Comments by "doveton sturdee" (@dovetonsturdee7033) on "TalkTV"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Sorry, but the Barrister is correct in his explanation of how the law works. Whether the CPS was right in concluding that there was a case to answer in the first place is not the issue. Once it had, then the trial had to proceed. It did, and the correct verdict was reached. If anything, that demonstrates that the Legal System is still fit for purpose.
Consider the alternative. If the facts and the evidence had not been properly tested before a Jury, how do you think the usual subjects would have reacted?
What is more dubious is the way the BBC and others portrayed Kaba as a young angel, 'unarmed. training to become an architect, and about to become a father' when those responsible within the organisation doubtless knew the facts, but chose not to report the events in an impartial manner.
The BBC had, it seems, concluded, for reasons of their own, that the Firearms Officer was guilty until proven guilty, as the virtually unconcealed fury of their presenters on Monday's news made obvious.
When the facts became public, the startling hand brake turn undertaken by that same BBC on Tuesday was 'mirabile visu.' Wonderful to behold.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Seriously, expecting Mr. Lammy to know who Archbishop Cranmer was is akin to expecting my cat to write an erudite thesis on Pope Innocent III.
Thomas Cranmer, by the way, was Archbishop at the time of Henry VII, Edward VI, and (briefly) Mary. But not, oddly, of Henry VIII's successor, Henry VII, Mr, Lammy.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3