General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Charles Eye
Forbes Breaking News
comments

Comments by "Charles Eye" (@TheCharleseye) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

She understood. That was all tactics.
43
It doesn't even matter. Look carefully at the text of the video (not the clickbait title). Several times over, it says the person died WITH the Omicron variant, not FROM the Omicron variant. There is a big difference between the two. If I got shot in the head right now, I would die WITH high cholesterol, not FROM high cholesterol.
36
He's about to term out. Then he'll be everyone's problem, when he runs for President.
30
It didn't even cause one death. Listen to what Boris Johnson actually says about that person. While CNN and the like are posting headlines that say "died from Omicron," Johnson said the person "died WITH Omicron. If I get hit by a car tomorrow, I will die with tendinitis, not from tendinitis. As of now, Omicron has a 100% survival rate.
8
Untrue. It's called pleading the fifth. However, a government agency is not a private citizen and does not enjoy that protection.
6
@websterri Look at it this way; if it's a weapon too dangerous for the people to own, then it's too dangerous for the government to own. Should civilians own chemical weapons and nukes? Nope. Neither should the government.
5
Is there a list? Yes. Is it illegal to have a list? Yes. That's really the whole deal. You compiled the data. You weren't supposed to. You're a criminal. Go to jail.
5
@ConsciousExpression No, he doesn't. Also, why are you talking about someone who isn't the President? If your only defense of the current POTUS is to attack people who aren't the POTUS, that doesn't really reflect well on your guy, does it? P.S. Before you start your pre-canned talking points, I didn't vote for Trump. Don't bother with your typical nonsense because it doesn't affect me at all. Answer for your chosen candidate, don't deflect to talking about people who don't run the Country right now.
4
That's the thing; they didn't The person died WITH the Omicron variant, not FROM the Omicron variant. Important difference.
4
@Sarah-im3lp Court decisions can (and typically are) appealed to higher courts, up to and including the Supreme Court of the United States...which is where the audio clip in this video comes from. If everything is ultimately decided in the courts anyway, the ATF is, in fact, redundant.
4
@Thornbush434 California. The land with so much sense, that the people thought it was a good idea to let a mountain lion live in Los Angeles. Not only did that result in the death of quite a few pets but the lion itself was put down, due to extreme health issues, including injuries sustained from multiple encounters with vehicles. Most Americans are long-since separated from nature. California is a perfect example of this. Of the forty million people in California, relatively few of them have any idea how to behave in a world with predators. If they did, they wouldn't cheer for legislation that helps disarm them around the worst predators in the world: humans. Californians, for the most part, are not aware and do not take precautions. There's plenty of reason to worry. Then again, maybe that's good reason to reintroduce the State mascot back into California. I wonder how many of you would support legislation that would have grizzly bears roaming the streets and parks of LA? We could make them a protected species, too. After all, they were in California before people were. They deserve to wander wherever they want, and people should just understand and go on about their business, right?
4
So, I can take a booster to "protect" me from Omicron...or I can just get Omicron? 60% of people in the US are vaccinated. 80% of Omicron cases in the US are vaccinated. I have a hard time believing that more of the same vaccine is going to stop a variant that, by all accounts, the vaccine is actually creating susceptibility to. Meanwhile, if I get Omicron, I can look forward to a runny nose, a scratchy throat, a mild cough, some fatigue, and possibly some body aches. In other words, exactly how I spend all Winter feeling, due to working outside all day. Plus, I'll get some nice, natural immunity boost from it. I'm sorry, where is the up side to the booster? Oh, that's right. You need those quarterly earnings. That couldn't possibly be why you're pushing for people to get boosters every three months, could it? Nah, I'm sure that's a complete coincidence. P.S. This video has 89 Likes and 468 DISLIKES as of this comment. Screw YouTube.
3
Exactly. It's not as though Congress is unaware of this situation. If it behooved them to do so, they would expand the definition of an automatic weapon in a lawful manner. They have not. Bump stocks do not make a semi-automatic firearm into an automatic firearm, by the legal definition outlined by Congress.
3
What do you call a beach full of oath breakers, buried up to their necks in sand? Not enough sand.
3
@elephantoflight3362 Omicron is non-lethal. Its most prevalent side effects are runny nose, mild cough, scratchy throat, fatigue, and headache. Nobody is dying from it and virtually nobody is getting severely ill from it. Those are the facts. You don't have to agree. After all, I can't force you to be right.
2
@rd-lw4td Ha! Omicron is the equivalent to a cold. Runny nose, sore throat, mild cough, headache...it's kept at bay by Robitussin. Please, tell me the current death rate, or even severe case rate from Omicron. Go ahead. It should be a quick Google search away. I mean, they've been talking about how scary it is, so you know there are plenty of outlets giving the death and severe case rates, right? Unless, of course, it's not actually that bad at all. In which case, all you'll find are COVID numbers in general, and nothing specifying any numbers for Omicron, other than cases. And don't bother with the one case the media jumped on in the UK. All of the news outlets were saying that person died from Omicron when, in fact, they died with Omicron. As soon as that was pointed out to them, they stopped talking about that case. However, even if they had died of Omicron, that would be one case in, what, hundreds of thousands at this point? Millions? Not exactly the "fucks you up" variant you seem to think it is.
2
@1018Tim I don't agree with making anything take longer. A right delayed is a right denied. If you want better training, so be it. Mandatory firearm safety classes in every high school in America. Owning and carrying guns are rights that belong to everyone. Therefore, everyone should understand those rights before they come of age, regardless of whether they choose to exercise them.
2
Yup. The economy will grind to a screeching halt come January, when all of those free tests get passed out and we start seeing who actually tests positive. Everyone who is completely asymptomatic or who just has the sniffles but tests positive will be out of work for two weeks. On the plus side, getting the real infection rate numbers in will give us a much better picture of the virus. Chances are pretty good that it's even less severe than even South Africa is claiming.
2
SA's data is bunk and US/UK data is not? That's an interesting take. How exactly did you come to this scientific conclusion?
2
That nonsense they're getting into halfway through the video is just that: nonsense. They're saying Omicron is 80% less likely to hospitalize you and 70% less likely to bring severe disease in those who do get hospitalized. THEN, to cover their butts with those in charge, they try to claim that's because of a high rate of natural immunity in SA. I call bullsh*t. If the high rate of natural immunity were the cause, it would also have been causing their Delta hospitalization numbers to wane. It didn't. It wasn't until Omicron took over in SA that the numbers of hospitalized, severely ill, and dying dropped. Omicron is far less severe, period. No need for caveats or addendums.
2
The average home invasion in the US involves 3-5 assailants. They are usually armed. Tell me which of these Democrats can take out 5 armed attackers with a baseball bat.
2
In thise case, their reaction to arson is to ban fire extinguishers. That's what we're really talking about, here. Someone commits a criminal act and the government wants to ban the things we use to protect ourselves from such acts. Then they claim we should just watch our houses burn while we wait for the fire department.
2
The ATF should have no need to classify specific pistol braces. They're pistol braces. They are legal. Furthermore, none of that is relevant. They didn't write a rule saying that all new pistol braces on the market have to get approval. They wrote a rule saying that everyone who bought a type of accessory - that was deemed perfectly legal - will become felons for the crime of simply continuing on with their lives. That means anyone who doesn't know about the new rules will be de facto criminals.
2
As of 8:36 AM Pacific: 2,165 views, 19 likes, 91 dislikes
2
Lie. He directly criticized the travel ban as xenophobic.
2
@therapinape9757 Again, nobody did that. Seriously, are you okay? You seem to be having problems with your reading comprehension.
2
It's not a new shot. They wouldn't waste the R&D money on that. It's the exact, same as the first. They see an opportunity to get people onto a treatment plan that happens to align with their fiscal quarters. You see, they figured out a while ago that cures are not as profitable as treatments. So, they come up with a shot that is just good enough to sell to those who are scared and desperate. Then they resell them the same thing every three months, to keep their profit margins up. It's a beautifully crafted system that the fearful will not question. Why? Because they're afraid that if they stop complying, they'll die. Nobody else is claiming to be able to "save" them and they can't fathom a world wherein they have to just protect themselves. Throw in some politicians who love getting kickbacks and news media that thrives on sensationalism and you've got a perfect storm. Omicron is thus far non-lethal. It's really fast moving. It also appears to be completely resistant to the shots. We'll pretty much all get it and then we'll all have what we need to fight off future variants. This is the beginning of the end for big Pharma's record breaking profits and they're scared as hell. $40,000,000,000/year allows you to buy off a lot of doctors, politicians, and news pundits. The coverage will get worse as we all get better. Guaranteed.
2
Nice bait and switch in the middle. Why are you talking about Trump and Colin Powell? Neither one had Omicron and neither one got a Moderna booster (that I'm aware of). What's the game? This stuff isn't politicized enough?
2
If pistol grips make guns super deadly...why aren't they trying to ban pistols?
1
@rd-lw4td Ha! Many will get the sniffles from Omicron. Almost nobody will be in the hospitals from it and I doubt anyone will die from it who isn't already on death's door. There's no crisis to cold symptoms, which is the vast majority of cases from Omicron. South Africa doesn't have nearly the medical infrastructure we do and they're doing fine. They also don't have near the vaccination rate we do and again, they're doing fine. Omicron is only scary to the media, politicians, and pharmaceutical companies because it signals an end to all of this. We're all going to get it - vaccinated or not, we're all going to survive it, and we're all going to have that sweet, sweet immunity boost from it. All future variants are likely to be just as mild, if not more so and we'll all move on with our lives. In a year's time, COVID-19 will likely be just another seasonal cold. No more record profits for the pharmaceutical companies. No more kickbacks to politicians. No more sensationalist headlines for the media. Meanwhile, the rest of us will be fine.
1
@1018Tim A. The woman looking to protect herself from a violent ex deserves instant gratification. Her dying because you're okay with delays doesn't change the fact that her right was denied for the rest of her life. Unless you know the moment and circumstances of my death, you can't say with any authority whether delays are acceptable. B. Our rights aren't based on what's usual. If someone wants their first or only gun for home defense to be an AR15, that's their business, not mine or yours. C. You're still arguing for delays, rather than acknowledging that with my plan, they're unnecessary. If everyone is required to take firearm safety in order to graduate high school, we'll have that issue dealt with in one generation. There are no other (so-called) solutions being offered that will do as much for safe gun ownership in as little an amount of time.
1
@jamesricker3997 Interesting hypothesis. How exactly did you come up with that number and how does it differ from the number of deaths we would get from Delta - which is already a much more contagious strain than any previous ones? Were looking at a stain that, by all legitimate accounts, should result in far fewer hospitalizations. That, in turn, results in more available resources for the severely ill, of which there will be far fewer as well. We're not talking about marginal differences in severity. 80% lower hospitalization rate and 70% lower instance of severe illness is better no matter how you slice it.
1
@CheeZyNutZ Beat me by six minutes.
1
@svenvaltik5657 Stop me.
1
@dankbreh9013 Cali and New York are busy spending a whole lot of time in court, bribing judges to play games to avoif the "text, history, and tradition" part of Bruen...and they're failing. Did you really think that decision would undo decades of unconstitutional laws overnight? Come on. It takes years to undo such things. We've only just begun.
1
Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Since the US Constitution does not delegate any powers to regulate drugs to the Federal government, those powers belong to the States respectively, or the people. Therefore, any and all Federal regulations over any drugs - other than interstate transport regulations - are, in fact, unconstitutional. I have a real problem with the rampant marijuana and other addictive substance abuse in this Country. That does not mean I support government overreach. I would rather live in a Country wherein people are doing something I don't like, than in a Country wherein the government is abusing their powers to stop said activities.
1
@donottakeseriously326 "Suspected" is doing some heavy lifting in this case.
1
@Runswithwolves6323 Wild hogs are mowed down in droves, in Texas. Coyotes get dropped left and right. They're not protected and defended, as though they're more important than people.
1
Massie: Can you shoulder the buffer tube? Me: Ooh! Ooh! Pick me! I know this one! Look at my hand! Look! Mr. Massie, pick me!
1
@thisguy9819 89 Likes, 469 Dislikes as of this comment. That's not a good ratio.
1
No, it's the same sauce.
1
@Joaquin546 I don't need to be a doctor to follow what Fauci, Pfizer, and Moderna (as well as countless pundits, scientists and medical professionals) have all said. It's not a new formula. It's a booster of the same formula.
1
@shanoukgaming6763 Which is a separate discussion, entirely.
1
@tracesmith3572 Clearly not, or other conversations wouldn't currently be happening. While I agree that the second amendment nullifies all of this, that opinion is of little consequence when we're discussing actual case being heard in actual courtrooms to determine their actual legal merits.
1
Isn't Swalwell the schmuck who said he would drop nukes on Americans who stood against gun confiscations?
1
For the record, if the answer to any of those questions had been 'no,' she would have said 'no.' If it had been 'I don't know,' she would have said 'I don't know.' That only leaves one answer and it was the one she "couldn't" say. Yes, to all of the above. NEXT!
1
When the woman on the right starts talking, increase playback speed to 1.25. When the guy on the left gets going, bump it up to 1.5. Otherwise, there's a very good chance you'll fall asleep and have weird dreams about Ben Stein. You've been warned.
1
@gidzmobug2323 After the showing Biden just put on at the debate? Democrats would flock to the polls for someone twenty years younger, who can form a complete sentence. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the DNC were to announce their support for Newsom in THIS election.
1
Does it seem like Colorado has a problem, more so than other States? Is that their gimmick, now? Chicago has the most gang violence, Louisiana has the most unsolved murders and Colorado seems to lead in mass shootings. What exactly are the parents doing there and how do we get them to stop?
1
@ichirocharles1 Try to avoid the appeal to authority arguments in regards to the FDA. They are the same organization that approves all of the incredibly unhealthy foods people pour down their gullets every day. Diabetes and heart disease aren't the top killers in this Country because of black market foods. Also, the FDA has not even approved any of the COVID-19 vaccines people are taking. They approved a clone of the Pfizer vaccine that isn't available at the moment. Meanwhile, Pfizer is so trustworthy that they just had to recall all batches of Chantix due to high carcinogen levels. That's right, their anti-smoking meds could actually give you cancer. Like I said, avoid the appeal to authority arguments on this one. The authorities have a pretty bad track record.
1
Are they banning the 1911? How about the Colt New Army? The Kentucky rifle? The musket? Black powder cannons? All weapons of war. All missing from this bill.
1
@svenvaltik5657 Nope. Omicron infects the vaccinated at an equal or greater rate than unvaccinated.
1
I think I'm in love...
1
Let them try. States are already moving towards full Constitutionality when it comes to the 2A. The Supreme Court is also leaning hard in that direction. Let them overreach, so we can slap that hand. If they think they're going to expand this to include all semi-autos - when they're having a hard enough time getting it passed in its current form - let them try.
1
Hey, Dems. I was talking to a couple of old Republicans the other day. They want to know when they can have their "Red Scare" tactic back. At least they knew how to use it correctly.
1
@marigold3687 There are three extensions for Chrome. I have all three. Currently only one is working.
1
@Rocky Mountain Way Were you born stupid and angry or did that happen over time?
1
@Rocky Mountain Way Wow, okay. We'll do this. "Return YouTube Dislike" was the best of the three for the most part. "Dislikes for YouTube" was the one working best on the last day they functioned (yesterday) before YouTube made some background changes that broke all three. It was no surprise that they were going to stop working at some point yesterday, as they advertised as much in their descriptions, at one point or another. Don't worry, though. They're actively working on trying to get around the new coding, so that those who choose to can again see the dislike count. As for your claims about them only restoring dislikes to older videos, that was only true for about five minutes (not literally, so don't be stupid) before the better two (named above) received updates. At that point, all videos showed current dislike counts, no matter how old. Of course, you likely read a half-assed article on some crappy tech site about them - back when they first hit the Web Store - so I'm sure you know more about it than someone who was actually using them for the past week... I do like how you tried to skew the argument by asking about which one is "currently" working...after the cutoff point when they stopped working. I'm sure I was supposed to know less about it than you and as such, panic when I "found out" they weren't working any more. Oops, sorry. I guess I spoiled that one. The funny thing is, with as hostile as you are about this, I have to assume you've got skin in the game. Are you one of the useless idiots at YouTube who came up with the terrible idea of getting rid of dislikes? Or are you one of the terrible content creators who benefit from it? If the latter, you know it's not going to stop you from seeing your dislikes, right? You'll still know you suck. EDIT: And just like that, "Dislikes For YouTube" is already back to working properly. Proper tallies for all videos, new and old. I just thought I'd share, since you're so concerned about it.
1
@therapinape9757 Nobody said she did. Are you okay?
1
Strong protection? What exactly is strong protection and how does it compare to actual immunity? Why are they busy tweaking the same flawed formula when they should be working on a real vaccine that works as well as every other vaccine? Oh, that's right. They're currently getting people on a three month cycle for boosters. What else happens on a three month cycle? Oh, that's right; quarterly earnings reports! Funny how that works. They came up with vaccines that just happen to keep them getting paid quarterly. One has to assume that the politicians they're paying off are also receiving their bribes quarterly. What a convenient cycle of giving tax dollars to giant corporations and crooked politicians.
1
Columbine was committed during the AWB, with weapons that complied with said ban. Apparently, it didn't do much good, since that is largely considered the beginning of the school shooting era.
1
@ljules41 The science? I'm pretty sure the science didn't tell him that people shouldn't wear masks, and then that they should, and then should wear two, and then should consider wearing goggles. I'm also pretty sure the science didn't tell him that he should ignore every early indicator of the lack of lethality of Omicron and the vaccines' inability to even slow it down, and instead try to panic people into getting boosters. No, it was most likely kickbacks from pharmaceutical companies that did that.
1
"90 years ago, Congress passed a law..." Ooh...let me just stop you there. About 230 years ago, the Founders wrote up a whole framework. Nowhere in that framework did they give your agency permission to exist. Likewise, they never gave the Federal government the authority to create your agency or to enact firearm restrictions. At no point since then did the States or the People allow for an amendment that grants that authority. You are illegal. Your agency is illegal. Every "law" and "rule" your agency ever enforced is illegal. The "law" Congress passed 90 years ago that gave you any freedom to interpret laws is illegal. Go away.
1
The answer is no. He does not think the 2A should exist. Just listen to his answers.
1
"People are only felons if they intentionally violate the, the law." What law? You're not a lawmaker and neither are your cronies. You don't make laws. You wrote down some rules but given you don't have the authority to codify those rules into law, then by definition, they can't be laws.
1
'We have no idea if this variant is even going to be as severe as Delta, let alone moreso. We also have no idea if the vaccines are going to be effective against it or not. Therefore, it's extremely important that everyone get vaccinated and boosted ASAP!' Honestly, is this a briefing or a forty minute ad for Pfizer? If the latter, they really need to work on their sales pitch. Stop thinking Shake Weight and start thinking SlapChop.
1
Which hospitals?
1
@jenni0278 You actually found Omicron deaths? I've gotta know where you found that. I've been searching and can't find a single one.
1
Cry harder.
1
That's okay! According to the doctors who are actually dealing with Omicron, it's a much milder strain. That means we can get it, fight it, beat it, and have all that good natural immunity that will keep us from dying from other strains. These people should be jumping for joy. Instead, they're fear mongering. Gosh, I wonder...how big are their regular Pfizer checks?
1