Comments by "pm ayo" (@pmayo7894) on "" video.

  1. They can, actually. There's even some photos of the planes with B61s (even if they're inert versions).
    1
  2. Not much. Besides, Russia also has nuclear-capable planes.
    1
  3. ​ @andyhughes1776  - "superior Russian air defense systems" - which weren't able to do much against low-cost Ukrainian drones flying towards Russia's oil refineries and depots, of all things before ATACMS came along. "It denies that the F-16 could carry nukes" - the problem here is, this has been an open secret way long before Moscow even complained. Ukraine doesn't need to use nukes; they just want a more capable fighter plane - and Russia to simply get out of their internationally-recognized territory (just using conventional weaponry is enough).
    1
  4. ​ @andyhughes1776  - my brother, let me remind here that a lot of the information I got aren't even from mainstream media (there's the pro-Russia milbloggers who have a little more freedom to post Russian military activities compared to the average citizen, satellite photo services for quite a hefty fee, and even the occasional amateur phone videos). Dude, I can tell you know that it's not the case.
    1
  5. ​ @andyhughes1776  - "Look up what U.S. Ambassador to the Soviet Union warned way back in 1990 about what would happen if NATO expanded." - you missed a lot of contexts. Besides, Moldova and Chechnya would like a word. "Like so many people, you have no clue what transpired long before Putin invaded." - dude, we know that it ain't the case here. Dude, cut the act.
    1
  6. Not exactly wasted considering that a lot of the stuff sent to Ukraine were already paid for.
    1
  7. yawn Missing context, bud. Besides, Moscow is way more Nazi than Ukraine.
    1
  8. Except, those aren't leaked.
    1