Comments by "Jovet" (@jovetj) on "John Stossel" channel.

  1. Terrible! Tyranny!!!
    2
  2. Obedience is peace, just as victory is peace.
    2
  3. Just like our edjewkayshun seestum for the past 50+ years.
    2
  4.  @crissd8283  Exactly right. That's what is so important about an Article V Convention of States. Such a convention can propose amendments to the Constitution by completely going around Congress. The states then can ratify them (or not) as if Congress had proposed them. Congress will NEVER vote to take away their own power!
    2
  5. They're not always wrong, and they're not always right or honest.
    2
  6.  @SkyLightsUFOs  I think he was joking.
    2
  7. No such thing as a "hate crime" either. All crime is based on hate, usually hate of one's self.
    2
  8.  @grimaffiliations3671  Government makes money just as well as I poop it.
    2
  9. Line item veto.
    2
  10.  @thespectator5259  Not all coals are the same.
    2
  11.  @SeekSomethingMore  Anarchy is not the answer. Very few people thrive in chaos just as very few people thrive in communism.
    2
  12.  @scytaleghola5969  I see how you think. If you agree with what he's saying, it's journalism. If you don't agree with what he's saying, he's just a talking head. Some talking heads are more correct than others.
    2
  13. Everyone who thinks he understands economics but does not needs to see this video.
    2
  14. Facts don't matter when feelings are.
    2
  15.  @Bill_Woo  Every 12? years we could have an entirely new Congress. If We the People wanted.
    2
  16. That's a GREAT oxymoron: emotional reasoning!
    2
  17. I thought the Southern Poverty Law Center was always a Left-wing, Money-grabbing, Slander Machine?
    2
  18. And he doesn't give two sharts about waste and pork!!
    2
  19. We're past ignoring balancing the budget. We're in the "what's a budget?" stage.
    2
  20. All I have to say is ARTICLE V CONVENTION OF STATES! Congress will NEVER vote themselves less power. WE THE PEOPLE have to take power from them!
    2
  21. Yep, that's just one of the corrupt "green energy" scams. Brightsource ($1.6 billion) First Solar ($1.46 billion) SunPower ($1.2 billion) Solyndra ($535 million) Fisker Automotive ($529 million) Abound Solar ($400 million) Johnson Controls ($299 million) A123 Systems ($279 million) Babcock and Brown ($178 million) LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million) ECOtality ($126.2 million) EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million) Mascoma Corp. ($100 million) Range Fuels ($80 million) Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million) Vestas ($50 million) Beacon Power ($43 million) Navistar ($39 million) Raser Technologies ($33 million) Evergreen Solar ($25 million) Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million) Nordic Windpower ($16 million) Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million) Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million) Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million) Thompson River Power ($6.5 million) Amonix ($5.9 million) Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million) Satcon ($3 million) Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million) Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981) GreenVolts ($500,000) SpectraWatt ($500,000) Do you know where your wallet is??
    1
  22.  @grimaffiliations3671  No it hasn't.
    1
  23.  @franssusan  Apparently my post here listing all the "green failures" of the Obama years got removed.
    1
  24. So, what are we gonna do about it?
    1
  25.  @amagi8137  Voting doesn't quell tyranny.
    1
  26. Leftism is a mental disorder.
    1
  27. @ArshAZ83 It isn't even a matter of intelligence. It's a matter of wisdom.
    1
  28. All of these numbers are, of course, worthless. No one knows how many people have had COVID-19, how many people have died from it, how many people are naturally immune from it, nor how many people received greater harm from lockdowns, masks, and financial upheaval. This whole situation has been a huge joke and we're the punchline. Absolutely disgusting.
    1
  29. You can always exempt yourself from the class suit and sue personally.
    1
  30.  @quintrankid8045  As I wrote above, "hate crimes" do not exist.
    1
  31.  @quintrankid8045  That does exist. It is stupid and misguided. Just another stupid idea that someone stupid came up with.
    1
  32.  @quintrankid8045  That is a bit too big and broad of a question to answer in a YT comment. But "hate crime" is a philosophical thing, not a legal thing. It seems to me that all crimes stem from hate. Usually that hate is the hate of one's self. You don't murder or batter someone you love, usually. Adding a "hateful" component is redundant and poor virtue signaling.
    1
  33.  @quintrankid8045  “...hate crime laws cover certain crimes committed on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, or disability.”
    1
  34.  @quintrankid8045  Because it is devoid of intelligent thought. It is like saying you should get extra punishment because you killed someone twice... you cannot kill someone twice. It makes no sense to make "hate" an extenuating circumstance when no one murders etc someone they love because he love them.
    1
  35.  @quintrankid8045  You seem to believe that hate is a motive. I do not.
    1
  36.  @quintrankid8045  Hate Crime laws assume that the perpetrator hates someone as a protected class. The actual hate is irrelevant, as you state. This is one reason that such laws are foolish. Hate is not a motive, because as I stated before, ALL CRIME stems from hate. A person who robs a bank hates others having money he does not have, and hates himself for not being financially successful.
    1
  37.  @quintrankid8045  Why are they called hate crimes?
    1
  38.  @sneakypress  LOL!!! You need to watch this until it sinks in!
    1
  39. ​ @anderivative  The point is that very few substances are actually worth recycling, with regards to "saving the Earth." If it takes more energy to recycle something than it does to make it new, that's not very "green" is it?
    1
  40. The carbon pollutant scam (and subsequent carbon taxes) is the biggest scam dreamed up in the past 100 years.
    1
  41. Sounds like you drove across Iowa.
    1
  42.  @mikeb5372  The power company where I live is a necessary monopoly. It isn't practical to have 2 or 3 or 17 sets of power lines running everywhere to service just their customers. Same for the water company. Same for the gas company. Speaking of ridiculous statements...
    1
  43.  @murphy511  The problem is there is no one to vote for who will curb the massive spending. And, even if there were, that's just one person in a sea of hundreds. And votes don't matter anyway, as we have seen.
    1
  44.  @mikeb5372  Would it require it? No. Would it be an eventuality? Yes, in some parts. Look at multiple cable providers. The nearly-infinite reach of cost-savings means controlling your own infrastructure, and not paying someone else for it.
    1
  45. I've received two Class Action notices this year, one suggesting I could get up to $16 and another up to $22.
    1
  46. Such universities (e.g. all of them) should be bankrupt and gone. There is no higher learning at university and college campuses these days... only higher indoctrination. That's really wrong, and it's a huge disservice to our progeny. It is literally evil.
    1
  47. I blocked that "context" panel ages ago, I forgot it was even a thing.
    1
  48.  @grimaffiliations3671  Some web browser plug-ins can do some handy things.
    1
  49. It won't matter. Sh'e s a moroon. Obama is the one in power now, and he will be in the one in power under a Harris presidency. Demons gonna demon.
    1
  50. LOL @ "It'll be John Stossel!!" hahahahaha
    1