Comments by "miraculixx" (@miraculixxs) on "Bloomberg Technology" channel.

  1. You don't need AI to determine what causes these fires. It's a lack of forest cleanup. Tackle the problem (forests with lots of dry wood) not the symptom (wild fires).
    8
  2. What's the technology other than buzzwords? Didn't catch that. It appears to be some medical nanny service for adults?
    6
  3. Hey Bloomberg, how about checking your facts first? Very easy, just go look at Tesla's web site on the model 3, it is still available starting at $35000. NO PRICE HIKE. WTF?!
    5
  4. Stop giving this scam a platform. It's no worth any reporting.
    4
  5. Can someone explain what he means when he says he is 10MM above ground?
    4
  6. Talking from the sideline is of course so much easier
    4
  7. It's not an "OpenAI voice". It's "Scarlett Johansson's voice that OpenAI appropriated without permission".
    3
  8. So essentially they issue coupons and call them token. Got it. Other than that the company is an event organizer with its own app. Cool.
    2
  9.  @EMPATHYISKEY  I didn't say let's cut the trees and the forest be gone. I said cleanup which means to remove dead wood and reduce the tinder.
    2
  10. Wait, Musk is almost NEVER in his office, and when he is, he is working for 3 companies at the same time.
    2
  11. When people talk about stuff they don't understand...
    2
  12. Tulips!
    1
  13. AI AI AI AI AI AI blabla AI AI AI AI 😅 Buzzwords make you sound so important
    1
  14. Blockchain is probably one of the worst ideas since sliced bread. Increasing tx/second means removing the decentralization and consensus, which then basically reduces blockchain to a append-only database a.k.a log file. There are far better databases and append-only stores that have been tried and tested in large-scale deployments. Essentially the whole blockchain hype is a bubble waiting to burst. Tulips!
    1
  15. Essentially a blockchain is an append-only data structure (you can't change a transaction/block once it's been added) - that's not a new concept. For example, CouchDB (introduced in 2005) provides a distributed database that includes document revisions and uses and append-only data structures and links the revision history of single documents (a document is the equiv. of a transaction in a blockchain, if you will, however a blockchain bundles transactions into blocks before they are accepted). Another example is git (also started 2005) that does the same thing, though it allows history rewrites by default. There have been other systems of similar capacity since before and after these, most of which do not require the compute-intensive consensus (proof of work/stake) that blockchain uses. Note I said blockchain reverts to an append-only database if one wants to achieve more tx/second as this implies (logically) to change the way consensus is achieved. If you want a blockchain with all its bells and whistels, by all means, use a blockchain. As with all things engineering there is a trade-off. My issue is not with the technology but with the claims that people put on the technology without appreciating what it actually is and how it works.
    1
  16. Lots of nice words, no information. So if the AI is trained to hire on merit, and the population has a heavy skew on merit, will the AI stop hiring on merit to have a better skew than the population? Also a competitive differentiator is no longer one if everybody does it, which they say everybody should and can with their technology.
    1
  17. Nano is interesting indeed. Is there a "non-currency" implementation of the protocol? i.e. like Ethereum but block-latice
    1
  18. What a load of BS
    1
  19. This is NOT a software acquisition. RHT does not sell software, they sell support & services. All RHT software is open source, free of charge.
    1
  20. How is "automotive" not "tech"? Guys you need to rethink your choice of language and buzzwords, it come the point where nothing means anything anymore
    1
  21. "It made a joke. It must be sentient" LOL
    1
  22. Sure, also the commissions earned by AI-automated decisions come in faster than ever, and only at the peril of the customer. Gold rush really 🤑
    1
  23. Nvidia is overvalued. This is a bubble. We'll see huge losses in ~6-12 months.
    1