Comments by "Jin Kee" (@JinKee) on "Japan's New Toy: The Tomahawk Missile" video.

  1.  @SosaKinkos  by definition that is impossible. it’s like saying the wrong team won the world cup
    4
  2.  @DieFlabbergast  biggest trading partners over the last three decades. Deng made your underpants, check the label. and then we saw them building the Belt and Road initiative and decided that the world shalt have no other gods before us.
    4
  3.  @manners7483  gain of function research?
    3
  4. what do the japanese run for anti-ballistic missile systems?
    2
  5. can we talk about the aussie nuclear sub deal? it would be weird for the aussies to have a nuclear sub without nuclear torpedoes, they usually go together
    2
  6.  @Dana-ie2bh  its easy to get worn out.
    2
  7. we are in the 1928 part of history, except this time America is playing England’s position, china is playing japan and russia is germany. instead of limits on battleship numbers we have limits on numbers of nukes. we have not yet seen the weapon that will be as useful as an aircraft carrier was. this is an any% speedrun of history.
    2
  8. i can’t get over how fast Raptor and F35 have gone the way of the De Haviland Vampire in favor of sixth gen aircraft armed with conformal tactical airborne laser. is sixth gen that big of a deal?
    2
  9. and why haven’t the japanese built their own cruise missiles?
    2
  10.  @pyrioncelendil  can’t you just buy plastic lawn chairs and underpants with yuan?
    2
  11.  @boosterh1113  i recall that nuclear torpedos were loaded and ready to go during the cuban missile crisis, the goal being to be able to kill more than one ship at once. or maybe just for propaganda value. also aren’t there torpedo tube lunched nuclear tipped tomahawk variants for land attack?
    1
  12. if we did get enough fusion energy to pull crude oil out of atmospheric CO2 the first thing Lockheed Martin would do is use the crude oil to 3d print a fusion powered unmanned stealth bomber that will orbit perpetually over our enemies. war, war never changes
    1
  13. didn’t you also say that the japanese also have 80% receivers for nuclear warheads?
    1
  14.  @herrfugbaum8978  that is because the russians have, um, quality control issues
    1
  15. LMT is cheap at any price.
    1