Comments by "" (@jmitterii2) on "Business Basics"
channel.
-
I agree.
But there are no checks and balances on aristocracy or oligarchy world wide.
And this aristocracy or oligarchy simply stack their hired men (usually men not always), in all branches. Thus the checks are cartoony phony farces usually a scapegoat here and there... along with denials, nothing to see here, or gas lighting or other distractions upon distractions.
Checks and balance for government is nice... but also there should be checks and balances on oligarchs/aristocracy who tend to buy the very government... and in any more free of press nation, they buy the government stacking in with their hired thugs, and propound propaganda that convinces the masses that the masses aren't the government at all...
therefore the masses of people with both hands hand the government over to the very oligarchs/aristocracy that was screwing them over... and leading the economic system into a debt trap collapse.
Rinse and repeat.
So I say, yes checks and balances on government... but we really need to include that to big business aka to the aristocracy, to the oligarchy.
In fact, we don't need an oligarchy whatsoever no aristocracy is really ever needed, it moots merit from people who actually do the work.
We need to move to a co-op employee owned equal vote no matter the number of shares to all aspects of a business model.
Checks and balances on an aristocracy is as necessary to advance civility and prosperity for all as prohibiting indentured servitude, serfdom, and slavering was. And then allowing collective bargaining, etc.
Checks and balance the government only can and is always and is actually being undermined by the aristocracy/oligarchy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1