Comments by "Bruce Tucker" (@brucetucker4847) on "The Far Right French Revolution - The 6 February Crisis | BETWEEN 2 WARS I 1934 Part 4 of 4" video.
-
4
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think that depends on the context. If your political goal is, say, to free your country from a military occupation that is itself established through violence, sometimes violence is the only means to accomplish that. This is something that I think Gandhi and King were wrong about - they both had the luxury of having opponents that, however brutal they could be in their systems of control, had to operate in the larger context of more or less liberal democracies. They were wrong in thinking the policeman will always tire of beating his victim - what happened with both of their movements is that the people back home were repelled by the policeman's brutality and eventually refused to countenance it any longer. The SS and NKVD are perfect examples of how, with the backing of a like-minded (usually totalitarian) government, it is sadly very easy to build a police force that will never tire of beating its victims, or indeed of murdering them, until it runs out of victims to murder.
Ireland probably could have been freed without violence, but as pointed out above, the disproportionate violence of the British response to Irish nationalism convinced many Irish people who had previously not supported the IRA that the British would never give up control of Ireland unless they were forced to, and violence was the only means of forcing them. The execution of the leaders of the Easter Rising was probably the most important British action in this context, but bringing in heavy artillery to level downtown Dublin in response to a few hundred ragtag, badly-armed, an largely unsupported rebels didn't help much with public opinion either.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1