Comments by "Hasan Al-habbobi" (@hasanal-habbobi4018) on "Shmee150" channel.

  1. OFFICER: Son, do you know how fast you were going back there? Individual: No sir, I apologize... OFFICER:That's it your coming with me (says to himself) YES!!! This is awesome OFFICER:You know what, I tell you what, I will give you a warning on this one, just don't do it again. Individual: Wait, what, NOOOOOO
    173
  2. They haven't destroyed it. Let's be real here... No matter what design they would have come up with you guys would still complain like you always do.
    12
  3. Paolo Munarolo they are not meant to compete with each other. ....thus the amg gt is not meant to replace the sls........ the sls is more of a super car... amg gt is more of a 911 competitor even still I would prefer amg gt over sls because even tho it's not meant to compete the amg gt destroys the sls performance wise handling wise, acceleration not to mention has a far nicer interior ..also the sls has an awful transmission
    6
  4. no first of all looks are subjective.....second of all amg gtr is not meant to replace sls bs (which you were kind of implying to) yet it destroys it performance wise handling wise, acceleration not to mention has a far nicer interior and for its price the amg gt r looks much better. it's 'a' shape grill is incredibly aggressive and the whole car looks much more athletic than the boxy/edgy looking sls front the head lights on the sls is literally just a circle plus a straight line, how does that look better than the nice curve headlights of the amg gtr?
    5
  5. get your eyes checked
    4
  6. Panayot Karpachev hell no first gen looks outdated and hidious let alone when compared to the other ones.
    4
  7. W H big no. And how the hell does it look like a duck? By that logic then the noble, mcleran f1 anf clk gtr also look like a duck..... Its not about the looks so much as it is about the performance.. Overall I like it. Its simple. Not the best looking but its a hommage to how the clk gtr or mcleran f1 looked (ish) from the front. Lmp1 like design... Where its function over design as main priority. And the figures alone of doing 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds is very exciting. Overall I am satisfied with the car (both looks and performance figures) but you guys are more than welcome to disagree.
    4
  8. Brandon Dove I wouldn't and first of all amg gtr is not meant to replace sls bs (which you were kind of implying to) yet it destroys it performance wise handling wise, acceleration not to mention that the sls has a crappy transmisson...... amg gtr also has a far nicer interior ...is more comfortable... and looks better imo it's a much better daily drivers car and for its price the amg gt r looks much better. it's 'a' shape grill is incredibly aggressive and the whole car looks much more athletic than the boxy/edgy looking sls front so I would prefer the amg gtr
    3
  9. To all those people saying that the sls bs is better than the amf gt r.... you are missing the point They are not meant to compete with each other. Sls is more of a supercar where as the gt is more of a super sports car....that competes with 911 models....thus the amg gt is not meant to replace the sls....just like the slr mcleran was never meant to replace the clk gtr...and just like the sls was never meant to replace the slr.... so saying the sls is better is as pointless as saying the 675lt is better than the 570s. or that the aventsdor sv is better than the hurucan or that the f12 is better than the 488 even tho the sls has an awful transmisson....amd even tho the amg gt r destroys the sls performance wise, handling wise accelerstion wise, ane has a far more luxurious interior, is more comfortable and in that respect ks a much betrer daily driver where it is as good of a race car as it is gt car
    3
  10. nazokimi​ again, I can't emphasize enough that the sls and amg gt are not meant to be compared to each other. Of course sls is going to be more special in a way... But you are missing the point my friend They are not meant to compete with each other. Sls is more of a supercar where as the gt is more of a super sports car....that competes with 911 models....thus the amg gt is not meant to replace the sls....just like the slr mcleran was never meant to replace the clk gtr...and just like the sls was never meant to replace the slr.... so saying the sls is better is as pointless as saying the 675lt is better than the 570s. or that the aventsdor sv is better than the hurucan or that the f12 is better than the 488...to say the sls is more special is not only saying the obvious but it's pointless because they are not even meant to be compared Yet despite that The amg gt beats the sls in many ways For one the sls has an awful transmisson....the amg gt r destroys the sls performance wise, handling wise accelerstion wise, ane has a far more luxurious interior, is more comfortable and in that respect is a much better daily driver and is as good of a race car as it is gt car So I respect your opinion and I agree sls will always be special over the gt with respect to it's na v8 and wing doors However at the end of the day they just are not meant to be compared to each other
    3
  11. nazokimi​ yes sls sounds way better than gt.... The gt still sounds great just not as good as the sls.....that's one perspective.... But on the flip side the amg gt is able to sound great without being anywhere near as much of a mosquito gas guzzler which the sls is....making the gt a better daily driver. So you see every point can have more than one perspective to it ;)
    3
  12. I disagree. Its not about the looks so much as it is about the performance.. Overall I like it. Its simple. Not the best looking but its a hommage to how the clk gtr or mcleran f1 looked (ish) from the front. Lmp1 like design... Where its function over design as main priority. And the figures alone of doing 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds is very exciting. Overall I am satisfied with the car (both looks and performance figures) but you guys are more than welcome to disagree.
    3
  13. Its not about the looks so much as it is about the performance.. Overall I actually really like it. Its simple. Not the best looking but not ugly either. Its a hommage to how the clk gtr or mcleran f1 looked (ish) from the front. Lmp1 like design... Where its function over design as main priority. And the figures alone of doing 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds is very exciting. Overall I am satisfied with the car (both looks and performance figures) but you guys are more than welcome to disagree.
    3
  14. 5rdjo Graphics Its not about the looks so much as it is about the performance.. Overall I like it. Its simple. Not the best looking but not ugly either. Its a hommage to how the clk gtr or mcleran f1 looked (ish) from the front. Lmp1 like design... Where its function over design as main priority. And the figures alone of doing 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds is very exciting. Overall I am satisfied with the car (both looks and performance figures and the back does looks special... What other car has a back like it? ) you guys are more than welcome to disagree.
    3
  15. Marcelo S Its not ugly. Its not about the looks so much as it is about the performance.. Overall I like it. Its simple. Not the best looking but not ugly either. Its a hommage to how the clk gtr or mcleran f1 looked (ish) from the front. Lmp1 like design... Where its function over design as main priority. And the figures alone of doing 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds is very exciting. Overall I am satisfied with the car (both looks and performance figures) but you guys are more than welcome to disagree.
    3
  16. Baptiste DL no first of all amg gtr is not meant to replace sls bs (which you were kind of implying to) if you say that the sls bs is better... or that you would rather have it rather than the amg gt r....then you are missing the point They are not meant to compete with each other. Sls is more of a supercar where as the gt is more of a super sports car....that competes with 911 models....thus the amg gt is not meant to replace the sls....just like the slr mcleran was never meant to replace the clk gtr...and just like the sls was never meant to replace the slr.... so saying the sls is better is as pointless as saying the 675lt is better than the 570s. or that the aventsdor sv is better than the hurucan or that the f12 is better than the 488... even tho the sls has an awful transmisson....amd even tho the amg gt r destroys the sls performance wise, handling wise accelerstion wise, ane has a far more luxurious interior, is more comfortable and in that respect ks a much betrer daily driver where it is as good of a race car as it is gt car and for its price the amg gt r looks much better. it's 'a' shape grill is incredibly aggressive and the whole car looks much more athletic than the boxy/edgy looking sls front
    2
  17. Its not about the looks so much as it is about the performance.. Overall I like it. Its simple. Not the best looking but its a hommage to how the clk gtr or mcleran f1 looked (ish) from the front. Lmp1 like design... Where its function over design as main priority. And the figures alone of doing 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds is very exciting. Overall I am satisfied with the car (both looks and performance figures) but you guys are more than welcome to disagree.
    2
  18. +Kev27RS Its new design language for mercedes yes but that doesn't mean that there isn't any mercedes dna in the design. It looks like a modern mcelaren f1, noble and clk gtr. NO I don't mean it in the sense that they ripped off a c class front and rear and put it on a hypercar body, that would look hidious. I mean in the actual shape and proportions of the car. Regardless I still think it looks like a mercedes. Yes not as much to the traditional mercedes design language but never the less mercedes. And I think its a good idea for them to explore other designs and think out of the box. The hyper car is meant to be the next wave that highlights new mercedes design language that will likely pass on to other mercedes down the spectrum in the near future. SO what I am saying is that yes you have a point but you are slightly overexaggerating. I am not saying that it looks totally like a mercedes however there are still elements to the car that are very reminiscent to the clk gtr as Dan talked about. Overall this shift in design language is no bad thing.
    2
  19. Marijan Matic you are entitled to your own opinion but I just digress.... The front lights do not look like a mustang. The only part that's similar about them to a mustang is the angle of the light that meets the grill.. That's it.... Beyond that its completely different mustang front lights have three parallelograms followed by a circle... In comparison cls is like an updside down check mark or an arrow with two circles... So it looks more like glasses if you will. If you don't like it that's fine that's your opinion but it does not look like mustang headlights. If you don't like the rear tail light that's also your opinion fine no problem but can you atleast try to justify your opinion.. I agree that I would have liked it if they stuck with the traditional rear tail lights of the previous gen but that doesn't make these ones ugly. If you don't like them again no problem... I'm just curious as to why you think that.
    2
  20. Its not the best but I wouldn't call it hideous. It's nice, simple and athletic
    2
  21. The only thing you will be laughing about is how insanely quickly you are accelerating! ;) V6 means relatively lighter engine and with electric power motors on all four wheels to compensate for torque its an absolute beast. Transaltion: 0-100kmph in 2 seconds! And 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds!
    2
  22. Larry Kippings if you don't like it fine that's your opinion but boring?? How the hell is it boring? Its not bland at all. Its a very athletic and sporty design... All be it not every ones cup of tea but sporty and anything but boring never the less. And if you bought a cls 63 before then consider the amg gt 4 which will be the replacement of the cls63.
    2
  23. And he and I prefer the e63s.
    2
  24. Evolved Sauron Mercedes make one of the best sounding turbo v8s if not the best.
    2
  25. Muhluri Nkuna Its not about the looks so much as it is about the performance.. Overall I like it. Its simple. Not the best looking but its a hommage to how the clk gtr or mcleran f1 looked (ish) from the front. Lmp1 like design... Where its function over design as main priority. And the figures alone of doing 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds is very exciting. Overall I am satisfied with the car (both looks and performance figures) but you guys are more than welcome to disagree.
    2
  26. +Gadarinco +Life of a Cricket No this is definitely Mercedes. Yes its new design language for the company but thats no bad thing as hypercars are meant to showcase and push the boundaires of technology and design language that will later trickle down to other models in the future. It still has some Mercedes DNA in its design. The front grill of this project one is the exact same design found on the front diffusers of other amg models. Furthermore this project one car shares its proportions with and takes many design ques from the clk gtr and sauber c9.... A modern version of them if you will. So yes its new design language for Mercedes however there is still Mercedes DNA in its design.
    2
  27. Mercades Benz lmao amg gt r destroys any bmw let alone the upcoming project one hyper car. Keep talking out of your fanboy ass. Also you aren't fooling any one with that username you two faced hypocrite!
    1
  28. *****​​ not replace... Well kinda.... It was meant to be the modern version of the 300sl..yes...so you are right ultimatly..... That's why you can tell that there are many design elements of the 300sl preserved in the sls's design language. The round rear end... the almost rectangular grill..... The wing doors... So you're absolutely right although I would say it's more of a modern version of the 300sl as opposed to a replacement... Because the convertible version of the 300sl would later be replaced by the sl line up of mercedes which still exists to this day as a hardtop convertable. And this is yet some other proof that the amg gt is not a replacement of the sls... Since its design is fresh from the ground up and shares virtually no design elements from the sls or 300sl with the exception of the long hood Sorry for the rant.... Hope that explains it.... Very good question .....thanks for asking it.
    1
  29. Mansa Musa​ yes better is subjective but as far as which has more effort put into it... it's clear that a mere straight line and a circle of the sls is too simple to look better than the curve head lights of the sls So better wise it's subjective but effort wise its crystal clear that the gt headlights have more effort put into their design... Thank you for asking me to clarify... Hope that helps clear my stance
    1
  30. Mercades Benz not a bmw fanboy or Mercedes hater right? Freaking two faced liar!!!!
    1
  31. By that logic the noble, mcleran f1 and clk gtr have ugly fronts..... I like it. Its simple and very much like a homage to the clk gtr
    1
  32. +Rafay Khan no
    1
  33. +LaSombra CS:GO Its not a combination, people just see it differently. Lets be real? Looks are subjective. With your kind of thinking then you can say practically every car look like this car + this car +...... It looks like a modern version of the clk gtr. The front is not ugly. I can understand not liking it but its not ugly.. Furthermore, this car is not about the looks so much as it is about the performance.. Overall I like it. Its simple. Not the best looking but its a hommage to how the clk gtr or mcleran f1 looked (ish) from the front. Lmp1 like design... Where its function over design as main priority. And the figures alone of doing 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds is very exciting. Its new design language for mercedes yes but that doesn't mean that there isn't any mercedes dna in the design. It looks like a modern mcelaren f1, noble and clk gtr. NO I don't mean it in the sense that they ripped off a c class front and rear and put it on a hypercar body, that would look hidious. I mean in the actual shape and proportions of the car. Regardless I still think it looks like a mercedes. Yes not as much to the traditional mercedes design language but never the less mercedes. And I think its a good idea for them to explore other designs and think out of the box. The hyper car is meant to be the next wave that highlights new mercedes design language that will likely pass on to other mercedes down the spectrum in the near future. SO what I am saying is that yes you have a point but you are slightly overexaggerating. I am not saying that it looks totally like a mercedes however there are still elements to the car that are very reminiscent to the clk gtr [(side skits and the like) with a more rounded body styling similar to the AMG Gran Turismo and an 'F1 McLaren-esque' front face. Just look at the stance, the c-pillers, the roof scoop, wheel arches, arch haunches, front side intake to point out a few..] Overall this shift in design language is no bad thing.
    1
  34. iaytoao still doesn't change the fact that what I said is true.
    1
  35. MEWITHMYSELF definitely not
    1
  36. Can. Comp at all? Not even the interior?
    1
  37. Kev27RS it still has Mercedes DNA and design language so no not nothing. Its like a modern clk gtr
    1
  38. +Screebob I actually love the sharkfin, it makes it very unique and looks great with the wing up imo ;)
    1
  39. +Kev27RS Likewise ;)
    1
  40. Aaron M its not marketing crap its a sedan with coupe like proportions.
    1
  41. Kev27RS no it does look like a Mercedes. Not fully but there still is a lot of Mercedes design language. It looks like a modern clk gtr.
    1
  42. Nfa on Youtube looks are subjective. I find this to be much better looking than the first gen. First gen is outdated as hell let alone when compared to this. Let's be fair though, no matter what design they would have come up with you would still complain about it.
    1
  43. Looks are subjective. Figures are not however so project one is definitely more exciting performance figures wise. 0-100kmph in 2 seconds. 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds! These are f1/lmp1 figures available to use on the street!
    1
  44. +TylerSanders Actually The mercs aero is not as obvious and is somewhat hidden, kind of like Lamborghini in their ala how its also hidden and not obvious at merely first glance......its front being shapped like that of the f1 or clk gtr also helps a lot. However overall I think its still fair to say Valkyrie has more aero, sure I will give you that. But to suggest that it will murder the project one? Lmao you have to be a fanboy to say that. I think its more fair to say that it will be a tight race and that the type of track they race on will be a key component. The Valkyrie has a v12, great for high speeds but its not as effective as a lighter 1.6 v6 combined with 4 electric motors. Consequently...... where the valkyrie will have a corning advantage mercedes will more than make up for that with its brutally fast acceleration. The v12 can't touch electric motors in acceleration which have instant torque. As a result the Project One does 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds! These are f1/lmp1 figures available to use on the street! just look at the foundation these cars are based on...the f1 cars........last time i checked mercedes is kicking red bulls ass in formula one big time..So if anything it looks like the project one will murder the valkyrie......However I will be more conservative and say that it will be a tight race which I think is fair to say. Regardless they are both amazing epic cars!
    1
  45. an buz yes. The new amg gt4 can beat it.
    1
  46. +Legio XXI Rapax Lmao you say I am a fanboy while you talk like a mercedes hater. And I am replying here since your comment won't appear when I click on it. I am a fan not a fanboy. 1) Not correct, project one has better power to weight ratio...project one has 1:1 power to weight ratio fxxk doesn't, it weighs (1295)more than the amount of power it has (1036) So the only one bs'ing is you 2) Lmao you genius the video you showed me is the OLD fxxk not the new one! The LaFxxk is NOT street legal. We are talking about the cars being street legal from the factory no modificication neccessary which would void a warranty...that would be stupid test.....may as well compare moded car to moded car. You talk about bs while using it in the same sentence! 3) Lmao excuses? They are not excuses its a valid reason. Name me 10 examples of hypercars with 30k miles on them let alone 50k. The reality is people don't drive these things a lot. This is a valid arguement not an exuse. You couldn't even properly counter it so ironically its you who is making excuses. Again I am not a fanboy. I am a fan because I still appreciate other companies and what they have to offer and have arguements to back up my statements. By your logic then you are a ferrari fanboy and mercedes hater.
    1
  47. Muhluri Nkuna I think it does have a lot of form just that there is a focus for function more.
    1
  48. Its not about the looks so much as it is about the performance.. Overall I like it. Its simple. Not the best looking but its a hommage to how the clk gtr or mcleran f1 looked (ish) from the front. Lmp1 like design... Where its function over design as main priority. And the figures alone of doing 0-100kmph in 2 seconds and 0-200kmph in under 6 seconds is very exciting. Overall I am satisfied with the car (both looks and performance figures) but you guys are more than welcome to disagree.
    1
  49. Kev27RS no it does look like a Mercedes. Its looks like a modern clk gtr
    1
  50. +Drunk Cat no
    1