Comments by "jjeffery worboys" (@jjefferyworboys8138) on "Labour RISK LOSING 59 Seats Over Farmer FURY as Starmer Faces Protests Amid Inheritance Tax Raid" video.

  1. When it comes to it, most will bottle out. Just watch.
    13
  2. If they work for a company that sells its products to the US, they should worry about Trumps promise to protect US business by charging 20% import tax on all foreign goods. They could be out of a job.
    8
  3. Clarkson brought a farm from a farmer and farms it. Why assume when a farm is sold that it won't still be a farm ?
    4
  4. Even then Labour still have a sufficient majority to out vote the motion.
    3
  5. When it actually comes to it most will bottle out. IHT should be abolished completely, increase other taxes/reduce spending to make up the lost revenue.
    3
  6. There aren't enough of them, work out the numbers for yourself.
    2
  7. Personally I would love to see it abolished, but how would you make up @ £9Bn a year of lost of tax revenue ?
    2
  8. Why the outrage just because it's farmers, why not include everyone and abolish IHT. Increase taxes elsewhere to make up the loss.
    2
  9. Reeves, Cooper or Lammy as PM, choose one !
    2
  10. I'm sure Starmer doesn't want to lose any, but as far as the numbers go you are absolutely right. Labour are untouchable.
    1
  11. A realist. Look after No.1. Make sure you have a plan that ensures you are OK, that's what I do.
    1
  12. WFP should be limited to all those pensioners living in properties in council Tax bands A to C. That's fair and easy to do.
    1
  13. The voting public thought differently on 4th July and that's all that matters.
    1