Comments by "pm ayo" (@pmayo7894) on "" video.

  1.  @cj09beira  - Try driving an A80 (Mk. IV) in pure stock form.
    4
  2.  @cj09beira  - hold your horses. The weight of the Supra Turbo weighed around 3,417 lbs. The new one will be around 3300. Also, Toyota stopped their collaboration with BMW in 2014.
    3
  3. Too expensive. Plus, you need more car models to accept the engine, just like the 2JZ, in order to lower costs.
    2
  4.  @cj09beira - doesn't need to.
    2
  5. Really? This interview would like to suggest Tada-san knows more than virtually all of us here. http://blog.toyota.co.uk/new-toyota-supra-interview-with-chief-engineer-tetsuya-tada
    1
  6. Reworking a 2JZ for today's times is expensive.
    1
  7. You don't know what the Supra is really about. Do some research, will ya?
    1
  8.  @remybrunson6204  - the car was originally supposed to be competing against the Nissan (Datsun) Z car back in the day. It was more on the luxury side until the 80s. That's what I've said before: do some research.
    1
  9.  @remybrunson6204  - not supposed to be up against the GT-R
    1
  10.  @remybrunson6204  - there is one thing missing. The rest of the world, barring some counties, don't even have the Skyline GT-R.
    1
  11.  @remybrunson6204  - SKYLINE GT-R. Don't mix up.
    1
  12.  @adamcz3183  - not exactly. We'll have to focus on the base models, not the Turbo ones.
    1
  13. The Supra was once part of the Celica for the first few generations.
    1
  14. Too expensive.
    1
  15. The Supra was never designed to compete with the GT-R, only the Z range.
    1
  16. It wasn't supposed to be competing with the GT-R, only the Z car.
    1