Comments by "Charles Eye" (@TheCharleseye) on "Biden: Buy a shotgun, not an AR-15" video.

@Thor.Jorgensen That wasn't strawman, it was ad hominem. I was only kidding about you being Elmer Fudd but if you confuse such basic fallacies, I'm not sure I was far off base. And no, I have no intention of treating you like a human. You're a line of text on my screen. Given that you're simply regurgitating things that have been posted millions of times, you could be a bot for all I know. Come up with something original and maybe you can move up from bot status in my view. I doubt you actually care how I see you, though, so I doubt you'll bother.
5
@Thor.Jorgensen "There's no reason to own a rifle with a magazine capacity beyond 10 rounds." Elmer, is that you? Yeah I thought I recognized you. I get that you'd like me to be quiet because you're "hunting wabbits," but this is where I put my firing range, so you're going to need to hunt elsewhere. Oh, don't be intimidated by all of the standard capacity magazines on the table over there. Yeah, a bunch of us are going to be out here shooting for several hours. I would have brought the California compliant mags you like but A) I don't own any because I live in a free State and B) I'm not going to waste more time loading mags at the range than I have to. Oh, you don't like my reasoning for having standard capacity mags? That's really too bad. Your opinion doesn't actually matter. You could fall off the face of the earth tomorrow and it won't affect my rights. Now, go get outsmarted by a rabbit...again.
3
If AR15s are so hard to use...why do we need to ban them?
2
@mk3pigeon407 The ATF didn't write your local laws pertaining to carrying in public. They didn't write any laws - local or Federal. You're giving them undue credit. There are no Federal laws against public carry of any firearms and if there were, it wouldn't be because of the existence of the ATF.
1