Comments by "suraj s" (@surajs5913) on "Delhi Police and their families protest against Republic Day violence" video.

@jishrayto4817 police should maintain law and order, simple. The rioters disrupted law and order on 26 Jan 2021, simple. The police were severely outnumbered, and attacked with swords and tractors, simple. The police had the choice.of either open fire or retreat and regroup, simple. The police chose restraint, and many police personnel were severely injured as a result, simple. The injury to the police severely affects their families too, since the police are humans, simple. The police as an arm of the state has no right to take a political side in a piece of legislation, simple. The families of the policemen have the constitutional right to protest against the violence caused, simple. And the locals affected by large scale protests in delhi also have the right to protest against the location of the protestors and the inconvenience caused therein (though the locals have no right to become violent against the farmers) , simple. Understand now?
3
@jishrayto4817 how do you justify farmers slashing at police with swords? How do you justify farmers trying to run over policemen? How do you justify farmers harassing a policewoman in public?
3
@jishrayto4817 1) police as an instrument of the state, should not be sexist and not discriminate between man and woman. 2) forcing to is not the same as harrassing 3) police didnt take sides on jan 26. If you have issue with some other day, then take it upto court with relevant proof. Or better yet make a political campaign out of it. How right you are can be seen by how much people support you 4)finally if your response is "no one will support me in fascist Modi's India" then it is for you mg dear friend that people suggest to emigrate to the totally secular states of pakistan and china.
2
@jishrayto4817 1) family of police can and may go to court. But i believe that the injury sustained by an officer in duty becomes the responsibility of the state and not private citizens. Their petition might not be entertained insofar as any damage done to police is concerned. If their private property was damage then their petition wont be dismissed. So family can go but such petitions are more likely to be dismissed. 2) anyone can protest against any inconvenience caused by any large group of people. Thats within the constitutional rights guaranteed by the state. Why are you so worked up then about the families of the police protesting? I believe these families too lice in delhi and would qualify as locals. Why is it that you are unable to acknowledge the right of the families to protest? Do they lose constitutional rights because some relative is in police force? Are they second class citizens according to you? 3) which developed country are you referring to? Are you referring to UK where the police overlooked "grooming gangs" of muslim immigrants because of political pressure? https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-28951612 Or are you talking about the United States of America where looting and riots from Black Lives Matter and antifa saw no opposition from the authorities? https://nypost.com/2021/01/21/biden-and-cops-wont-stop-them-until-portland-is-burned-down/amp/#aoh=16121044849335&_ct=1612104557187&csi=1&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&_tf=From%20%251%24s
2