Comments by "Glamdolly" (@glamdolly30) on "WatchMojo.com" channel.

  1. 21
  2. 14
  3. 5
  4. Agreed! In my view Richard Lester's first two Muskateer movies, released just 6 months apart in 1973 and '74, are by far the best Muskateer movies ever made. He intended it to be one movie, but had filmed so much material, he realised he'd never make his promised release date, so instead he split it into two movies, 'The Three Muskateers' of '73 and hot on its heels 'The Four Muskateers' of 1974. Because the two films were made simultaneously with the same superb, all-star cast, they are best watched back to back. Richard Lester (unwisely in my view), made a third movie with the original cast - minus its wonderful leading ladies Faye Dunaway and Raquel Welch who'd both been killed off - in 1989, 'Return of the Muskateers'. I think that third film was a mistake. The plot and script were inferior, and most disappointingly, the cast were no longer in their sexy, dynamic prime. And it showed! Oliver Reed was looking quite portly and booze-ravaged, and Michael York had lost the youthful exuberance so essential to D'Artagnan's character. The only Muskateer who'd hardly aged a day was Richard Chamberlain as Aramis. Christopher Lee was rather improbably brought back as villain Count de Rochefort, after he was definitely killed with a sword through the heart by D'Artagnan at the end of the 1974 'Four Muskateers' movie. In the subsequent, third and final movie, Rochefort explains that he survived that fatal wound, bleeding overnight on the floor of the cathedral (where he'd received D'Artagnan's sword through his chest in a dramatic and beautifully choreographed and performed fight to the death), and spent the next 20 years imprisoned in the Bastille. Liberties like that with the plot make me prefer to watch the two first movies, which wrap the story up well, and forget the third movie ever happened!
    3
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1