Comments by "chaosXpert" (@chaosXP3RT) on "NATO "Mercenaries" in Ukraine: Fact or Cap?" video.

  1. Wagner Group are mercenaries
    5
  2. Both sides are using Volunteers and Mercenaries. Who cares?
    3
  3. I'm sorry you support Fascism
    3
  4.  @konrd  Yeah it is. We spent trillions in Afghanistan and the USA is still going
    3
  5.  @kuroki2986  Which battles did the US lose?
    3
  6.  @joshpearson2970  I'm not "huffing copium" so to speak. My only issue is that the US political loss in the Afghanistan doesn't change the potency of the US military in conventional conflict. But it is pretty hilarious watching the Anti-Americans lose their minds over how effective US military equipment is in Ukraine. Because to them, the US losing in Afghanistan means the US military must be weak and inept. It's like the Vietnam War. The US strategy in Vietnam was absolutely horrendous. We didn't even invade North Vietnam out of fear of creating a wider conflict with the PRC. Our strategy was basically to just kill as many North Vietnamese as possible and just...wait for them to give up. The problem with partisan wars like Vietnam and Afghanistan is that the South Vietnamese government and the Afghan government didn't offer anything new or better to their people. Even though the Vietnamese monarchy (which was basically a puppet of France) had been deposed, most of the same old aristocrats and corrupt officials were still in power in the new Republic of South Vietnam. But I digress. The problem for the Conflict in Ukraine is that the Russians have only been able to capture and hold land where most ethnic Russians lived in Ukraine and even still, Russian soldiers are being attacked by local Ukrainians partisans and Ukrainian Special Forces. The latest attack on the building in Mariivka that resulted in 89+ dead Russian soldiers, the most likely cause was local Ukrainian partisans relaying the info to the Ukrainian military. Just like when South Vietnamese would tell the Viet Cong about the location of American soldiers or the Taliban joining the Afghan Army to shoot US soldiers in the back. Wars of occupation are extremely difficult and totally different than conventional wars. Not that the USA hasn't won wars of occupation in the past. But that goes into strategy and such and I don't want to drone on too long.
    2
  7.  @r200ti  Yeah, that's not true. Lmao
    1
  8.  @Draconianoverlord55  Those are wars, not battles
    1
  9.  @kuroki2986  If you punched someone in the face and walked away, would you claim you lost the fight?
    1
  10.  @maxkazzora4234  You support Russian Fascism?
    1
  11.  @ceejay1476  Cope take? You're not even talking about reality. It was North Korea that invaded South Korea. It was North Vietnam that invaded South Vietnam. I didn't even read what you wrote about Afghanistan, but you clearly have no idea what you are talking about in the slighest
    1
  12. "I regard newspapermen as spies because in truth, they are." - General William T. Sherman
    1