Comments by "" (@jmitterii2) on "Real Lawyer Reacts to Legally Blonde | LegalEagle" video.

  1. Depending on the case, if it goes to a jury or even judges today might find legalese misleading from the laymen written words if their meanings, dates, times, and other specifications are different. You have the last day for a 100% refund in legalese hidden on a pdf burried in a link is by 6/1/20... but you have the website proclaim it's 6/2/2020, particularly if this 6/2/2020 date is in more than one link page on the website, and especially more so if there is literal printed documentation with this other date. And the person demands a refund after this date only gets a 50% refund... therefore they wait and decide to return and refund after the 1st... and only get the 50% refund... most juries or judges will place the judgement against the defendant for the other half of the refund owed to the plaintiff. It's misleading, even bait and switch if done on purpose fraud, if done on accident still misleading, even if the website somewhere else especially very hidden has a disclaimer that whatever is on the website doesn't constitute a contractual obligation. Most juries and judges are fed up with companies either purposefully or accidentally posting contradictory pricing, dates, refund policies, warranty limitations, etc.
    7