Comments by "miraculixx" (@miraculixxs) on "Lex Clips" channel.

  1. I get it alright. So what to we do?
    1
  2. Change the contents of these sentences to something unlikely.
    1
  3. The intelligent question to ask is "Lex, what is AGI in your thinking and why do we need that"? The even more intelligent question is "what are the world's key problems and how can we solve them?" Hint: AGI is not the answer.
    1
  4. That's BS
    1
  5. No, Lex. Labelling code is a not a good practice. Like not at all, literally bad kind of not good.
    1
  6. In absence of certainty excercise caution. Simple as that. Wear a mask! There is ample scientific evidence that masks provide the best protection, short of not getting in social contact at all. The problem is not lack of scientific study, there is a lack of acceptance of facts.
    1
  7. So we all have to wear AR goggles to appear 'natural' in VR space. I don't think so.
    1
  8. Actually the opposite. There is too much group think going on.
    1
  9. The biggest limitation of humanity is the belief that everything in the universe is subject to mathematics. 😂
    1
  10. Some animals are concious. Apes, dogs, cats come to mind.
    1
  11. The key things to learn are memory, instructions and pointers. Unfortunately hardly anyone starts there anymore.
    1
  12. Peer review is overrated. Things that matter happen in preprints.
    1
  13. If you want to do search, well, just do search. Seems that Perplexity is search with an AI label
    1
  14. There will be a new programming paradigm, but it won't be English
    1
  15.  @WilliamParkerer  the value in watching ex machina is in reflecting about the story, not in the story itself. Mr Altman does not strike me as someone who reflects a lot.
    1
  16. Vscode is totally inferior to intellij though
    1
  17. @1cx7r23  hey Sam nice meeting you here. You made my point - not qualified.
    1
  18.  @1cx7r23  that's your first fallacy. AI is not a society wide technology. Besides, nobody wants you (Sam) near that kind of decision making.
    1
  19. The German Green Party wants us to go back to 0.0
    1
  20. One way functions are not complex. Their reconstruction is.
    1
  21. So if reality is a simulation why do I have to shave each day?
    1
  22. Calm down everyone. Today I couldn't even loan a book from my local library because it is not available online.
    1
  23.  @lucagain.  consider an Email system. Main purpose: Send and Receive Email. Start with that. Most people start with the UI, which causes to obscure the main purpose.
    1
  24. People's health is affected by catching this virus far more than any of the measures taken. COVID is the leading cause by now.
    1
  25. In fact the models war exactly on point. Look at the numbers.
    1
  26. Ever seen the aftermath of an earthquake or a flood? Vastly more devestating than any city. Just saying
    1
  27. All he's saying is it's not the government overspending but congress. Go figure
    1
  28. It's not true that there was no face to face communication between the West and Russia. Quite to the contrary. There was a continuous and constant flow of initiatives, talks, partnerships, investment and most of all exchange of culture by expats on both sides. For almost 30 years. It was working well until Putin decided to attack Ukraine in 2014 for no reason at all.
    1
  29. Statistics is a bad advisor for things you know nothing or very little about. In fact, we call it guessing.
    1
  30. 10'000 hours on a fulltime, 8 hours/day, 5 days/week is approx. ~6 years. Fyi
    1
  31. It's not the risk of dying that motivates protection. It's the risk of falling ill, possibly for life.
    1
  32.  @oSwhs  kids not only have the right to the same protection as adults but we are ethically if not legally bound to afford them the best protection available to avoid any harm, even if only as a precaution. Risking infection with a virus whose long term effects are unknown yet potentially harmful is the opposite of precaution. I don't see how this can be framed as desperate.
    1
  33.  @oSwhs  not sure where in the world you live, I don't know any nation other than China who has actually forced lock downs on anyone. Limitations of contact yes (it's a dangerous virus, after all) and meaures of protection like social distancing & masks. Kids don't have a problem with these measures, but they do have a problem with their close relatives dying of a preventable desease and with life-long disabilities caused by neglience. Re the side effects of vax in children, the effects of the disease are far more frequent than the former, ie vax risk is much lower than risk of becoming seriously ill from infection (both in children and in adults). Long term effects of vax are generally unknown - besides very unlikely in the way that the vax work, i.e. helping the immune system to learn to fight a new virus without actually causing the illness. If you fear the long term effects of the vax (in adults & children) it would be wise to fear the long term effect of the actual virus more.
    1
  34. Gotta love how everyone is now flocking to peddle their wares around ChatGPT. Actually I find it disgusting.
    1
  35.  @scientist30  No, it is not. I see your argument in that chemical reactions are the mechanics of how biology works, similar to maths being the mechanics of current AI. Yet chemistry alone is not sufficient to make us alive. In contrast to AI and in particular LLMs, where even a subset of the same math + data is sufficient to replicate similar phaenomena. So the mechanics of it are not enough.
    1
  36. I have essentiay stopped reading and responding to email. Period
    1
  37.  @nygeek6471  so you disagree. What is a virus, if not code?
    1
  38.  @nygeek6471  neither did I even say it was novel. You are reading too much into my statement. It says what it says. That's it.
    1
  39.  むく  interesting question. I think atoms are different from code in that they are what make up the material the code (as in DNA) written on/in.
    1
  40.  @matthewpeterson5159  code is just that. It doesn't do anything. It needs some device, machinery to be executed. Code is like text in a book. If code could be intelligent libraries would run the world :)
    1
  41. So funny to see all these overblown "promises" dismantled by reality.
    1
  42. Science: you don't understand this, lowlifes. Hush hush Alson science: people don't understand science.
    1
  43. Chomsky's analysis is way off. It's not the US that is causing issues.
    1
  44. I'm not sure what Lex thinks ChatGPT does but it is not some super intelligent can do anything machine. It's essentially the equivalent of a calculator but for language. No new insight possible.
    1
  45. When 'common' people wonder it's called speculation. When 'scientists' speculate it's called scientific study. Stop the arrogance (looking at her).
    1
  46. And u know better ofc
    1
  47.  @anthonybeaton9823  you have to read between the lines. Always 😉
    1
  48. All things considered and thought about, taking every argument into account and throwing like 100 times more compute power at it, figuring out all the scientific challenges along the way, could it be he doesn't know what he is talking about? Probaaably
    1
  49. Also single lines of code are never dangerous as such.
    1
  50. What a BS question.
    1