Comments by "doveton sturdee" (@dovetonsturdee7033) on "Mary Rose row | 'This is the problem with these liberationist movements!' says David Starkey" video.

  1.  @stevetodd7030  The point is that it is very inaccurate. The classic case being 'Beachy Head Lady.' A reconstruction of her facial appearance from her skull suggested sub-Sarahan African origin, and had the celebrated David Olusoga claiming that she was proof of the presence of sub-Sarahan Africans in Britain from the time of the emperor Septimius Severus. Unfortunately for Olusoga, subsequent DNA analysis by the Crick Institute identified her probable origin as being that well-known part of sub-Saharan Africa, CYPRUS. With such imprecise techniques, the results can often say what people with agendas want them to say. To the best of my knowledge Olusoga has not acknowledged his error.
    16
  2.  @PaulMason-c9m  Do you find all more intelligent people so intimidating?
    4
  3. No. They won't be claiming that for another two years or so.
    2
  4.  @PaulMason-c9m  Your evidence for that being?
    2
  5. Surely you know that recent research has revealed that 29% of Mary Rose's crew were transgender, 37% were gay, and the remaining 34% came from sub-Saharan Africa? Or, if it hasn't revealed that as yet, it will do in a few years' time.
    1
  6. You don't consider discussing an asinine blog about the 'Mary Rose' to be relevant to history?
    1