Comments by "Military History Visualized" (@MilitaryHistoryVisualized) on "Military History not Visualized" channel.

  1. first!
    443
  2. I only read once about him, yet, I think the author balanced him out a bit. In short not enough information and as I saw recently there are so many aspects out there that are misrepresented aka Sherman death trap that this could also be the case with Generals.
    21
  3. Whitewash what exactly? I don't know what you mean and how it is related to your paragraph.
    3
  4. Yeah
    3
  5. First, question mark in the title. Second, you seem to look at mostly ethic criteria.
    3
  6. Third, I wanted people to know about Thomas.
    3
  7. The text is not for reading, but for reference.
    2
  8. Lol I had that part in and cut it, because it is complicated.
    2
  9. Nette Argumentation, aber grundsätzlich falsch auf 2 Ebenen. 1) für arbeit kriegst du was, du hast die Wahl. Bei Präsenzdienst/zivi wirst du bei Verweigerung von der Polizei abgeholt. 2)alle Frauen sind ausgenommen.
    2
  10. I am waiting on THE book on Auftragstaktik, since I am assuming that there is a lot of bullshit out there that might be wrong.
    2
  11. Who?
    1
  12. @2. Les das faq
    1
  13. it was not in the strategic plan, besides that: how do you get the oil out of there and back to Germany...
    1
  14. Thank you
    1