Comments by "suraj s" (@surajs5913) on "What is BJP's official philosophy 'Integral Humanism'?" video.

Can you actually give an example to support your claim?
8
@ashwinidesai4051 let him talk about the minority, i still dont see how BJP has not followed the philosophy as a political party (i am not talking about individual exceptions but the party line in both politics and policy, both in speech and implementation)
5
@TrueandpracticalIndian fyi m.k. gandi had an idea called non violebce but thtat didnt prevent nehru from fasting unto death in protest of gandis assassination or turn the other cheek and offerhimself to the assassins - instead nehru did what the british used to do to those who opposef his colonial rule... fyi deendayal upadyays understanding of economics was wrong and capitalist consumerism is not unbridled but restricted by market forces which are determined by peoples needs rather than the dictum of the state. We still have work to do but todays hindutvavadis can appreciate how crony capitalists like ambani brought internet coverage to India and hastened the process of hindu renaissance, gave a voice and level playing field for all ideas and increased the reach and knowledge of the common man. Socialism is a dead end and capitalism is just a path chosen for now, rather than a goal or destination. The goals of integral humanism can be acheiced through capitalism too and unbridled consumerism is a misconception and a dog whistle used by anti capitalists like m.k.gandi....
1
@TrueandpracticalIndian means are equally important and when one means called socialism has shown to cause more sufferring than before then a new means called capitalism is needed to ensure betterment of people.
1
@TrueandpracticalIndian bjp still follows the vision of integral humanism - socialism was not a his ideology and karl marx was not any of our forefathers. Deenadayal Upadhyaya was wrong in that socialism is the tool to acheive economic prosperity, but his vision of integral humanism was right and is being pursued by bjp. It is like if some medieval prophet claims that semen comes from spinal fluid, the followers of the prophet can either keep following that theory despite new medical information or they can use their common sense and learn from history without rejecting the fundamental principles. People who have not sacrificed their brains at the altar of an ideology and instead see the value of the ideology insofar as how good it is for humanity will use common sense ....
1
@TrueandpracticalIndian maybe you are incapable of debating logically and on moral grounds with proper historical evidence, that is why you are trying to attavk my moral character rathwr than addressing my arguments or countering them...
1
@TrueandpracticalIndian just like how you are free to assume what you want. Also a impartial person reading this is free to assume what she wants but most logical people will see who questioned whose morality first...
1