Comments by "pm ayo" (@pmayo7894) on "TFLnow" channel.

  1. Except, the 90's part isn't exactly rosy for the A80 model. Spoiler: the A80 was initally hated.
    4
  2.  @Inferno45  - the Supra was never meant to compete with the GT-R, even with the previous two generations. It was meant to be a Z rival. Edit: For the A90, it was aimed at the Porsche Cayman and (if you known the French) the Alpine A110.
    2
  3. The first Civic Type R is a hatchback. And if you want a sedan Type R, look east. There is an older one in Japan for you, and it's naturally aspirated (once it reaches 25 years since it left the factory). https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_Civic_Type_R#FD2_(Asian_version)
    1
  4.  @DailyDriversCarReviews  - I wouldn't write tomato just yet. Sure the Z offering the manual would give Toyota the incentive to develop the manual transmission, but using BMW's straight-6 engine? Toyota went to them mainly because of that configuration. Besides, do many people forget the somewhat abysmal sales of the Mark IV Supra, especially during the time that Japan's economy declined in the 90s?
    1
  5. Not really slow once you take it to a road with plenty of corners.
    1
  6. Toyota created Lexus.
    1
  7. No.
    1
  8. There is a turbo. And, no, let's keep it FWD. We have a bit too much of that variety.
    1
  9. That's how a Civic Type R should always be. Why go for AWD?
    1
  10. The Type R is never RWD, like every Civic.
    1
  11.  @bebetofandi6431  - yes.
    1
  12. You might want to look at last weekend"s Fuji 86 Style with BRZ 2021 event.
    1
  13. If the "Supra"'s a rebadge Z3, the driving characteristics would have been very different.
    1
  14. No. It should stay FWD. And this is track-oriented. Why the need for a moon roof?
    1