Comments by "Haruhi Suzumiya" (@haruhisuzumiya6650) on "Peter Schiff" channel.

  1. is it just me or is peter schiff contradicting himself?
    4
  2. luvcheney1 surplus value, the capacity of a worker to work diligently, you know they need to change 'work' to servitude.
    1
  3. 1crackerjack oh, i love proletarian pipedreams, go ahead comrades. PS your money is useless, suggest you mint your own.
    1
  4. kommisar debt, i believe was the only factor left out of your grand plan.
    1
  5. Simon Purist hmm, workers also are consumers as well. supply/demand in this case is the velocity of money, i.e people spending at  a rate to move the economy, stimulus only works when it is given to people with the fastest rate of VOM ( velocity of money) units. take Australia, many small businesses would've closed but labor stimulus helped the economy thereby softening the effects of the recession.
    1
  6. Simon Purist i knew it, had nothing to say. well, answer me this, if wages were determined by the free market i.e money then who would bother to pay anyone for work at all?
    1
  7. Simon Purist are you suggesting conspiracy?
    1
  8. Simon Purist well, many would pay anyone nothing if they had their way, hence the need for an umpire to adjudicate disputes but NOT to have any conflicts of interest
    1
  9. Simon Purist plus the revolving door.
    1
  10. Simon Purist so what role does government play in your solution? or do you propose a sugar fix?
    1
  11. kommisar i take you didn't read what i said, so i'll explain that... A. i was talking about the role of the government in a solution. B.  what do you describe as economic quackery? C. debt is ONLY good when a country has no or little infrastructure, or when the government invests in new technologies that contribute to the nations GDP AND social MARGINAL benefit. D.too much debt,  is worse, only when debt can be repaid without hurting the society and economy is the debt honorable and serviceable.   
    1
  12. kommisar debt is the LEAST of your problems... now, they are spending money to help their friends and are not helping the crumbling infrastructure.
    1
  13. kommisar a. i am not Keynesian, i'am macro-marxist economist in my spare time.    b. i don't care about the usa infrastructure,  i however care that money is not going into corrupt projects, mal-investment and  bailouts. public funding of councils has been diverted. and all you say is care about the debt.  face facts the dollar is dead the us is heading to disaster and yet you claim paying off a debt THAT was DIS-honorable to start with. the US is insolvent AND bankrupt.  c. you just contradicted yourself.  observe you quoted "Where is all this "crumbling infrastructure"?  You Keynesians just love to use that "infrastructure" crap as a cheap distraction." then at the end of your post you you then quoted "things like infrastructure are neglected." which implies i was right about the existence of 'crumbling infrastructure' you just proved it YOURSELF. secondly, you quoted "infrastructure, like so many other things, are included into budgets" however infrastructure if anything is neglected. the us is going to default and so will the banks and when it does the US will burn in it's own ideology and contempt for the world. 
    1
  14. kommisar a. i do not care about the infrastructure (unaffiliated with the us as in I DON'T LIVE THERE ) b. just because i am a Marxist, doesn't give you any validity to paint me as a Stalin loving crypto fascist commie your government news (propaganda) has told you to lovingly loathe. i am an anarcho-commie, very different to Bolshevism i  am about decentralization of power and autonomy of yourself (liberty) calling me a quack and a liar is nonsense. c. i do not enlist in economic schools that are deeply rooted in capitalistic control of the populace. i care about money spent on the infrastructure. but i thought you were to go as far as to say (proverbial slippery slope) that you cared more about debt than the lives affected by the basic infrastructure. d. debt that is the US national debt is inevitable to default and designed for default. conspiracy theories aside, the debt was dishonorable when the banks used the fed as an ATM. the dollar is worthless, not only that, it is also worth noting that the US will burn in it's own ideology and the contempt for the world. countries don't want the US as superpower anyway so why stop them. it's destiny was zero from the very start. e. i am not a citizen of the US and so i am unrestrained of any patriotism of any kind. 
    1
  15. Regulation allows for trust and faith in currency not like a new age cult mentality that has led to billions wiped off the books
    1
  16. Ah hindsight is 20/20 Indeed I knew crypto would collapse
    1
  17. Just like max Keiser, once you are vested in a token you become a shill for it
    1