Comments by "doveton sturdee" (@dovetonsturdee7033) on "Whatifalthist" channel.

  1. Don't you perhaps consider that a country with no navy is less than well equipped to attempt a seaborne invasion on an island with the largest navy on earth?
    3
  2. Why would the British accept an armistice?
    1
  3. Actually, the Bengal Famine had a number of causes, among which were the number of refugees from Japanese held areas, the inability to import food from those same areas, stockpiling by hoarders and, perhaps worst of all, the Bengal administration, which tried to minimise the crisis. The worst that could be said of Churchill was that he should have known what was taking place, but didn't. After all, in 1943, he had little else to worry about. You could also add the refusal of FDR to allow the transfer of merchant shipping, by the way. What is without dispute, except by those who choose to blame Churchill for everything since the Black Death, is that once he did find out, he transferred food distribution to the British Indian Army, and had grain convoys diverted from Australia to India. You might perhaps ask why, when there were 2.5 million Indians serving in the military, Churchill should, supposedly, bring about a famine in Bengal?
    1
  4. Germany had an excellent army, which had no means whatsoever of mounting a seaborne invasion of Great Britain.
    1