Comments by "Charles Eye" (@TheCharleseye) on "Channel 4 News" channel.

This interviewer is frustratingly dense.
663
I just bought my children bicycle helmets the other day. The blue one cost the exact, same amount as the pink one.
442
Why doesn't this relatively successful, well paid woman put her money where her mouth is and start a "feminine" style company, to see if it can be profitable? Maybe she thinks it would fail miserably and prove that people like Peterson were right, all along.
277
Mr. Snuffleupagus I give them a "Like" so that it will spread further. The conversation needs to be as public as possible in order to gain credibility and increase awareness. There are a whole lot of people who hate this PC crap and think they're in the minority. That's why Trump won. People saw someone who isn't going to mince words to avoid hurting every, single person's feelings. He spoke loud, plainly and often. We need more of that (though personally, I do prefer Milo's rhetoric to Trump's).
9
imapineapple15 And there's the rub: Intersectionality with the Trans community dictates that the Feminists should stop talking about the "pink tax" and start promoting the purchasing of the cheapest version of any product by "all" genders. Their very insistence on talking about the "pink tax" as a male vs female problem means that they're not embracing intersectionality. It seems they're not as progressive as they claim.
2
I love how the title calls this a debate. They intentionally set it up in an interview format - with no moderator - and then proceed to let the perceived interviewer just badger the perceived interviewee with outlandish accusations and misinterpretations. This isn't a debate, and if it weren't for the fact that this woman is clearly outgunned by Peterson at every turn, I'd call it an embarrassment that shouldn't be aired. Fortunately, Peterson saved it for them by being able to push through all of her empty and false accusations. It seems their plan backfired.
1