Comments by "Hasan Al-habbobi" (@hasanal-habbobi4018) on "New BMW M5 vs Mercedes-AMG E63 S - DRAG RACE, ROLLING RACE \u0026 BRAKE TEST" video.

  1. Exactly. Now these pathetic bmw fanboys should shut up and lets all appreciate both these beasts.
    43
  2. I fully respect your opinion. Personally I prefer the merc overall for its better interior and exhaust note imo but really you can't go wrong with the m5. Both equally impressive beasts.
    23
  3. Pathetic bmw fanboys can never let go off these milisecond differences. Always have to suck off one car instead appreciating both these beasts.
    14
  4. VV got 2.7 one time and 2.8 seconds multiple times on his e63s. different conditions different times different drivers. This is as close as you can get to a fair head to head comparison where both cars are in the exact same conditions. Regardless of which is faster the difference is completely negligible and in the real world you really don't care about a tenth of a second you care more about enjoying the car itself. SO both these cars are equally brilliant.
    12
  5. not in every single way no. Both are equally great and impressive. the car thats better comes down to personal preference.
    11
  6. +Kaisuke971 says the one that blindly complains no matter what result happens. If the m5 won you pathetic bmw fanboys would be non stop flooding the comment section with your toxic hatred. Keep your bets to yourself. We are talking about reality not your biased bets. I appreciate both the m5 and e63s. they are equally impressive beasts. Meanwhile all fanboys like you can do is whine and complain when the truth and reality hits you in the face. Yes it is a minor difference. In the real world a tenth of a second is entirely negligible and not even noticeable without a vbox. Literally that difference is so small that it can come down to the smallest of factors like driver reaction time. In the real world you are not going to notice a tenth of a second difference..3.1 will seem as equally fast/quick as 3.2. and you will be far more concerned with the experience which both these cars are also equally good at.
    10
  7. +Edwar J yes many people have timed it at 2.8 and even 2.7. VV for example timed his car at 2.7 once and 2.8 multiple times. And at the end of the day regardless of which is faster the difference in spped is so small and entirely negligible. We are talking about a tenth of a second I mean come on. That difference is so small it literally comes down to the smallest of factors like driver reaction time. In the real world thos edifferences are not even noticable without a vbox. Whats sad is that you guys fanboy and can't let go of milisecond differences rather than appreciating these equally impressive beats.
    8
  8. +Ian Mush Looks are subjective. I think both look bloody gorgeous. For me personally I like: E63's front better m5's rear end better e63's interior better m5's seats better Both are equally impressive cars. For me personally I would go for e63 for its better looking interior and exhaust note (imo). But really you can not go wrong with the m5 at all either. Equally impressive beats. Love both. Totally respect your decision! m5 is very sexy indeed especially in blue with blacked out grill
    8
  9. +Pesterac e63s estate is fastest sedan around nurburgring.
    7
  10. So they can take another extra year to beat the Merc? This m5 is already over a year newer. Before this video you guys were non stop talking about how the m5 would beat the e63s. Now even when reality has spoken it looks like you haven't learned you yet and say oh oh competition package will win lmao. by the time the cp version comes out the e63s will be two years old. Furthermore this e63s is meant to compete with standard m5. the s for mercedes is just a naming convention for 4wd and more power and trim differences. The E63 S 4matic+ w/performance package will compete with the m5 cp. BMW fanboys you think it's more fair to compare the 571 hp E63 with the 600 hp M5? The M5 has 29 more hp, weighs 200 kg less and is 0,2 seconds faster to 60 mph than the E63. There is no question about which one is the fastest. The M5's real competitor is the E63 S. Both are claimed to do 0-60 in 3,4 seconds, and despite the fact that the E63 S has 12 more hp than the M5, the M5 is 200 kg lighter so it should be a fair match So Quit fanboying. Both these cars are equally impressive beats.
    7
  11. +TheBimmerMan buthurt BMW Fanboy LMAO !!! Yah competition pack So that bmw can take another extra year to maybe beat the Merc? lol This m5 is alredy 2 years newer. Both m and amg are awesome. You're just a toxic fanboy. AMG is competes in much higher leagues...we are talking supercars like the amg gt r and even hypercars like the project one which no m product can answer. So take a seat before you say anything.
    7
  12. +SJW Maniac I agree with the first part it hasn't always been faster......however today it doesn't just keep up. the e63s estate for example is the fastest estate to lap the nurburgring. So they aren't just keeping up, they are making records. Yes bmw is the original legends to this sector..but that doesn't mean it always stays that way. Amg have caught up. this e63 isn't just a muscle car ...its a proper beast both on and off the track. Heck mercedes was also the first to introduce the 4wd and rwd system. SO if anything they are the ones giving bmws lessons....the tables have turned. these are the closest these two rivals have ever been. They are both equally impressive beats.
    6
  13. +Claudiu S. So they can take another extra year to beat the Merc? This m5 is already over a year newer. Before this video you guys were non stop talking about how the m5 would beat the e63s. Now even when reality has spoken it looks like you haven't learned you yet and say oh oh competition package will win lmao. by the time the cp version comes out the e63s will be two years old. Furthermore this e63s is meant to compete with standard m5. the s for mercedes is just a naming convention for 4wd and more power and trim differences. The E63 S 4matic+ w/performance package will compete with the m5 cp. BMW fanboys you think it's more fair to compare the 571 hp E63 with the 600 hp M5? The M5 has 29 more hp, weighs 200 kg less and is 0,2 seconds faster to 60 mph than the E63. There is no question about which one is the fastest. The M5's real competitor is the E63 S. Both are claimed to do 0-60 in 3,4 seconds, and despite the fact that the E63 S has 12 more hp than the M5, the M5 is 200 kg lighter so it should be a fair match So Quit fanboying. Both these cars are equally impressive beats.
    5
  14. +Pioneer So they can take another extra year to beat the Merc? This m5 is already over a year newer. Before this video you guys were non stop talking about how the m5 would beat the e63s. Now even when reality has spoken it looks like you haven't learned you yet and say oh oh competition package will win lmao. by the time the cp version comes out the e63s will be two years old. Furthermore this e63s is meant to compete with standard m5. the s for mercedes is just a naming convention for 4wd and more power and trim differences. The E63 S 4matic+ w/performance package will compete with the m5 cp. BMW fanboys you think it's more fair to compare the 571 hp E63 with the 600 hp M5? The M5 has 29 more hp, weighs 200 kg less and is 0,2 seconds faster to 60 mph than the E63. There is no question about which one is the fastest. The M5's real competitor is the E63 S. Both are claimed to do 0-60 in 3,4 seconds, and despite the fact that the E63 S has 12 more hp than the M5, the M5 is 200 kg lighter so it should be a fair match So Quit fanboying. Both these cars are equally impressive beats.
    5
  15. +This Guy The s is just a naming convention for 4wd and slightly more power and different trim. Its nots stripped down or anything like that. So it still competes with the standard m5. The E63 S 4matic+ w/performance package on the other hand is what will compete with the m5 competition pack. So this is very much a fair comparison.
    4
  16. exactly both are equally great cars. the ultimate deciding factor is preference. For me I prefer the e63s for its better looking interior and exhaust note imo. But really you can't go wrong at all with the m5 either. its all comes down to preference.
    4
  17. we are waiting for the new rs6 and rs7 We are waiting for audi to update it before including it in these rivalries.
    4
  18. no no the s for mercedes is just a naming convention for 4wd and more power and trim differences. This m5 is already over a year newer. Furthermore this e63s is meant to compete with standard m5. the s for mercedes is just a naming convention for 4wd and more power and trim differences. The E63 S 4matic+ w/performance package will compete with the m5 cp. You think it's more fair to compare the 571 hp E63 with the 600 hp M5? The M5 has 29 more hp, weighs 200 kg less and is 0,2 seconds faster to 60 mph than the E63. There is no question about which one is the fastest. The M5's real competitor is the E63 S. Both are claimed to do 0-60 in 3,4 seconds, and despite the fact that the E63 S has 12 more hp than the M5, the M5 is 200 kg lighter so it should be a fair match
    4
  19. no no shame. the bmw m5 has nothing to be ashamed of. Its an equally impressive car. Looks are subjective. Both these cars are equally great. SO much so that the ultimate deciding factor comes down to personal preference.
    4
  20. +Njoyyy you coudln't have said that any better. they would flood the comments with their toxic hatred.
    3
  21. +Pioneer in your pathetic fanboy dreams. both are equally great and impressive cars and are equally good in practically every way. SO much so that the car thats better comes down to personal preference. For example for me the e63s better interior and exhaust note easily take the cake imo. But you can't go wrong with the m5 either. both are equally impressive.
    3
  22. +Danial I think what you mean is the E63 S 4matic+ w/performance package that will come out later
    3
  23. +TheBimmerMan I am so happy the merc won so that you idiots can finally shut up with your toxic and pathetic fanboysim. I really appreciate both the m5 and the e63. Both are equally impressive beasts. And even in comparisons like these the difference in performance is completely negligible. These cars are equally good. So much so that the ultimate deciding factor comes down to personal preference.
    3
  24. +Kushal yah they are doing those tests in different conditions. Also VV got his e63 to do 2.7 once and 2.8 multiple times. So the e63 is just as fast. This video is the first time where both cars are in the same conditions. And regardless of which is faster...the difference is so small and entirely negligible. In the real world you are not going to notice a tenth of s second difference without a vbox. you just won't and frankly when you are driving the car its about the experience, not the tenths of a second ....which both these cars are equally good at. Instead of fanboying and being butthurt and salty appreciate what both these cars to bring to the table. We are talking about performance saloons with supercar performance. this is an incredible time to be a car enthusiast. not a butthurt fanboy.
    3
  25. +Ib7 h tell that to bmw fanboys. thats what i have been saying everytime. but ofcourse they still give you a toxic attitude. but like you said.....arguing over a tenth of a second is just downright pathetic. the difference is so small that it can come down to the smallest of factors like driver reaction time. The difference is negligible.In the real world you can't notice these small differences without a vbox. Both these cars are equally great and impressive beasts. So much so that the one thats better really does come down to personal preference. For me that would be the e63 since i prefer its interior and exhaust note. But really you can not go wrong at all with the m5. again both are equally impressive beasts.
    3
  26. Dope profile pic dude!
    2
  27. +MegaFregel Both have equally good build quality and agility and are equally fun to drive. Looks are subjective and the speed differences are neglible. Really these cars are equally matched. The better car comes down to personal preference.
    2
  28. Black Out it's not better. Both are equally good. The better car comes down to personal preference.
    2
  29. Vehab22 you utter moron. Vbox doesn't lie. And he did the tests again on a FLAT SURFACE and still got same results. You're a joke.
    2
  30. +Mothusi So they can take another extra year to beat the Merc? This m5 is already over a year newer. Before this video you guys were non stop talking about how the m5 would beat the e63s. Now even when reality has spoken it looks like you haven't learned you yet and say oh oh competition package will win lmao. by the time the cp version comes out the e63s will be two years old. Furthermore this e63s is meant to compete with standard m5. the s for mercedes is just a naming convention for 4wd and more power and trim differences. The E63 S 4matic+ w/performance package will compete with the m5 cp. BMW fanboys you think it's more fair to compare the 571 hp E63 with the 600 hp M5? The M5 has 29 more hp, weighs 200 kg less and is 0,2 seconds faster to 60 mph than the E63. There is no question about which one is the fastest. The M5's real competitor is the E63 S. Both are claimed to do 0-60 in 3,4 seconds, and despite the fact that the E63 S has 12 more hp than the M5, the M5 is 200 kg lighter so it should be a fair match So Quit fanboying. Both these cars are equally impressive beats. We should all appreciate both to them. This is a great time to be a car enthusiast where we have these kind of saloons with supercar like performance. Its a time to appreciate what both cars bring to table not a time to fanboy and say "wait for this version and that version". Lets appreciate the beasts in front of us that we have today.
    2
  31. Now you pathetic m fanboys shut up and appreciate both of these beasts.
    1
  32. jamviator not necessarily... Although its heavier its so far more powerful thanks to that amazing v12 engine. And you're a BMW fanboy getting butthurt over these times when in reality both these cars are equally impressive and we can all appreciate both of these German beasts.
    1
  33. Kaisuke971 all those are seperate tests in different conditions. And there were many other magazines that got an equally quick time if not faster. There is also Veichle Virgins who got his to do 2.7 once and 2.8 seconds multiple times. But like I said all those are seperate tests. In comparison car wow's test is with both cars in the exact same conditions so its loud and clear that the e63 is the quicker car. Give it up. Regardless however the difference is incredibly tiny and very much negligible and it can go either way. Not just top gear. Roadandtrack...amoung many other magazines. The truth is that both cars are equally good. The better car all comes down to personal preference. That's THE TRUTH.
    1
  34. Kaisuke971 yes people can still count as a source with vbox and other evidence of the time. Magazines are not the only source... Plus most of them don't even show you proof of the time so they could have easily been payed to say something. Vbox and other evidence however is clear evidence that speaks for itself. Can't take a toxic BMW fanboy like yourself seriously. So don't lecture anyone about being worse or low when you are the lowest of the low and worst of the worst. You get so butthurt over a tenth of a second instead of appreciating both these German beasts.
    1
  35. Tadas Simasevicius no we already know that new m5 is faster. New e63 is faster than rs6 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JB9Ki9YWXU And we know that new m5 and e63 are pretty much equally fast therefore the new m5 would beat the rs6.
    1
  36. Tadas Simasevicius m5 is lighter and has more torque if I am not mistaken so it should still work out in favour of the m5
    1
  37. The rs7 and rs6 are both outdated. The e63 and m5 are quicker. There is just no other way of putting it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-CYm8qvb2o When audi release the new rs6 and rs7 then they will put it in comparisons like these. Until then, quit complaining. you should be complaining to audi to update it already.
    1
  38. Tadas Simasevicius it doesn't contain new m5 but we know that both new m5 and new e63 are equally fast so since we also know that the new e63 beat the rs6 then its clear that new m5 will also beat rs6.
    1
  39. Tadas Simasevicius not by that much. The difference is very tiny. The results are predictable already ...
    1
  40. Tompog 89 absolutely incorrect. They are related. They are separate but related.f1 is to experiment and push the bounds of technology which later gets trickeled down to road amg cars like the amg gt r, amg gt63 and project one to name a few examples
    1
  41. No they look perfect, better than the e63s tail lights which are way too narrow. Thats one of the main reasons I would prefer estate version of e63 as the lights are wider and good. And m5 tail lights are properly athletic and wide.
    1
  42. +Andrea Scorsone mercedes doesn't look like a female car. You're blind. Both the m5 and e63 look beautiful . Looks are subjective. For me I like the: front of e63 better Rear of m5 better Interior of e63 better Seats of m5 better. imo
    1
  43. Mehmet T. Bakkal glad you asked E63 estate is the fastest estate to lap the nurburgring so the e63 is very track capable. And the e63 is the first one of the two saloons to come out with the drift mode where only the rear wheels are active. And both are fun to drive. Chris Harris even said that the e63 handles like an m car.
    1
  44. jamviator lmao butthurt BMW fanboy. Take the L. Although the 7 series is heavier it makes up for it wih its greater torque and power thanks to its v12. So try again. Keep thinking of excuses its all you can do. And don't talk about quick when the amg gt r alone beats any m car let alone the project one. A45 and c63, e63 to name just a few examples are quicker than their m counterparts.
    1
  45. Whoppi you make no sense. Just like all the other BMW fanboys.
    1
  46. jamviator top gear didn't say that. Both are equally great drivers car and both are comfortable and efficient.
    1
  47. laweta potrzebna od zaraz says the BMW fan girl ironically!
    1
  48. Serius both are beautiful. Only disgusting and blind BMW fanboys would find the amg disgusting.
    1
  49. Mirosław yet it ways more so no it's not just about having more power and torque.
    1
  50. Peter Hammer its not faster. Both are equally fast and great. The difference is so tiny that it is entirely negligible. In the real world such a small difference is not even noticeable. Its not a better car. Both are equally great. The better car comes down to personal preference. Both will sell well. You said it yourself buyers of the car won't buy it for drag races and neither will they for a tenth of a second which goes either way for both of them. They buy the one based on their personal preferences.
    1