Comments by "doveton sturdee" (@dovetonsturdee7033) on "Times Radio"
channel.
-
224
-
14
-
13
-
12
-
8
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
Actually, the Bengal Famine had a number of causes, among which were the number of refugees from Japanese held areas, the inability to import food from those same areas, stockpiling by hoarders and, perhaps worst of all, the Bengal administration, which tried to minimise the crisis. The worst that could be said of Churchill was that he should have known what was taking place, but didn't. After all, in 1943, he had little else to worry about.
You could also add the refusal of FDR to allow the transfer of merchant shipping, by the way. What is without dispute, except by those who choose to blame Churchill for everything since the Black Death, is that once he did find out, he transferred food distribution to the British Indian Army, and had grain convoys diverted from Australia to India.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Actually, the Bengal Famine had a number of causes, among which were the number of refugees from Japanese held areas, the inability to import food from those same areas, stockpiling by hoarders and, perhaps worst of all, the Bengal administration, which tried to minimise the crisis. The worst that could be said of Churchill was that he should have known what was taking place, but didn't. After all, in 1943, he had little else to worry about.
You could also add the refusal of FDR to allow the transfer of merchant shipping, by the way. What is without dispute, except by those who choose to blame Churchill for everything since the Black Death, is that once he did find out, he transferred food distribution to the British Indian Army, and had grain convoys diverted from Australia to India.
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@xaiano794 'seriously?' Because firstly you claimed that wages had been cut. When I pointed out that this wasn't the case, you added 'in real terms.'
That is what moving the goalposts means. Basically, when the original argument is proven false, altering the basis of the argument rather than trying to defend the initial falsehood.
'otherwise you'd be suggesting that we were all super rich as we earn nearly 30 times the average wage in 1970 which we both know is nonsense.' Nonsense. You simply argued that drivers should have received a proportion of the 5.5% fares rise of 2022. I pointed out that they did, and now here you go again with your goalpost shifting.
'So honestly, did you genuinely think I was talking about anything else and what gave you that impression?' My mistake, as I replied to what you had written. Clearly I should have realised that what you had written really wasn't what you had meant. I have never been particularly psychic, a lack for which I apologise.
'Clearly you haven't taken the time to even read it. This is just sad.' Again, as I stated, I simply replied to your claim about 2022/2023. Proving you wrong.
'As for Angel trains, you seem to be inferring that there is no relevance since they are a 3rd party.' Not so. I simply pointed out that they did, and do, not employ drivers. Now you are not so much moving the posts as transferring to a different ground.
'how can you be irked by the government putting money in?' You must remind me where you thought I wrote that.
Rather, don't bother, as I won't reply further to your constantly shifting comments. You are becoming tedious, and I have more interesting things with which to occupy my time.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MissR-hn8be I am sorry you prefer to ignore facts. Sadly, the infantilisation of society seem to be progressing rapidly.
Actually, the Bengal Famine had a number of causes, among which were the number of refugees from Japanese held areas, the inability to import food from those same areas, stockpiling by hoarders and, perhaps worst of all, the Bengal administration, which tried to minimise the crisis. The worst that could be said of Churchill was that he should have known what was taking place, but didn't. After all, in 1943, he had little else to worry about.
You could also add the refusal of FDR to allow the transfer of merchant shipping, by the way. What is without dispute, except by those who choose to blame Churchill for everything since the Black Death, is that once he did find out, he transferred food distribution to the British Indian Army, and had grain convoys diverted from Australia to India.
You might try to ask yourself, by the way, why Churchill would have acted in such a manner when, without conscription, 2.5 million Indians had joined the allied armed forces? Did your indoctrinators not mention that?
I appreciate, of course, that you won't accept any of this, as it doesn't suit the agenda with which you have been programmed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Actually, the Bengal Famine had a number of causes, among which were the number of refugees from Japanese held areas, the inability to import food from those same areas, stockpiling by hoarders and, perhaps worst of all, the Bengal administration, which tried to minimise the crisis. The worst that could be said of Churchill was that he should have known what was taking place, but didn't. After all, in 1943, he had little else to worry about.
You could also add the refusal of FDR to allow the transfer of merchant shipping, by the way. What is without dispute, except by those who choose to blame Churchill for everything since the Black Death, is that once he did find out, he transferred food distribution to the British Indian Army, and had grain convoys diverted from Australia to India.
I appreciate, of course, that you won't believe any of this, as it doesn't suit the agenda.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1