Comments by "Jovet" (@jovetj) on "WOMAN CAN'T BELIEVE HER INSURANCE SCAM DIDN'T WORK" video.

  1. Regular automobiles should be mindful of giving larger vehicles a wide berth, and staying out of the driver' blind spots. It isn't a truck driver's responsibility to correct your fuckup and it's often beyond his capability (coz physics).
    12
  2.  @freedomwillneverdie6600  That's the reason I believe most people get car cameras... to channel their road rage. "Look at what all these morons around me are doing! (I'm a purrrrfect driver!)"
    5
  3. I "love" the inaccurate descriptions of events submitted by the video owners. It's a constant source of amusement and frustration.
    5
  4. Where I live in Nebraska, you are required to present valid insurance when licensing your car each year. I lived in South Dakota for a few years. There is no such requirement there, though you are supposed to keep insurance on your car. So many people would get insurance, license their car, and then cancel the insurance... it became a worthless law too hard to police, apparently. No idea what happens to you if you're pulled over there without insurance.
    3
  5.  @freedomwillneverdie6600  I never do. I mean what I write and write what I mean. Coincidentally, honking the horn is not beeping it, electrocution is always death by electric shock, what most people call jealousy is really envy, and hypocrisy is saying one thing and believing another thing, not saying one thing and doing another thing. I can understand that not everyone has the same capabilities as a writer or thinker. But, if you're going to submit a video for publishing to the world and misrepresent what happens, you accept the consequences of doing that. How many of these clips are the cammers actually the bad guys in??
    3
  6.  @iainhughes8110  ”What does MA mean? Sorry; but we're not familiar with your abbreviations here in the UK.” Do they limit your internet in the UK? Because if you had the same access to the sum of human knowledge that the rest of us enjoy, you could just spend 2 seconds and find that answer yourself. Because internet. Apparently I'm in a very snarky mood tonight.
    2
  7. I'm not convinced that's what happened. But it could be.
    2
  8.  @freedomwillneverdie6600  You obviously meant "winning" and I will forgive you, this time.
    2
  9. Yeah I'm not sure that's what she was doing. I think she could just as easily have been expecting to change lanes as she pleases while everyone else stays the hell away from her (as you would want to).
    1
  10.  @christinecampbell7301  They were probably illegal aliens, too. And of course illegal aliens aren't going to get insurance.
    1
  11. (7) *amber
    1
  12. When a truck is blocking or parked in your lane, you need to yield to oncoming traffic. Unconditionally.
    1
  13.  @iainhughes8110  “You're not even worth it.......” Apparently I am! LOL!
    1
  14. The generalized treating of bicycles as vehicles is so stupid. The mass difference of a train to an automobile is about the same as an automobile and a popcan. Any guess what the similar mass difference of an automobile and a bicycle is? Bicycles are much closer to pedestrians and should be treated as such.
    1
  15. I guess it's okay to run a red light if no one is around? Or drive around with your nose on your phone and not the road?? The honking was stupid. That's it.
    1
  16.  @Khaisz.  That is not what I have done. And that is not what you wrote. You wrote: “You where [sic] not even in the intersection when he ran the red light, there was [sic] like at least 4 car lenghts [sic] between you, you turned what was basically a non-event...” You just described running a red light as a "non-event." Sure, there was no lasting consequence to the running of the light, but it shouldn't be treated as nothing happened. The honking was indeed ridiculous, but he's still lucky he wasn't there a few seconds earlier.
    1
  17. Why do people call honking the horn beeping? It's so silly. It's childish and very inaccurate.
    1