Comments by "" (@jmitterii2) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. That's why she needn't worry about the "hype". Nobody understands if whatever was written about QM computer was being hyped or not anyway.
    9
  2.  @tatonemio6388  They're not worth the time... makes me interested so many feeling the need to debunk something so obvious... at this rate the few crazies who think we're all collectively having delusions video screens and tv screens... they're really blank... and you're looking into a mirror. Or black hole LOL! They're nuts.
    3
  3. When we die we forget we ever existed nor what that even means... so sure.
    2
  4.  @bachirmessaouri4772  You tear apart the mystical babble that pseudo goofs have used to sell their mysticism and related merchandise when you explain how mundane energy really is in the pure definition. A quantification of the ability to do work. After being told it's mystical magical substance and in the end we're all energy after all, and energy must be conserved, we're immortal energy beings which can look into every universes verse! Yeah, sure... our bodies are an organized system that uses energy to do work to make us live. The once organized body that used energy in an organized manner to produce life such as motion and thoughts all stop using energy in that way upon death... systems around it, though, use what left over energy from your dead rotting body, and use the energy to do their life functions. So okay. Basically, we become a party pooper when you explain energy is more a verb and not a noun.
    2
  5. My favorite example to explain undefined and singularity similar to the result you get with Relativity concerning black hole density becoming mass/volume become m/0... that it's tantamount to Ohm's Law. Mathematically undefined divide by 0 is meaningless as saying go north of the north pole. So in physical theories that give you results that are undefined you have to realize the relationship of that theory no longer apply, you are beyond the limits of the relationship that theory is capable of describing and predicting. Ohm's Law states Current = voltage/Resistance. So if you had 0 ohm's of resistance you would get a singularity of current or infinite current per the law. That's not what happens. Superconductors literally have 0 ohm's of resistance, but the current doesn't approach infinite amps. It is true that the current can exist within these circuits indefinitely, but the amperes is not infinite as adding additional voltage to superconductive circuit to increase amps is limited to the temperature that increases in doing so, at a certain amps the temperature in the circuit will induce a resistance ending the superconductivity and limiting the amount of amps that circuit can contain. Instead one must look to other properties when 0 resistance is achieved. In this case, the Meissner effect is the phenomena that takes place in such 0 resistant (superconductive) conditions. Which are mathematically described in the London equations. Which explain the expulsion of the magnetic field about the superconductive current which explains the limit of voltage and current that can be applied to such a circuit until the temperature exceeds superconductive temperatures and a resistance the circuit returns.
    1
  6. Okay just paused at the start... Sabine tears other groups apart for getting tiny things wrong... Flat eathers... run... just run... that won't even work... you all are doomed! LOL! Okay, I'm ready... un-paused.
    1
  7. Bohm's interpretation both local and non local hidden variables has been ruled out by experiments: the Bell's experiment with his theorem demonstrates no local hidden variables. And an experimental test of non-local realism Simon Gröblacher in 2007 rules out non-local hidden variables. Fact remains, fundamental particles of the uncertainty principle means the nature of reality is not completely determined until interactions occur. The very act of measurement is an interaction that disturbs the response. Since we only perceive time in on direct, it simply could be that transactional interpretation is correct, or many world's. Whatever the mechanism or interpretation: it's not deterministic. Either way, Bohm's mechanics and all is wrong. No need to harp on it. We simply still don't know for sure... so have fun with whatever interpretation you like... eventually more will be discovered and that will of course provide us better "interpretations".
    1