Comments by "doveton sturdee" (@dovetonsturdee7033) on "Rachel Reeves 'shaking with anger' as she announces cuts to winter fuel payments" video.

@joemitchell69 Pensioners not on benefits are not, in the main, wealthy. However much you wish to justify Reeves making it clear that she intends to punish any demographic not deemed to be loyal to her Party.
5
@richardcook1987 There is a difference between being on a low budget and qualifying for benefits, as you would know where you not so in thrall to the Labour Party.
5
@FrostekFerenczy Really?
4
@John-r9x5h Sorry, but I thought we were required to believe that the Labour party were morally 'better?' It seems not to be so, does it not?
3
@thecheesefactor You sound like an apologist for the Labour Party. You think that up to £600 to those 'on the margins' is not significant? Perhaps you might discuss it with a few of them? ' You can see the anger on Rachel Reeves' face in Parliament on Monday. She was not acting.' In your opinion, of course. I have heard others suggest that this volte-face was always intended.
3
@alanbowles1985 I think that, more probably, he has simply found a way in his mind to justify something which cannot really be justified.
2
@papapiers1588 Indeed. Just as there are many more who cannot, but will have to find a way of coping.
1
@thecheesefactor Glad you wrote 'if.' Have you considered those pensioners who are on the margin, or do they simply not matter?
1