Comments by "Glamdolly" (@glamdolly30) on "Nate The Lawyer" channel.

  1. Exactly Nate, she could have pocketed the $7m Depp gave her in the divorce, walked away and shut up about the failed, 15 month marriage to a superstar. If she'd been a decent, well-balanced non-abusive human being, that's exactly what she would have done. But this warped and dangerous individual is a narcissistic abuser who was DUMPED by her victim. So she's mad as hell and wanted revenge on him. When you end a close relationship with a narcissistic abuser, there's hell to pay. Sometimes you don't escape with you life (all the dead, mostly female victims of domestic abusers prove it). Tell your violent abuser you're leaving them, and the odds of them escalating their abuse to your murder rocket. I believe Depp's only alive today because he left the US for a European music tour right after he called time on the marriage. If he'd stayed in their penthouse after pulling the plug, there's every chance he'd have wound up with the large knife she gifted him inscribed 'UNTIL DEATH' sticking out of his heard. Yep, this could have been a murder trail - with Heard telling exactly the same lies about Depp abusing her, to support a self defence claim! In his absence, Heard could no longer physically attack him. So she set about getting vengeance in other, just as heinous ways. She started divorce proceedings and took out a totally unnecessary restraining order, to make it look like SHE had rejected HIM, because he was an ABUSER. That was the launch of her big lie, from which all her increasingly heinous, bigger abuse lies have followed. She lied that she gave his $7m to two charities because she didn't want to be correctly identified as a gold-digger, who had married Depp for his superstar status. As an off-the-chart narcissistic abuser, she had no conscience about keeping the money, after benefiting from that self-promoting lie! The NERVE of her! She must have weighed up the chances of the two charities outing her lie to the media for reneging on her $3.5m promises to both. She knew they were highly unlikely to out her. Donations are the lifeblood of every charity - no charitable organisation wants to enter into public fights with their wealthy patrons! She'd made a small down payment to both to keep them off her back for a while ($500k didn't even come from her, but from Elon Musk!) But it's obvious 5 years post divorce with no further instalments forthcoming, she had no intention of paying the rest. The LA Children's Hospital wrote to her to ask if she intended to honour her $3.5m pledge - she did not reply. The ACLU were never going to make problems for her - they had made her an Ambassador and eve wrote the Op-Ed Depp sued her over - they were in bed with Heard, she could rely on their loyalty and silence. In fact Depp's lawyers were forced to subpoena them to find out how much of the promised $3.5m she'd actually handed over! And by the way - why was there ANY delay in her handing over Depp's $7m? If she wanted to donate it, why didn't she just do it? She wasn't destitute, she was a wealthy woman by any standards! She made mega money as a movie actress, $1m for the 'Aquaman' movie alone, plus her ongoing 'Loreal' and other lucrative modelling contracts. Many of us struggle to understand why, if she promised to hand over that cash from her - supposedly abusive marriage - she didn't do it without delay! What you've never had, you never miss, right? Depp's lawyers even tried making payments direct to the two charities - surprise, surprise, Heard's lawyers jumped in and threatened legal action if he didn't give the money direct to her! Frankly it stinks. She wanted to get credit for taking no money from Johnny Depp, while taking money from Johnny Depp! She's so dumb and arrogant, she didn't even confront this issue in court and show remorse over it. She knew full well Depp's lawyers would quiz her about why she hadn't paid up - she knew it looked bad for her. Yet she came out fighting and wouldn't admit she'd done anything wrong! Incredibly stupid and self-sabotaging. Did her legal team advise her to take that course? If so it was lousy advice. If she'd only said she felt bad about not YET donating the full amount - that she still FULLY INTENDS to make those donations etc - (maybe she deliberately didn't make any such pledge under oath for fear the charities could use them to get the money at a future date) If she'd only given a better explanation for keeping the money than "My ex husband was suing me". She could have said she had a baby and was worried about her financial future as a single mother - she could have said as an actress her income is unpredictable - and since the bad publicity she's had from the divorce, she wasn't confident about her future finances etc. She didn't even try to express regret or explain why she didn't honour those charity pledges! A narcissist is so entrenched in their own, self-centred mindset, they have no empathy for non-narcissists and cannot mimic their responses convincingly - not even when to do so, would get them out of big trouble! In the final analysis, the biggest victim of Amber Heard is Amber Heard.
    1