Comments by "coolmodelguy" (@coolmodelguy6304) on "Face the Nation" channel.

  1. Lg springs - Do you know anything at all about the structure of the government you are criticizing? Adam Schiff is duty bound by his oath of office and the part that concerns us right now is this . . . "Loose Lips Sink Ships". What prosecutor has ever released information about the case before the case is ready to go to trial? None. The Mueller investigation is a tight ship, no leaks. Adam Schiff has seen some of the classified intel Mueller has and he is duty bound not to divulge what that intel is. That is why Adam Schiff say's there is 100% proof, he has seen it and he can say that he has seen it, but he cannot reveal what it is without breaking his oath of office. Why do you not know this? More important, did you know and you just don't care? Duty. Do American's care any more about how deep the meaning of that word is?
    12
  2. The economy is doing better only if you are already wealthy. The claim or belief that the economy is doing better is irrational.
    8
  3. Wow. What a bunch of trump trolls. Since when does a prosecutor release information on the investigation before they are ready to file charges?
    7
  4. Tony Bonura - Adam Schiff has been presented with evidence. As minority Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, he signed the rebuttal to the republican findings of "no collusion" and those papers are public. In addition, he has seen the classified information. There is more than enough information in the public sector already to convict the entire Trump family of conspiracy in a court of law, so what Mueller is holding is much more powerful. So, as a point of fact . . . evidence does exist, it has been presented, it is in the public domain, and Trump's track record shows he is following the Russian foreign policy script instead of the well established U.S. foreign policy. That is also public evidence. Do you really need more?
    6
  5. farmer 1 1 - If Schiff is dirty, then Trump is drenched in slimey swamp mud. No one who is so innocent protests and lies as much as trum(PP)utin does.
    6
  6. Danny N. - Many hundreds of thousands of people are dying annually here in the USA because they lack basic health care, or they are being overdosed with legal opioid prescriptions, or they are choking on fumes from legalized pollution, or they are committing suicide with legalized guns. Where is your outrage over those deaths?
    6
  7. Chad Clemen - Is that all you are capable of? No reasoned argument, just call those you disagree with snowflakes and spit out a bunch of emogies? Pitifully inadequate, no wonder democrats have swept most of the special elections.
    5
  8. Truth Matters - You have your head stuck in the swamp water.
    4
  9. Marc Short - short on truthfulness . . . as in has none. You think the American people cannot see through you Marc?
    4
  10. Chad Clemen - Diplomacy? If that were the case, why not use "diplomacy" with our allies?
    3
  11. Douglas Barton - I hope your first line is tonque-in-cheek. Everything else you wrote is spot-on.
    3
  12. J.A. Holland’s Quiet Storm - The trump trolls are out enmasse, don't let them stop you from writing your excellent commentary. This is the second comment of yours I have encountered today, just like the first one . . . this one is spot on.
    3
  13. Fake troll alert.
    3
  14. Lor M - Yup, just like the taxpayers paid a bunch of billionaires 1.5 trillion dollars last year with trum(PP)utin's tax scam cut. By comparison, 200 million is a hella'va deal because we taxpayers will actually get something for our money!
    3
  15. Jennings644 - Do you know anything at all about the structure of the government you are criticizing? Adam Schiff is duty bound by his oath of office and the part that concerns us right now is this . . . "Loose Lips Sink Ships". What prosecutor has ever released information about the case before the case is ready to go to trial? None. The Mueller investigation is a tight ship, no leaks. Adam Schiff has seen some of the classified intel Mueller has and he is duty bound not to divulge what that intel is. That is why Adam Schiff say's there is 100% proof, he has seen it and he can say that he has seen it, but he cannot reveal what it is without breaking his oath of office. Why do you not know this? More important, did you know and you just don't care? Duty. Do American's care any more about how deep the meaning of that word is?
    3
  16. Rusty Hill - Ignorant and stupid I see. You are correct that Americans are not as stupid as some might think . . . but that certainly does not include you! If you love the Liar in chief so much, you can be his next wife. You already lick his boots and he really digs that!
    2
  17. Jennings644 - Wow, you really are brainwashed. Too much Fox news my friend!
    2
  18. Legalize drugs in the USA and stop selling weapons south of our border, then the gangs terrorizing these children will evaporate. That will save the children without the need for a stupid wall.
    2
  19. Yes we are . . . a banana republic. Nothing to be proud of.
    1
  20. Agreed.
    1
  21. Amethyst7 - I'm afraid my dear lady, that you are reading things quite incorrectly. We call trump the "Divider in Chief" for a reason. He is instigating the hatred, causing it to rise to the surface and be displayed for all to see. He alone is spouting the hatred bile, and those who believe as he does are becoming his rabid followers. Those of us who despise what the Divider in Chief is doing are still loyal to our worldwide friends and we WILL take back our country. We have at long last glimpsed who the real enemy is (corporations and oligarchs) and though we have long struggles ahead against out own countrymen to defeat this enemy, it will be done.
    1
  22. It is past time for a cap on both income and accumulated wealth. The idea that low taxes will add jobs has been long ago proven to be a false premise. The real problem we have is that wealth is being used to magnify one persons libertarian vote into millions of similar votes through the use of unrestrained propaganda on a uneducated population. Just how much income or wealth does one person need anyway? Beyond excessive luxury, wealth these days for the sake of wealth accumulation is simply leading to the degeneration of human society rather than the advancement of human society.
    1
  23. Aaron Seng - If ever there was a case for projection my friend, you are it. If an ideology is being pushed here, it is the one that you have adopted which has one simple premise . . . "what is good for the billionaires and oligarchs is good for you as an individual". You are mired in a belief system that was created for you by people who do not have your best interest at heart. In the past I would tear your argument apart, but beating my head against a stupid brick wall only results in a headache. Suffice to say, it is you who are pushing an ideology . . . if your ideology were an object, it would look like the Titanic going down. Head for the life boats my friend, you have no other recourse.
    1
  24. Exactly.
    1
  25. Indeed.
    1
  26. Ox Alek - Good idea. It is about time that all of mankind shares in a "productivity and resource" dividend, because it is insanely wrong for so few to be getting so rich on the backs of all of mankind. The same for you and I as well.
    1
  27. From the moment Jan Crawford opened her mouth until she stopped talking in the first segment ( 1:13 to 3:33 ), the spiel was a political spin job and was certainly not anything resembling "reporting". When the camera showed the other guests, they were all nodding and smiling in agreement. There is a simple common sense reason a perfectionist like Robert Mueller would submit a incomplete job on his report, which follows the next point. The new Attorney General and his staff were not confused in the least by the form of Mueller's investigation, because everyone including Barr and his staff are well aware of Justice Department OLC policy. This supposed "confusion" was clearly meant as political cover for the act of ordering Mueller to conclude his investigation. Since Mueller had an active investigation and Grand Jury empaneled in support of his investigation, it stands to reason the hurried submission of the report on a suddenly terminated investigation would be incomplete.
    1