Comments by "jjeffery worboys" (@jjefferyworboys8138) on "Jeremy Hunt: Stop Heating Homes To Beat Putin 😡 🤔 WHAT!!!" video.

  1. He may turn his heating down a degree or two and perhaps re set the timer so its on for a little less time each day. Thats enough to reduce consumption by 15%.
    2
  2. Most of you are !
    2
  3. Fracking and Nuclear are great as long as the sites chosen aren't anywhere near where you live. No one wants to live next door to one.
    1
  4. No need you will have done it yourself.
    1
  5. Common sense if you want to reduce your energy consumption and therefore your bill.
    1
  6. How does a 15% reduction in energy consumption equate to no heat ?
    1
  7.  @imbonkers3629  Only those who qualify, most won't.
    1
  8. That's what anyone sensible should be doing, most Youtubers seem lacking in that area though.
    1
  9. Better plan ahead and buy some warm clothes. I have a wood burner and lots of logs.
    1
  10. Agreed, its common sense.
    1
  11.  @forevertoons9022  Sadly some people aren't bright enough to think of it themselves, most vote Labour.
    1
  12.  @solily4308  I have a wood burner and hundreds of trees.
    1
  13. So you already have made a conscious decision to reduce your consumption, probably be more than 15%. Wasn't so hard, was it ?
    1
  14. Putin.
    1
  15. What party do you think that would hurt the most ?
    1
  16. That's the opposite of what he said if you could be bothered to listen.
    1
  17. My favourite colour !
    1
  18. Unilaterally it would have zero effect.
    1
  19. The video title was deliberately misleading to get your attention, Hunt suggested using slightly less energy, which is no more than basic common sense, something that most commentators seem to be lacking.
    1
  20.  @chrishart8548  The poorest will always be the most vulnerable irrespective of economic conditions.
    1
  21.  @Ashtarot77  You could watch how the Chinese and Russian governments treat protestors.
    1
  22. Another misleading sensationalistic click bait title by a desperate YouTuber. If you want to reduce your heating bill, consume less, if not don't complain that its costing you more.
    1
  23. Perhaps you should have tried harder at school ?
    1
  24. Thats the opposite of what he said. Didn't you listen ?
    1
  25. Thats actually costs the taxpayer less than permanent hotel accommodation.
    1
  26.  @sh.4409  Great idea, only the well off will be able to afford be MP's and that will kill the Labour stone dead.
    1
  27. Did you engage your brain before posting this comment ? Obviously not.
    1
  28. There are Health and Safety regulations which need to be adhered too.
    1
  29.  @susanpeters5392  He can afford it though and it's up to him how he decides to spend his own money.
    1
  30. Which isn't saying much !
    1
  31. It cost 4 times as much and unlike you he can afford it.
    1
  32. Why not check out your Pension providers shareholdings in Energy companies ?
    1
  33. Very generous of you to offer to pay for everyone.
    1
  34. Hunt was suggesting reducing your heating slightly not doing without it. Properly ventilated properties don't suffer with mould.
    1
  35. If you want to reduce your energy consumption and therefore its cost, it is rather obvious. Sadly some people aren't bright enough to think for themselves.
    1
  36. No, but Im sure they will turn it down a degree or two, which is all that I will be doing.
    1
  37. Thats the opposite of what he said, just shows how a deliberately misleading video title can fool the gullible.
    1
  38. iI you can afford it why not.
    1
  39. Power cuts are very effective. It's ether on or off, couldn't be easier.
    1