Comments by "Maxwell Benz" (@Tential1) on "What to do with Nvidia now?" video.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@Jeff-uo8ro I remember when tesla was a 20B market cap, people said it was overvalued and you'd get it cheaper... Right before it went up 20x.... Lol. People are weird. They think because a chart went up vertically, it's overpriced. Maybe, it was undepriced.... Lol. They never consider that. Ever. Just "remember cisco!" ok... Remember Amazon, Google, Facebook, Tesla, etc. Not everything is a bubble. But to be fair, Tesla when it was a billion dollar company, I told my sister it was a bubble. She 5xd her money... Too bad she sold. I wish I hadn't said anything. But, I was the typical finance bro "look at the pe, you can't beat traditional auto!" I never looked at the product or growth. Just like these people. Difference is, I learned from my mistake.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wutangyang6611 Google pausing it's AI program, doesn't mean they can pause their hardware spend. Lol, why is this hard to understand? All AI is Nvidia. I get it, you're used to competition. You've never been a computer nerd before. But Nvidia dominates their fields. Just like Apple does. Why don't you doubt Apple ownership of the cellphone market? You don't say a random competitor will dethrone apple overnight? Nvidia is the Apple of AI, except with a larger switching cost. Also, for Google to fix its AI Program, it has to retrain the model, which requires using the Nvidia server Gpus it purchased lol. So that just means MORE usage of Nvidia products, not less.
Then, Nvidia has a new product coming out in November(We're tech nerds, you can follow our rumors if you want, it's how I started making money off my hobby). This is a ~30% performance increaes. We know this, because we confirm it from TSMC reports, which if you understand the tech jargon, you know that when they say "This is a high performance node" they actually mean, "This is a manufacturing process we did for Nvidia". So, if Google doesn't upgrade, they can't train models as fast. Which means everyone upgrades, and Nvidia knows this, so they charge 30% extra. This has been happening for the last 5-8 years. You didn't notice Facebook Capex Spend go CRAZY? What do you think they were spending the money on? Their "VR" spend was half Nvidia Gpus to train their models. Tesla uses them. Everyone uses them, and everyone upgrades the second they can, to keep their models on the cutting edge.
Welcome to being a customer of Nvidia, it sucks. No matter what, you give up, and just pay because you need their product to work efffiecently. I want to edit videos for youtube? Well, better have an Nvidia GPU.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@@micro-organism-pv5gdand you should have been purchasing the whole time, because that was when the people that don't understand the stock were selling. That was when revenues were flat, go look it up in your Bloomberg terminal on a graph. However, revenues were flat because of their deal with tsmc. Lol. People don't understand the stock. To predict revenues of nvidia, you have to look at tsmc's investor report, and then they tell you the upcoming production, and if you understand the tech jargon, you know they're not talking random, they're speaking specifically about Nvidia lol. But normal people don't know that stuff.
The stock will go sideways or down again when there is a change over of manufacturing lines at tsmc, and people see sales go down while Nvidia waits lol. Then, it will go back up. You have to remember, the average person does not understand anything about how to manufacture this product, or the manufacturing lead times are really anything about this. It's a goldmine for those of us who actually know how it works. All that time I spent as a kid learning how my graphics card worked, rather than actually using it to play games, finally paid off.
1
-
@@micro-organism-pv5gdLet's explain this another way. Nvidia had a forward PE of 30-35 for 20 years, while selling to video game players. During this time period, they sustained 20% Revenue growth, 25% net income growth, had margins that started at 40% and now are at 70%. Now, the primary customer is no longer a video game player. It's data centers. Nvidia has never had data center as a customer, they have had business customers, but NEVER data centers at this scale. So now, their customer is Microsoft, Google, Facebook, and Amazon, and you believe, they can't sustain the 20% growth?
I get it, 20% seems like a lot, especially for 20 years, but well, go find a 30-40 year old video game nerd, and ask if they kept paying Nvidia prices? They did, clearly, Nvidia owns 70% of that market. Nvidia will make Microsoft, etc. pay, and they wont have a problem. I believe Facebook spent 7B alone in one year. You've clearly NEVER dealt with Nvidia, if you think you just pay them for a product, and you're done. No, you HAVE to upgrade. It's just, only video game players, engineers, architects, animators, etc. had to deal with this before, and they HATED it. Now, Nvidia will get to abuse big tech, and from experience, it will be easy lol.
1
-
1
-
@aeromotive2 Broadcom is the only company you can own instead of Nvidia, and get "Good enough" returns. It's popped off this whole time, just not as hard as Nvidia, because Broadcom has lower growth rates. Broadcom is the only semiconductor company who I don't really know their chips. They are not as interesting chips. Wifi, Bluetooth, cable foxes, just random little things, but they're in so many different things, and they are critical to how they work. But I prefer Nvidia since I'm intimately familiar with them, and I know you HAVE to upgrade, because I'm a customer. I know I have to upgrade this November(Nvidia is also a gaming company, we gamers all play together, people talk about work, rumors easily spread, Nvidia always leaks performance a year in advance) and pay another 30% more. So, since I'm a victim of the 20% annual revenue increase, why not profit from what I know is going to happen.....
1