Comments by "Hasan Al-habbobi" (@hasanal-habbobi4018) on "Doug DeMuro" channel.

  1. Lmao g wagons sell like hot cakes and make them tons of money. So if they are crying its out of joy for the amount of money they make from the g wagons.
    83
  2. I wouldn't go that far. Best sounding AMG is the V12 that was used in the older s class models which is very close to the engines they built for the Pagani Zonda. And while turbo will never sound as great as NA they still sound great and are no where near as much of the mosquito gas guzzlers that NA engines are ;)
    55
  3. haha even he asked himself that: 10:26 " I wonder how many times I said seventy six thousand dollars today?"
    40
  4. Classic Mercedes 👌
    29
  5. these "jokes" are so cliché tbh. and its sad you consider it humor to begin with. they are starving and you have the audacity to treat even something as serious as that as a joke?
    21
  6. Jacob Bauman they look great actually.
    17
  7. Swole Team 6 you don't get it... Ofcourse entertainment wise 720s is better car to buy for the money... But this is poor people mentally of only choosing one.... When you are rich... Which are the people who buy these cars in the first place ....you are looking at this cars rarity, its prestige, heritage history and value... Which it will hold well... Maybe even appreciate in value.. So its a collectors car.... An investment ... You may as well be asking... Why do people buy expensive vintinge cars when new cars are better in every way? That's not the point.... the point is that They are still desirable to people and the value they have and how different and unique they are from other cars.
    17
  8. Anton Zuykov says the fool himself ironically. He is not talking about the e class idiot. He is talking about the e badge that's on the stinger for the Korean market. Mercedes e class is high quality. you have absolutely no clue what you are talking about. And its reliable if you take care of it. In fact it has to be reliable because they are used as taxis and the taxi industry relies heavily on reliablility. You spend more and get way more.... Way more luxury Way more. Features, way more luxurious amenities, way more technology, way more comfort... Etc etc. You are truely clueless
    15
  9. It still has leds which is what the light mainly is. Not every wants the whole light to be led. So they give you the option. They are not overpriced. They are optional. And these quirks and technologies that the Germans have from an early age push technology forward faster than the rest of the car industry otherwise would. So the Germans are leaders of the automobile industry.
    14
  10. jj lad its not a posers car, its a collectors car and has rarrity prestige and heritage and will increase in value. So you can actually make money from this car. All race cars like these are expensive.
    13
  11. All the German sport divisions are awesome.
    11
  12. George B well it's a ultra luxury trim level for the s class now and rightfully so.... as the s class is already good so the maybach trim level really spicins it up. It's no pretender, it delivers and redefines what a land yacht is. Mercedes has remained in business since it's founder created the first gasoline combustion engine automobile. RR went bankrupt if it wasn't for BMW saving it's ass. And bently had some near bankrupt tough times
    9
  13. +Kaspar Marcusson I beg to differ. the e63s wagon is better than both the rs6 and rs7. Looks are subjective but even beyond that the e63 is faster acceleration, has better exhaust sound, a miles better looking interior and light years ahead of audi with tons more technologies and features.
    9
  14. gabrielgalaxygh it should be a genesis badge.
    9
  15. AncientFury nonsense. Lmao the irony. america is a nation if immigrants..... A nation of immigrants protesting against immigrants and refugess???? You denied the Jews refugees entrance before and looked what happened.... The were killed in the holocaust. So yes it is your problem when you have the means to solve it but choose not to. Lmao! Colonization helped them??? That's like saying a dictatorship is OK to have because it helped them. Did it help them to have slaves?????????? If it helped them so much then why don't we have colonization like that today? Oh that's right because the world ks not backwards like your twisted logic. Two wrongs don't make a right. If I shoot you in the foot and then give you money my "help" to you doesn't mean crap. The crimes outweigh the benfitits significantly! They can't build it? Or maybe was it the puppets and remote controls your ancestors left behind??? Huh ever thought of that? You don't speak for the majority so quit making stuff up out of thin air. Lmao without any help???? Which is why to this day Americans still pay taxes part of which go to funding them. You have absolutely no idea what you are taking about. The only lie is you saying its a lie ironically! Lmao your logic is so pathetic where to begin!!!! By your logic the news were "lazy" for running away from Hitler to white land instead of fighting the natzis. Why didn't germany give up its land foe the Jews as punishment? Y a random other place? Who gave Britain authority to say what is a country and what's not??? You think refugees are all refugees who didn't try to fight? Of course they did. And many of then still do. Its just that the war has so many sides and never ends so people seek a better life. You would do the EXACT SAME THING if you we're born there guarenteed. Easy for you to say that behind a computer screen.
    8
  16. TrickyKing none because Doug is completely clueless about this. It's not a mini van. It's a working van. it's priced at 30k as base.....Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run.
    8
  17. cingratta 0-60 is acceleration... Saying a car is quick means it has a high acceleration. Saying a car is fast means it has a high top speed or that its fast around the track. In this case Doug is referring to the fact that the e63 is the fastest wagon to lap the nurburgring.
    8
  18. It was a little biased though.
    7
  19. It would look cooler as a rectangleish design which complements the rest of the design language of the car. Its not the end of the world... But it would be a nice touch.
    7
  20. SPORTCARLUXURY its not available for north American markets because vast majority of Americans don't like wagons
    7
  21. +Michał 77 hah so you are saying Alfa is reliable and cheaper to maintain!?!? they are not crap at all and amg version brings the car to life even more and they sound boss, and it looks nice too and the interior is also better looking and merc is also miles ahead of Alfa in technology
    6
  22. Liam Quiroga amg gt r > sls bs
    6
  23. williamvillanueva93 says the boring person ironically.
    6
  24. MTB Addict not at all. Many construction sites airports etc will still buy them for their incredible reliability and utility. Doug is completely clueless. It's not a minivan and was never meant to be one. For that there is the v class.
    6
  25. In the right colour (a dark colour for example or black) then it shouldn't be too big of a deal. Otherwise yah its definitely noticeable.
    6
  26. Doug DeMuro I can't believe you of all people would say that! Don't fix what isn't broken. Simple. Yes.. But they still have the same 'vw bug' like design for over 50 years which is what he is trying to say (which btw is no bad thing). The g wagon was also redesigned it in the sense that they modernized it. Its a simple clean timeless box design and its been working for them and still works for them to this day. Yes its stupid and crazy and makes no sense. But that's exactly why it makes perfect sense. It's crazy and wild... There's nothing quite like it on the road. And it has a lot presence where it goes. Especially the 4x4 and 6x6 which have incredible off road capabilities too. Don't get me wrong... I would never buy one myself... Even with an infinite supply of cash I wouldn't buy one but I do see why their is a market for these kinds of veichles and why... Even though they don't make sense to us.... they do make sense to a niche market which is frankly all that really matters. Its basic economics. Seller gets their money and buyer gets their desired product. Simple!
    6
  27. Dauge Yo does a fj cruiser have leather sears and a v12 or v8 engine? Does a fj cruiser look like a military veichle? Does a fj cruiser or land rover have anywhere near the same amount of presence on the road? No no no and no. Not at all. Not even close. So yes. There is nothing like it on the road. No car like it exists with a design like that with that level of luxury and off road capability as a whole package in a way like the g wagon.
    6
  28. BMW Porsche Mercedes also have great engineering and quality that is very much appreciable... So I don't see why its a few.
    6
  29. Trades46 i just can't believe that people actually watch him
    5
  30. it's not fake, and amg gt is actually faster and has a better interior..... amg gt r recks the sls and even sls black series
    5
  31. N Shell its not garbage.
    5
  32. The Juice not at all. It has tons of presence and luxury and offroad capability and it holds Its value very well. A fisher price watch at that price would tank invalue immediately not the g wagon.
    5
  33. Instead they like crossovers and SUVs. Smh.
    5
  34. errorcode99 yes it does believe it or not. That's why it sells so dam well.
    5
  35. TheLegend 27​​​​​​ "Rr is On another" *level Ya you're right, it's on a level below maybach and Mercedes that's right "Have you ever sat in a rr" have you? I have sat in an s class.... But Like I said you don't need to have sat in a car to be able to talk about it you genius Of course it's quality materials, but I don't need to have sat in it to tell you the interior looks hidiously ugly and outdated, nor to tell you that it lacks features the s class has like perfume dispensor and ambient ligthing nor to also tell you how it is light years behind the s class in technology And doesn't even have basic technology like park assist and brake assist that even a Ford has! How pathetic for a car that costs as much as a house. Ever heard of the internet? Pst You are using it right now. Yea I am a fanboy, FOR A REASON, cause they make great cars, and please.... don't act like you're anything but a rr fanboy for defending rr without any sound argument. Everyone knows that without the badge rr is almost nothing. I am bringing up facts and reality so I definitely know what I am talking about, more than you for sure.
    4
  36. TheLegend 27​ I have sat in them and that depends, the cheapest s class with no options will have soft touch plastics and fake leather in some areas of course, which is inevitable if you want to get a less expensive car. However it's In hidden places that are not obvious and where you really would have to be picky to find. even rr has plastic in some places, the point is however that they are in parts of the car you would never even look for and hard to find That said as you option an s class more and more you get to option leather and higher end materials. Then there is maybach which is fully loaded s class with even higher quality materials and even alligator skin if you so wishes..... you'd be hard pressed to find any plastic there. You clearly haven't been inside these cars and are just talking out of your ass. Normal s class will have some plastics to bring down the cost. The pint is however if you want better quality then it's available for you to option up or you can go with maybach which comes with even higher end materials. I already admitted that I was a fanboy but don't try acting like your anything but a rr fanboy yourself. The difference is I have an argument and facts to back it up. You clearly missed the point, there is no rr to even compete with the maybach s class Pullman limo or emperor! That's my point, that's why no rr can touch them because they don't even have a car that can compete on that level.
    4
  37. utubeballbag mecercedes is the defintion of class let alone maybach lmao you don't know what you are talking about
    4
  38. so well said man, every time I see the thumbnail "5 reasons I hate the (insert car model)" I think to myself 1 trillion reasons I hate vehicle virgins (exg! His voice)
    4
  39. Suboptimus Lime​​ that's also kinda true now that you point it out, he is just essentially showing off daddys money. Reminds me of other people I hate.... cough lord aleem cough cough
    4
  40. for an electric car I can forgive it but for it's other models...... .mehhhh
    4
  41. +Mari Onette I understand the solution should be that simple but it isn't unfortunatly, its often a lot more complicated than that. Food is not easy to find in the desert, and you can't simply 'move away' from the desert, you have to leave in large groups and walk for miles upon miles (thats IF you know where you are going to begin with), and you need to find food and shelter every time which itself involves additional walking miles and miles in a different route. So its not as simple as just walking away from the problem....its more like the problem of malnutrition and starving (among others , like diseases) walking with them everywhere they go. And its not food we should be giving them, but the mediums and skill to get the food. You know what they say, give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime Also Even if there is food there is not enough to serve such large families of theirs which is another problem of over breeding they have there due to ignorance and lack of education let alone good education
    4
  42. +AncientFury The fact that you can do something to actually help your brothers in humanity from world hunger yet choose not to makes it partly your problem. And your disrespect on top of that makes it an even bigger problem. You think they choose to be poor? There is no economic stability, too many diseases, lack of education, etc....they need help. And yes it is indirectly your problem since there was colinzation as well as the fact that some of your politicians have been exposed with helping out with the corruption there.
    4
  43. *****​​​ nah, amg gt r has better looks, better interior, better performance, great sound yet isn't a gas guzzler like the sls, not to mention it's no where near as expensive as a sls bs. So it's better in almost every way despite NOT being designed as a replacement to the sls bs. That said you can't go wrong with either. ;)
    4
  44. EXACTLY, it's like am I slowing down or speeding up?!?!
    4
  45. Have you looked at the expeditions interior? The navigators interior alone makes the ford look like a cheap toyota corolla. You're blind if you Actually think its just a rebadged expedition. That couldn't be farther than the truth.
    4
  46. Notice that its only visible on the right side of the car not the left.
    4
  47. victor2krk because at its base price it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run.
    4
  48. sushi otaku yes really Looks are subjective. Lmao lfa doesn't cost that much less especially not to the millionaires+ who buy these cars. So nice try..... This clk will hold its value much better than the Lexus and maybe even increase in value/appreciate over time. Its not faster, it sounds nice but its not exactly reliable... You can't just copy paste toyora reliabity on every single model.. This is a Lexus project made independently from how any other Lexus or toyora are built.... Its not your average Lexus and by default not your Lexus level of reliability. And clk is a race car. Dtn is a German racing league which the clk actually raced in... So this is car is actually based on the gt3 car which actually raced in the dtk racing league so its a legit race car.
    4
  49. Rs6, v90 and new e63s wagon and c63 wagon beg to differ
    4
  50. I searched long time ago well before this video :p
    4
  51. Alviniscute I don't care if he doesn't like the Mercedes but he is a hypocrite. If he doesn't like it then fine but he should alteast be consistent with his criticism. The exact same thing he hated the g wagon for he praised for the jeep. That's some really low double standards especially from Doug.
    4
  52. Hungover Garage its not a pos!
    4
  53. for the v10 segment yes.... best sounding car you are looking at the Lamborghini murceilago..... porshe 917....Ferrari enzo fxxk.... pagani cinque....
    3
  54. Protector of the Republic you don't have to be old to desire merc
    3
  55. Sapher no it isn't
    3
  56. TheLegend 27​​​​​​​​​ first of all there are no plastics in the s class, and if there are then they are in hidden places that you wouldn't even know unless you did a whole search of the car. And no it doesn't cost as much as a house it is around the 100k mark. And especially if you option it up there are no plastics. This is where maybach comes into play, it takes the already luxurious and more technologically advanced s class and ups the quality of the materials even more to be just as good if not better than rr. And yet still it's 2x cheaper than the rr despite being just as luxurious and more comfortable and technologocally advanced and has better interior design Furthermore maybach is limited production which makes the car more rare and exclusive and hence it won't take as much of a hit in depreciation as a rr or regular s class will. Yes interior design is a big deal and can make or break the difference of buying or not buying a car. The reality is that rr interior looks outdated and ugly. Sure build quality is good, but what good is that if its ugly? Furthermore s class offers more features than rr like ambient lighting and perfume dispenser to name a few which set the tone of the cabin. And yes technology is also a big deal, that is not an excuse for rr and bentely to be stuck in the past. Mercedes has autopilot for example which is a luxury in of itself allowing the driver the luxury to take his feet, eyes and hands of the car and road and relax. So technology is there to provide luxurious convinience as well as safety. Rr doesn't even have simple technology like park assist and brake assist that even a ford has! That's pretty pathetic for a car that costs as much as a house to be so far behind on even basic technology. And yes many people who buy these cars look for differentiating factors one if which is technology because it improves the safety of the car while provding convenience. It also reflects how Mercedes is a technology leader rather than a follower while rr struggles to even follow So no the quality of materials are just as good as bently and rr when considering the price and whether or not you option it up to have more leather than normal for example. Maybach however comes with all the luxury the s class has and takes it an ultra step further to be right on par if not better than rr and bentley quality And Mercedes can go even further with the s class Pullman limo and emperor, and even include alligator skin if you really wanted. No rr can touch those kinds of s classes
    3
  57. Trey Perry​ Don't know how credible your story is since you can say anything on YouTube but "feels special" is so relative and subjective. When you drive the amg gt r it will feel much more special because it will have a much better interior that not only feels more special but is better in every way as well as a Much more special feel while driving thanks to it's better handling and exciting performance
    3
  58. johnnyXXX 1.yes if you spec it that way 2. Yes Mercedes has many seat adjustments. And it does have a massage function. Even stone massage in fact 3.yes Mercedes c class has ambient lighting.. Way before Lincoln in fact. 4.yes it does have the navigation functions. Not all of them... However the new c class will get Mercedes's new In house infotainment system with a significantly improved navigation. 5.yes it has the 360 camera if you spec it that way. The c class has practically all of those things... And keep in mind you guys are comparing an entry level Mercedes sedan to a top of the line Lincoln SUV. That alone speaks for itself how even the small Mercedes has such high quality that its able to be compared with the big cars of Lincoln. Having said that I absolutely adore the Lincoln and think its the best SUV in the segment right now but to pretend like a Mercedes c class is worse couldn't be farther than the truth. The c class does have practically all the features you talked about. And especially the e class. With Mercedes they give you total control and flexibility... So thats why things are optional.. Because not everyone wants to spend money on a feature they don't want. Mercedes is not plastic all over. That's is absolutely false. One the plastic that is there is hidden and not obvious. You would have to search the entire car to find. All manufacturers do this one way or another. Two.... Again as I said you get to choose the spec qne quality you want to have hence so if there's plastics that can only be your fault and own decision. Not just s class. Even e class blows this Lincoln out of the water in terms of interior luxury and quality. And also remember that the s class and c class came out nearly 4 years ago and still top of their game interior wise. Again... Having said that Lincoln really hit it out of the park with the navigator and its definitely a lot more special than the equivalent Mercedes SUV. But the s class is leagues above the navigator so don't even bother comparing it. And don't even get me started on maybach which would blow the navigator out of the water even more. So don't get me wrong the navigator is superb but don't get too carried away.
    3
  59. Christoph S. You're blind of you think all Mercedes look the same.
    3
  60. blackcountryme your an utter moron than for generalizing a whole company off of one car. The amg gt r, the e63 the s class etc etc are all cars worth their price tag and then some.
    3
  61. Yup. The rs7 is too long just like the m6 and cls63 and these cars are not as nimble as the e63 m5 or rs6. Its a weird thing..... M5 only comes as a sedan.... Rs6 only comes as an estate and e63 comes as either. And rs6 is not available in north America so as a result people end up very confused about what it competes with but here is the deal. So like you said... the rs7 is designed to compete with the cls63 and m6... Just as the non sport versions.... Cls and a7 and 6 series would compete with each other. Only difference is that a7/rs7 comes in a hatch back like design.... Which there is also a cls shooting break I believe as well that comes as a hatchback....these are cars designed to be 4 doors but with a coupe like profile.... They are long luxury sedans with a sporty edge to them. But they are more of authobahn cruising rockets rather than nimble sports cars. That's where the rs6 m5 and e63 come in. Not only can they accelerate well but they are also nimble and good around corners... So you are right. Having said that though... Because the rs6 is not available in north America... In that respect only you can say the e63 and m5 can still compete with the rs7 even though they aren't really designed to.
    3
  62. Thomas Fährmann a station wagon with supercar like acceleration and power is boring? The only thong that's crap is your comment. It has the practically of a family car and acceleration of a supercar.... Its a super family car! It's the best of both worlds. That's anything but boring. And its the non amg models that are taxis. Furthermore... If anything being a taxi is a compliment. It shows that out of all the other car companies... Audi bmw etc they choose Mercedes e clas largely because it is way more reliable/durable and way more luxirious and comfortable than them. So it's not a shifty car. You're just a shitty person who's desperate to hate.
    3
  63. Tehgziz Lauw no they aren't. They are incredibly rare so in fact if anything they are underated
    3
  64. Alex Bramm thats in your opinion. Imo e63 wagon (especially the new one) looks much better rhan the rs6 (even better than the avant). So the audi is one of the best looking not the best looking. There is also the v90 which looks awesome. The e63 is not outdated especially not the new one...... The new e63s wagon not only looks better on the outside but is light years better looking on the inside. So much so that it makes the Audi interior look hidiously outdated. Not to mention far more technologically advanced than the rs6 with many more features. Either way the rs6 is not sold in north American markets due to the fact that most Americans do Not like wagons
    3
  65. Pieter Post no he is right. The rs7 is too long just like the m6 and cls63 and these cars are not as nimble as the e63 m5 or rs6. Its a weird thing..... M5 only comes as a sedan.... Rs6 only comes as an estate and e63 comes as either. And rs6 is not available in north America so as a result people end up very confused about what it competes with but here is the deal. As the original commenter said the rs7 is designed to compete with the cls63 and m6... Just as the non sport versions.... Cls and a7 and 6 series would compete with each other. Only difference is that a7/rs7 comes in a hatch back like design.... Which there is also a cls shooting break I believe as well that comes as a hatchback....these are cars designed to be 4 doors but with a coupe like profile.... They are long luxury sedans with a sporty edge to them. But they are more of authobahn cruising rockets rather than nimble sports cars. That's where the rs6 m5 and e63 come in. Not only can they accelerate well but they are also nimble and good around corners... So the original commenter is right. Having said that though... Because the rs6 is not available in north America... In that respect only you can say the e63 and m5 can still compete with the rs7 even though they aren't really designed to.
    3
  66. It doesn't have AWD. There is an e63S and e63. the e63S has awd and e63 has rwd. Doug has the e63 not the e63s.
    3
  67. For future videos he should film a pov and set up other go pros during his drive to give us different angles.
    3
  68. MrWoodii If it sells so well then its not pointless. Period. Don't fix what isn't broken. So its not outdated. Its a simple clean timeless boxy design. Doug doesn't get it. He makes valid criticisms but fails to realize that its these same very criticms that make it a success. Its crazy. Its stupid. Its pointless. Its ridiculous. And its supposed to be like that. Its because it makes no sense that it makes perfect sense! Of course to you and me its outrageously overpriced. But if you really think about it. The people who buy these cars sleep on millions so to them this is pocket change. To them its an investment... The g wagons keep their value very well..... They have a lot of road presence... Since their really is no veichle out there on this same level that exists on the road. And if you go for the 4x4 or 6x6 then you also get incredible off road capabilities. So he is right to be angry... J also wouldn't buy this even if I had all the money in the world. But he is overreacting as he fails to understand that its the same reasons he hates it that people like it... And why a market for these viechles exists at all... And why it sells like hot cakes.
    3
  69. To us yes it makes sense to say its overpriced. But basic economics tells us its not. It sells extremely well and if people are willing to buy it... Especially to such a high degree... then its price is justifiable. Not to us but to the market it has. Its a one of kind niche veichle. There is nothing like it on he road. I would never buy one but it doea have a market for itself and in that respect is not completely overpriced. It depends on how you look at it.
    3
  70. AlexBFresh they do change it. Subtle changes but still changes never the less.
    3
  71. +Luke Kazimierz Its actually a lot of car just in a different way. instead of comfort and features its reliability, durability and utility.....these vans will last long and take a lot of abuse. to a family they are too much money but to a company they are not only pocket change but an investment ....sine this van will end up making these companies 10 times the cost of the van and more in profit. So its not much money at all in that respect.
    3
  72. WheatSnackBread looks are subjective. Its not a turd at all. And its not overpriced considering how even at that price it sells like hot cakes. And Doug is no one to call it overpriced when he bought an iPhone x which is the definition of overpriced. And you would buy a g wagon because it looks much better seats more people for a smaller size, has way more road presence, better engine, better interior, etc etc.
    3
  73. Michał 77​​​​ intentionally made to be broken!?!?! No, they have more technology, so they may be more prone to being broken but that doesn't mean they break often, they are actually quite reliable from my experience and of many others. And even if we awesome they are unreliable (which they aren't) the luxury and technologies they offer more than makes up for it.
    2
  74. Ross MK​ haha that is so not true, and BMW is not only less reliable but costs much more to maintain too. And there are also merc police cars in Germany as well as sprinter ambulances and fire trucks across the world so you proved nothing there And my other point also valid how merc is the most luxurious of the German brands
    2
  75. Michał 77​​​ haha no you just have to stop being a German car hater, you have zero evidence for your bs, you are just a hater of German master piece engineering... plain and simple.and like I said, EVEN IF WE ASSUME (for sake of argument) that that they aren't reliable....they more than make up for it for their top craftsmanship in luxury and sport performance. Cuz if you wanna go this route I can easily ask you Who built the first car genius?? Mercedes did, Karl Benz...For that alone Germans deserve tons of respect from the car world.
    2
  76. *****​ ahaha that's funny joke man, Mercedes have much more tech than Alfa does, besides lane keeping and brake assist which I don't even think the Alfa has, Mercedes has distrinic plus (essentially auto drive for stop and go traffic) magic body control that absorbs all the bumps in the road and scans the road ahead to prepare the suspension ahead of time, smart head lights that allow you to use high beam without harming on coming drivers, that also turn in the direction you are turning...etc I could go on and on, Alfa can't touch Mercedes' technology
    2
  77. BokiXI haha e class is taxi cuz it's WAY MORE LUXURIOUS AND WAY MORE RELIABLE than any BMW! And it's not just for old people, that stereotype is old itself ironically, it's 5 year old logic BMW fanboys use because they have no real argument, Mercedes is for anyone with the money that desires to buy a merc... tons of going celebrities and entrepreneurs biy Mercedes so you can stick that old bs up you r ass otherwise I can say bkw are for douchy teens who don't know how to drive properly and shouldn't even have a drivers license and who can't even use their blinkers properly.
    2
  78. BokiXI​ I disgaree on the not for young people part ....amg gt r and c63 and practically whole amg line up say no to that. They are very appealing to young buyers who have the money..... as young celebrities and entrepreneurs have demonstrated
    2
  79. Croo ookie when was he not?
    2
  80. kingwindie ikr
    2
  81. flyingphoenix113 Well said
    2
  82. Suboptimus Lime exactly, exactly!
    2
  83. Trey Perry alright ;)
    2
  84. Mewzyc nah I like the looks of the amg gt r better much more athletic and aggressive and mean looking. How many times have you seen an amg gt r. Normal gt sure, but gt r will is a better car in every way then the sls bs
    2
  85. Mewzyc​ I think you should know that the amg gt was never meant to replace the sls, just as the sls was never meant to replace the slr nor the slr replace the clk gtr.... The point of the amg gt is to compete with the porshe 911 market which makes good money, so this is Mercedes' key into the game. Yet despite not being a replacement to the sls black series the amg gt r has a better interior, better looks IMO and miles better performance without compromising on exhaust note or being a gaz guzzler and harm to the environment. For these reasons the amg gtr is the better car in almost every way
    2
  86. Keny J.​ Sure it's not going to suit everyone but there is definitely a market for it. Some people enjoy it's stiffness and simplicity... Its more of a status symbol or offroad machine. Especially the 6x6 which is an offroad killer. But ya totally understand where you are coming from
    2
  87. Ya bmw x5 is badass looking suv
    2
  88. camdog it's not loaded with features. And Mercedes do make reliable cars you ignorant moron. In fact they have tool...there cars are used as taxis and they also have trucks like the actress and unimaginative and other working vans and veichles....and these industries rely and depend heavily on reliability .....so you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Keep feeding yourself ironically false stereotypes when reality says otherwise.
    2
  89. johnnyXXX says the one that can't read himself ironically. You're point is flawed. Yes the c class interior does match the navigator especially when you take price and year the two came out. They are available as options actually ... Including the 360 cam too. https://youtu.be/7pRDsx_T1ck Led lights don't need to be standard. Again I told you Mercedes let's the customer have control and flexibility over what they want and don't want. Not everyone wants to pay for leds and other features they don't need... Especially on an entry level merc. Its not wrong. If you consider that the c class came out nearly 3 years before the navigator and costs less than half of the navigator then yah it is better than a navigator. When you factor in these then its entirely fair to make that proposition. Otherwise yes obviously the navigator has a slightly better interior... It had better. But considering the price etc then its fair to say the c class is on par if not better than the navigator.
    2
  90. WobblePizza lmao look at yourself hating on car that's so good that you are jealous of! Its not just marketing... Its legit genuine innovations, inventions and engineering. And I did evaluate the car... Hence why I was able to give so many points and arguments and evaluations. And you couldn't counter a single one! Can't say I'm surprised there since you never had an argument to begin with! You're just a pathetic hater.
    2
  91. Its not ugly, its classy. The facelift imo looks a lot better tho
    2
  92. MTB Addict they are very similar actually. Especially with the metris. In fact there are many metris with over a million miles on them. They are very reliable if you take care of them. Mercedes are especially notorious for their bullet proof engines. You're just ignorant.
    2
  93. FruitablyPlayz YT its not overpriced considering that it sells like hot cakes even at that price. Its got way more precense than a jeep right from the factory, much better build quality and craftsmanship, better interior, better exterior, better engine. Better offroading. I could go on and on. So expensive no doubt but significantly better than the jeep wrangler.
    2
  94. Coopnazty 997 no they are not. Quit talking out of your ass. Look at the s class and 2014 e63 they have still held on to their value incredibly well even after 4 years. And amg gt r recks the mcleran on so many levels. It's half the price yet sounds way better with a proper growling v8 compared to the mcleran a vacuum cleaner of an engine sound...and actually the amg got r reclaim the mcleran I terms of performance too despite costing less. It has rear wheel steering 9 stage traction control....and it obliterated the crap out of the mcleran on the track....as the amg gt r is the fastest rwd car in production to lap the ring especially for it's price. That's a heck ton of value. You are completely clueless. Costs half the price for more than 2 times better sound and performance. And it's maintenance is actually far better than a mcleran. Not only less expensive but more reliable too. I fact Mercedes are especially notorious for their bullet proof engines,
    2
  95. +blackcountryme speak for yourself. Look in the mirror before you call anyone a twat, you're the definition of one! Mercedes are better than ever. They won f1 world championship and they have a whole variety of awesome cars like the project one, amg gt r, amg gt63, s class e class c class etc 6x6 4x4 etc etc. Not cheap at all. And they are not pimp mobiles. They have models that are taxis because out of all the companies they choose Mercedes they are the most comfortable and luxurious while also being reliable etc. So you're the clueless twat. And rather than counter a single one of my arguments you could only ignore it like the looser you are. Go ahead, you're only proving my point.
    2
  96. WS 88 chill the frik out. I'm talking about the same line that Doug is complaining about (which he has every right to complain about). I'm just saying that the way he showed it... its not visible on one side like it is on the other side he showed. This could be because of the car itself or because the angle in which he showed the car had sunlight reflecting off the car to make the line not be as visible. Thick as a brick? Says the triggered snowflake ironically! I'm saying that at a distance its not as noticeable. I know that it exists but its not as noticeable when far away whereas on the side where he should it close up it became more noticeable.
    2
  97. WS 88 I'm not a troll, you're just a moron. In the very beginning of the video the line is not very noticable.... Because in the beginning he shows the car from a distance and there is sunlight reflecting off of the car SK where there is a panel gap instead you see a white reflection and since the car is white it makes it hard to notice that the gap exists at all. Of course if you look below that you can see a line which is the panel gap but its very tiny. Hence why its hard to notice the panel gap. But that flew right over your your thick triggered snowflake ass unsurprisingly. You idiot just because the gaps are identical doesn't mean crap because I am talking about he showed them FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES. In the first angle he shot it so that the sunlight is facing the car and also from a distance. So at this angle and distance its harder to notice the panel gap. In comparison when he reviews the gap close up its more noticeable. That's what I mean by its more noticeable on one side than the other. I am talking about the way Doug showed the sides of the car in the video. Look in the mirror before you calk anyone a dumb tool when your the definition of one!
    2
  98. WS 88 keep being an idiot and utter moron. So what if I edit comments? I am adding new information and correcting for spelling mistakes moron. It doesn't change my actual argument. Keep living in your fantasy land. Rather than actually counter anything I said you can only complain about me editing my comments as if you have never in your life edited comments! Can't say I'm surprised since you never had an argument to begin with!
    2
  99. Doug won't pin this comment. /°\__/°\ \_____/ Its about average
    2
  100. Sorry e63s is better in every way. It has a faster acceleration, better looking interior, far more features, is light years ahead in technology of the audi, sounds way better, can be drifted, and I am not even scratching the surface! Not to mention it's not even sold in america! So its a major double no!
    2
  101. Jerry Li because they can but also because thanks to having less technology and features there is less stuff that can go wrong hence far more reliable....and also because at its base price it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run. ....so they will sell them for a higher price because they know that the people and companies who buy them will use them as work veichles to make a lot of money.
    2
  102. Yo Jotty partly because of that. That definetly had an influence on his bias.
    2
  103.  @eventusvantos2770  lmao
    2
  104. Not at all. There is the c class which sells amazingly well as well as the e class, s class, glc etc etc
    2
  105. +A James They are not...its a commercial veichle which is why they sell it on their commercial mb vans site not their private vehicle site.
    2
  106. sushi otaku also if you actually think all Mercedes look identical then you are literally severly blind and should see a doctor immediately. By your own logic then all Lexus look identical... They all have the same grill, same front check mark lights, same interior.
    2
  107. BIG ABD 1. You can get a warranty for them 2. If you take care of them then they won't break down on you and will be reliable 3. The level of luxury technology comfront, fun to drive feel, features, sound etc you get more than makes up for the cost of maintenance. If you can't afford the maintenance then you can't afford this car to begin with. But if you can afford it then it's an investment in something that will make you happy. And that by far outweighs the cost of owning it. Unlike a souless Japanese car. Sure it will be reliable but it will bore you out of your dam mind. To car enthusiasts a car is not just something that takes you from a to b. Its more than that. Its something that will put a smile on your face whether its looking at it or being behind the wheel of it or hearing the orgasmic sound it makes. So its a bargain in the respect that you are getting $150k of car for half the price. And if you wait longer you can get it even cheaper. So its a lot of car for the money and if you can have warranty or take care of it well and can afford to maintain it then it is indeed one hell of a bargain.
    2
  108. You guys are utter morons, it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......to a family it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run.
    2
  109. Vergina Simpson it's underpowered because it doesn't need much power.....just to get from, point a to b reliably ....and it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence more isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. That's what the companies are paying for ....., which to the, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them profit in the long run.
    2
  110. D. B. Cooper depends on what you are buying the car for. I think m2 is more a drivers car and more fun to drive especially with that manual transmission... Whereas this Audi is more about being a great daily driver with some nice tech and sporty edge to it. Its like comparing two different meals that have different tastes and focuses but ultimately both taste equally great just in a different way.
    2
  111. Hungover Garage looks are subjective. Many people like the looks. Road presence and if you opt for 4x4 or 6x6 you also get incredible off road capability. Overpriced? Sure... But their is a market for it so why not.
    2
  112. The Juice yes they have every right especially when even at thi s price they sell like hot cakes. Its basic supply and demand. Its not what you think. Its basic economics.
    2
  113. Not if it was only the intro.
    2
  114. Those wheels though...
    2
  115. JDM racing it might be stock... But even if its not.... That's why I used the word basically
    2
  116. In dark colours it will be much harder to notice, especially black. But otherwise yah its noticeable.
    2
  117. Легушька because at its base price it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run.
    2
  118. Lol "screw you that's why"
    2
  119. Hasty One better offroader than this sure but not a 6x6. You're right though its bought mainly for its presence on the road.. Hence the cool factor.... And it has the incredible offroad capability and luxury... So its a whole package. All be it an extremely expensive one. But it has a market and sells well so it does have a point. Would I buy it? Hell no. But it does have a point.
    2
  120. justin beath Who cares if it has open doors... That just means that people can now more easily steal from it. what's your point??? One has a v12 the other doesn't. One has more offroad capabilities than the jeep could ever have. One has more presence right from the factory. One has leather seats and high build quality and craftsmanship and the other doesn't.
    2
  121. Thomas Bailey​​​ I am OK with them liking the Alfa more, that's cool, but talking out of their ass and making ridiculous false claims is what ticks me off
    1
  122. Thomas Bailey​​​​ exactly, like distronic plus, lane keeping amd braking assist, etc
    1
  123. moholinagy​ exactly to each their own, all these cars have their buyers
    1
  124. Thomas Bailey​ I know, they are very durable
    1
  125. eQuALiZeR​​ I think amg version of e class is not dull at all And they are taxis for a reason cause they are the most reliable and most luxurious of any other German brand
    1
  126. Ross MK​​​ OK so then.... Why are we complaining if we agree on that? And by this logic you are contradicting your previous comment, they are not soulless and if you call your self a BMW fanboy you should know better that they are fun to drive.
    1
  127. ***** well that's what most people mean generally speaking when they say technology, you are talking about engine technology specifically. Prove that Alfa did it first
    1
  128. *****​ ;) are you a fan of auto vlogs?
    1
  129. ***** aha I c :)
    1
  130. Ross MK haha you're funny! Not only is BMW less reliable than Mercedes but it's also more expensive to repair and maintain! http://www.bmwblog.com/2016/02/01/whos-more-reliable-bmw-audi-or-mercedes-benz/
    1
  131. Ross MK​​ haha it's a BMW blog! Can't get more unbiased than that, and that's just one of countless of stats that show that BMW are less reliable than Mercedes ...as consumer reports suggest It'd known very well that bne are much more expensive to repair them BMW and have much more expensive parts, BMW owners always complain about that see tons of evidence online.
    1
  132. Ross MK​​ my point is that BMW is generally less relibable than Mercedes and also more expensive to maintain too
    1
  133. Ross MK I think I meant to direct that comment to someone else sorry, that is what I meant by generally, yes some Audi's and BMW's have been able to become more reliable but for the most part generally Mercedes tend to be more durable and longer lasting, at least from my experience
    1
  134. FlyingAero keep dreaming. Its been three years and they have still held their value very well.
    1
  135. is it just me or are the wheels too small?! ?
    1
  136. SFHoudini I know I am talking about amg gt line up in general. And I believe amg gt r delivery has begun in parts if the world if I am not mistaken, example : Shmee
    1
  137. SFHoudini​ maybe you're right about the amg gt s but I still see why it's a better option than the sls. Beyond being cheaper, it has significantly better transmission, is more fun to drive, has much better handling and a much better interior as well, not to mention it's not a 6.3L gas guzzler yet does not completly compromise it's exhaust note and has a great sounding rumbling v8. And it's also worthy to note that the amg gt was never meant to replace the sls just as the sls was never meant to replace the slr nor that the clk gtr. Rather it is designed to compete with the 911 market as hiu hinted at (which makes good money). And it does compete and is more of a head turner than a 911. So amg gt is going to appeal more to someone looking for a 911 range kind of car (purchasing mentality/need). For these reasons people will buy an amg gt over a sls. That said you are also right in that someone might still want a sls for the doors and appreciation. But I don't think that will take away from the advantages of the amg gt s The amg gt r on the other hand I think is clearly a better option than any sls including the black series. I mentioned the black series because I want to illustrste how even tho the amg gt r is not meant to replace the sls bs it is better than it in every way even price wise. Otherwise I think you have a very valid argument indeed. The next amg to look out for is the amg project one 1000hp hyper car which will be an absolute monster.
    1
  138. pagadqs nope zeroto60times.com/ Amg gt has faster 0-60, faster lap time, higher torque, significantly lower fuel consumption, better interior, and the amg gt r is even better.
    1
  139. Liam Quiroga ;)
    1
  140. An Italian m3
    1
  141. looks and sounds so boss!!!!
    1
  142. Patrick Kennedy no they have updated it.... look at the 6x6, it's a monster. this is just the 4x4 version of it. hence it's a more offroad version of the g wagon so it is a significant difference. Please the new gt3 is hardly new, porshe have stuck with the EXACT SAME design and interior design, don't see people complaining there!?! They are timeless conservative designs, in this case it's more focused on the offroading capabilities as opposed to the just the looks
    1
  143. So everything is angular and aggressive except the rear view mirror...........
    1
  144. still overpriced , especially for that ugly interior
    1
  145. ***** well that's part of why I am right that makes it by default more rare and special.
    1
  146. *****​ it will still be rare to some extent because its limited production.
    1
  147. Mewzyc​ no problem! Totally understandable my friend!
    1
  148. am I the only one that wishes the steering wheel was more balanced.... as in the red start button is on the left but there is no other button on the right to give it a balanced look like the r8 steering wheel
    1
  149. it's meant to be an offroader not a looker
    1
  150. Keny J.​ You and I may see that as an absurd price which it is, but from Mercedes' perspective it's actually really smart because they know rich people who want to go offroading will buy it, especially Dubai and their sand dunes. So it's crazy yea, but almost in a good way depending on how you look at it
    1
  151. No you have. And so has Doug who is flat out clueless like you pathetic sheep who just believe everything he says without doing any kind of research or looking at the bigger picture. This is not a private mini van. its a commercial working van. it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......to a family it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run. it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence .it isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and used for air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. That's what the companies are paying for the, which to them, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them profit in the long run.
    1
  152. +TheOne AndOnly Yah and look at the comments below it....so many people called him out and exposed his ignorance and stupidty and Doug is a pussy to admit it which is why he hasn't countered the evidence and arguments. And the fact that you didn't even bother to read mine just further proves my point. The truth hurts and you can't handle it. You didn't read it because you're a pathetic sheep that treats Doug like some kind of infallible God who can never be wrong. Only people who are afraid of the truth are afraid to read it. So go ahead. You are only proving my point how ignorant and clueless you are.
    1
  153. +TheOne AndOnly This is not a matter of opinion. The Metris is not a minivan. Thats a FAT not an opinion. And I prvided a variety of arguements that prove this and you couldn't counter a single one. Doug is a clueless moron just like you. Its not a freaking opinion you utter moron. That only further proves how utterly deluded and brainwashed you are. Its not a mini van. its not a rip off because its not targeted towards families as a private vehicle...rather its targeted to businesses , airports, construction sites etc for commercial use and marketed as a working van that is incredibly reliable and take take a lot of abuse.....and since the companies end up making lots of money off of these vans the cost of the van is completely reasonable and worth it. And its competitively priced with other working vans like the transit. So its not a rip off at all in that context. This is a fact, not an opinion. Get that through your dense head.
    1
  154. +TheOne AndOnly You utter freaking moron. I am not a Mercedes worshipper....i didn't say "its good because its a merccedes"....no I actually provided arguements and reasons which you completely ignored because you know its the truth adn you can't handle it because the truth hurts. Its not over nothing. Its over the fact that Doug is falt out ignorant and lying. This is not a minivan. Period. You cant buy this on mercedes's mainwebsite instead it you buy it via their commercial mbvan website. Its clearly advertised loud and clear as a working commercial van not a minivan. Hence its not aimed at families....its aimed at companies who will buy the metris for its reliability, durability, utility and the fact that it lasts long and takes a lot of abuse....and they will make 10 times the cost of the car and more in profit so to them this van is a worthy investment.....hence this van is not designed to compete with other mini vans like the Odyssey.....so Doug is completely clueless and should do more research before posting this video.
    1
  155. TheBradVEVO how is it a rebadged r8 when the huracan looks completely different both inside and out. Huracan looks far more. Only someone who's blind would call it rebadged.
    1
  156. Rast Sorry e63s is better in every way. It has a faster acceleration, better looking interior, far more features, is light years ahead in technology of the audi, sounds way better, can be drifted, and I am not even scratching the surface! Not to mention it's not even sold in america! So its a major double no!
    1
  157. NOT BASIC it doesn't shit on it at all. It competes with it though yes. And yes Mercedes do arguably make the best interiors in the business. S class is said to be the best interior of any car.
    1
  158. user 59802 c class is not cheap plastics all over. Not true at all.
    1
  159. Keylin Visockis then you don't actually own one. They are easily the best in class. Are you giys hearing yourselves? You guys are comparing a 100k SUV to a 40k small sedan. If anything .. You are screaming a compliment to Mercedes. There 40k interiors can be compared to 100k interiors of Lincoln. That's how good they are.
    1
  160. WobblePizza says the one who's worse than garbage. Its only garbage if your blind. The materials do have the quality and looks. And they are reliable if you take care of them. Consumer reports are completly flawed. Their sample sizes are way to small to speak for all owners not to mention there is no actual credibility and authentication... Literally anyone can say anything as a self proclaimed owner. Not to mention that many people are bribed into saying certain things. And I am not even scratching the surface. Look in the mirror before you call anything trash.
    1
  161. johnnyXXX then what's your argument? Navigator has high quality and good looking interior. And so does c class.
    1
  162. Aluminati
    1
  163. williamvillanueva93 yah but not an estate with this level of luxury performance technology and comfort, features etc. Not boring at all.
    1
  164. Its only up from there!
    1
  165. Jay Dunbar no actually you would end up spending way more in the odyseey. The Odyssey is built for comfort etc... The metris is built to take abuse and be durable for millions of miles. So in the long run this would save them more costs than the Odyssey ever could. That's why there is so little tech and features... If any at all... And so there is little to go wrong if any at all. That's part of what makes it super reliable.
    1
  166. Alviniscute g wagon has a much more advanced differential lock It also comes in a convertable Looks are subjective. G wagon looks much better than this cheap jeep wrangler.
    1
  167. Sonny Parisi exactly, so how can you guys call it a cheap g wagon when its nothing close to a g wagon as you just indirectly admitted
    1
  168. Matthew Wheeler many times actually. A quick search and you will find many examples. Some owners especially take them to the limit like Jon https://youtu.be/2E5bthgftKw
    1
  169. FruitablyPlayz YT every car has flaws regardless of the price. Yes its obvious which is exactly why it should be obvious that merc is better. Its actually not ridiculously priced at all when you consider how even at that price they sell out like hot cakes so why the hell would they make them cheaper if they sell so well at this price? I get it to you and me they are overpriced but economics tells us they are not.
    1
  170. Christoph S. No not even most of them. They look different. Yes there are similarities but they are still very much distinguishable. Otherwise according to your logic virtually all companies do this... 5 series is just a small 7 series. And no they don't look boring. You're just a blind and biased bmw fanboy.
    1
  171. AluuuuMINIuUuum
    1
  172. +jj lad Actually lets look at what you said.... "weighs over 3700lbs"... yet does 0-60 in 3.8 seconds despite that weight. Not only is that amazing for its time but thats still amazing to pull off today. So thats actually something thats impressive as opposed to a negative. So what if it has an automatic/torque converter lock up transmission? Who cares if they are fake? They are meant for ascetics and a wider presence on the road. The coolent is at the back because mercedes already made the calculations so that with the engine and battery up front and the rear wheel drive components and windshield washer at the back it will be better balanced weight wise. How does any of those things make it a posers car? People are not driving these cars in streets posing and showing off their washing fluid at the back, no they are using them on tracks and driving them how they are mean to be driven. So by your logic if they have more money than brains then you have no brains. Be kind to yourself and stop talking bs first before you suggest anything will be kind to other things. You are just desperately trying to hate this car. You act so offended and triggered by it. Chillax, you wouldn't be able to buy one anyway so why do you care?
    1
  173. but it won't be able to carry 7 passengers and cargo. Merc has both the practicality of a family car and acceleration performance of a supercar. Hence its a super family car.
    1
  174. +blackcountryme You utter moron....no your claim was about mercedes in general so I gave you a general response. So don't complain about this video when you are making general claims. You're the real moron. You're a joke. Mercedes are the best. They are still one of the best if not the best luxury cars out there They didn't wipe millions off the customer service. Look in the mirror before you call anyone a fool, you're the definition of one. Oh and you couldn't counter a single one of my arguments which is why you could only deny them and use insult....can't say I am surprised though since you never had an argument in the first place.....nice five year old comeback...oh wait i take that back...even a five year old is more mature than you!!! No this is not a joke van. I am not a taxi driver. You're the moron just like Doug, this is not a minivan. its a commercial working van.... it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......to a family it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run. it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence more isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and used for air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. That's what the companies are paying for the, which to them, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them profit in the long run. So you are the ignorant clueless moron.
    1
  175. Please get a better microphone for driving.
    1
  176. I think a lot of cars have that turn signal.... Like amg gt to name onr example
    1
  177. WS 88 sorry I mixed that up. Its only visible on the left side of the car not the right
    1
  178. WS 88 its not. The only time you see it is on one side when he is close to the car. Not trying to justify fiats choice.. Its still a poor craftsmanship finish. But its only on one side of the car.
    1
  179. WS 88 snowflake getting butthurt and triggered over a panel gap lmao. "Gtfo" after you!! you crying butthurt moron. I'm not changing the story. Im elaborating but your dense dumb ass still can't comprehend anything because you're that much of an idiot.
    1
  180. I said notice how the gap is only one side... As Doug filmed it. This doesn't mean the car has only one panel gap on one side. But that the way Doug filmed it makes it hard to notice that the panel gap exists at all on the right side.... based on the angle he filmed it from. Regardless, it doesn't change my original point that in the right colour its not too big of a deal.
    1
  181. Does the Ghibli?
    1
  182. Its About Average.
    1
  183. +Donald Trump lmao you can deny it all you want but what i said is FACT Rs6's interior is hidiously outdated let alone when compared to the e class interior! Rs6's exterior is nice sure however that doesn't make up for how its behind in nearly every other single way. It has no technology when compared to the e63, literally, it needs to be updated, its very behind. E63 has autopilot, magic body control (which scans the road ahead for bumps and perpares the suspension ahead of time so you can even go over a speed bump and not know it), parking assit, remote parking, air bag seatbelts ...and I am not even scratching the surface,
    1
  184. +Donald Trump It doesn't. We have to wait for the new version.
    1
  185. You guys are .....completely clueless just like Doug. This is not a minivan., it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......to a family it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run. it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence it isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and used for air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. There are many in fact that have over a million miles on them. That's what the companies are paying for , which to them, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them 10 times more than the cost of the van and more in profit.
    1
  186. Casperrr 6:14
    1
  187. 14 mpg :O
    1
  188. havif akbar Its not stupidily designed. Its a simple clean timeless boxy design. And to you and me its stupidly high priced but objectivly speaking basic economics tells us its not overpriced since people are willing to buy it and it sells like hot cakes. Its basic supply and demand. And I get it if you don't like it, but hate it? You have to be really triggered to hate a car.
    1
  189. Finally we see the owner!
    1
  190. Not the v class.
    1
  191. Nathan Batten they don't....they sell it on their commercial mbvans website
    1
  192. Duckie if you buy the other cars you are not old. That's nothing more than an overused false stereotype. Tons of young celebrities, entrepreneurs, lawyers dentists etc have s classes and a8s and 7 series etc. And the amg versions are especially anything but boring. They are far more technologically advanced than the panermera and far more luxurious too with miles more features. Having said that though the panemera is very beautiful and won't disappoint you. But to suggest that the others are boring is rather arrogant.
    1
  193. N Shell no. You could argue Its overpriced sure but not garbage. Two different things you are mixing up. Just because its overpriced doesn't mean its hot garbage or any garbage for that matter. For the history, heritage, prestige rarity and the performance this car had for its time is anything but garbage. So the only thing you should be sorry for is your ignorance.
    1
  194. Maxima Life its not pointless. It has great history and is as close you can get to buying the actual dtm racing car. And the very fact people did in fact buy it further proves that its not pointless.
    1
  195. Maxima Life none of you guys get it. People don't buy this car because its better or worse than other cars. They buy it because its an investment. This is like collecting a vintage car: why would anyone own one? They are "pointless"... They are worse in every respect, except for perhaps looks. Yet people find them desirable and value how rare and different they are from normal cars. So for the rarrity, heritage prestige alone and history this car represents and is a part of its not a pos nor pointless at all. The only thing that's a pos is you and your salty hatred and ignorance.
    1
  196. Legendary!
    1
  197. Its a super family car! It has the performance of a super car and the practicality of a family car and the luxury and technology of a luxury car. A great cohesive balanced package.
    1
  198. P1 is the best looking car of all time imo.... Atleast from from the front.
    1
  199. tsitoine911 g wagon was also modernized in a smart way. Its a military and offroading veichle. Many updates were made. New engine, new suspension. Its not the same car. Just because it carries over similar design language doesn't make it the same car. Plus the new g wagon is already on its way with a completely revised and modernized Interior especially. So Mercedes have also done it in a smart way which is why it sells like hot cakes. If it was the same car then just as Doug commented about the Porsche no one would have bought this. . they would just stick to the old one since its "the same".
    1
  200. Bubbles Samsquanch well come on now you are way over simplifying it. They both have boxy designs but they are still completely different. The jeep looks cheap where as the g wagon looks premium and expensive and hence has far more raod presence. That alone justifies the difference in price to many people. Furthermore the merc interior is wayyyymore luxurious than the jeep. It also has a way better engine. And i am jusr scratching the surface. One other important reason it costs that much because it can. Even with this price Mercedes sells them like hot cakes. So why the hell would they lower the price?
    1
  201. Awesome beast!
    1
  202. No people still care. Give it the right colour and it will still turn heads. Its a timeless design. Cayman is awesome.
    1
  203. F I A T A
    1
  204. Bender Banana keep clinging on to those pathetic cliche stereotypes. Wagons have evolved far beyond mom mobiles..... The rs6, v90 and new e63s wagon beg to differ
    1
  205. Best looking Range Rover!
    1
  206. Fiat looks mote sporty
    1
  207. It's not a minivan.
    1
  208. They should make a new one.
    1
  209. 6:14
    1
  210. Божидар Димитров road presence. And if you go for the 4x4 or 6x6 then you get even more road presence and incredible off road capability.
    1
  211. +Alex Bramm Speak for yourself mate, you seem to be fanboying the audi yourself! Look at the facelift 2014 e63s wagon or the new 2017 e63s wagon. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, looks are subjective. Personally I think the audi rs6 looks better than the e class Doug bought yes I will say that. However the 2014 face lift one and the 2017 new e63s wagon look just as good as the rs6 if not better. However again this is subjective. Beyond exterior looks the e63s wagon has a faster acceleration, a miles better looking interior and is light years ahead of the audi in technology and has a lot more features. http://www.motortrend.com/cars/mercedes-benz/e-class/2014/2014-mercedes-benz-e63-amg-s-model-4matic-wagon-first-test/ http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-news/motor-shows-events/geneva/2017/mercedes-amg-e63-4matic-estate-at-2017-geneva-motor-show/ E63 doesn't look good????? I can understand if you think the rs6 looks better (exterior wise) but I don't understand how you don't think it looks good especially with its athletic and sporty design. Regardless I can respect your opinion despite disagreeing with you.
    1
  212. Alex Bramm OK I respect your opinion ;)
    1
  213. When Doug goes British... 5:18
    1
  214. Chasing Tails the c class coupe also has a similar back up camera to that where the logo flips up.
    1
  215. Martin M sound overrides reliability. Especially of you can get a warranty. You only live once. Enjoy or forever hold your peace.
    1
  216. MrStefano218 no I wouldn't say that. I mean just look at the r8 its one hell of a freaking awesome car. Yes they are behind iin terms of rs6 and rs7 but don't worry they will be back soon enough. Ultimately the Germans just build such great sport division cars.... The best combination of sport and luxury truely.
    1
  217. Soulx CrusherX so true.
    1
  218. $3 million. ONLY $3 million.
    1
  219. Happy New Year!
    1
  220. Hungover Garage lmao so how can you talk crap about this when you drive a hummer?!? That's like talking crap about a Tesla model 3 while being an owner of a nissan leaf. This has way more presence than any number of hummers and its 4x4 and 6x6 version are much more off road capabile than your hummer so yes of course I will talk to you about those things.
    1
  221. Too many Doug the type of guy comments.
    1
  222. I like the e63 m6 (coupe version of the m5) ;)
    1
  223. There's also the e92 m3 and e46 m3
    1
  224. Doug DeMuro I'm sure you'd care at least a little bit.
    1
  225. Doug DeMuro this video definitely had at least a little bias though. You complain about the g wagon having the same styling yet praise the jeep for doing the exact same thing for the wrangler. There is a big time double standard. I don't care if you hate the g wagon but at least be consistent with your criticism. Here you are definitely being biased and hypocritical and it most likely has to do with the fact they flew you out there etc.
    1
  226. jazz03 because if jeep decided to make some exclusive model or give out a demo to a car that hasn't fully come out yet then that would be his only way of accessing such a car.
    1
  227. Nah best infotainment systems are from the germans like Mercedes audi and especially bmw. They are a combination of knob and touch which makes them perfect.
    1
  228. Doug, the kind of guy to wear A tiny bit huge shirt.
    1
  229. You guys are utter morons, it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......to a family it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run. it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence .it isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and used for air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. That's what the companies are paying for the, which to them, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them profit in the long run.
    1
  230. And you're the type of guy to be original..... Cough cough
    1
  231. Why don't they make a new one?
    1
  232. Lucas Melo not really
    1
  233. Overpriced? Depends how you look at it. For us yah its overpriced..... And so many cars are much better to buy over it. But people who buy these cars literally sleep on millions so this is like pocket change to them. This has presence and power on the road. So yes it overpriced but considering how well its selling that means that its price tag is justifiable since people are willing to buy it. Its basic supply and demand. So in that respect its not overpriced.
    1
  234. sillymoons oo many people care actually....not only the environment but also the practicality of not having to stop so often for fuel. And it's not just a performance car it can be a daily driver too.
    1
  235. Fluterra no mate you are wrong, they save a lot and even a 10% is huge in the auto industry...and plus.... They wouldn't spend so much on r and d to develop these turbo engines if it didn't benefit fuel economy and the environment significantly Plus the new ones in the e63 for example have cylinder deactivation which saves even more fuel.
    1
  236. Solomon Tetteh I agree the best v12s are the pagans zones cinque and Mercilago with ipe exhaust....but that's exactly my point zones uses amg engine
    1
  237. Jak Dexter it's still an amg engine which is what matters...they could have added an exhaust mod to the s class's...but since it was an s class it was a luxury car ultimately and had to be at least somewhat civilized With a an exhaust modification you will literally get a f1 sound from the s65 https://youtu.be/D-iV59F7E7s Checkout that video and you will see why pagani choose amg to build their engines.
    1
  238. NATHAN KILEY v8s have a great rumble to them....and v10s and v12s scream in orgasmic beauty
    1
  239. Solomon Tetteh they did put a similar engine in their own cars.....just tune the exhaust and bam....f1 car check this out. https://youtu.be/D-iV59F7E7s I dare you tell me that's not better sounding than the c63 you claimed was the best sounding amg
    1
  240. Solomon Tetteh...yes the point is to show that the engine itself is technically the best sounding amg engine. The c63 exhaust was tuned by amg . For the s class they didn't tune it because the s class is a luxury car and has to be relatively civilized....a pagani engine is technically a stock amg engine as is the s class I showed you. the 6.2 will always have a place in my heart but the amg v12 is undeniably the best sounding engine not just from amg but the best sounding car in the world arguably.
    1
  241. Just the tail lights. Not the entire rear.
    1
  242. So true!
    1
  243. n n no it's not because of just price but for being light years ahead of it's time. They are the ones innovating and pushing the boundaries of technology..... For the automitive industry and they are the ones who are bringing this technology out to market. If it weren't for rhe germans doing this companies would take even longer to catch up and the progression of technology would be slower than it is today. The bragging happens simply because people don't know about it. Mercedes for example didn't advertise their technologies well perhaps to be humble about it but as a result when companies that finally caught up after years and years they advertised it and so it seemed like there was something new to brag about but in reality it was just their ignorance of not knowing that the germans had it years before any other manufacturer even knew it existed. And it does work most of the time. If it didn't then no body would buy them as simple as that. You are overexaggerating it big time. They are built to last if you take care of them.
    1
  244. Tony Teoh NL maybach is not dead. Their philosophy and dna is still alive as a ultra high premium trim level for the s class.... Maybach is now the ultra luxury arm of mercedes just like amg is the sport arm of mercedes.
    1
  245. Bepis Ad yes but those still do great on both the track and the dragstrip... Not just good in one specific area/measure. Having said that its still obviously very impressive.
    1
  246. You guys are utter clueless morons.....it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence more isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and used for air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. That's what the companies are paying for......... which to them, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them profit in the long run.
    1
  247. *at being worse.
    1
  248. +Jacob Schumacher No where near as technologically advanced, has far less features, worse build quality, worse looking interior, mosquito gas guzzler in comparison, and I haven't even scratched the surface.
    1
  249. Like some reviewers have said..... It makes no sense and its crazy which is why it makes perfect sense!
    1
  250. Flash back effect.
    1
  251. cingratta key word.. Wagon. Its the fastest wagon/estate. Panemera is not a wagon... Its a sedan with a hatchback design. Also it costs nearly 2 times more than the e63.
    1
  252. LamboPlays panemera is not a wagon and costs two times more. And no i did not make that up. Look up the definition of quick and fast. Not to mention many review channels point out this distinction between the two words.... Like moter trend in the model x vs bentayga video.
    1
  253. Victor Jensen did the sport turisomo lap the ring with that time? No.
    1
  254. Tjade Looman they are not. Cls compares with the panemera.... And a Cls shooting break would be a closer comparison in terms of design. Its not a wagon. Its a sedan with a hatchback rear end. .
    1
  255. Tjade Looman similar but not the same.
    1
  256. cingratta no its not invalid because the turisomo was not the car that lapped the ring with that time. You can't cherry pick different cars based on the generic name. And the price is still very much relevant. just because the cars discussed are more expensive doesn't mean price is thrown out the window. And I didn't say that means they are not comparable. I am just saying to take that into consideration.
    1
  257. cingratta yes it does change things believe it or not. Its a different set of rear aerodynamics of the car. But even then.... That's not the point I'm trying to say. When they lap it around the ring it will be the fastest. But officially its not the fastest. I have nothing against the Porsche. All I am saying is that Doug is accurate and not incorrect when he says its the fastest wagon to date to lap the ring.
    1
  258. Rafael_Santos its basically stock...
    1
  259. Because YouTube"s refresh rate can't keep up with the incoming traffic watching the video. If you refresh youtube you will see it update itself...
    1
  260. From a classic Ferrari to a Mitsubishi.
    1
  261. Review the Arteon.
    1
  262. That right indicator though...
    1
  263. Joostin J 1.its not half a million dollars. Its 200k. 2.thats still hypocritical of him because you can't hate on a car for having the same design and then praise another car for doing the exact same thing. Regardless of the difference of price its a really pathetic double standard to have.
    1
  264. JDM racing by your own logic the wrangler is a box. The g wagon is nice simple boxy timeless design. Just like how a square never gets old and has that powerful millitary look.
    1
  265. Doug DeMuro its not about the price. Its about the philosophy. You can't hate on a car that doesn't change its design much from the last then praise the jeep for doing the exact same thing. Price doesn't matter because at the end of the day the customers still buy it because they like the design and don't want it to change. If its not broken then don't fix it. Regardless of the price.
    1
  266. Best looking Corvette. . Best looking Chevrolet.
    1
  267. This is not a mini van. It's a working van. And it is one of the best very reliable and can take a lot of abuse.
    1
  268. ThePhiltastic design wise yes. Technology wise the mercedes aged better
    1
  269. Hell Yes, I knew you would eventually review it!
    1
  270. mashed potatoes what why?
    1
  271. +Hoch134 You are buying cars for the wrong reason then....you buy a car for YOU not for others!.....also that is just a stereotype and way over exaggerated.
    1
  272. +Hoch134 Thats true this will differ depending on where you are in the world but my friend that is still not an excuse. You don't owe anyone a justification, its none of their business, its your car not theirs! This is just a stereotype.....for example......"asians cause car accidents" is a stereotype thats ridiculously overexaggerated....doesn't mean asians have to start justifiying being asian. I am not saying you have to like bmw, I am just saying you are hating bmw for the wrong reasons. Don't hate a car company just because of its fans.....direct your hate to the bad drivers not the company. Hope you understand.
    1
  273. Hoch134 alright but just know that you buying a car doesn't mean you support the bad drivers... Two very different things
    1
  274. They should make the air vents on the door for the new 8 series like they did for this old one.
    1
  275. Swole Team 6 well regardless of whether you like it or not the fact its rare and will hold and appreciate it value makes it a worthy investment for a rich person even at 450etc. That's nothing for the people who buy these cars especially not when the car will appreciate and make them money in the long run. A car that will make you a profit when you buy it is by definition worth its price tag no matter how outrageous it may seem to us.
    1
  276. Jose Pina not neccesaarly rarely drive them. That's generalizing. There are many collectors out there who actually drive them.
    1
  277. Jose Pina you are putting words in my mouth. I never said they constantly drive them.... You said they rarely drive them which is not true.... It's a balance in between.
    1
  278. +Jose Pina Lmao I am the kid? If I am a kid and you're an adult then you are an adult that acts worse than a kid! Not constantly is rarely? Constantly means you are always doing that action. Rarely means you hardly ever do it. I said its in between. You are putting words in my mouth by claiming that I said otherwise. If for sake of argument hypothetically speaking I don't brush my teeth constantly....does that mean I am hardly/rarely brushing my teeth? No, not necessarily that doesn't neccessarly mean I am rarely brushing my teeth, it just means I am not brushing my teeth 24/7 every single second of every minute of every hour of every day of every week of every month of every year. I am saying that they take them out in between rarely and not constantly (i.e often).... So for example every week or two they will drive it. That is not constant but neither is it rare. Rare would mean driving it once a year which is not the case.
    1
  279. They should make a hard top version of it like the RF miata.
    1
  280. Oh Yeah yes its mainly bought as a status symbol to show off but it does have an undeniable road presence off road capability and luxury. It rides like crap because its supposed to be stiff like that for offroading. Believe it or not some people some stiff rides like that. The amg ones are to maje what is already crazy even more crazy with a lot more power etc.
    1
  281. NotPewDiePie to you and me yes its not worth that much money. But objectivly speaking basic Economics tell us that its worth that much. If people are willing to buy it and it sells like hot cakes then its clear that that price tag is justifiable. Its basic supply and demand.
    1
  282. BLB13films no its not. Looks are subjective
    1
  283. Don't fix what isn't broken. Its a simple clean timeless boxy design.
    1
  284. WheatSnackBread no its not a turd. Look in the mirror before you call anything a turd. Exactly my point, you are clueless.
    1
  285. Tyvek Homewrap I'm not a fanboy. I'm a fan. Major difference. And just so you know I would never buy a g wagon even with the money. I would never buy it nor plan to buy it. But that doesn't change the fact that its not overpriced since it sells like hot cakes at that price. Yes one costs 5 times more so what? Still doesn't hinder my argument at all. Its not about the price. Its about the philosophy. Many people like its design and don't want it to change. If its not broken don't fix it. Regardless of the price.
    1
  286. skileg10 it doesn't lack features. It has the features it needs. Otherwise by your logic then rr lacks features and a lot of technology... To the point where even a ford is more well equipped with technology than a rr.
    1
  287. manah56 better ia subjective. Many people actually like the stiff ride of the g wagon believe it or not. I mean I wouldn't buy it but clearly many people do which is why it sells like hot cakes even at that price.
    1
  288. Kifo in what way??? Lmao Countless of ways.. Better luxury, better build quality, better offroad capabilities, better looks, better interior, better engine and exhaust note, better and more presence ... I could go on and on Yes g wagon does have aftermarket support. A ton actually. Go look at Jon Olisoms g wagon.. He moded the hell out of it. There are also brabus kits etc https://youtu.be/2E5bthgftKw Costs more than 2 times more because its more than 10 times better. Ride is not worse if you opt for the right suspension. And g wagon definitely has way more offroad capabilities than the jeep. In particular the 4x4^2 and 6x6 It doesn't have a higher roll center. Weight is not necessarly all that bad m. It keeps the csr planted and gives it more traction and deeper footprint into the surface which is great for offroading. It has tons of significant customizablity. You are clueless dude. It does have aftermarket what are you talking about!?! Quick making assumptions! No it doesn't just have a more powerful motor as I already explained above. Yes there are tons of g wagons that can not only do extreme rock crawling but will humiliate the jeep. Not the amg variant but the other g wagons for sure can do offroading significantly better.
    1
  289. Sarcasm right Doug?
    1
  290. Kia really hit it out of the park with the stinger!
    1
  291. You guys are utter morons, it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......to a family it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run. it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence more isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and used for air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. That's what the companies are paying for the, which to them, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them profit in the long run.
    1
  292. The other cars are most definitely not boring. They are not just bigger engines, and they are not for old people. Tons of young celebrities, entrepreneurs, lawyers dentists etc drive them. And the priority for these cars is to be luxurious, if you want handling as main priority then get amg gt or r8. Or if you want a 4 door thats sporty and luxurious then get a rs6 or e63. So its not boring at all quite frankly. Besides the panemera competes with a7 and cls and 6 series not s class or a8. Those are above the panemera, are more luxurious and comfortable.... with far more features...and are light years ahead of it in technology. Having said that though the panemera is unquestionably beautiful and won't disappoint. But that doesn't make the other cars boring at all.
    1
  293. Will they ever make a new one?
    1
  294. You're talking so fast for the Doug score. slow down! ;)
    1
  295. Maybe if you were not so bloody ignorant you would realize how clueless you are..........its not a minivan..... it's priced at 30k. Which is competitively priced similar to the Ford transit at 36k.......to a family it's overpriced...but for the companies and airports that buy it it's pocket change and makes them a lot money in the long run. it lacks a lot of technology and features so that it's more reliable....with less technology less can go wrong,...hence .it isn't a mini van. It's about ultimate reliability and utility in the context of a working van be it cargo....moving construction workers and used for air port transport.....it's meant to last long and take a lot of abuse. That's what the companies are paying for the, which to them, is not only pocket change but an investment because the van will make them profit in the long run.
    1
  296. Ch6in Re6ction g70 doesn't have a hatchback like design which has its own appeal. It would be nice for example to have the g70 as the sedan (like an a8) and then the stinger as hatchback genesis model (like an a7). The reason is... As much as its annoying that people badge whore........... Badges do make a difference ............ it would make the stinger look and feel more premium..... even more than it is already. Its fine with the KIA badge but it would be even better with something like a genesis badge imo.
    1
  297. Ch6in Re6ction no it doesn't. How? GM recycle the same car. Totally different thing. I'm saying this should be a genesis model. It doesn't matter if it a KIA. Its just that as a genesis it would be arguably better.
    1
  298. Elijah Whitesell the KIA doesn't suck. Especially not for a first attempt at this kind of car. And neither does genisis suck.
    1
  299. Anton Zuykov no its good quality even at base. Ofcourse you pay more you get more that's how it works. Mercedes is for fairly wealthy people not peasants. Mercedes allows you to choose what you want... Hence why so many things are optional... Not everyone wants to pay for a certain luxury or technology they don't care about compared to others they do. So this gives the customer complete control and flexibility and so frankly there is nothing wrong with this kind of approach. The KIA can't touch the Mercedes in terms of build quality and luxury. You get what you pay for with the merc. Even look at carwows new review of the stinger... They openly point out how e class and the Germans have much better build quality than the stinger. And frankly that goes without saying. Kia dash is plastic.... You just can't compare that with the elegant ambient lighting, leather stitched, wood trim quality finish of the e class. E class is a whole different league of luxury and build quality. I agree that looking strictly at just the price..... KIA offers a lot of quality... But with the e class the amount of quality is in your hands and easily 100 times better if you want it to be.
    1