Comments by "doveton sturdee" (@dovetonsturdee7033) on "Documentary identifies new culprit in Titanic disaster" video.

@chrisvillarreal2752 Astor and Guggenheim, two of the three millionaire financiers who died, had never expressed therir opinions about the Fed., whilst the third, Straus, was a supporter and had publicly spoken in favour. The rest of your post simply amounts to gibberish. If your ludicrous claim was 'OBVIOUS' then how do you explain the lack of any actual evidence in support of it? Furthermore, 'full speed' is not a relative term. It means the maximum speed of which (in this case) a ship is capable. As Titanic had five of her boilers unlit, then, ipso facto, she was not at full speed. Only one clown here, mon brave!
2
The 'theory' as you call it, was invented in the mid 1990s, and has precisely no credible evidence to support it. Don't be gullible enough to take Gardiner's nonsense seriously.
1
Smith acted exactly as any other liner captain would have done under similar circumstances. Who says so? Not me, but several master mariners who testified at the British Inquiry. Which half-baked conspiracy theory video did you watch and swallow whole?
1
Quite an achievement to get so many things wrong in one paragraph, albeit an unwieldy one. 1). Titanic was not steaming at full speed. Five of her boilers were not connected. 2). The fire had been extinguished at least 24 hours before the collision, and was not a serious issue in any case. 3). No one in authority from White Star or H & W ever called the Olympics 'unsinkable.' 4). None of the three financiers about Titanic had expressed opposition to the Federal Reserve. Indeed, one had publicly confirmed his support. Well done. Five serious errors in less than 80 words!
1