Comments by "suraj s" (@surajs5913) on "'Some people's history is limited to one family', says PM in Rajya Sabha" video.

@Anonymous-bm5rb hahaha hahaha did you actually associate the abrahamic concepts of sin and eternal damnation with Dharma? The errors we do haunt us in this life and the next. But we suffer only for individual sins. Humanity in its entirety is not damned for the sins of one man (like adam in christianity). If you knew the story of Maharishi Valmiki, you might know that and understand that all those who commit atrocities in the name of caste or any other collectivist social notion, bear the burden of error on their own individual aatman. Their sins are theirs alone to carry, its a non transferable asset/liability. Maybe modern hindus are willing to take up this burden to rid society of todays pressing problems. I personally wont .ind a few more births if it ensures continuity of my current culture. Thankfully we are not so foolish as to profess an omnipotent omniscient benevolent god, who sees all evil and has the power and grace to stop it, but still doesnt (like some depraved masochist enjoying the sufferings of humanity). We are a bit more realistic, well aware of the consequences of our actions, still executing them knowing that it is the lesser of all evils. It is less evil to qnnhilate your enemy than be annihilated by them. If you see no enemies, it would be only because you dont want to see them.. But when you use foreign concepts to interpret native philosophy, its truly funny...
4