Comments by "suraj s" (@surajs5913) on "Mandir or Masjid — Why an acceptance of truth u0026 slow reconciliation is needed and not new surveys" video.

@asmitnandi3432 what is your language? Which central state is dominating? Maharashtra or Tamil Nadu?
1
@asmitnandi3432 then how did they become two if the most industrialised states in India along with karnataka if they are treated so unfairly by landlocked states? And tell me what is YOUR language?
1
Lulu Ma evne the term adivasi was invented 200 years ago by christian missionaries to alienate the tribal societies further and foment enmity. They are tribalw and not first tenants of anything.
1
As long as the national motto is "Satyameva Jayate" truth should prevail.
1
@anshuraj4277 temples destroyed due to kash8 vishwanath expansion will also be reconstructed. But i want you to share news of your outrageous claims since all i can find in connection to your claim is a debunked article by the caravan. Truth and reconciliation is not to just target muslims but to close the scars of the past. Present policy cannot be ignorant of history. If we do that we arw no better than the chicken that gets slaughtered generation after generation in meat shops. The only way to prevent the repeat of the past is to acknowledge it and base your policy without ignoring history.
1
@anshuraj4277 who are you to tell a religious denomination not to obsess over their historical religious sites? Just how Sardar Patel reconstructed the Somnath temple against the wishes of nehru, every place of importance will be reclaimed. That is the just affirmative action for the historical wrongs done to hindus by virtue of being hindus in the past. You cannot selectively highlight caste discrimination while ignoring religious barbarism.
1
@anshuraj4277 you acknowledge the historical wrongs of caste but not religion. And you call me a nutjob. The people will decide who is the real nutjob hiding behind weak arguments. Tell me again when hindus denied returning any seized or destroyed lands to jains or buddhists? We are ready for archaeological excavation at any disputed site to ascertain the history of that place. If normalising qenocide against hindus is your modus operandi then there is no point reasoning with you. Public opinion will decide which of the two was bloodier- cast or religious violence. And public will decide how to reconcile historical social conflicts. You will suffer the full effect of democracy, dont worry...
1
@anshuraj4277 i am prepared for upliftment of oppressed classes and repatriation just as i am in favor of reclaiming temple land. Caste repatriation is not to wash over the sins of the past but to acknowledge it and provide means for those castes to catch up with the remaining castes in terms of social development. The same logic applies for religious denominations. But tell me how many qenocides did muslims commit on hindus? And what about the reverse? Entire towns and universities were put to the sword to erase the civilisation of India. It was an attack on the Indian way of life, an attack on the Bharat mentioned as the fourth word of article one of our modern constitution. To acknowledge that attack and allow that religious denomination to catch up with the rest , these lands must be returned. Keep denying islamic excesses against hindus and keep amplifying the violence of hindus against hindus . No matter how much you lie, historical and archeological evidence, including the self recorded barbarism of islamic rulers who took pride in persecuting hindus , are sufficient to expose your malicious hypocrisy.
1
@anshuraj4277 places of worship act was a legislation passed in 1991. It will go the article 370 way. Repatriation for any buddhist stupas destroyed is acceptable. Again i am telling you the only way the state can truly acknowledge the brutality of ALL kings is to undo their destructive and perverse actions irrespective of the religion of the king. Then any argument of US vs them is negated and purely historical data is utilised. But you dont want even that to happen, you dont want even archaeological surveys to be conducted . Lofty ideals like "those who forget history are doomed to repeat it" is only for other issues according to you and not to specific religious discrimination by any king ruler or warlord of any religion region of ethnicity on the various religious and social denominations of India. But no, you would rush to acknowledge the qenocide of everyone from zoroastrians to jews, but not of hindus. The people of India will decide for themselves, dont worry. They are not stupid, they have already decided on their priorities...
1
@anshuraj4277 whatever the marathas destroyed will also be rebuilt. Who said i denied any excess by marathas? That is just your assumption. The only argument of mine is truth should triumph, not ignorance or history denial. And Kashi is being reclaimed not because aurangazeb destroyed the temple but because hindus rever that place inspite of history. The argument for the temple is the religious rights of the people and acknowledging a historical wrong, not punishing or erasing anyones legacy. If this is the mughal legacy that muslims want to preserve then i am appalled. Hindus have anyway decided to abhore the legacy of sati prata and now jati bhed, but do muslims still take pride in the actions of aurangazeb destroying temples? If they dont take pride in such perverse violence then they should vacate the land if the archaeological evidence is in favor of hindus. This question is very important in the social conversations of India and there can be no peace or common ground if any group take pride in the atrocities of their ancestors.
1
@anshuraj4277 his lineage fid not cause his actions, his faith did. Your argument is a s stupid as whitewashing the sins of brahmins by saying they are from africa.
1
@chandrareddy4392 yes, why not? Hindus dont have the delusion that their kings were perfect men. We do not think every ruler was the champion of hinduism or that they were comparable to any prophet mohamed. Acknowledging their sins will not tarnish hinduism in any way. Tell me though? Who killed buddhism in India? Pushyamitra sanga or islam? Why is it that every region that was buddhist dominated in medieval India - sindh, bihar, bengal - have large population of descendents of buddhist converts to islam? And who destroyed more stupas? Hindus or muslims?
1