Comments by "doveton sturdee" (@dovetonsturdee7033) on "Mixed Phenomenon" channel.

How is it that people who write 'research it!!' have invariably done little or none themselves? In this context, watching a switcher video & swallowing it whole does not count as 'research.'
4
Then you are a clown.
2
Well, certainly not the rubbish in this idiotic video, for a start.
2
@MBrown.AlternativeFactualNews Unfair! I haven't laughed so much for ages!!
2
Olympic & Titanic both cost, at 1911 rates, £1.5 million to build. Both were insured for £1 million. That fact alone shows the insurance scam nonsense up for what it really is.
1
Yet a sister ship, using the same materials, was a successful liner for 23 years.
1
@jimmyv5730 Then you believe wrong. They did no such thing.
1
@jimmyv5730 My beliefs are based on facts. Please explain how the rivets in Olympic could have been changed, without dismantling the entire hull of the ship?
1
Never heard of paragraphs? How is it then, that one of the blades on the wreck has the yard number 401 (Titanic) cast into it? Or that the irregular rectangular, pattern, of windows at the forward end of the wreck matches photographs of Titanic after her yard modifications, but is different from the regular square pattern of Olympic of the same period?
1
No historian would ever take the nonsense that is this video remotely seriously.
1
@lisamcgrath4208 This video might well be used as a comedic alternative to actual history, but nothing more.
1
@kickalittlemustanggaming8317 No, there wasn't. Why even post such drivel?
1
@kickalittlemustanggaming8317 'there's a billion theories we will be hundreds of years trying to figure it out.' No, there aren't. Any serious student of the events knows precisely what happened. I cannot speak for the half-wit conspiracists who seem determined to believe a fact free-sensationalist book by an amateur historian, written in the 1990s. Would that be the Britannic which was only completed, as a hospital ship, in December, 1915, by the way?
1