Comments by "chaosXpert" (@chaosXP3RT) on "Why Soviet Logistics weren’t as nightmarish as German Logistics in WW2" video.

  1. "Western Trucks" It's that difficult to say "American Trucks" isn't it?
    6
  2. It looks that way, but it depends on your use of the term "armies". Soviet Fronts were typically equal in size to a Germany Army. For example, Soviet rifle divisions usually consisted of about 10,000 soldiers. German infantry divisions usually numbered around 15,000 soldiers. British infantry divisions had about 18,000 soldiers and American infantry divisions had about 14,000 soldiers. I'm not saying you are wrong, I'm just saying that military units can be confusing at first glance, because not every nation had the same size units. A Soviet Army was usually about the size of a German Corps. So 4-6 Soviet Armies in the East might not even equal one German Army Group.
    1
  3. You just lied about the Allies only opening "second front" to block the Soviets. The D-Day landings were the 3rd Front in Europe and 4th Front for the USA. So I have absolutely no reason to take anything else you said seriously. You don't even have credentials or sources. Why do you lie?
    1
  4. You can't steal money from a tax payer. It's already stolen. In the USSR, the factories are government owned. In the USA, the government hired companies to make product, but the companies were still their own independent entities
    1
  5. You have no idea what a Free Market or Capitalism is and it shows
    1
  6. Well, the east likes to claim the UK and USA didn't contribute anything to the war and that they would've won it anyways. It's demeaning and awful
    1
  7.  @eescoto71  But did the US even send the trains set to the wrong gauge?
    1
  8. What is Capitalism other than anything that isn't Socialism?
    1
  9. That wasn't real capitalism
    1
  10. The UK, the USA and France didn't defeat the Germans too? The Soviets did it by themselves?
    1