Comments by "chaosXpert" (@chaosXP3RT) on "Battle of Gettysburg: Bird's-Eye Perspective | Animated History" video.

  1. US (and Confederate) Cavalry was some of the most elite in the world at the time. With Sabers and quick-firing Carbines, American Cavalry acted more like Mounted Infantry, which was more advantageous than traditional European Cavalry which largely still used lances
    5
  2. Because then his Army could be cut in half. It'd be spread out way to thin. He also had no idea where the Union positions exactly were. He had bad intel. He was out numbered here, thousands of miles from home and had a tenable supply situation. For all the criticisms of the American Civil War, it'd be that American generals studied Napoleonic Warfare too much
    2
  3. It's easy. The Confederate government and rich plantation owners lied to them. They bought the propaganda hook, line and sinker.
    1
  4. 1) A war between the Union Army and the French could've been possible as General U.S. Grant was very keen to seen France pushed out of Mexico at the end of the Civil War, but besides sending some weapons to the rebels, the US never needed to send soldiers. 2) Withdrawing without pursuing the enemy immediately was common for the time. Even immediate pursuit took time as once armies deployed for battle, they had to pack up their equipment, kitchens, tents, horses, mules, etc. and transition to marching. This is why cavalry and skirmishers were so important. Even if Cavalry couldn't win a battle on their own, they could harass the enemy and provide recon. American Cavalry of the time period was different than that on Europe as they functioned much more like mounted infantry. Pistols, carbines and repeating rifles were much more common than swords and there were no lances. 3) In 1870, General Sheridan was given permission by President U.S. Grant to observe the Franco-Prussian War. Sheridan was very impressed by the Prussians, however he did make the comment that if he "had a U.S. Cavalry Corps, I should stop them in their tracks." Granted, this is just one man's perspective, but as a decorated Civil War veteran and general, I wouldn't dismiss his opinion entirely.
    1
  5. Because the British couldn't
    1