Comments by "jjeffery worboys" (@jjefferyworboys8138) on "Prince Andrew 'ARROGANT' | Time for a 'BIG review' on his royal future after Epstein case files" video.

  1. The answer to your question is someone to whom £12m is insignificant and just wants the problem to go away as quickly and quietly as possible.
    4
  2. Agreed. Being measured rather than reactive are qualities the average Youtuber has yet to master.
    2
  3. The King doesn't run the country, that's the governments job.
    2
  4.  @rachelpatlingrao499  Don't think you aren't equipped for it.
    2
  5.  @gtavmj-1852  Probably the Queen, mothers tend to do such things for their children even if they are rotten ones.
    2
  6. The safety of whole family is more important than that of one single member.
    2
  7. Not true, many have been convicted and gone to prison. However they can afford much better legal representation and have the financial ability to make problems disappear.
    2
  8. Even Royalty can get conned, Savile had many rich and powerful friends. The British public loved him too. You should look at all the stars who attended his funeral at Leeds Cathedral !.
    1
  9. It won't because the alternative is so much worse, think about it ?.
    1
  10. For what ?
    1
  11. I don't think he wants to bugger choir boys !
    1
  12. It was expedient to make the problem go away, the Queen paid an insignificant sum to prevent further damage to the reputation of the whole Royal family.
    1
  13. Some women are seduced by their greed for money rather than getting a proper job.
    1
  14. Many very ordinary people, perhaps members of your family or friends have also done similar things. The only difference is the surrounding aren't as nice.
    1
  15. What is the point of money if you can't use it to your advantage. Are you really so naive.
    1
  16. Probably the same as £12 for you and me, so a bit of a bargain !
    1
  17. Neither innocent or under age, naive, stupid, gullible certainly.
    1
  18. Epsteins Island now belongs to another Billionaire who no doubt will have many rich and powerful visitors.
    1
  19.  @misplacedsouthern1236  That's what tarts do, it's better than working like ordinary people have to.
    1
  20.  @kungfu4003 Wrong. In New York the age of sexual consent is 17, in the UK it's 16.
    1
  21.  @botanicG  Yes, a child in New York can consent to sex at age 17 and in the UK at 16. The law doesn't always make sense.
    1
  22. As have some members of ordinary peoples families, the only difference is that don't have to travel to a private Island.
    1
  23. He can't be extradited to the USA either.
    1
  24. Don't people traffickers do the same thing with young girls, forcing them into prostitution ?
    1
  25. Nothing like them.
    1
  26. Did any of this allegedly happen in the UK ?
    1
  27.  @timothywatson659  So very true. Brand behaviour was probably far worse than Andrews.
    1
  28. Andrew will fade into obscurity. Charles is a great King and when the time comes so will William.
    1
  29. The court of public opinion had already found him guilty and it was a small sum to make the problem go away.
    1
  30. Sunaks family isn't ? That would be our replacement for the Head of States family.
    1
  31. So were many rich and famous people. Savile conned many people. The British public loved him too . If you have the slightest doubt of just how popular he was take a look at all the stars who attended his funeral at Leeds Cathedral.
    1
  32. Why does anyone go to Thailand ?
    1
  33. As did the British public for very many years.
    1
  34.  @valiasa-di6hr  Its estimate having a RF contributes @ £2bn a year to the UK economy. A great use of taxpayers money.
    1
  35. In New York it's 17. It varies elsewhere.
    1
  36. Does your family benefit the uk economy by @ £2bn a year, the Royal family does.
    1
  37. Was anyone under the age of sexual consent ? He may be despicable but not a peado.
    1