal. Liberals have BETTER morals and ethics than christians who rely on fantasy and superstition. We have secular HUMAN morality, which is superior. Your notions about "liberals" not having morals or virtues are mere delusions and fantasies you vainly use to comfort yourself in your extreme error.
    1
  48.  @inthejcurve7968  You don't GET to. Your whole motive is to dogmatically distort and mischaracterize. You're DONE! Whatever you "feel' is nothing but brainwashed dogmatism. Unique DNA means NOTHING and has NOTHING to do with anything, it's merely part of your religious superstition, which isn't even biblically based!! Secular morality existed LONG before religion EVER did. Religion doesn't get to come along and hijack morality to add its superstitions and attempts at slave control and claim it is its source. It is NOT!! Morality is NOT based on the bible, humans Evolved morality on the plains of Africa, when those human groups without them all died out and are NOT our ancestors!! Human morality is mostly INHERITED GENETICALLY!! That's WHY our objective morals as a species are similar among our subjective opinions. Doing no harm is for objectively conscious and aware humans ONLY! Something is either a person or it is property, based SOLELY on whether it has a MIND!! We kill our property to eat it or eliminate it as a problem EVERYDAY!!
    1
  49.  @inthejcurve7968  Saying they aren't does NOT make your idiot assertion true, merely because that would be convenient to you in this issue.
    1
  50.  @inthejcurve7968  You pretending that morality isn't inherited is merely an incorrect assertion supported by NOTHING! What you cite is humankind's warlord empire period, where there was a vast use of religion to control their slave populations and hideous aggressions by these warlords to conquer territory for more slaves. That was a TINY part of human history, and quite recent!! For 99% of human existence we had to cooperate to survive, and our inherited morality IS what enabled us to come THROUGH the religious warlord period and establish democracy and the rule of law, and banish the warlords!! We're still IN THE PROCESS of that, destroying the rich and their republican sycophants.
    1
  51.  @inthejcurve7968  Your just repeating and doubling down on your lying garbage and pretending that recent history is evidence that 99% of early human history didn't happen and that it was long enough to cause Evolutionary change. You might as well be just another lying creatard. All warlord, empire, ruling caste members in history are the moral equivalent of the rich and their republican sycophants they paid to be in Congress to stymy democratic social measures and preserve their "right to rule". The Left is the movement for humanity, it isn't some "cult", rather the rich warlords ARE the cult here!
    1
  52.  @inthejcurve7968  I answered it, you can't seem to read all comments. Those who have established their conscious awareness cannot legally be killed unless and until several physicians running a number of tests over several days certify them as brain dead. We all want that protection so we have enshrined it in the law.
    1
  53. Nobody said that, your fantasy mind is running too far ahead.
    1
  54. Nobody SHOULD get penalized for not answering your mentally distorted questions the way your insanity would have them do so!!
    1
  55. No, it's because they know he's WRONG and DISHONEST!!
    1
  56. Who else would they be? Reagan was a total ass!!
    1
  57.  @sharonb378  And...?
    1
  58. Reagan was a bit senile and demented. The only people with ANY opinion would be those who are alive.
    1
  59.  @sharonb378  No, you said a truism. And so what if everyone here was wanted?
    1
  60. There are NO "demons", "satan", or "god". No one supports killing children, only unwanted fetuses.
    1
  61.  @jamestapley8878  No, your mind is ridiculous!!
    1
  62. Aren't any such things. Delusional right-wing fantasy.
    1
  63.  @Autists-Guide  Primitive religionists.
    1
  64. There is NO "Baal", there is NO "god", there is NO heaven or hell, this is all you get!
    1
  65. WRONG!! Pregnancy that isn't wanted is slavery. The fetus has NO MIND and thus is a LARVA, NOT A PERSON!!
    1
  66.  @midnull6009  Yup, and Yup!
    1
  67. You HAVE good health care, ABORTION IS GOOD HEALTH CARE!!
    1
  68.  @uni4rm  Providing healthcare to the mother, she has the right of bodily autonomy, of deciding who comes TO or FROM her body, PERIOD!! Same as you have the right to refuse to give blood or donate your organs, even if someone else might die without them!!
    1
  69.  @stevecoyle1  The fetus does NOT count, it has NO MIND so no harm can be done to it! The concerns of conscious and aware humans are more important!!
    1
  70.  @jeffb8562  Not about a fetus, which has NO MIND and thus cannot even BE harmed. After a child is born it no longer burdens the mother's body illegally. So it can be protected, but a fetus has NO MIND, and cannot even BE harmed.
    1
  71.  @terribedford7729  It's illegal to sell humans or human body parts.
    1
  72.  @soldtobediers  There is NO "god" or "next world". This is the only life you're gonna get. And there was NO "jesus", it was nothing but a story, there is NO evidence of him at all.
    1
  73.  @Pocket-Calculator  Abortion is NOT "murder", murder is of a PERSON, a fetus has NO MIND so is NOT A PERSON!!
    1
  74.  @Pocket-Calculator  IT IS a right!! It is acknowledged by vast majorities in democracies and by the UN!!
    1
  75.  @kellyhorsley3229  It isn't a "child", it has NO MIND!!
    1
  76.  @kellyhorsley3229  Abortion is NOT "murder". Murder is ONLY of a PERSON, and no fetus is a person because the fetus has NO MIND, and there is nothing to harm!!
    1
  77.  @Pocket-Calculator  No, they have HAD MINDS, provably, and our laws forbid us killing them unless several physicians run a set of tests over several days and certify them brain dead. ONLY then can it be assumed they are no longer conscious or have a MIND!! Food animals don't have enough of a mind to matter, which is why most of us eat them. The MIND is that which recognizes past, present, future, and self, and death. Chckens and pigs don't even react when the fellow next to the is killed, they go right on eating.
    1
  78.  @kellyhorsley3229  A fetus is NOT a "child".
    1
  79.  @jeffb8562  The fetus becomes human after it is born and grows a MIND!! Not before!! No one wants to kill newborn, stop being an over-the-top asshole! Fully 67% of Americans support the right to an abortion, and in other advanced nations it's much higher!! In Japan it's 90%!!
    1
  80.  @kellyhorsley3229  A fetus is NOT a "child", it has NO MIND!! A child has a MIND!
    1
  81.  @Pocket-Calculator  Comatose people are protected until several physicians running a specific list of tests over several days certify them brain dead.
    1
  82. No, when they don't answer keep your damned jack questions!!
    1
  83. When the questions are dishonest, yes!
    1
  84.  @dawngregory6549  The things dems support are lawful and good, the things repubs want are unlawful , evil, and against democracy. We're right and you're WRONG, that's WHY BITCH!!
    1
  85.  @jwil4905  I'm better educated than YOU are, by far! I'm a physicist and an Evolutionary geneticist.
    1
  86.  @Hawkcam1996  Sorry, but it isn't in most states. And a pregnant woman WANTS the baby, so that is why it is a crime. Her desire determines court attention.
    1
  87.  @Hawkcam1996  No, it's not. There are only a few southern evangelical states where a fetus is CALLED a child, and ONLY if the woman wanted it. It is her PROPERTY!! That supposed "federal law" seems to have never passed.
    1
  88.  @Hawkcam1996  No, it was a political football with NO effect on what the States do. Such crimes are NOT tried at the federal level, so it is meaningless.
    1
  89. No, that's your stupid fantasy.
    1
  90.  @odellgreene234  After it's born and grows a MIND, about 2-4 months of age. Slaves are humans with a MIND, your bullshit narrative doesn't apply.
    1
  91. Abortion isn't "murder", since it doesn't kill a MIND.
    1
  92. You're delusional, abortion is NOT "murder".
    1
  93. The questioner WAS being ignorant!!
    1
  94.  @Starbat88  He was using dishonest well-poisoning and not dealing with the argument, which he knew he cannot win logically.
    1
  95. SORRY, SHIT, BUT YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY WRONG!!!!
    1
  96. No, that's YOU being immature.
    1
  97. A fetus has NO MIND and thus cannot BE considered a "living" anything.
    1
  98.  @paulcolburn3855  It's not a person, which is why we cut them down when we need to.
    1
  99. She understood his dishonest ploy!!
    1
  100. It's a stupid dishonest question.
    1
  101. She didn't say that, she said the question was offensive. Abortion is NOT killing children, it is terminating unwanted non-thinking fetuses which have NO MINDS!!
    1
  102.  @Randaddy96  No, it's a one-way street. Once anyone has established their conscious awareness, they cannot be killed no matter their state of heath till several physicians running a list of tests over several days certify them brain dead. I know you were just being cheeky, but it also proves you're not too bright.
    1
  103.  @Randaddy96  It has a brain, but it's growing too fast to be wired up for thinking yet. When that slows down about 2-4 months after birth, then its mind wakes up and begins thinking. That fetuses don't think is NOT a "delusion". We were once a fetus, and yet NONE of us has EVER recalled being a fetus or having ANY thoughts before birth. That's the PROOF!!
    1
  104.  @Randaddy96  Nonsense, I have memories from age ONE and we learn to crawl and walk and manipulate items and speak some words by then. They neither need a big vocabulary nor any, to remember their young life till they KNOW how to talk about it! Abortion is NOT a crime of any kind. No one is harmed, they don't have a MIND so they CANNOT BE harmed. You CANNOT BE harmed without a mind!! The dictators you cited tortured and killed conscious humans! Your analogy is juvenile garbage!!
    1
  105.  @swbigfan1  You're the simple one here. It's okay because it ISN'T a child, it's a LARVA, it can't think, so it isn't a person!!! And she has the RIGHT to remove ANYBODY from HER body that she doesn't WANT there!!
    1
  106.  @swbigfan1  No, it doesn't and you seem unable to read. Some few southern states have bigot laws to please idiot evangidiot populations. Most do not. Coma patients are assumed to be conscious by law until a team of physicians runs a battery of tests and determines they are brain dead. ONLY then they can be harvested or burned or buried. Newborn are NOT conscious at birth, and not for 2-4 months, but our LAWS grant them the assumption of consciousness until legal brain death in later life. We do this because no longer being a burden to the mother's body, she has lost any further right to kill them. The brain is determined to be conscious by specific behaviors that NO fetus exhibits, Also, NO ONE recalls ever being a fetus, and consciousness REQUIRES memory. There is NO ONE AT HOME in the fetus!! No harm can possibly be done to a person if they can't think!!
    1
  107.  @swbigfan1  Basically that's just the "don't kill wanted fetuses" act. It doesn't cover aborted fetuses. If the mother loses a fetus because of your violent action, we stick you with a manslaughter charge. But if SHE kills it, no charge.
    1
  108.  @johnclark538  No, they were simply wrong and my enemy, I'm right and seek to protect their victims.
    1
  109.  @BigFootTheRealOne  There is No "god" or "heaven"!!
    1
  110. She might, her birth control might fail like anyone else.
    1
  111. Not if he is shown to be responsible. Better, tax all adults for childcare and support. It wouldn't be much since most aren't reproducing, and it would solve all problems.
    1
  112. They have the right to that opinion, however.
    1
  113. When police are fascists we throw them cocktails.
    1
  114.  @STELLASCUTENESS  Irrelevant.
    1
  115. No, it's protecting the life plans and rights of the mother to not be enslaved.
    1
  116. No, it's NOT!! That's your religious delusion.
    1
  117. They usually do, sometimes they fail.
    1
  118. She never said she WOULD, because his questions were DISHONEST!!
    1
  119. WRONGO!! Courts don't do that.
    1
  120. English has a problem, which may partly be at the root of your misunderstanding. Cellular life is life, small L, but the experience of a conscious person is Life, a capital L, but totally different than small L "life". Many languages have different words for these, preventing the kind of confusion you are experiencing. Something alive may not have a MIND, which IS that which we value as humans. The fetus has NO MIND!! The infant doesn't grow a mind till between two and four months after birth!! We protect pre-MIND infants solely because they no longer illegally burden a woman's body after birth. The woman has every RIGHT to destroy anything she doesn't want in her body!!
    1
  121. No, they will not answer dishonest questions.
    1
  122.  @Patriot-om8hw  Yes, they are. They imply something untrue and try to force the answerer to agree.
    1
  123.  @Patriot-om8hw  But what he thinks are our "falsehoods" AREN'T and HIS opinions ARE the REAL FALSEHOODS!!
    1
  124. No, no born child has ANYTHING to do with the issue of abortion rights. THAT was the dishonesty of the question!!
    1
  125. You're delusional.
    1
  126. Your opinion is uneducated and stupid.
    1
  127.  @jimjones3065  WRONG!! ALL abortions are WILLING and CONSENTED!
    1
  128.  @mrsfitt4637  Fetuses cannot think or choose anything.
    1
  129.  @midnull6009  That "law" would get you assassinated.
    1
  130. WRONGO!! They know the question is DISHONEST!! Abortion doesn't NEED a defense, it's LEGAL!!
    1
  131.  @alexandraispro-life1682  Abortion is a HUMAN RIGHT, like not turning your body over to the state to harvest your organs or enslave you with tubing to another who needs your kidneys!!! Things are legal BECAUSE they are right. Your notion of right and wrong doesn't count because it comes from your religiously delusional mind. We have the RIGHT to decide who comes TO OR FROM our bodies!! Period!!
    1
  132. She's NOT "lying", the question is dishonest!!
    1
  133. Or anyone else, you're deluded.
    1
  134.  @callipitter8474  You can't even spell.
    1
  135. Your projecting your own evil anger upon them.
    1
  136.  @BartholomewSmutz  They're NOT your fucking "servants", they are experts, and YOU don't GET to judge what they say!!
    1
  137.  @BartholomewSmutz  If they're not experts, why are you bothered by what they think?
    1
  138.  @danjones5065  You must have shit on your shirt.
    1
  139. She was entirely exactly right in everything she said, and MOST people, and nearly ALL (68%) EDUCATED people agree with her, When he tried to depict her as "evil", she didn't allow him to do so, because MOST people KNOW that abortion is NOT "evil" but an important RIGHT!! Unprotected sex is decried by everyone, so you're delusional here. You're spouting fundy christian delusions, not the truth. Fundies and evangelical bigots try to impose THEIR notion of RELIGIOUS "right & wrong", when they are totally wrong headed and wrong in their beliefs. The doctor reflects the views of her profession, whether YOU like it or NOT!! MOST doctors are social liberals and support the right to abortion. Your view is primitive, superstitious and uninformed.
    1
  140. No, it's ABSOLUTELY TRUE!!
    1
  141.  @AMM1998  And it SHOULD be!!
    1
  142. Yes, such questions as he asked are obnoxious, irrelevant and offensive. The question of abortion is TOTALLY UNRELATED to born children! His purpose was to manipulate emotions in a fraudulent manner with issues that SOUND similar to right-wing religious idiots, but are NOT!!
    1
  143.  @kevinphillips150  ALL thought IS abstract, what the fuck are YOU talking about!
    1
  144.  @lowdown49  No! These are all different, and the MOST different is the BRIGHT MORAL LINE between killing a thinking PERSON and killing a non-thinking human LARVA or fetus. We kill sperm between the sheets, in the trash, or down the sink by their millions! Half of all pregnancies DIE! Intervening in medical needs is what humans do! We do it to save thinking human PERSONS!! We end the life of the brain-dead, similarly to abortion of non-thinking vegetative fetuses!! Whatever it MIGHT have become is unimportant, we serve the Living Persons and the Dignity of their Life Plans, NOT imaginary future fantasy "persons" which are not in existence!! We owe imaginary people NOTHING!!!!
    1
  145.  @lowdown49  They're NOT "babies". Babies have MINDS, fetuses do NOT!! That's a FACT, not some excuse. There are NO "babies" in wombs, only non-thinking fetuses.
    1
  146.  @AppleOfThineEye  WRONGO!! A one year old has learned to crawl and walk and manipulate objects. He recalls how to do them every time he does those acts and for the rest of their life! I happen to recall events of my first year, not everyone remembers them in journal order, but they remember. They have a MIND!! Shithead!!
    1
  147.  @AppleOfThineEye  That's instinct, not MIND!! It doesn't ever RECALL doing anything.
    1
  148.  @AppleOfThineEye  WRONGO!! Already told you why, you will not learn. You're now muted.
    1
  149.  @ericjespersen6440  None of it is "made up", it's Science and Fact!! Twice as many Americans believe as I do and NOT as YOU do!!!
    1
  150. You're completely insane.
    1
  151. More right-wing dishonest bullshit.
    1
  152. Not relevant to abortion, in court would be tossed out as an emotional outburst.
    1
  153. No, she knows that NO fetus has a mind, and so no harm can be done to it. We let born live ONLY because they no longer illegally occupy the woman's body!!
    1
  154. No, that's your religious delusion. The fetus has NO MIND, and thus it is NOT a person yet. And whether it may become a person or not is irrelevant to the current circumstance. NO HARM can be done to something with NO MIND, so pregnancy is the appropriate time to kill it if it is unwanted and damages the woman's life plans or burdens her body without her permission. It is NOT "innocent" because it has never had a single thought, and thought is HOW we judge innocence!! A whale is simply something we have a public desire to protect, if their numbers grew too large we could change that desire. There is NO "child" in a womb, it is a non-thinking fetus with NO MIND!! She denied your religious delusion so you called her "insane", but MOST humans on earth support the right of abortion, the more advanced the nation, the more they support it!! It is YOU who are the deluded minority!!
    1
  155.  @johnforman2264  None of your bullshit matters. And all you've done here is stagger around amongst topics like a drunk using one disorganized illogical persuasion after another. Morality has ALWAYS been based on the consensus of Evolved human morality. Any "god" is nothing but a fiction to justify local moralities. Our laws protect any baby after it is born, whether it has a MIND yet or NOT!! But before birth is the realm of the woman's RIGHTS based on her bodily autonomy. NO one has the right to compel anyone to remain pregnant against their will, or tell her what to do with her PROPERTY, the non-thinking fetus with NO MIND!! A whole world of people marched into Germany and killed the Nazis because they did such things as you mentioned. That doesn't magically make moral consensus wrong, the world killed the Nazis because it was OUR moral consensus that it had to be done. We shot them, executed them by firing squad and hanged them!! Our laws protect all who are born and have establish even once their conscious awareness, and that protects them till such time as several physicians running a specific list of tests over several days conclude and certify them brain-dead. No number of relatives or any non-medical panel have ANY say over it AT ALL!! Researchers in infant development say the infant becomes aware of itself at between two and four months of age, and that the date of that can be determined by watching them. They go from an eating-crying-shitting machine whose eyes don't focus on anything to a PERSON who is looking around and reacts to events, often in just one day.
    1
  156.  @AppleOfThineEye  Yes! Do YOU recall being a fetus?
    1
  157. Oh yes there is!!! YOU just want to pretend there isn't!
    1
  158.  @trentjacobs3957  Bullshit! Sex is a RIGHT!! So is remaining unpregnant and stopping pregnancy.
    1
  159.  @trentjacobs3957  No, murder is ONLY of PERSONS!! The Larva fetus is NOT a PERSON because it has NO MIND!!
    1
  160.  @trentjacobs3957  They're NOT "boys and girls", they're NOT EVEN PERSONS because they HAVE NO MIND!! Without a MIND they are the moral equivalent of a rock, a dead animal, or a pile of rotting leaves. The difference between "them" and us is that WE have MINDS and are thus PERSONS!! Having NO MIND it is then the appropriate time for them to be destroyed if unwanted. "They" are NOT "innocent and precious" because they have never experienced a single thought, BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO MIND!!! The difference between PERSON and PROPERTY is MIND!! No MIND, and it's only PROPERTY!!
    1
  161.  @trentjacobs3957  Your comment is complete emotion-driven garbage without a speck of truthful analysis.
    1
  162.  @trentjacobs3957  You CANNOT BE a "little boy or girl" WITHOUT A MIND! In your stupid emotionality, you are labeling something what it is not, just to service your argument. That's DISHONEST!! Hitler labeled PERSONS WITH MINDS NON-HUMAN!! He made the same emotion-driven LIE argument that YOU'RE attempting!! Chopping up a conscious and aware PERSON is a crime, chopping up something without a MIND is perfectly reasonable if it meets the needs of PERSONS!! Because, you see, NO HARM can BE DONE to anything with NO MIND!! Fetuses cannot BE "innocents" because they have NO MIND TO BE INNOCENT!!
    1
  163.  @trentjacobs3957  You're fantasizing about my motives to try to find some way to poison my message, which is dishonest. My motives are purely logical. There is NO "duty to care for them", that's your fantasy. They are NOT persons and have NO MINDS so they cannot even BE harmed. It's impossible to harm something with NO MIND!! Your words change nothing I've said in this thread, because they are extraneous to my motivations.
    1
  164.  @cmthomas07  It's obvious. Nobody recalls being a fetus, so our mind did not exist at that time. Something without a mind cannot experience harm, so no harm can be done to it.
    1
  165. No one forces anyone to get a vaccine, you just can't work for me if you don't, and that's MY RIGHT!!
    1
  166.  @thisslightlysweetlife3402  A woman does NOT have to let a fetus stay in her body if she doesn't want it. It's a matter of self-defense, NOT a matter of "allowing someone to pass"!!
    1
  167.  @johndibert5509  When they grow one, long about age 2-4 months old.
    1
  168.  @johndibert5509  Science, reason, and logic.
    1
  169.  @thisslightlysweetlife3402  Yes, it should, otherwise she would be enslaved by another, which is a EVIL!
    1
  170.  @juliaha4934  No, it's snot. Persons think, it does snot!
    1
  171.  @juliaha4934  They did, it failed. Even if they didn't, they have the right to an abortion!! We support B/C, but we also support full sex education. You shit don't do that and you don't give them B/C. You keep them sexually ignorant and then blame them if they fail.
    1
  172.  @juliaha4934  Humor. It's snot.
    1
  173.  @dawngregory6549  Because the first is RIGHT and the second is WRONG!!
    1
  174.  @trentjacobs3957  Fetuses are NOT persons, NOT "little boys and girls", they do NOT THINK!! That is proven by NOBODY EVER recalling having been a fetus!! Things that do not THINK are PROPERTY, NOT PERSON!! Nature has delegated that time appropriate to get rid of them if they are not wanted or offend the woman's life plans!! And to do so WITHOUT doing ANY harm to a thinking PERSON!! We are now 80% of the American public and we will KILL for the right to abortion!!! Be scared, BE VERY SCARED TO OPPOSE US!! The only EVIL here is your religious FASCISM!!
    1
  175.  @skAhnaksA  Yes it IS birth control!! Fetuses do NOT THINK!! Those are NOT PERSONS!! Nature has ordained this time in which to terminate them without doing ANY HARM to a THINKING PERSON!! Things that do NOT THINK are PROPERTY, NOT PERSON!!
    1
  176.  @trentjacobs3957  No, you were making shit up and CALLING SOMETHING "murder" that ISN'T!!
    1
  177.  @johndibert5509  The Truth, shthead.
    1
  178.  @johndibert5509  Two to four months AFTER birth.
    1
  179.  @thisslightlysweetlife3402  Yes, and yes!! When we start burning all your churches will you finally realize that 80% of Americans support the right to an abortion, will you finally believe us!!?? There WILL be a war against your fascism, and YOU will LOSE!!
    1
  180.  @juliaha4934  No, LARVAE are NOT PERSONS!! Larvae don't think. Things that do not think are PROPERTY, NOT PERSON!!!
    1
  181.  @juliaha4934  Yes it is. It prevents birth.
    1
  182.  @dorothymiddaugh6234  No, that is NOT the case. The girls who don't use b/c are not informed HOW to get or use b/c. Or they are shamed for their sexuality.
    1
  183.  @juliaha4934  The cost is minimal compared to the costs of raising unwanted children and the criminality that will result.
    1
  184.  @angiewilliams1386  No, its NOT a "baby", that's just your little girl delusion. What they MIGHT become is irrelevant. Only what they are NOW counts in women's decisions.
    1
  185.  @dawngregory6549  NO! Abortion is NOT "murder" and if people don't want to protect the rest of us by getting vaccinated, then they must put up with public health restrictions against them.
    1
  186.  @trentjacobs3957  Fetuses are NOT persons, they cant THINK, they have NO MIND, and thus ALSO can't be "innocent"!! It isn't murder because murder is killing a PERSON, and those are NOT PERSONS! Also, they are NOT "children", NOT "little boys and girls"!! They do NOT "experience" ANYTHING, and will NOT experience death EITHER! They are NOT "someone" AT ALL!! They are the moral equivalent of a ROCK because they do NOT THINK!! Things that think are PERSONS, things that DO NOT THINK are PROPERTY!!
    1
  187.  @thisslightlysweetlife3402  It will, and it will destroy christianity.
    1
  188.  @juliaha4934  Ronald Reagan was an IDIOT!! No one COULD EVER BE for abortion unless they WERE BORN!! He thought he was being profound, he was just being stupid. Being cellularly alive is NOT being a PERSON!! All the things we EAT are alive till we kill and eat them! When "I" was a larva I wasn't a PERSON, and could NEVER have known or cared at all if my larva had been killed! And that's the point, abortion harms NO PERSON, because it isn't a PERSON!!
    1
  189.  @kuba2ve  Your "god" is imaginary and doesn't exist!
    1
  190.  @haidaralmohsen4408  Fetuses are NOT "children", they have NO mind and cannot BE harmed without having a mind. They are merely human LARVAE!!
    1
  191.  @TheGeonam  No, the REAL EVIL is trying to ENSLAVE women as BREED SOWS for men and society's desire for UNWANTED CHILDREN as future CHEAP LABORERS! Men would never tolerate that done to them, If men got pregnant you could get an abortion at 7-Eleven!!! No one recalls being a fetus because we did NOT EXIST then!! Human LIFE, CONSCIOUS PERSONHOOD, NOT MERE CELLULAR life, begins AT BIRTH!! NOT AT CONCEPTION!! A zygote/embryo/fetus does NOT THINK and is NOT A PERSON!! It is nothing more than a pre-human non-thinking LARVA!! Things which cannot THINK are PROPERTY, NOT PERSON!! GROWN THINKING WOMEN HAVE THE RIGHTS OF LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF THEIR HAPPINESS, AND FUCKING LARVA DO NOT!!
    1
  192.  @m87orion  Garbage and lies!
    1
  193. They're MORE civilized than YOU are, wanting to enslave a woman to be pregnant against her will!!
    1
  194.  @AppleOfThineEye  What the fuck is Clarence?
    1
  195.  @AppleOfThineEye  Nobody cares what you think.
    1
  196.  @ericjespersen6440  No, that is the accepted analogy of most pro-choice folk who outnumber you 2 to 1 in the US population (67% of Americans support the right of abortion!). Forcing a woman to remain pregnant is enslaving her, in fact organ enslavement similar to you being tied down and having your bloodstream forcibly linked to another with tubing if their kidneys have failed. That IS what being pregnant IS when it is unwante
    1
  197. Yeah, YOU!!
    1
  198. You.
    1
  199. No, leading questions like his in court would be objected to and stricken and the jury admonished to ignore them.
    1
  200. No, because she is telling the truth and using her right not to testify against herself in any way.
    1
  201.  @thekingiscoming2731  Except this isn't a "homicide", actually all this is just your self-comforting delusional fantasy and NO imaginary "King" is "coming" EVER and you're just lost in your delusion. Face it, your jeebus went out for ciggies and never came back, like your father did all those years ago. He told you he'd be right back during the lives of some there witnessing him. Sounds like the story was just a lie, a fairy tale.
    1
  202. No, she has the right to her own answers, this is a first principle of courtroom law. You're totally in error regarding courts of law. Also, any judge would find the question leading and strike it. Slanting your question with your belief system is considered dishonest in a court. You wouldn't even be allowed to phrase a dishonest question like that.
    1
  203.  @williamjones4483  If your imagination is brainwashed by QAnon.
    1
  204. There are NO "souls", there is NO "god"!!
    1
  205.  @jwil4905  Sorry, but you are soulless too, the soul is fiction.
    1
  206.  @jwil4905  Saying that doesn't make it so. It's merely your self-comforting lie to yourself.
    1
  207. The dishonest question denies bodily autonomy which is a human RIGHT!! The fetus is NOT a person because it HAS NO MIND!!
    1
  208.  @markeyfarrell  No, mine is the truth!
    1
  209. That's because it is according to cellular life, but NOT according to PERSON life!!
    1
  210.  @2dudescamp  Everything alive is cellular life, but not conscious and aware life. Personhood begins AFTER birth. Also, forced pregnancy violates basic human rights to personal bodily autonomy and is the equivalent of enslavement.
    1
  211.  @2dudescamp  Living human tissue, or a living body, is NOT, by itself "human life". It is the MIND which we value, the MIND ALONE!! The fetus has NO MIND! That's PROVED by NO ONE recalling ever BEING a fetus. Viabiity alone is a extraordinary rescue of a WANTED child, it is NOT evidence of PERSONHOOD!! The MIND STILL does not happen till much later. When a woman does NOT want to be pregnant, the mere fact that she IS signifies ONLY a medical ACCIDENT, which is CORRECTED by abortion!! ALL UNWANTED pregnancies ARE UNPLANNED!! It is everyone's RIGHT to have sex without worrying about becoming pregnant against her will!! 99% of all sex is for pleasure and bonding, NOT for reproduction. When a car accident occurs we do NOT say, "well, you should have known this would happen, so suffer!" Instead we heal their wounds in the hospital!! Abortion is the SAME THING!! There is NO harm done to a non-thinking larva. Harm would REQUIRE a MIND!! And that doesn't exist! There can be NO "evil" without a victim with a MIND!! She has the RIGHT to control who comes TO OR FROM her body, just like YOU do!! You cannot be forced to give blood, or a kidney, or even be FORCED to undergo USE of your kidneys by some surrogacy with tubes and needles!! Well, it is the SAME for a woman regarding a fetus!!
    1
  212.  @2dudescamp  "Human life" IS personhood, or else it isn't anything but cellular life, which is irrelevant. Viability is merely extraordinary rescue of wanted children, they do NOT have MINDS at the time of such rescue. ALL unwanted pregnancies ARE UNPLANNED! There is NO "selfishness" involved, a person has the RIGHT to decide who comes TO OR FROM her body!! Are YOU "selfish" for NOT donating blood or your kidney? NO!!
    1
  213. That would be everyone.
    1
  214. Born persons are the only ones with opinions, could some other non-born person have a opinion? NO!! Reagan suffered dementia. So do christians and republicans!!
    1
  215.  @chuckkady7282  Because they're right and the questioner is dishonest. And they're NOT "dancing around", they're refusing to answer a dishonest question.
    1
  216. Not a person's life, a worm perhaps.
    1
  217.  @ShmaAdonaiEhad  Which is superior to brainwashed religious pseudo-logic!!
    1
  218.  @ShmaAdonaiEhad  Leave us non-believers alone or you will be HARMED!!
    1
  219.  @frederickberg6781  No, the truth inspires the narrative. Phony truth gets NewsMax sued.
    1
  220. No, it's NOT, a MIND would be, but they have NO MIND, so they're NOT persons, they're PROPERTY!!
    1
  221.  @jessefontenot9846  FETAL dogs FETAL dolphins FETAL anything have NO MINDS!!
    1
  222.  @jessefontenot9846  No, the MIND of an infant doesn't become conscious and aware till between 2 and 4 months of age after birth. The only reason we protect newborn is we assume the mother has lost the right to terminate it if it no longer burdens her body autonomy. We ASSUME that it will develop a MIND and then it cannot be terminated until and unless several physicians run many tests over several days and certify it as brain dead. Those are our laws.
    1
  223.  @jessefontenot9846  No, you can't make what I said your pitiful disingenuous phony "gotcha"!! The distinction is EVER AND ALWAYS MIND!!
    1
  224.  @jessefontenot9846  No, that's you trying to fantasize and deceive.
    1
  225.  @jessefontenot9846  Yes!
    1
  226.  @jessefontenot9846  No, why should I bother? I consider you people a lost cause. A great majority of people in the USA AND an even greater majority in all advanced nations agree with me, not you.
    1
  227. No, heartbeats are NOT person's lives, just animals'.
    1
  228.  @lindsey4463  Heart is not a person, it's a pump.
    1
  229. Abortion is NOT "infanticide"!! A fetus is NOT an "infant"!!
    1
  230. The fetus is NOT a "infant", an infant is already born.
    1