Comments by "chaosXpert" (@chaosXP3RT) on "Военное телевидение" channel.

  1. "The M1A2 Abrams uses too much fuel! It's trash!" - Russian who cannot fuel his own tanks
    131
  2.  @RobinRobertsesq  Fun Fact: the M240 used today by the US military is basically a BAR with it's receiver upside down. After John Browning died, Fabrique National had the rights to produce the BAR and after years and several modifications, the M240 (FN MAG) is what they came up with. So technically, in a roundabout way, the US is still using the BAR too
    16
  3.  @sexyitalian891  There a video by the YouTube channel BattleOrder that does a fantastic job on discussing the tactics of weapons like the Javelin. They are not perfect. Tanks are still very useful. But my comment was only pointing out the common critique of the Abrams being a "gas-guzzler" and needing a robust supply line to be effective while it's claimed the T-72 and T-90 have no such weaknesses. It's clear now that the Russians have poor logistics and struggle to fuel their own tanks while the US has had no such trouble despite fielding the "inefficient, old, heavy, loud, and gas-guzzling" Abrams.
    11
  4. M2 goes back to 1918. It's older
    9
  5. I would love to talk to Egyptian helicopter pilots and hear their opinions on both
    6
  6. India bought the Apache AH-64 over the KA-52 and after watching Russian performance in Ukraine, they are probably satisfied with their choice lol
    5
  7. This proves the Leopard 2 is just as trash as the Abrams and people are salty about it. Lmao Germany's tank is just as bad as the American tank
    4
  8. Egypt bought the M1A2 Abrams too
    4
  9. By that logic the Abrams and Leopard 2 are better than the T-90 because they are safer for the crew.
    3
  10. The US is looking into a mobile system similar to the CAESAR that fits on the back of existing Humvees and trucks like the HIMARS does
    3
  11. This proves the Leopard 2 is just as trash as the Abrams and people are salty about it. Lmao
    2
  12. Actually they don't. Only UH-60s
    2
  13. This proves the Leopard 2 is just as trash as the Abrams and people are salty about it. Lmao Germany's tank is just as bad as the American tank
    2
  14. It does work, it's just got some reliability issues. Kinda like the J-15
    2
  15. The Cobra is used by the US Marine Corps. It's lighter, smaller and better suited for taking off and landing on assault carriers. The AH-64 is more heavy duty and fielded by the US Army. They have different roles and doctrines
    2
  16. TOW is as deadly as the Kornet
    1
  17.  YouTubeAlgorithm Dismantler  What do "logistics" and "military organization" mean to you? Do you know what a Quartermaster does in the military?
    1
  18. Not really. You should study history
    1
  19. This proves the Leopard 2 is just as trash as the Abrams and people are salty about it. Lmao Germany's tank is just as bad as the American tank
    1
  20.  @mrpotatoman_pr1554  Turkish Leopards are burning in Syrian dessert! Superior my ass! It uses an American fire control system and lacks half the commander sights of the Abrams. It doesn't have an active protection system, a datalink or ERA
    1
  21. By that logic the Abrams and Leopard 2 are better than the T-90 because they are safer for the crew.
    1
  22. This proves the Leopard 2 is just as trash as the Abrams and people are salty about it. Lmao Germany's tank is just as bad as the American tank
    1
  23. The military is our economy, dumb dumb
    1
  24. Well, your wrong. Fact
    1
  25.  @sambrooks7862  The US lost the Mexican-American War, the Spanish-American War, the Iraq War, the Indian Wars, the Phillipine-American Wars?
    1
  26. The Bradley is perfectly fine for the modern day. I haven't seen many IEDs in Ukraine so I'm not sure wasting taxpayer dollars on a new vehicle to be "IED-proof" is worth it. Just don't start anymore Iraq or Afghanistan Wars. Simple
    1