Comments by "Charles Eye" (@TheCharleseye) on "Two Bit da Vinci" channel.

  1. Considering how long it's taking to create a worthwhile charging network, energy density is definitely the first thing I would be tackling.
    2
  2. If too large of a surplus of power is being created by an energy company (either traditional or alternative), why not offer it to nearby municipalities for free? Any city would jump at the chance to power more streetlights, billboards, etc without excess energy costs.
    1
  3. A) California has way too many people. Even without climate change, it's not sustainable. B) Grocery stores toss out literal tons of food every year. So much food goes to waste, even now. We don't actually need California's agriculture. It could all stop tomorrow and we'd still have plenty of food. C) Is California going to use its $200,000,000,000 over taxing (ahem) "surplus" to pay for this pipeline...or expect the Federal government to pay for it? I wouldn't worry too much. By the time people are done fleeing from California's insane policies and the politicians bully out the farmers after buying up their water rights, you and the few people left will have plenty of water.
    1
  4. Yet another ☑ on a very long list of why I'm leaving California. Have fun riding the Titanic to the bottom of the ocean.
    1