Comments by "Scott Franco" (@scottfranco1962) on "PragerU" channel.

  1. 361
  2. There are so many distortions of fact here it is hard to know where to begin. First, "the car emits 1/3 of its emissions when produced". This is a comparison with zero, since, as the announcer details, gas powered cars emit %64 of the same emissions to make. Further, the emission costs to make a car are themselves highly dependant on the energy source of the factory that makes them. Thus Tesla, made in northern California, is largely powered by natural gas. Third, the "extra" emissions said in the video come from Lithium mining, which comes primarily from countries with little emissions controls on mining. Thus, there is every expectation that this will improve. Forth, the "emissions" of an EV are highly dependent on the power source, and conversion of power in the USA is moving towards natural gas. In California it is the primary source. As pointed out elsewhere, the major source of coal based power in California is because of imports from other states that still use coal. Fifth, the lifetime and scrapping of an EV is based on the idea that EVs have the same lifetime as gas cars, for which there no basis. There is every reason to believe that EVs will last longer than gas cars due to less wear and complexity. Sixth, "renewables will only advance %3 in the next 25 years, meanwhile those fossil fuels will still generate %64 of power [in 25 years]". This is an incredible mixing of different facts to "prove" your point. Even IF that is true it discounts the rapid move away from coal to natural gas power generation. remember "EVs are coal powered"? your central thesis falls simply because of the changing mix of power generation, and you navigate around that fact. Summing up, your misstatement of facts and conclusion based on navigation of the facts you like vs. the facts you don't like qualifies you perfectly to report for the Wall Street Journal, but it does not qualify you to lecture US.
    331
  3. 23
  4. 16
  5. 16
  6. 15
  7. 12
  8. 11
  9. 8
  10. 6
  11. 6
  12. 5
  13. 5
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. Ok, so I guess I have to rebut this nonsense. First, PragerU decided to lump CAFE and electric cars all together with public transport and a borderline black helicopter theory about the government wanting to take everyone's car because it gives you freedom. I'm from LA, I grew up with polluted air, so I back CAFE, and cars generate much less pollution today. That's a good thing. PragerU has an axe to grind for electric cars. The had a previous video ("are electric cars really green"). It was also loaded with distortions of fact. 1. 4 hours to charge. Anti-electric car types love to trot this out because it scares people who know nothing about electric cars. Most EVs can be charged in 30 minutes while on the road. 4 hours or more is the slower rate on a home charger. Notice that you can't have a gas station at your house, so this is comparing apples to oranges. 30 minutes is certainly slower than the 5 minutes it takes to get gas, but it is not 4 hours. And 4 hours is the worst case. You rarely arrive with your battery empty, and so 1-2 hours is a more common case. Further, because you CAN charge your car at home, the correct answer of "how long does it take to charge your car" is 0 hours 0 minutes. As in, you didn't sit around waiting for your car to charge at all. You parked it, it charged overnight. It was ready to go in the morning. This is something you cannot do at all with a gas car. 2. less than 100 miles range. No, there are several cars that have way more range than that, Tesla (for years now), Bolt, and several new cars coming out. 3. Cost $20,000 over time to run an electric car. Complete made up nonsense. 4. Generates more pollution. These kinds of statistics are found by taking the dirtiest power generating states, coal driven, as the power source for charging. Its a standard way to bash electric cars. 5. Rare earth mineral mining is destroying the planet. This is cherry picking articles and statistics that agree with you. Virtually all of these are widely debated.
    1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1