Comments by "Papi Chulo" (@par3me) on "Mobile Home Residents TAKE ON Wall Street And Win" video.

1st - I don’t like what these folks are going through. However, it doesn’t change facts, laws and the way the world turns. Mobile homes by themselves are almost never appreciating assets. The land is. When you don’t own your land you can’t make the decision on said land. This is the price paid for renting on someone else’s land. This was known and signed stating you understood at the time of purchase. I’m glad that they had a non profit to step in. However, it’s not the fault of the properly owner that as housing rises, so will your rent. Why rent for 400 to you when I can rent for 800 to someone else. No one reading this including those in this video would take a pay cut just to be nice. Taking less than Mackey value is a pay cut. With so many legitimate problems in the US this channel goes after the most insane shit that is completely and easily explainable with common sense and a google search. This channel prays on the ignorance of its viewers to push a false agenda. I hope you’re all proud of yourselves. 🇺🇸
2
@Santello22 you literally said nothing. Please provide details and context. There are many, many, many laws.
2
@Santello22 umm maybe the person who bought and owns the property. By your logic. If you owned property. I could back my mobile home onto it and decide how much my rent should be. Because laws of ownership means nothing. I don’t know what they’re teaching you kids in school but it’s clearly backwards.
1
@tylerpurrden I’m a property owner and small business owner that has a family a four and we live below the poverty line. So we’re not wealth, we just live within our means. I don’t support corporations or the establishment politicians. With all that said. I don’t believe anyone but the property owner should decide rent. If it’s too much, no one will live there. Governments have no place in this matter. However this is different. In their case a nonprofit was able to come in, educate them and financially assist them. I’m sure that came at a cost but this didn’t go into that.
1
@Nathair The data doesn’t back up what your saying. But I know it feels right so go with it.
1
History completely backs you up. 👍🏼
1
@PeerKristijan You’re referring to communism. Luckily in our country we have freedoms. Both of these parties can choose to or not to engage. If no one wanted to play ball with them. They’d have no money. We always have options. We don’t have the option to force another to charge more or less. We also don’t force anyone to pay or not to pay. Unless we’re talking about COVID and the unconstitutional moratorium on evictions. It doesn’t matter how anyone feels or how bad another person’s situation is. No one should ever support forced compliance like this. They both can choose to leave or stay. I know it’s not ideal. And the easiest way out would be forced compliance. But we don’t live in Russia or China yet. I have a buddy back home that’s been on drugs and on the streets for decades. He can’t afford rent. I personally think it would be better for him if you gave him your couch for 5 bucks a month. Everyone loves socialism until it’s your shit someone wants half of.
1
@PeerKristijan I’m for neither. I’m for personal responsibility and accountability. You can’t force me to pay unless it’s agreed upon. And I can’t force you to give me shit. Seems pretty simple and straight forward. If I was for tyranny, I would’ve voted for Biden. 👍🏼🇺🇸
1