Comments by "Maxwell Benz" (@Tential1) on "Disparu"
channel.
-
69
-
36
-
18
-
11
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
@Aesthetic.Ascetic south park covered the steaming wars perfectly. I wanted to do a video on it, just got scared of strikes(this isn't my upload account). When you look at the financials, this ends one way. We pay cable prices again. Lol. Streaming prices have to double for the business to just break even. Disney, paramount, Warner, Netflix, are all screwed. Especially as Nvidia makes special effects easier. Youtube content is more cost competitive. As an investor, I'd have to actually have a mental deficiency(and many do) to pick Disney, paramount, warner, over Google. Youtubes economics for content delivery are just broken. I can watch a one-hour Special by magnates media on tencent or I can watch a two-hour movie that Disney spent three hundred million dollars to produce that still sucks.... How do you compete with the brutal cost efficency of YouTube developed content?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@beanclam the ceo is chosen by shareholders to manage the company. That pay the ceo takes, if not paid, would go to shareholders. Not workers. So complaining about ceo pay makes zero sense, as this is an issue for shareholders. And as a person who owns stock, the reason I don't care about ceo pay is, it's freaking impossible to get people to work management jobs. Everyone wants management salary. No one wants to work the slave labor hours. The average tenure of a ceo is 3 years. You're the most visible person. Screw up once, and shareholders fire you. In fact, they just fire you anyway. United Healthcare ceos outpaced the s&p for 8-10 years straight. The stock did better than Warren buffett. And the ceo still was fired. You want that job? You can outperform the world's best investor, and be fired. That's the life of a ceo. So they get paid. If you want them to get paid less, you buy shares, and vote against the pay. See who shows up to run the company.... But when you own shares in a company, you'll pay someone like Elon musk whatever they ask, to get the 10x+ return he delivered on the stock.
1
-
1
-
@beanclam you act like the ceo set his own pay. Are you daft? The shareholders approve it. Dude, if we could pay the ceo less we would. You act like the shareholders want to pay the ceo. Bro, we don't want to pay ANYONE. We pay what's necessary to get the talent. If you can get ceos to sign 10 million dollar contracts instead of what they're signing now, then dude, we'll pay you 10 million a year. If you can get ceos to accept less money, start a consulting business, I will get you business nonstop. Otherwise, if a ceo wants 30 million instead of 10 million, well, just like you said, the ceo won't be freezing out in the cold if he gets 20 million less, we investors don't mind 20 million less in profits, on a couple billion in profits. Assuming you deliver, otherwise, like the average 3 year term of ceos, bye bye. Get fired, and never hired again, loser. That's why they get paid a lot and have golden parachutes. It's an end of the line job for a lot of people. If these workers think the company is so profitable, they should buy the stock too. Paramount, Disney, etc. Have done amazing.... No? They didn't? So lol, don't cry if you don't have to hold these bags. I wish workers got paid in stock, so they understood, companies and shareholders aren't always doing amazing.
1
-
@beanclam if Elon musk does nothing all day, then you beat him. I mean, he runs 7 companies, but sure, pretend he just tweets all day. This is the problem with people like you. You have zero idea how businesses work. You want to say a ceo does nothing, OK, you start a business, do nothing, see how far you go. It's painfully obvious you've never done this before. You've never started, or ran a business with millions in revenue. The idea it just runs itself... Dude... You are insane. If you think business that easy, go invest in businesses. You'll be a trillionaire, every business you do will be profitable. Yet, MOST businesses fail. Most stocks return below the s&p. So when a person out paces the index with an amazing company, with amazing growth, you think they do nothing lol. It's wild. But of course, you can't do it yourself. Nor can you invest in the businesses that do. Nope. You know the business is broken, makes profits non stop, but, you're above making money by buying the stock... Or..it's next to impossible to pick which businesses will stay profitable....
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's wild how people just think investors just have this infinite money hack where they start a business, it makes money, and there was no risk or initial capital that should be compensated. You can give these people 100 million, buy all the equipment, set up the whole hr, legal, etc. And then, they make the product and they think they did 100% of the work, and everyone else is stealing from them. But ask them to just gtfo? No, they want YOUR STUFF. but will they risk 08 levels of crashes to their networth? No, they want you to hold the volatile stock, fund them, give them all the profits, like no. Get your money. You go around and raise money from everyone you know, tell them you might lose all their money on your idea to start a movie company.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@fishjones4618 I dunno, I think if more protagonists looked like me, big tits, thin waist, big booty, just think crazy anime storyline chick, it would be better. No, I don't need to provide proof, I just want you to understand how large of a demographic this is and how much better movies would perform if people who look like me, again, I won't provide evidence, were in them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
10:00 this would require normal people to understand, businesses can and regularly do lose money. The average person just assumes businesses print money(but don't invest in those money printing businesses...ignore that level of insanity). The same way they think the CEO pay somehow relates to them, and that high ceo pay means they're being screwed. Like the money would go to them or something if the CEO was paid less. They have no idea how the system works. I remember voting in favor of Elon musks compensation package. They don't understand these are things SHAREHOLDERS approve of. I mean, he wanted shares in the company for hitting insane revenue and profit marks... Whatever lol.... Not like he was gonna hit them quickly, and if he did, the share dilution would be worth it. Little did I know, he'd be the richest man in the world and the shares would 10x, but that's the deal the INVESTORS make. If the CEO makes 10 million less dollars, that's 10 million of reinvestment, dividends, or buybacks. That's not going to employees. I'm not sure why they care what the CEO makes, it has nothing to do with them. If investors choose to pay a ceo 25-50 million, that's their choice. I really don't care if apple pays tim apple 50 million a year. Or 100 million. Apple has delivered idiotic growth, and as long as it does, I'll vote my shares on the compensation. I don't care. If we making money because the stock goes up, and ceo wants 50M, we signing that. When random people can run companies successfully, they can get those checks too...
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1